OUP accepted manuscript

Long-term survival following adrenalectomy for secondary adrenal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Secondary adrenal tumors (SATs) are uncommon, and the benefits of adrenalectomy for SATs have not been well-established. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the survival benefits of adrenalectomy for SATs.

METHOD

ology: A systematic literature search was performed (1990-2022). The inclusion criteria included a known primary tumor with confirmed adrenal metastasis in patients who underwent adrenalectomy. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included, with 2279 patients. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 61.1 years. Lung cancer was the most common primary tumor. The average time from primary tumor diagnosis to identification of adrenal metastasis was 17 months. The median OS was 35.2 months. One, three, and five-year OS were 79.7 ​%, 49.1 ​%, and 37.9 ​%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review provide insight into the long-term survival of patients with SATs who underwent adrenalectomy. The study highlights the need for further research to identify the risk factors that play a role in the outcome of adrenalectomy in patients with SATs.

Comparative outcomes and prognostic indicators in adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis

PURPOSE

The indications for adrenalectomy and feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis are controversial. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes between open adrenalectomy (OA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) and to evaluate the prognostic factors for oncological outcomes of adrenal metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 141 consecutive patients who underwent adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis at Seoul National University Hospital from April 2005 to February 2021. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between OA and LA.

RESULTS

OA was performed in 95 (67.4%) patients, and 46 (32.6%) patients underwent LA. Among the patients who underwent adrenalectomy without adjacent organ resection for adrenal tumors less than 8 cm, LA was associated with a shorter operation time (100.1 ± 48.8 vs. 158.6 ± 81.2, P = 0.001), less blood loss (94.8 ± 93.8 vs. 566.8 ± 1156.0, P = 0.034), and a shorter hospital stay (3.7 ± 1.3 vs. 6.9 ± 5.8, P = 0.003). For locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), on multivariate analysis, a positive pathological margin (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.777, P = 0.002), disease activity at the primary site (HR: 6.497, P = 0.005), other metastases (HR: 4.154, P = 0.015), and a relatively larger tumor size (HR: 1.198, P = 0.018) were significantly associated with poor LRRFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that metachronous metastasis (HR: 0.51, P = 0.032) was associated with a longer overall survival (OS), whereas a positive pathological margin (HR: 2.40, P = 0.017), metastases to other organs (HR: 2.08, P = 0.025), and a relatively larger tumor size (HR: 1.11, P = 0.046) were associated with a shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LA is a feasible treatment option for adrenal metastasis in selected patients. The pathological margin, metastases to other organs, and tumor size should be considered in adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis.

Perioperative Outcomes After Adrenalectomy for Secondary Adrenal Malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The risk of adverse outcomes after adrenal metastasectomy is not well defined. Knowledge of these risks is essential to guide patient counseling.

METHODS

The 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets were combined. Patients who underwent adrenalectomy for secondary adrenal malignancy (SM) and benign nonfunctional (BNF) adrenal neoplasms were identified; BNF neoplasms were chosen as a comparison as functional neoplasms can contribute to comorbidity. Patients who had additional surgery at the time of adrenalectomy were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, and outcomes were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 3496 adrenalectomy patients, 332 had SM and 3164 had BNF neoplasms. Patients with SM were older (65 versus 54 y) and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (7.5% versus 4.4%), chronic steroid use (10.5% versus 3.8%), and bleeding disorders (4.5% versus 2.2%) than patients with BNF, respectively (P < 0.01 for all). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was the most common operative approach for both groups (74.7% versus 88.3%). Rates of mortality, morbidity, reoperation, readmission, and nonhome discharge did not differ significantly between groups. Patients with SM had higher rates of postoperative bleeding than patients with BNF (6.3% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). This persisted on multivariable regression analysis that adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and operative approach (odds ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.19-4.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenalectomy for SM is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding compared to adrenalectomy for BNF adrenal neoplasms. Patients with SM that meet criteria for adrenal metastasectomy should be counseled appropriately.

Surgical resection of adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The decision for resection of adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancers remain controversial and there is no proposed standard treatment. The aim of the article is to review the available literature on outcomes and complications rates following adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Relevant papers were identified through electronic databases. Data was extracted independently by two authors on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet up to June 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies were included in the final analysis (145 cases). A large proportion of patients had an uneventful postoperative recovery following surgical adrenalectomy. The mean length of follow up ranged from 2 months to 9.5 years. A total of 33 (22.8%) patients were alive and well with no evidence of local or systemic recurrence; 2 (1.4%) patients had recurrence in the bed of adrenalectomy; 2 (1.4%) patients were alive with recurrence in the contralateral adrenal gland; 4 (2.8%) patients were alive with extra-adrenal metastasis, and 7 (4.8%) patients were alive and well with no comments regarding local and systemic recurrence. Post-operative mortality following adrenalectomy was uncommon: 1 patient died due to systemic sepsis following anastomotic leak. 17.2% of patients died due to disease progression.

CONCLUSION

If complete resection can be achieved, surgical adrenalectomy in the surgically fit patient should be strongly considered, especially in patients with solitary adrenal metastasis which may translate into survival benefits and potential surgical cure.

Adrenalectomy for Metastasis: The Impact of Primary Histology on Survival Outcome

Adrenalectomy is commonly considered a curative treatment in case of adrenal gland as site of metastasis. In the present study, we evaluated the impact of primary tumor histology on survival outcomes after a minimally invasive adrenal mastectomy for a solitary metachronous metastasis. From May 2004 to August 2020, we prospectively collected data on minimally invasive adrenalectomies whose pathological examination showed a metastasis. All patients only received metastasectomies that were performed with curative intent, or to achieve non-evidence of disease status. Adjuvant systemic therapy was not administered in any case. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied to identify independent predictors of CSS. Out of 235 laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomies, the pathologic report showed metastases in 60 cases. The primary histologies included 36 (60%) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 9 (15%) lung cancer, 6 (10%) colon cancer, 4 (6.7%) sarcoma, 3 (5%) melanoma and 2 (3.3%) bladder cancer. RCC displayed significantly longer survival rates with a 5-year CSS of 55.9%, versus 22.8% for other histologies (log-rank p = 0.01). At univariable analysis, disease-free interval (defined as the time from adrenalectomy to evidence of disease progression) < 12 months and histology were predictors of CSS (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). At multivariable Cox analysis, the only independent predictor of CSS was primary tumor histology (p = 0.005); patients with adrenal metastasis from colon cancer and bladder cancer showed a 5.3- and 75.5-fold increased risk of cancer death, respectively, compared to patients who had RCC as primary tumor histology. Oncological outcomes of adrenal metastasectomies are strongly influenced by primary tumor histology. A proper discussion of the role of surgery in a multidisciplinary context could provide optimal treatment strategies.

Adrenal Metastasectomy in the Era of Immuno- and Targeted Therapy

Adrenal metastasectomy has an increasing role in multimodality oncologic care for diverse primary cancer types. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, evaluation, and contemporary best practices in the management of adrenal metastases from various primaries. Initial evaluation of suspected adrenal metastases should include diagnostic imaging to assess the extent of tumor involvement and determine surgical resectability, as well as biochemical evaluation for hormone secretion. Biopsy has a minimal role and should only be performed in tumors that are established to be non-hormone secreting and when the biopsy results would change clinical management. Adrenal metastasectomy is associated with survival benefit in selected patients. We suggest that adrenal metastasectomy has the greatest benefit in four clinical scenarios: (1) disease limited to the adrenal gland in which adrenalectomy renders the patient disease-free; (2) isolated progression in the adrenal gland in the setting of otherwise controlled metastatic extra-adrenal disease; (3) need for palliation of symptoms related to adrenal metastases; or (4) in the context of tissue-based clinical trials. Both minimally invasive and open adrenalectomy techniques are safe and appear to have equivalent oncologic outcomes. Minimally invasive approaches are favored when technically feasible while maintaining oncologic principles. A multidisciplinary evaluation including clinicians with expertise in the primary cancer type is essential to the successful management of adrenal metastases.