1
|
Zheng QJ, Xu L, Fan ZQ. Reply to "A nomogram for predicting axillary node pathologic complete response-A necessary component of the path toward true axillary de-escalation but needs a clear definition of the research question and a robust study design". Cancer 2024. [PMID: 39057195 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Jun Zheng
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Xu
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhao-Qing Fan
- Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin E, Yoo TK, Kim J, Chung IY, Ko BS, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Son BH, Lee SB. Association of residual ductal carcinoma in situ with breast cancer treatment outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to hormone receptor status. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:288. [PMID: 39017974 PMCID: PMC11254890 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01157-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This research aimed to clarify the impact of residual ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) in surgical specimens obtained after neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) for breast cancer on the associated prognosis outcomes. METHODS This retrospective study was performed on a cohort of 1,009 patients who achieved pCR following NAC for breast cancer and underwent subsequent breast surgery at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2019. Overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and disease-free survival of the residual and non-residual DCIS groups were the outcomes compared, with further subgroup analysis performed according to hormone receptor status. RESULTS 260 individuals (25.8%) presented with residual DCIS. Based on a median follow-up of 54.0 months, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between the two groups. Patients with residual DCIS and hormone receptor-negative (HR-) breast cancer demonstrated a significant decrease in distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.030) compared to those without residual DCIS. In the HR + cohort, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis of the HR- cohort demonstrated a significant association between residual DCIS and an elevated risk for distant recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-5.20, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS Residual DCIS following NAC may impact breast cancer outcomes, particularly with respect to the occurrence of distant metastasis in HR- patients. Therefore, clinicians must vigilantly monitor patients with residual DCIS after NAC, and further research is needed to expand our understanding of the clinical implications of residual DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunju Shin
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Tae-Kyung Yoo
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jisun Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Il Yong Chung
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Beom Seok Ko
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jong Won Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Byung Ho Son
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Sae Byul Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tasoulis MK, Lee HB, Kuerer HM. Omission of Breast Surgery in Exceptional Responders. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:310-318. [PMID: 38365541 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer management has transformed significantly over the last decades, primarily through the integration of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and the evolving understanding of tumor biology, enabling more tailored treatment strategies. The aim of this review is to critically present the historical context and contemporary evidence surrounding the potential of omission of surgery post-NST, focusing on exceptional responders who have achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). Identifying these exceptional responders before surgery remains a challenge, however standardized image-guided biopsy may allow optimized patient selection. The safety and feasibility of omitting breast and axillary surgeries in these exceptional responders are explored in ongoing clinical trials and the reported preliminary results appear promising. Moreover, understanding patient and physician perspectives regarding the potential elimination of surgery post-NST is integral. While some patients express a preference to omit or minimize surgery, the majority of healthcare providers are intrigued by the prospect of avoiding surgical interventions and endorse further research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios-Konstantinos Tasoulis
- Breast Surgery Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Han-Byoel Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Henry Mark Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zaborowski AM, Doogan K, Clifford S, Dowling G, Kazi F, Delaney K, Yadav H, Brady A, Geraghty J, Evoy D, Rothwell J, McCartan D, Heeney A, Barry M, Walsh SM, Stokes M, Kell MR, Allen M, Power C, Hill ADK, Connolly E, Alazawi D, Boyle T, Corrigan M, O’Leary P, Prichard RS. Nodal positivity in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: multicentre collaborative study. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad401. [PMID: 38055888 PMCID: PMC10763529 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The necessity of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been questioned. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of nodal positivity in these patients and to identify clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN+). METHODS A retrospective multicentre study was performed. Patients with cT1-3 cN0 breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 were included. Negative nodal status was defined as the absence of palpable lymph nodes, and the absence of suspicious nodes on axillary ultrasonography, or the absence of tumour cells on axillary nodal fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. RESULTS A total of 371 patients were analysed. Overall, 47 patients (12.7%) had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Nodal positivity was identified in 22 patients (29.0%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours, 12 patients (13.8%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 3 patients (5.6%) with hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 10 patients (6.5%) with triple-negative breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that multicentric disease was associated with a higher likelihood of ypN+ (OR 2.66, 95% c.i. 1.18 to 6.01; P = 0.018), whilst a radiological complete response in the breast was associated with a reduced likelihood of ypN+ (OR 0.10, 95% c.i. 0.02 to 0.42; P = 0.002), regardless of molecular subtype. Only 3% of patients who had a radiological complete response in the breast were ypN+. The majority of patients (85%) with a positive sentinel node proceeded to axillary lymph node dissection and 93% had N1 disease. CONCLUSION The rate of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients who achieve a radiological complete response in the breast is exceptionally low for all molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katie Doogan
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Siobhan Clifford
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gavin Dowling
- Department of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Farah Kazi
- Department of Breast Surgery, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karina Delaney
- Department of Breast Surgery, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Himanshu Yadav
- Cork Breast Research Centre, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Aaron Brady
- Department of Breast Surgery, Bon Secours Hospital Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - James Geraghty
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Evoy
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jane Rothwell
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Damian McCartan
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anna Heeney
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mitchel Barry
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Siun M Walsh
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maurice Stokes
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Malcolm R Kell
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Allen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colm Power
- Department of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arnold D K Hill
- Department of Breast Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Dhafir Alazawi
- Department of Breast Surgery, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Terence Boyle
- Department of Breast Surgery, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mark Corrigan
- Cork Breast Research Centre, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Peter O’Leary
- Department of Breast Surgery, Bon Secours Hospital Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ruth S Prichard
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sunen I, Isabel Garcia Barrado A, Cruz Ciria S, Garcia Maroto J, Gros Bañeres B, Garcia Mur C. Is contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) an alternative to MRI in assessing the response to primary systemic therapy of breast cancer? Eur J Radiol 2024; 170:111270. [PMID: 38141263 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessing radiological response to primary systemic therapy (PST). METHOD Prospective study between February 2021 and October 2022. Women with breast cancer and indication of PST were enrolled. CEM and MRI were performed before and after PST, and the findings, including size and radiological response pattern, were compared with the size of the residual lesion measured in surgical specimens and its Miller-Payne classification (considered the gold standard). Two of four independent radiologists, with 2 years of CEM experience and 10 years of MRI experience, reviewed the images while being blinded to the results of the other technique. The agreement between measurements was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Lin's coefficient. RESULTS Forty-eight women with breast cancer who required PST were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 57.21 ± 10.14 years. A total of thirty-three participants (68.75 %) completed the study. The correlation between CEM and MRI measurements was high before PST (r: 0.97), and local staging was identical for 45 out of 48 patients. MRI demonstrated better accuracy in predicting residual tumor size than CEM, with Lin's coefficient 0.91 and 0.73, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in predicting response to therapy. Both methods tended to overestimate the size and degree of response in our study, with mean overestimations of 2.87 mm in CEM and 0.51 mm in MRI. CONCLUSION CEM was found to be as accurate as MRI in predicting response to PST, indicating its potential as an alternative imaging technique, but further research is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Sunen
- Department of Radiology, Nuestra Señora de Gracia Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pesapane F, De Marco P, Rapino A, Lombardo E, Nicosia L, Tantrige P, Rotili A, Bozzini AC, Penco S, Dominelli V, Trentin C, Ferrari F, Farina M, Meneghetti L, Latronico A, Abbate F, Origgi D, Carrafiello G, Cassano E. How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041372. [PMID: 36835908 PMCID: PMC9963325 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent technological advances in the field of artificial intelligence hold promise in addressing medical challenges in breast cancer care, such as early diagnosis, cancer subtype determination and molecular profiling, prediction of lymph node metastases, and prognostication of treatment response and probability of recurrence. Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, which aims to enhance the existing data available to clinicians by means of advanced mathematical analysis using artificial intelligence. Various published studies from different fields in imaging have highlighted the potential of radiomics to enhance clinical decision making. In this review, we describe the evolution of AI in breast imaging and its frontiers, focusing on handcrafted and deep learning radiomics. We present a typical workflow of a radiomics analysis and a practical "how-to" guide. Finally, we summarize the methodology and implementation of radiomics in breast cancer, based on the most recent scientific literature to help researchers and clinicians gain fundamental knowledge of this emerging technology. Alongside this, we discuss the current limitations of radiomics and challenges of integration into clinical practice with conceptual consistency, data curation, technical reproducibility, adequate accuracy, and clinical translation. The incorporation of radiomics with clinical, histopathological, and genomic information will enable physicians to move forward to a higher level of personalized management of patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-574891
| | - Paolo De Marco
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rapino
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Lombardo
- UOC of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Priyan Tantrige
- Department of Radiology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Anna Rotili
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Penco
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Trentin
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Ferrari
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Mariagiorgia Farina
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Meneghetti
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Antuono Latronico
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Abbate
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Origgi
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Foundation Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|