Abdominal wall closure

Collating evidence to support the validation of a simulated laparotomy incision and closure-training model

BACKGROUND

It is essential to evaluate the functionality of surgical simulation models, in order to determine whether they perform as intended. In this study, we assessed the use of a simulated laparotomy incision and closure-training model by collating validity evidence to determine its utility as well as pre and post-test interval data.

METHOD

This was a quantitative study design, informed by Messick's unified validity framework. In total, 93 participants (surgical trainees ​= ​80, experts ​= ​13) participated in this study. Evaluation of content validity and the models' relationships with other variables was conducted, along with a pre and post-test confidence assessment.

RESULTS

The model was deemed realistic and useful as a teaching tool, providing strong content validity evidence. In assessment of relationships with other variables, the expert group out-performed the novice group conclusively. Pre and post-test evaluation reported a statistically significant increase in confidence levels.

CONCLUSION

We present strong validity evidence of a novel laparotomy incision and closure simulation-training model.

A postoperative body weight increase is a novel risk factor for incisional hernia of midline abdominal incision after elective gastroenterological surgery

PURPOSE

Midline abdominal incisions (MAIs) are widely used in both open and minimally invasive surgery. Incisional hernia (IH) accounts for most long-term postoperative wound complications. This study explored the risk factors for IH due to MAI in patients with clean-contaminated wounds after elective gastroenterological surgery.

METHODS

The present study targeted patients enrolled in 2 randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative interventions for incisional SSI prevention after gastroenterological surgery for clean-contaminated wounds. The patients were reassessed, and pre- and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were collected. IH was defined as any abdominal wall gap, regardless of bulge, in the area of a postoperative scar that was perceptible or palpable on clinical examination or computed tomography according to the European Hernia Society guidelines. The risk factors for IH were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The study population included 1,281 patients, of whom 273 (21.3%) developed IH. Seventy-four (5.8%) patients developed incisional SSI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.86, p = 0.031), high preoperative body mass index (OR, 1.81; 95% CI 1.19-2.77, p = 0.006), incisional SSI (OR, 2.29; 95% CI 1.34-3.93, p = 0.003), and postoperative body weight increase (OR, 1.49; 95% CI 1.09-2.04, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for IH due to MAI in patients who underwent elective gastroenterological surgery.

CONCLUSION

We identified postoperative body weight increase at one year as a novel risk factor for IH in patients with MAI after elective gastroenterological surgery.