1
|
Magyar CTJ, Choi WJ, Li Z, Cattral MS, Selzner N, Ghanekar A, Sayed BA, Sapisochin G. The aim of donor safety: surgical approaches and current results. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01881-9. [PMID: 38916620 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01881-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Living liver donation (LLD) has been suggested as a potential solution to reduce the waitlist mortality for liver transplantation (LT) recipients by facilitating living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Ensuring both donor and recipient safety is a critical aspect of LDLT. An accurate understanding of the complexity and extend of safety outcomes of the donor is imperative to maintain the high-quality standard this medical program requires. This review seeks to outline safety outcome parameters of interest for donors. Early postoperative mortality is very low with no significant differences comparing left lobe to right lobe LLD. Complications most commonly are biliary (leakage or strictures), bleeding, respiratory or pulmonary, gastrointestinal or infectious. Return to full-time work and quality of life are essential parameters in the mid and long term. As evidence continues to accumulate, outcomes may evolve with the expansion of minimal invasive surgery practice and currently laparoscopic approach is recommended in large experienced centers. By offering safer operations that require fewer incisions or liver resections, living liver donations can be further encouraged, and the perception of the procedure can be improved. Rational consideration of the safety of the donor and in-depth discussion and evaluation with the patient is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Tibor Josef Magyar
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Woo Jin Choi
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhihao Li
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Steven Cattral
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Blayne Amir Sayed
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Gasperi A, Petrò L, Amici O, Scaffidi I, Molinari P, Barbaglio C, Cibelli E, Penzo B, Roselli E, Brunetti A, Neganov M, Giacomoni A, Aseni P, Guffanti E. Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist. World J Crit Care Med 2024; 13:92751. [PMID: 38855273 PMCID: PMC11155507 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea De Gasperi
- Former Head, Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Laura Petrò
- AR1, Ospedale Papa Giovanni 23, Bergamo 24100, Italy
| | - Ombretta Amici
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Ilenia Scaffidi
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Pietro Molinari
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Caterina Barbaglio
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Eva Cibelli
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Beatrice Penzo
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Elena Roselli
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Andrea Brunetti
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Maxim Neganov
- Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva Generale, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giacomoni
- Chirurgia Oncologica Miniinvasiva, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| | - Paolo Aseni
- Dipartimento di Medicina d’Urgenza ed Emergenza, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda ASST GOM Niguarda, Milano 20163, MI, Italy
| | - Elena Guffanti
- Anesthesia and Critical Care Service 2, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda AR2, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan 20163, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sarkhampee P, Ouransatien W, Chansitthichok S, Lertsawatvicha N, Wattanarath P. The impact of post-hepatectomy liver failure on long-term survival after liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:808-817. [PMID: 38467530 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) can accurately predict short-term mortality of liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), its significance in predicting long-term overall survival (OS) is still uncertain. METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed on patients with pCCA who underwent liver resection between October 2013 and December 2018. The patients were divided into 3 groups; No PHF, PHLF (all grade) and grade B/C PHLF according to The International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria. RESULTS A total of 177 patients were enrolled, 65 (36.7%) had PHLF; 25 (14.1%) had grade A, and 40 (22.6%) had grade B/C. Prior to surgery, patients with PHLF showed significantly greater bilirubin levels and CA 19-9 level than those without (11.5 vs 6.7 mg/dL, p = 0.002 and 232.4 vs 85.9 U/mL, p = 0.005, respectively). Additionally, pre-operative future liver remnant volume in PHLF group was lower than no PHLF group significantly (39.6% vs 43.5%, p = 0.006). Major complication and 90-day mortality were higher in PHLF group than no PHLF group (69.2% vs 20.5%, p < 0.001 and 29.2% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001, respectively). The OS in both grade A PHLF and grade B/C PHLF was significantly worse compared to no PHLF, with median survival times of 8.4, 3.3, and 19.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that PHLF was independently prognostic factor for long-term survival. CONCLUSION To achieve negative resection margin, the surgical resection in pCCA was aggressive, however this increased the risk of PHLF, which also affects the OS. Consequently, it is necessary for establishing a balance between aggressive surgery and PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poowanai Sarkhampee
- Department of Surgery, Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
| | - Weeris Ouransatien
- Department of Surgery, Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
| | | | | | - Paiwan Wattanarath
- Department of Surgery, Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Primavesi F, Senoner T, Schindler S, Nikolajevic A, Di Fazio P, Csukovich G, Eller S, Neumayer B, Anliker M, Braunwarth E, Oberhuber R, Resch T, Maglione M, Cardini B, Niederwieser T, Gasteiger S, Klieser E, Tilg H, Schneeberger S, Neureiter D, Öfner D, Troppmair J, Stättner S. The Interplay between Perioperative Oxidative Stress and Hepatic Dysfunction after Human Liver Resection: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study. Antioxidants (Basel) 2024; 13:590. [PMID: 38790695 PMCID: PMC11118143 DOI: 10.3390/antiox13050590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains the major contributor to death after liver resection. Oxidative stress is associated with postoperative complications, but its impact on liver function is unclear. This first in-human, prospective, single-center, observational pilot study evaluated perioperative oxidative stress and PHLF according to the ISGLS (International Study Group for Liver Surgery). Serum 8-isoprostane, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), total antioxidative capacity, vitamins A and E, and intraoperative, sequential hepatic tissue 4-HNE and UCP2 (uncoupling protein 2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) were assessed. The interaction with known risk factors for PHLF and the predictive potential of oxidative stress markers were analyzed. Overall, 52 patients were included (69.2% major liver resection). Thirteen patients (25%) experienced PHLF, a major factor for 90-day mortality (23% vs. 0%; p = 0.013). Post-resection, pro-oxidative 8-isoprostane significantly increased (p = 0.038), while 4-HNE declined immediately (p < 0.001). Antioxidative markers showed patterns of consumption starting post-resection (p < 0.001). Liver tissue oxidative stress increased stepwise from biopsies taken after laparotomy to post-resection in situ liver and resection specimens (all p < 0.001). Cholangiocarcinoma patients demonstrated significantly higher serum and tissue oxidative stress levels at various timepoints, with consistently higher preoperative values in advanced tumor stages. Combining intraoperative, post-resection 4-HNE serum levels and in situ IHC early predicted PHLF with an AUC of 0.855 (63.6% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). This was also associated with grade B/C PHLF (36.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.021) and 90-day mortality (18.2% vs. 0%; p = 0.036). In conclusion, distinct patterns of perioperative oxidative stress levels occur in patients with liver dysfunction. Combining intraoperative serum and liver tissue markers predicts subsequent PHLF. Cholangiocarcinoma patients demonstrated pronounced systemic and hepatic oxidative stress, with increasing levels in advanced tumor stages, thus representing a worthwhile target for future exploratory and therapeutic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, 4840 Vöcklabruck, Austria;
| | - Thomas Senoner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Sophie Schindler
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Aleksandar Nikolajevic
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
| | - Pietro Di Fazio
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany;
| | - Georg Csukovich
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
- Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetmeduni, 1210 Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Eller
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
| | - Bettina Neumayer
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/University Hospital Salzburg (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (B.N.); (E.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Markus Anliker
- Central Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Rupert Oberhuber
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Thomas Resch
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
| | - Benno Cardini
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Thomas Niederwieser
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Silvia Gasteiger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/University Hospital Salzburg (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (B.N.); (E.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Herbert Tilg
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/University Hospital Salzburg (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (B.N.); (E.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.S.); (E.B.); (R.O.); (T.R.); (M.M.); (B.C.); (S.G.); (S.S.); (D.Ö.)
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
| | - Jakob Troppmair
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (A.N.); (S.E.); (J.T.)
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, 4840 Vöcklabruck, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li XP, Bao ZT, Wang L, Zhang CY, Yang W. Construction of a predictive model for acute liver failure after hepatectomy based on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and albumin-bilirubin score. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1087-1096. [PMID: 38690037 PMCID: PMC11056668 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute liver failure (ALF) is a common cause of postoperative death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is a serious threat to patient safety. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a common inflammatory indicator that is associated with the prognosis of various diseases, and the albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) is used to evaluate liver function in liver cancer patients. Therefore, this study aimed to construct a predictive model for postoperative ALF in HCC tumor integrity resection (R0) based on the NLR and ALBI, providing a basis for clinicians to choose appropriate treatment plans. AIM To construct an ALF prediction model after R0 surgery for HCC based on NLR and ALBI. METHODS In total, 194 patients with HCC who visited The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang to receive R0 between May 2018 and May 2023 were enrolled and divided into the ALF and non-ALF groups. We compared differences in the NLR and ALBI between the two groups. The risk factors of ALF after R0 surgery for HCC were screened in the univariate analysis. Independent risk factors were analyzed by multifactorial logistic regression. We then constructed a prediction model of ALF after R0 surgery for HCC. A receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the value of the prediction model. RESULTS Among 194 patients with HCC who met the standard inclusion criteria, 46 cases of ALF occurred after R0 (23.71%). There were significant differences in the NLR and ALBI between the two groups (P < 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and blood loss volume (BLV) were significantly higher in the ALF group compared with the non-ALF group (P < 0.05). The multifactorial analysis showed that NLR, ALBI, AFP, and BLV were independent risk factors for ALF after R0 surgery in HCC. The predictive efficacy of NLR, ALBI, AFP, and BLV in predicting the occurrence of ALT after R0 surgery for HCC was average [area under the curve (AUC)NLR = 0.767, AUCALBI = 0.755, AUCAFP = 0.599, AUCBLV = 0.718]. The prediction model for ALF after R0 surgery for HCC based on NLR and ALBI had a better predictive efficacy (AUC = 0.916). The calibration curve and actual curve were in good agreement. DCA showed a high net gain and that the model was safer compared to the curve in the extreme case over a wide range of thresholds. CONCLUSION The prediction model based on NLR and ALBI can effectively predict the risk of developing ALF after HCC R0 surgery, providing a basis for clinical prevention of developing ALF after HCC R0 surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Pei Li
- Department of Family Planning and Assisted Reproductive Technology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zeng-Tao Bao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Family Planning and Assisted Reproductive Technology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chun-Yan Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wen Yang
- Department of Gynecology, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Santol J, Ammann M, Reese T, Kern AE, Laferl V, Oldhafer F, Dong Y, Rumpf B, Vali M, Wiemann B, Ortmayr G, Brunner SE, Probst J, Aiad M, Jankoschek AS, Gramberger M, Tschoegl MM, Salem M, Surci N, Thonhauser R, Mazari V, Hoblaj T, Thalhammer S, Schmelzle M, Oldhafer KJ, Gruenberger T, Starlinger P. Comparison of the LiMAx test vs. the APRI+ALBI score for clinical utility in preoperative risk assessment in patients undergoing liver surgery - A European multicenter study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108048. [PMID: 38471374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains the main reason for short-term mortality after liver surgery. APRI+ALBI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI) combined with albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI), score and the liver function maximum capacity test (LiMAx) are both established preoperative (preop) liver function tests. The aim of this study was to compare both tests for their predictive potential for clinically significant PHLF grade B and C (B+C). MATERIALS AND METHODS 352 patients were included from 4 European centers. Patients had available preop APRI+ALBI scores and LiMAx results. Predictive potential for PHLF, PHLF B+C and 90-day mortality was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calculation of the area under the curve (AUC). Published cutoffs of ≥ -2.46 for APRI+ALBI and of <315 for LiMAx were assessed using chi-squared test. RESULTS APRI+ALBI showed superior predictive potential for PHLF B+C (N = 34; AUC = 0.766), PHLF grade C (N = 20; AUC = 0.782) and 90-day mortality (N = 15; AUC = 0.750). When comparing the established cutoffs of both tests, APRI+ALBI outperformed LiMAx in prediction of PHLF B+C (APRI+ALBI ≥2.46: Positive predictive value (PPV) = 19%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 97%; LiMAx <315: PPV = 3%, NPV = 90%) and 90-day mortality (APRI+ALBI ≥2.46: PPV = 12%, NPV = 99%; LiMAx <315: PPV = 0%, NPV = 94%) CONCLUSION: In our analysis, APRI+ALBI outperformed LiMAx measurement in the preop prediction of PHLF B+C and postoperative mortality, at a fraction of the costs, manual labor and invasiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Santol
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria; Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Ammann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Surgery, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Tim Reese
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany; Semmelweis University Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna E Kern
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Felix Oldhafer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Yawen Dong
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedikt Rumpf
- Hospital Barmherzige Schwestern, Department of Surgery, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marjan Vali
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany; Semmelweis University Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bengt Wiemann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gregor Ortmayr
- Center for Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Joel Probst
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Monika Aiad
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Mariel Gramberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Madita M Tschoegl
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohamed Salem
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niccolò Surci
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rebecca Thonhauser
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vulnet Mazari
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Hoblaj
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Thalhammer
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Karl J Oldhafer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany; Semmelweis University Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nojima H, Shimizu H, Murakami T, Shuto K, Koda K. Critical Roles of the Sphingolipid Metabolic Pathway in Liver Regeneration, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression and Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:850. [PMID: 38473211 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The sphingolipid metabolic pathway, an important signaling pathway, plays a crucial role in various physiological processes including cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis, and immune regulation. The liver has the unique ability to regenerate using bioactive lipid mediators involving multiple sphingolipids, including ceramide and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). Dysregulation of the balance between sphingomyelin, ceramide, and S1P has been implicated in the regulation of liver regeneration and diseases, including liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Understanding and modulating this balance may have therapeutic implications for tumor proliferation, progression, and metastasis in HCC. For cancer therapy, several inhibitors and activators of sphingolipid signaling, including ABC294640, SKI-II, and FTY720, have been discussed. Here, we elucidate the critical roles of the sphingolipid pathway in the regulation of liver regeneration, fibrosis, and HCC. Regulation of sphingolipids and their corresponding enzymes may considerably influence new insights into therapies for various liver disorders and diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Nojima
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba 299-0011, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba 299-0011, Japan
| | - Takashi Murakami
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba 299-0011, Japan
| | - Kiyohiko Shuto
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba 299-0011, Japan
| | - Keiji Koda
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3, Anesaki, Ichihara, Chiba 299-0011, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koch DT, Horné F, Fabritius MP, Werner J, Ilmer M. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of Surgery in Liver Cirrhosis. Visc Med 2024; 40:20-29. [PMID: 38312365 PMCID: PMC10836947 DOI: 10.1159/000535782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Liver surgery is an essential component of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. Advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care have improved outcomes and have helped to expand surgical indications. However, liver fibrosis and cirrhosis still remain major problems for liver surgery due to the relevant impact on liver regeneration of the future liver remnant (FLR) after surgery. Especially in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis, surgery is limited. Despite recent efforts in developing predictive models, estimating the postoperative hepatic function remains difficult. Summary In this review, we focus on the role of surgery in the treatment of HCC in structurally altered livers. The importance of assessing FLR with techniques such as contrast-enhanced CT, e.g., with the help of artificial intelligence is highlighted. Moreover, strategies for increasing the FLR with approaches like portal vein embolization and liver vein deprivation prior to surgery are discussed. Patient selection, minimally invasive liver surgery including robotic techniques, and perioperative concepts like the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines are identified as crucial parts of avoiding posthepatectomy liver failure. Key Message The need for ongoing research to optimize patient selection criteria and perioperative care and to develop innovative biomarkers for outcome prediction is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik T. Koch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Horné
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Ilmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuang TZ, Xiao M, Liu YF. Predictive value of NLR, Fib4, and APRI in the occurrence of liver failure after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:155-165. [PMID: 38328329 PMCID: PMC10845278 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), fibrosis index based on four factors (Fib4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) can be used for prognostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, no study has established an individualized prediction model for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on these factors. AIM To screen the factors that affect the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and establish a nomogram model that predicts postoperative liver failure after hepatic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS In total, 220 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected. They were divided into 154 participants in the modeling cohort, and 66 in the validation cohort. Comparative analysis of the changes in NLR, Fib4, and APRI levels in 154 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver resection and at 3 mo, 6 mo, and 12 mo postoperatively was conducted. Binary logistic regression to analyze the influencing factors on the occurrence of liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, roadmap prediction modeling, and validation, patient work characteristic curves (ROCs) to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the model, calibration curves to assess the consistency, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the model's validity were also conducted. RESULTS Binary logistic regression showed that Child-Pugh grading, Surgical site, NLR, Fib4, and APRI were all risk factors for liver failure after hepatic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The modeling cohort built a column-line graph model, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.986 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.963-1.000]. The patients in the validation cohort utilized the column-line graph to predict the probability of survival in the validation cohort and plotted the ROC curve with an area under the curve of the model of 0.692 (95%CI: 0.548-0.837). The deviation of the actual outcome curves from the calibration curves of the column-line plots generated by the modeling and validation cohorts was small, and the DCA confirmed the validity. CONCLUSION NLR, Fib4, and APRI independently influence posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The column-line graph prediction model exhibited strong prognostic capability, with substantial concordance between predicted and actual events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-Zuo Kuang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ji’an Central People’s Hospital, Ji’an 343000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Meng Xiao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ji’an Central People’s Hospital, Ji’an 343000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yong-Fan Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ji’an Central People’s Hospital, Ji’an 343000, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baumgartner R, Engstrand J, Rajala P, Grip J, Ghorbani P, Sparrelid E, Gilg S. Comparing the accuracy of prediction models to detect clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure early after major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad433. [PMID: 38150185 PMCID: PMC10763542 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arterial lactate measurements were recently suggested as an early predictor of clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This needed to be evaluated in the subgroup of major hepatectomies only. METHOD This observational cohort study included consecutive elective major hepatectomies at Karolinska University Hospital from 2010 to 2018. Clinical risk factors for PHLF, perioperative arterial lactate measurements and routine lab values were included in uni- and multivariable regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristics and risk cut-offs were calculated. RESULTS In total, 649 patients constituted the study cohort, of which 92 developed PHLF grade B/C according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Lactate reached significantly higher intra- and postoperative levels in PHLF grades B and C compared to grade A or no liver failure (all P < 0.002). Lactate on postoperative day (POD) 1 was superior to earlier measurement time points in predicting PHLF B/C (AUC 0.75), but was outperformed by both clinical risk factors (AUC 0.81, P = 0.031) and bilirubin POD1 (AUC 0.83, P = 0.013). A multivariable logistic regression model including clinical risk factors and bilirubin POD1 had the highest AUC of 0.87 (P = 0.006), with 56.6% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity for PHLF grade B/C (cut-off ≥0.32). The model identified 46.7% of patients with 90-day mortality and had an equally good discriminatory potential for mortality as the established ISGLS criteria for PHLF grade B/C but could be applied already on POD1. CONCLUSION The potential of lactate to predict PHLF following major hepatectomy was inferior to a prediction model consisting of clinical risk factors and bilirubin on first post-operative day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Baumgartner
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jennie Engstrand
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patric Rajala
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonathan Grip
- Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Gilg
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Machry M, Ferreira LF, Lucchese AM, Kalil AN, Feier FH. Liver volumetric and anatomic assessment in living donor liver transplantation: The role of modern imaging and artificial intelligence. World J Transplant 2023; 13:290-298. [PMID: 38174151 PMCID: PMC10758682 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i6.290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The shortage of deceased donor organs has prompted the development of alternative liver grafts for transplantation. Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as a viable option, expanding the donor pool and enabling timely transplantation with favorable graft function and improved long-term outcomes. An accurate evaluation of the donor liver's volumetry (LV) and anatomical study is crucial to ensure adequate future liver remnant, graft volume and precise liver resection. Thus, ensuring donor safety and an appropriate graft-to-recipient weight ratio. Manual LV (MLV) using computed tomography has traditionally been considered the gold standard for assessing liver volume. However, the method has been limited by cost, subjectivity, and variability. Automated LV techniques employing advanced segmentation algorithms offer improved reproducibility, reduced variability, and enhanced efficiency compared to manual measurements. However, the accuracy of automated LV requires further investigation. The study provides a comprehensive review of traditional and emerging LV methods, including semi-automated image processing, automated LV techniques, and machine learning-based approaches. Additionally, the study discusses the respective strengths and weaknesses of each of the aforementioned techniques. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including machine learning and deep learning, is expected to become a routine part of surgical planning in the near future. The implementation of AI is expected to enable faster and more accurate image study interpretations, improve workflow efficiency, and enhance the safety, speed, and cost-effectiveness of the procedures. Accurate preoperative assessment of the liver plays a crucial role in ensuring safe donor selection and improved outcomes in LDLT. MLV has inherent limitations that have led to the adoption of semi-automated and automated software solutions. Moreover, AI has tremendous potential for LV and segmentation; however, its widespread use is hindered by cost and availability. Therefore, the integration of multiple specialties is necessary to embrace technology and explore its possibilities, ranging from patient counseling to intraoperative decision-making through automation and AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayara Machry
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020-090, Brazil
| | - Luis Fernando Ferreira
- Postgraduation Program in Medicine: Hepatology, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, Brazil
| | - Angelica Maria Lucchese
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020-090, Brazil
| | - Antonio Nocchi Kalil
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020-090, Brazil
- Postgraduation Program in Medicine: Hepatology, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, Brazil
| | - Flavia Heinz Feier
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020-090, Brazil
- Postgraduation Program in Medicine: Hepatology, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang Y, Xu L, Xu M. The significance of severe postoperative complications on liver regeneration. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; 12:978-980. [PMID: 38115929 PMCID: PMC10727821 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yanfang Zhang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Liangliang Xu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingqing Xu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Doi S, Yasuda S, Hokuto D, Kamitani N, Matsuo Y, Sakata T, Nishiwada S, Nagai M, Nakamura K, Terai T, Kohara Y, Sho M. Impact of the Prolonged Intermittent Pringle Maneuver on Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure: Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Approaches. World J Surg 2023; 47:3328-3337. [PMID: 37787778 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of prolonged intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) on post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of the prolonged IPM on PHLF in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic hepatectomy. METHODS We retrospectively included 546 patients who underwent hepatectomy using IPM. The patients were divided into open (n = 294) and laparoscopic (n = 252) groups. Odds ratios for PHLF occurrence were estimated in each group according to cumulative Pringle time (CPT). The cut-off value was set at CPT of 120 min. Risk factors for PHLF were evaluated in the open and laparoscopic groups. Additionally, we analyzed the post-operative outcomes in the open and laparoscopic groups with CPT ≥ 120 min and performed propensity score matching analysis based on PFLF-associated factors. RESULTS In the open group, the risk of PHLF increased as CPT increased, particularly after 120 min. However, in the laparoscopic group, PHLF did not occur at less than 60 min, and the risk of PHLF was not significantly different at more than 60 min. Multivariate analysis identified CPT ≥ 120 min as an independent risk factor for PHLF in the open group (p < 0.001), but not in the laparoscopic group. Propensity score matching analysis showed that the PHLF rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group with CPT ≥ 120 min (p = 0.027). The post-operative transaminase levels were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group with CPT ≥ 120 min. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic hepatectomy may cause less PHLF with prolonged IPM compared with open hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Doi
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yasuda
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Hokuto
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Naoki Kamitani
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yasuko Matsuo
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sakata
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nishiwada
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Minako Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kota Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Taichi Terai
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Kohara
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arntz P, Olthof PB. Assessment of liver function before major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1588-1589. [PMID: 37531456 PMCID: PMC10638528 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Arntz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oh N, Kim JH, Rhu J, Jeong WK, Choi GS, Kim JM, Joh JW. Automated 3D liver segmentation from hepatobiliary phase MRI for enhanced preoperative planning. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17605. [PMID: 37848662 PMCID: PMC10582008 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44736-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advancements in deep learning have facilitated significant progress in medical image analysis. However, there is lack of studies specifically addressing the needs of surgeons in terms of practicality and precision for surgical planning. Accurate understanding of anatomical structures, such as the liver and its intrahepatic structures, is crucial for preoperative planning from a surgeon's standpoint. This study proposes a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of liver parenchyma, vascular and biliary structures, and tumor mass in hepatobiliary phase liver MRI to improve preoperative planning and enhance patient outcomes. A total of 120 adult patients who underwent liver resection due to hepatic mass and had preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were included in the study. A 3D residual U-Net model was developed for automatic segmentation of liver parenchyma, tumor mass, hepatic vein (HV), portal vein (PV), and bile duct (BD). The model's performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) by comparing the results with manually delineated structures. The model achieved high accuracy in segmenting liver parenchyma (DSC 0.92 ± 0.03), tumor mass (DSC 0.77 ± 0.21), hepatic vein (DSC 0.70 ± 0.05), portal vein (DSC 0.61 ± 0.03), and bile duct (DSC 0.58 ± 0.15). The study demonstrated the potential of the 3D residual U-Net model to provide a comprehensive understanding of liver anatomy and tumors for preoperative planning, potentially leading to improved surgical outcomes and increased patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namkee Oh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Hun Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Woo Kyoung Jeong
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ammann M, Santol J, Pereyra D, Kalchbrenner T, Wuerger T, Laengle J, Smoot RL, Hulla W, Laengle F, Starlinger P. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon-like peptide-2 regulation during human liver regeneration. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15980. [PMID: 37749369 PMCID: PMC10519971 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43283-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that metabolic demands of the regenerating liver are met via lipid metabolism and critical regulators of this process. As such, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) critically affect hepatic regeneration in rodent models. The present study aimed to evaluate potential alterations and dynamics of circulating GLP-1 and GLP-2 in patients undergoing liver resections, focusing on post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). GLP-1, GLP-2, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and parameters of lipid metabolism were determined perioperatively in fasting plasma of 46 patients, who underwent liver resection. GLP-1 and GLP-2 demonstrated a rapid and consistently inverse time course during hepatic regeneration with a significant decrease of GLP-1 and increase of GLP-2 on POD1. Importantly, these postoperative dynamics were significantly more pronounced when PHLF occurred. Of note, the extent of resection or development of complications were not associated with these alterations. IL-6 mirrored the time course of GLP-2. Assessing the main degradation protein dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) no significant association with either GLP-1 or -2 could be found. Additionally, in PHLF distinct postoperative declines in plasma lipid parameters were present and correlated with GLP-2 dynamics. Our data suggest dynamic inverse regulation of GLP-1 and GLP-2 during liver regeneration, rather caused by an increase in expression/release than by changes in degradation capacity and might be associated with inflammatory responses. Their close association with circulating markers of lipid metabolism and insufficient hepatic regeneration after liver surgery suggest a critical involvement during these processes in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Ammann
- Department of Surgery, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jonas Santol
- Department of Surgery, HPB Centre, Viennese Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Pereyra
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tamara Kalchbrenner
- Department of Pathology, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Tanja Wuerger
- Department of Pathology, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Johannes Laengle
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wolfgang Hulla
- Department of Pathology, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Friedrich Laengle
- Department of Surgery, State Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Primavesi F, Maglione M, Cipriani F, Denecke T, Oberkofler CE, Starlinger P, Dasari BVM, Heil J, Sgarbura O, Søreide K, Diaz-Nieto R, Fondevila C, Frampton AE, Geisel D, Henninger B, Hessheimer AJ, Lesurtel M, Mole D, Öllinger R, Olthof P, Reiberger T, Schnitzbauer AA, Schwarz C, Sparrelid E, Stockmann M, Truant S, Aldrighetti L, Braunwarth E, D’Hondt M, DeOliveira ML, Erdmann J, Fuks D, Gruenberger T, Kaczirek K, Malik H, Öfner D, Rahbari NN, Göbel G, Siriwardena AK, Stättner S. E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1331-1347. [PMID: 37572099 PMCID: PMC10480040 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. METHODS A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. CONCLUSION These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Vivévis AG—Visceral, Tumour and Robotic Surgery, Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary–pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Section of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Damian Mole
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III and CD-Lab for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Paul Gerhardt Stift, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France
- CANTHER Laboratory ‘Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies’ UMR-S1277, Team ‘Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance’, Lille, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michelle L DeOliveira
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, Clinic Favoriten, Hepatopancreatobiliary Centre, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hassan Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Göbel
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fidan D, Mero G, Mazilescu LI, Heuer T, Kaiser GM. Mixed reality combined with ALPPS for colorectal liver metastases, a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2023; 109:108624. [PMID: 37562278 PMCID: PMC10432778 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improvement of treatments for patients suffering from colorectal carcinoma and extended liver metastases has increased the overall survival and enables more patients to undergo surgical therapy. If the future liver remnant (FLR) is expected to be low, Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a potential treatment with high feasibility and an increase in overall survival. The evolving mixed reality technology could support hepatobiliary surgery. This case report demonstrates for the first time the combination of mixed reality technology and ALPPS procedure for a patient with low expected FLR. PRESENTATION OF CASE A 49-year-old patient is presented with adenocarcinoma of the caecum with bilateral liver metastasis. After colon resection, a palliative chemotherapy was administered with good response and partial remission, so curative liver resection was intended. Based on the low expected FLR, calculated from the 3D-model of the liver, we decided to perform an in-situ split resection supported by mixed reality intraoperatively. The total operation time was 6 + 2 h. During both steps no blood transfusion was required and no major complication occurred. The patient was discharged 15 days after the second step. Final pathology revealed multiple predominantly necrotic metastases of the pre-existing colon carcinoma (ypM1, R0). DISCUSSION After the first step of ALPPS, an increase of the FLR up to 57 % was achieved, so the second step was performed on postoperative day (POD)11. The 3D-model and the intraoperative use of mixed reality supported our decision making and intraoperative navigation. This technique could be implemented on a larger scale to support complex liver resections. CONCLUSION The combination of mixed reality with ALPPS resulted in a good surgical outcome and should be considered as a potential alternative for liver resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darick Fidan
- Department of General Surgery, St. Bernhard Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany.
| | - Genadi Mero
- Department of General Surgery, St. Bernhard Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany
| | - Laura Ioana Mazilescu
- Department of General Surgery, St. Bernhard Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Theodor Heuer
- Department of General Surgery, St. Bernhard Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bozkurt E, Sijberden JP, Abu Hilal M. Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Right or Extended Right Hemi Hepatectomy Following Modulation of the Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023. [PMID: 37015071 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Major hepatectomies after future liver remnant (FLR) modulation are technically demanding procedures, especially when performed as minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to assess current evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation. Materials and Methods: The Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for studies involving laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation, from their inception to December 2021. Two reviewers independently selected eligible articles and assessed their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the included studies and summarized. Results: Six studies were included. In these studies, the median length of stay after the second stage ranged from 4.5 to 15.5 days and postoperative complication rates between 4.5% and 42.8%. Overall, 7.4% of patients developed liver failure, and 90-day mortality occurred in 3.2% of patients. The R0 resection rate was 93.5%. Only one study reported long-term outcomes, describing comparable 3-year overall survival rates following laparoscopic and open surgery (80% versus 54%, P = .154). Conclusions: The current evidence is scarce, but it suggests that in experienced centers, laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomy, following FLR modulation, is a safe and feasible procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Bozkurt
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Best papers of 2022-Editor-in-Chief's picks. BJS Open 2023; 7:7035432. [PMID: 36780309 PMCID: PMC9924492 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
|