Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy: a clinicoseropathologically distinct myopathy

Compound Muscle Action Potential and Myosin-Loss Pathology in Patients With Critical Illness Myopathy: Correlation and Prognostication

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prolonged compound muscle action potential (CMAP) duration and preferential loss of myosin are considered the diagnostic hallmarks of critical illness myopathy (CIM); however, their correlation and prognostic values have not been studied. We aimed to investigate the correlation between CMAP duration and myosin loss and their effect on mortality by comparing between patients with CIM with and without myosin loss.

METHODS

We searched the Mayo Clinic Electromyography Laboratory databases (1986-2021) for patients diagnosed with CIM on the basis of prolonged distal CMAP durations (>15 msec in fibular motor nerve studies recording over the tibialis anterior or >8 msec in other motor nerves) and needle EMG findings compatible with myopathy. Electrodiagnostic studies were generally performed within 24 hours after weakness became noticeable. We included only patients who underwent muscle biopsy. Clinical, electrophysiologic, and myopathologic data were reviewed. We conducted myosin/actin ratio analysis when muscle tissue was available. We used the Fisher exact test for categorical data comparisons and the Mann-Whitney 2-tailed test for continuous data. We applied the Kaplan-Meier technique to analyze survival rates.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (13 female patients) were identified [median age at diagnosis of 62.5 years (range: 19-80 years)]. The median onset of weakness was 24 days (range: 1-128) from the first day of intensive care unit admission. Muscle biopsy showed myosin loss in 14 patients, 9 of whom had >50% of myofibers affected (high grade). Type 2 fiber atrophy was observed in 19 patients, 13 of whom also had myosin loss. Patients with myosin loss had higher frequency of steroid exposure (14 vs 3; p = 0.004); higher median number of necrotic fibers per low-power field (2.5 vs 1, p = 0.04); and longer median CMAP duration (msec) of fibular (13.4 vs 8.75, p = 0.02), tibial (10 vs 7.8, p = 0.01), and ulnar (11.1 vs 7.95, p = 0.002) nerves compared with those without. Only patients with high-grade myosin loss had reduced myosin/actin ratios (<1.7). Ten patients died during median follow-up of 3 months. The mortality rate was similar between patients with and without myosin loss. Patients with high-grade myosin loss had a lower overall survival rate than those with low-grade or no myosin loss, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Myosin loss occurred in 70% of the patients with CIM with prolonged CMAP duration. Longer CMAP duration predicts myosin-loss pathology. The extent of myosin loss marginally correlates with the mortality rate. Our findings highlight the potential prognostic values of CMAP duration and myosin loss severity in predicting disease outcome.

Neuromuscular Emergencies

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to familiarize the reader with the clinical approach, diagnostic considerations, and treatment strategies for patients presenting with abrupt-onset or acutely worsening weakness due to neuromuscular disorders.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Neuromuscular weakness is often the result of an inflammatory process. In recent years, there has been growing recognition of pathologic antibodies that cause neuromuscular injury. This has allowed clinicians to make a more accurate diagnosis. Additionally, neuromuscular junction disorders and myopathies are increasingly identified as the adverse effects of novel anticancer therapies, namely immune checkpoint inhibitors. More data are being incorporated into frameworks for neuroprognostication after neuromuscular emergencies, especially for commonly encountered disorders such as Guillain-Barré syndrome.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Care of patients with neuromuscular emergencies requires prompt attention to respiratory status. Once supportive measures are in place to protect the airway and facilitate effective ventilation, diagnostic considerations should hinge on appropriate neurologic localization. Aggressive immunosuppression is often required for immune-mediated neuromuscular disorders, and clinicians must be thoughtful in selecting a strategy that best aligns with each patient's risk factors and comorbidities.

The Utility of Laboratory Investigations for the Assessment and Management of Rheumatic Immune Related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have greatly improved survival of several cancers with historically very poor prognosis. ICIs act by stimulating the patient's own immune system to fight cancer. Simultaneously, this immune activation can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including rheumatic manifestations (Rh-irAEs). Rh-irAEs mimic primary rheumatic diseases including arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, myositis, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, and sicca. This article summarizes the latest evidence regarding the utility of laboratory investigations in Rh-irAEs.

Imaging in Rheumatic Immune-related Adverse Events

Since their introduction, immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the body's own immune system as a defense against tumor growth. The downside of activating the immune system is the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which mimic autoimmune disease of various organ systems. The musculoskeletal system is an uncommon, but substantial one for patients and can lead to long-term pain and disability that affects their quality of life. This review summarizes recent literature on imaging forms utilized for diagnosis and assessing treatment response in rheumatic irAEs.

Severe acute myositis and myocarditis on initiation of 6-weekly pembrolizumab post-COVID-19 mRNA vaccination

We describe three cases of critical acute myositis with myocarditis occurring within 22 days of each other at a single institution, all within 1 month of receiving the initial cycle of the anti-PD-1 drug pembrolizumab. Analysis of T cell receptor repertoires from peripheral blood and tissues revealed a high degree of clonal expansion and public clones between cases, with several T cell clones expanded within the skeletal muscle putatively recognizing viral epitopes. All patients had recently received a COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccine prior to treatment and were positive for SARS-CoV2 Spike antibody. In conclusion, we report a series of unusually severe myositis and myocarditis following PD-1 blockade and the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Neurological Adverse Events Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Practical Review

The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer therapy has brought attention to their associated neurotoxicities, termed neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs). Despite their relatively rare incidence, n-irAEs pose a significant risk, potentially leading to severe, long-lasting disabilities or even fatal outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of n-irAEs, focusing on their recognition and management. The review addresses a spectrum of n-irAEs, encompassing myositis, myasthenia gravis, various neuropathies, and central nervous system complications, such as encephalitis, meningitis, and demyelinating diseases. The key features of n-irAEs are emphasized in this review, including their early onset after initiation of ICIs, potential association with non-neurological irAEs and/or concurrent oncological response, the significance of ruling out other etiologies, and the expected improvement upon discontinuation of ICIs and/or immunosuppression. Furthermore, this review delves into considerations for ICI re-challenge and the intricate nature of n-irAEs within the context of pre-existing autoimmune and paraneoplastic syndromes. It underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the pivotal role of severity grading in guiding treatment decisions.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Due to Cancer Immunotherapy: Immune Mechanisms and Clinical Manifestations

The landscape of cancer treatment has undergone a significant transformation with the introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Patients undergoing these treatments often report prolonged clinical and radiological responses, albeit with a potential risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we reviewed and discussed the mechanisms of action of ICIs and their pivotal role in regulating the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor immune response. We scrutinized the intricate pathogenic mechanisms responsible for irAEs, arising from the evasion of self-tolerance checkpoints due to drug-induced immune modulation. We also summarized the main clinical manifestations due to irAEs categorized by organ types, detailing their incidence and associated risk factors. The occurrence of irAEs is more frequent when ICIs are combined; with neurological, cardiovascular, hematological, and rheumatic irAEs more commonly linked to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors and cutaneous and gastrointestinal irAEs more prevalent with CTLA4 inhibitors. Due to the often-nonspecific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis of irAEs (especially for those rare ones) can be challenging. The differential with primary autoimmune disorders becomes sometimes intricate, given the clinical and pathophysiological similarities. In conclusion, considering the escalating use of ICIs, this area of research necessitates additional clinical studies and practical insights, especially the development of biomarkers for predicting immune toxicities. In addition, there is a need for heightened education for both clinicians and patients to enhance understanding and awareness.

Prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myasthenia gravis: a single center experience and systematic review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-induced myasthenia gravis (MG) is an uncommon but potentially fatal neurotoxicity. We aim to help physicians familiarize themselves with the clinical characteristics of ICI-induced MG, facilitating early diagnosis and prompt intervention.

Methods

We searched the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital medical record system from January 2017 to August 2023 for patients diagnosed with ICI-induced MG. We systematically reviewed the literature until August 2023 to identify all similar patients. We collected clinical information on these patients.

Results

110 patients were identified, 9 from our institution and 101 from case reports. In our institution, Median age was 66 years (range: 49-79 years). 6 were males. The most common was lung cancer (n = 4). All patients had no previous history of MG and received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. The median time from ICI initiation to first MG symptoms was 4 weeks (range: 2-15 weeks). ICIs were discontinued in all patients. Most patients initially received high-dose corticosteroids, and their symptoms improved. Some patients are discharged with corticosteroids maintenance therapy. In addition, 55 patients (50%) with concomitant myositis and/or myocarditis and MG-induced mortality were more common in the myositis and/or myocarditis group (10.9% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.016). Overlap of myositis with MG (OR = 3.148, p = 0.009) and anti-AChR antibody positivity (OR = 3.364, p = 0.005) were both significantly associated with poor outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study reveals the prognosis of ICI-induced MG and suggests that myositis and/or myocarditis are severe comorbidities of ICI-induced MG, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and clinical intervention.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis and myocarditis: diagnostic pitfalls and imaging contribution in a real-world, institutional case series

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are reshaping the prognosis of many cancers, but often cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among neurological irAEs, myositis is the most frequently reported. Our aim is to describe clinical and non-clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of all irMyositis (skeletal limb-girdle and/or ocular myositis) and irMyocarditis cases in our reference center.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled all irMyositis/irMyocarditis patients seen between 2018 and 2022. We reviewed demographics, clinical characteristics, biological, neurophysiological, imaging workup, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

We included 14 consecutive patients. The most frequent treatments were pembrolizumab (35%) or ipilimumab-nivolumab combination (35%). Limb-girdle, ocular (non-fluctuating palpebral ptosis and/or diplopia with or without ophthalmoparesis) and cardiac phenotypes were equally distributed, overlapping in 40% of cases. Ocular involvement was frequently misdiagnosed; review of brain MRIs disclosed initially missed signs of skeletal myositis in one patient and ocular myositis in 3. Seven patients had other co-existing irAEs. When performed, myography showed a myogenic pattern. CK was elevated in 8/15 patients, troponin-T in 12/12 and troponin-I in 7/9 tested patients. ICI were discontinued in all cases, with further immunosuppressive treatment in nine patients. In most cases, neurological and cardiological outcome was good at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Myositis is a potentially severe irAE. Despite its heterogeneous presentation, some highly suggestive clinical symptoms, such as ocular involvement, or radiological signs should raise physicians' attention to avoid misdiagnosis. We thus recommend a multidisciplinary assessment (including complete neuromuscular evaluation) even in case of isolated myocarditis. Our series underlines the importance of an early diagnosis, since suspension of ICI and adequate treatment are usually associated with good functional outcome.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a class of oncological treatments that enhance antitumour immunity, can trigger neurological adverse events closely resembling paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Unlike other neurological adverse events caused by these drugs, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes predominantly affect the CNS and are associated with neural antibodies and cancer types commonly found also in spontaneous paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Furthermore, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have poorer neurological outcomes than other neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are likely to be crucial in preventing the accumulation of neurological disability. Importantly, the neural antibodies found in patients with post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are sometimes detected before treatment, indicating that these antibodies might help to predict the development of neurological adverse events. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes probably share immunological features with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Hence, the study of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help in deciphering the immunopathogenesis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and in identifying novel therapeutic targets.

Neurologic manifestations of autoimmunity with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are cancer immunotherapies that enhance the body's own immune system to treat cancer. ICI treatment, however, can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Neurologic irAEs (nirAEs) are rare and can affect the peripheral nervous system more commonly than the central nervous system. Treatment is dependent on the severity of the neurologic manifestations and often includs discontinuation of the ICI and initiation of steroid therapy as the first line; other treatments have also been used. NirAEs and cardiac irAEs have higher fatality rates underlying the importance of early recognition and appropriate management. This chapter reviews the clinical manifestations of neurologic immune-related adverse events associated with ICI treatment as well as diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Paraneoplastic neuropathies and peripheral nerve hyperexcitability disorders

Peripheral neuropathy is a common referral for patients to the neurologic clinics. Paraneoplastic neuropathies account for a small but high morbidity and mortality subgroup. Symptoms include weakness, sensory loss, sweating irregularity, blood pressure instability, severe constipation, and neuropathic pain. Neuropathy is the first presenting symptom of malignancy among many patients. The molecular and cellular oncogenic immune targets reside within cell bodies, axons, cytoplasms, or surface membranes of neural tissues. A more favorable immune treatment outcome occurs in those where the targets reside on the cell surface. Patients with antibodies binding cell surface antigens commonly have neural hyperexcitability with pain, cramps, fasciculations, and hyperhidrotic attacks (CASPR2, LGI1, and others). The antigenic targets are also commonly expressed in the central nervous system, with presenting symptoms being myelopathy, encephalopathy, and seizures with neuropathy, often masked. Pain and autonomic components typically relate to small nerve fiber involvement (nociceptive, adrenergic, enteric, and sudomotor), sometimes without nerve fiber loss but rather hyperexcitability. The specific antibodies discovered help direct cancer investigations. Among the primary axonal paraneoplastic neuropathies, pathognomonic clinical features do not exist, and testing for multiple antibodies simultaneously provides the best sensitivity in testing (AGNA1-SOX1; amphiphysin; ANNA-1-HU; ANNA-3-DACH1; CASPR2; CRMP5; LGI1; PCA2-MAP1B, and others). Performing confirmatory antibody testing using adjunct methods improves specificity. Antibody-mediated demyelinating paraneoplastic neuropathies are limited to MAG-IgM (IgM-MGUS, Waldenström's, and myeloma), with the others associated with cytokine elevations (VEGF, IL6) caused by osteosclerotic myeloma, plasmacytoma (POEMS), and rarely angiofollicular lymphoma (Castleman's). Paraneoplastic disorders have clinical overlap with other idiopathic antibody disorders, including IgG4 demyelinating nodopathies (NF155 and Contactin-1). This review summarizes the paraneoplastic neuropathies, including those with peripheral nerve hyperexcitability.

Neurologic Complications of Cancer Immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Immunotherapeutic approaches have revolutionized cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T-cell therapy now approved to treat a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies. This article summarizes the distinctive neurologic side effects of these therapies as well as their management.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Neurologic immune-related adverse events are rare but potentially serious complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Both peripheral and central nervous system disorders have been described, often necessitating a pause or cessation of immunotherapy. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome is a potentially serious complication of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. While symptoms may be mild and self-limited, delirium, encephalopathy, seizures, focal neurologic deficits, and fulminant cerebral edema can be seen. Close neurologic monitoring is imperative. The mainstay of treatment for neurologic complications includes high-dose corticosteroids, although other immunomodulatory strategies may be used in severe or refractory cases.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The spectrum of neurologic complications of cancer immunotherapy is broad, encompassing both central and peripheral nervous system disorders, indolent as well as fulminant clinical presentations, and wide-ranging severity with variable response to treatment. Early identification and multidisciplinary management are crucial to balance neurologic recovery and antitumor control.

Evaluation of a self-questionnaire to screen for neurological complications associated with immunological checkpoint inhibitors: Are we missing something?

INTRODUCTION

Immunological checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have led to a therapeutic revolution in the management of many cancers and indications are increasing. Neurological complications seem to have a profile quite distinct from that of toxicities related to chemotherapy, although it is possible that some manifestations remain under-reported or misdiagnosed.

OBJECTIVES

(i) To evaluate the value of a self-questionnaire in screening for neurological ICI-related complications. (ii) To investigate whether, apart from the subacute complications described in the literature, neurological complications of more insidious onset might occur.

METHOD

Patients followed in dermatology department for skin cancers treated with ICI, completed every infusion a neurological screening auto-questionnaire. Patients were selected for a neurological expertise based on the questionnaire's data.

RESULTS

In total, 149 patients completed≥1 questionnaire, with a median delay of 174 days from the start of treatment. A total of 229 questionnaires were completed between July 2019 and December 2019. 38 patients were identified for a neurological consultation. None of these patients had a neurological event attributable to ICI. During the follow-up, only one patient had a neurological event related to ICI, which was not revealed by the questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

Neurological signs in ICI-treated-skin-cancer context are more often due to tumoral progression. Neurological complications of ICI remain rare and unpredictable. The systematic neurological questionnaire has not been shown to be useful in this context. These results highlight the need to educate patients about possible subacute signs that should lead to contact the treating physicians and the need for a close cooperation between dermatologists/oncologists and neurologists.

Epidemiology of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases that affect the skeletal muscles and can also involve the skin, joints, lungs and heart. The epidemiology of IIM is obscured by changing classification criteria and the inherent shortcomings of case identification using healthcare record diagnostic coding. The incidence of IIM is estimated to range from 0.2 to 2 per 100,000 person-years, with prevalence from 2 to 25 per 100,000 people. Although the effects of age and gender on incidence are known, there is only sparse understanding of ethnic differences, particularly in indigenous populations. The incidence of IIM has reportedly increased in the twenty-first century, but whether this is a genuine increase is not yet known. Understanding of the genetic risk factors for different IIM subtypes has advanced considerably. Infections, medications, malignancy and geography are also commonly identified risk factors. Potentially, the COVID-19 pandemic has altered IIM incidence, although evidence of this occurrence is limited to case reports and small case series. Consideration of the current understanding of the epidemiology of IIM can highlight important areas of interest for future research into these rare diseases.

Safety monitoring of drug-induced muscle injury and rhabdomyolysis: a biomarker-guided approach for clinical practice and drug trials

Skeletal muscle tissue (SKM) may be damaged due to mechanical, metabolic, and exertional causes. However, drug-induced myopathy is among the most frequent causes of muscle disease. The clinical picture of drug-induced myopathies may be highly variable. It may present as asymptomatic or mild myalgias, with or without muscle weakness, which are likely underreported. However, it may also appear as chronic myopathy with severe weakness and, rarely, even as massive rhabdomyolysis with acute kidney injury (AKI). Unfortunately, the available biomarkers for SKM injury do not fully meet the needs for satisfactory detection of drug-induced damage, both in clinical and research settings, mainly due to their low sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the present study proposes a strategy for drug safety monitoring using the available biomarkers of SKM injury. Moreover, we will discuss mechanisms of drug-induced SKM injury, traditional laboratory testing for SKM injury, and novel skeletal myocyte biomarkers under investigation. This can be incredibly useful in both clinical practice and for de-challenge/re-challenge investigational trials where the risk of drug-induced SKM injury is present.

[A case of atezolizumab- and bevacizumab-induced myositis showing high intensity in the pterygoid muscles, soft palate, and tongue on STIR-MRI]

A 61-year-old woman was treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination. Blood tests revealed elevated creatine kinase (CK) that peaked at 2,657 U/l. After two cycles of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy, she complained of progressive dysarthria and dysphagia. Needle electromyography showed myopathic changes. Initial MRI showed high signal intensity in the orbicularis oris muscle, soft palate, tongue, pterygoid muscles, and paravertebral muscles on STIR images. Myositis-specific autoantibodies were not detected. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis. The clinical symptoms improved after administration of oral prednisone, and follow-up MRI showed reduced extent of areas of high signal intensity and almost complete resolution of signal abnormality in the paravertebral muscles. The CK level normalized after 1 months of oral steroid administration. MRI of the head and neck, including the tongue and soft palate, may be useful in diagnosis and for evaluating therapeutic efficiency in cases of bulbar symptoms that occur following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Unexpected Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer treatment standards and significantly enhanced patient prognoses. However, the utilization of these groundbreaking therapies has led to the observation and reporting of various types of adverse events, commonly known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In the following article, we present four patients who encountered uncommon toxicities induced by ICIs. The first patient was a 59-year-old female diagnosed with stage 4 lung adenocarcinoma. She received immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) together with chemotherapy and subsequently developed autonomic neuropathy (AN). The next two patients also received chemo-immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) and were both 63-year-old males with stage 4 lung adenocarcinoma. One of the two experienced palmoplantar keratoderma, while the other presented with Reiter's syndrome (urethritis, conjunctivitis and arthritis). The 4th patient, an 80-year-old male with stage 4 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, received chemo-immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) and developed myasthenia gravis.

Transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct subsets of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced myositis

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory myopathy or myositis is a heterogeneous family of immune-mediated diseases including dermatomyositis (DM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can also cause myositis (ICI-myositis). This study was designed to define gene expression patterns in muscle biopsies from patients with ICI-myositis.

METHODS

Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on 200 muscle biopsies (35 ICI-myositis, 44 DM, 18 AS, 54 IMNM, 16 IBM and 33 normal muscle biopsies) and single nuclei RNA sequencing was performed on 22 muscle biopsies (seven ICI-myositis, four DM, three AS, six IMNM and two IBM).

RESULTS

Unsupervised clustering defined three distinct transcriptomic subsets of ICI-myositis: ICI-DM, ICI-MYO1 and ICI-MYO2. ICI-DM included patients with DM and anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies who, like DM patients, overexpressed type 1 interferon-inducible genes. ICI-MYO1 patients had highly inflammatory muscle biopsies and included all patients that developed coexisting myocarditis. ICI-MYO2 was composed of patients with predominant necrotising pathology and low levels of muscle inflammation. The type 2 interferon pathway was activated both in ICI-DM and ICI-MYO1. Unlike the other types of myositis, all three subsets of ICI-myositis patients overexpressed genes involved in the IL6 pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified three distinct types of ICI-myositis based on transcriptomic analyses. The IL6 pathway was overexpressed in all groups, the type I interferon pathway activation was specific for ICI-DM, the type 2 IFN pathway was overexpressed in both ICI-DM and ICI-MYO1 and only ICI-MYO1 patients developed myocarditis.

Neurological outcomes in immune checkpoint inhibitor-related neurotoxicity

While the spectrum of neurological immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events is expanding, patients' outcomes are not well documented. This study aimed to assess outcomes of neurological immune-related adverse events and to identify prognostic factors. All patients experiencing grade ≥2 neurological immune-related adverse events identified at two clinical networks (French Reference Center for Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes, Lyon; and OncoNeuroTox, Paris) over five years were included. Modified Rankin scores were assessed at onset, 6, 12, 18 months, and last visit. A multi-state Markov model was used to estimate the transition rates between minor disability (mRS <3), severe disability (mRS 3-5), and death (mRS 6), over the study period. The state-to-state transition rates were estimated using maximum likelihood and variables were introduced into the different transitions to study their effects. A total of 147 patients were included out of 205 patients with a suspicion of neurological immune-related adverse events. The median age was 65 years (range 20-87) and 87/147 patients (59.2%) were male. Neurological immune-related adverse events involved the peripheral nervous system in 87/147 patients (59.2%), the central nervous system in 51/147 (34.7%), and both systems in 9/147 (6.1%). Paraneoplastic-like syndromes were observed in 30/147 patients (20.4%). Cancers included lung cancers (36.1%), melanoma (30.6%), urological cancers (15.6%), and others (17.8%). Patients were treated with programmed cell death protein (ligan) 1 (PD(L)1) inhibitors (70.1%), CTLA4 inhibitors (3.4%) or both (25.9%). Severe disability was reported in 108/144 patients (75.0%) at onset and in 33/146 patients (22.6%) at last visit (median follow-up duration: 12 months, range 0.5-50); 48/147 (32.7%) patients died, from cancer progression (17/48, 35.4%), neurological toxicity (15/48, 31.2%), other causes (10/48, 20.8%) or unknown causes (6/48, 12.5%). The rate of transition from severe to minor disability independently increased with melanoma [compared to lung cancer, hazard ratio = 3.26, 95%CI (1.27; 8.41)] and myositis/neuromuscular junction disorders [hazard ratio = 8.26, 95%CI (2.90; 23.58)], and decreased with older age [hazard ratio = 0.68, 95%CI (0.47; 0.99)] and paraneoplastic-like syndromes [hazard ratio = 0.29, 95%CI (0.09; 0.98)]. In patients with neurological immune-related adverse events, myositis/neuromuscular junction disorders and melanoma increase the transition rate from severe to minor disability, while older age and paraneoplastic-like syndromes result in poorer neurological outcomes; future studies are needed to optimize the management of such patients.

Clinicoserological insights into patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myasthenia gravis

To compare the immunopathology of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myasthenia gravis (ICI-MG) and idiopathic MG, we profiled the respective AChR autoantibody pathogenic properties. Of three ICI-MG patients with AChR autoantibodies, only one showed complement activation and modulation/blocking potency, resembling idiopathic MG. In contrast, AChR autoantibody-mediated effector functions were not detected in the other two patients, questioning the role of their AChR autoantibodies as key mediators of pathology. The contrasting properties of AChR autoantibodies in these cases challenge the accuracy of serological testing in establishing definite ICI-MG diagnoses and underscore the importance of a thorough clinical assessment when evaluating ICI-related adverse events.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: An update of clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has represented a major advance in cancer treatment. By enhancing endogenous immune responses to destroy cancer cells, ICIs can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with possible involvement of any organ system. IrAEs are frequent, particularly those involving the skin or the endocrine system, and usually completely reversible after temporary immunosuppression, while neurological irAEs (n-irAEs) are relatively rare, often severe, and they carry a considerable risk of mortality and long-term disability. They usually affect the peripheral nervous system, mainly manifesting as myositis, polyradiculoneuropathy, or cranial neuropathy, and, less frequently, involve the central nervous system, causing encephalitis, meningitis, or myelitis. Although somehow reminiscent of the disorders that neurologists are familiar to deal with in their daily practice, n-irAEs are characterized by distinctive features from their idiopathic counterparts; for instance, myositis may have a predominant oculo-bulbar involvement reminiscent of myasthenia gravis and frequently associates with myocarditis; peripheral neuropathy, although often resembling Guillain-Barré syndrome, usually responds to corticosteroids. Remarkably, several associations between the neurological phenotype and the type of ICIs or the type of cancer have emerged in the last few years, and the growing administration of ICIs in patients with neuroendocrine cancers has led to an increased number of reports of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (triggered or worsened by ICIs). This review aims to update current knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of n-irAEs. We also discuss the essential parts of the diagnostic approach, and we provide general recommendations for the management of these disorders.

Granulomatous myopathy: Sarcoidosis and beyond

Non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation is a rare but easily recognized histopathological finding in skeletal muscle biopsy. A limited number of diseases are known to be associated with non-necrotizing granulomatous myopathy. Once identified, a careful evaluation for evidence of extramuscular granulomatosis and other signs suggestive of sarcoidosis is warranted as about half of the patients have sarcoid myopathy. In addition, the presence of granulomatous myopathy should trigger a search for clinical and pathological clues of inclusion body myositis (IBM), which accounts for most of the remaining patients and can coexist with sarcoidosis. Recognizing the features of IBM in patients with granulomatous myopathy can potentially spare the patients from unnecessary exposure to immunosuppressive therapies. In patients whose granulomatous myopathy remain unexplained, further investigations should aim at identifying myasthenia gravis and other autoimmune disorders, especially those known to cause granulomatous inflammation in other organs. Laboratory investigations should include acetylcholine receptor, antimitochondrial, antineutrophil cytoplasmic, thyroglobulin, and thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies. In the appropriate clinical context, exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors and chronic graft-vs-host disease can be causes of granulomatous myopathy. In cases of unexplained granulomatous myopathy, natural killer/T-cell lymphoma should be considered and careful histopathological examination for atypical cells and appropriate immunostaining is crucial. Identifying the etiology of granulomatous myopathy in each patient can guide appropriate treatment.

Autoantibody profiles in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced neurological immune related adverse events

Background

Neurological immune-related adverse events (irAE-n) are severe and potentially fatal toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). To date, the clinical significance of neuronal autoantibodies in irAE-n is poorly understood. Here, we characterize neuronal autoantibody profiles in patients with irAE-n and compare these with ICI-treated cancer patients without irAE-n.

Methods

In this cohort study (DRKS00012668), we consecutively collected clinical data and serum samples of 29 cancer patients with irAE-n (n = 2 pre-ICI, n = 29 post-ICI) and 44 cancer control patients without irAE-n (n = 44 pre- and post-ICI). Using indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblot assays, serum samples were tested for a large panel of neuromuscular and brain-reactive autoantibodies.

Results

IrAE-n patients and controls received ICI treatment targeting programmed death protein (PD-)1 (61% and 62%), programmed death ligand (PD-L)1 (18% and 33%) or PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-)4 (21% and 5%). Most common malignancies were melanoma (both 55%) and lung cancer (11% and 14%). IrAE-n affected the peripheral nervous system (59%), the central nervous system (21%), or both (21%). Prevalence of neuromuscular autoantibodies was 63% in irAE-n patients, which was higher compared to ICI-treated cancer patients without irAE-n (7%, p <.0001). Brain-reactive autoantibodies targeting surface (anti-GABA_BR, -NMDAR, -myelin), intracellular (anti-GFAP, -Zic4, -septin complex), or unknown antigens were detected in 13 irAE-n patients (45%). In contrast, only 9 of 44 controls (20%) presented brain-reactive autoantibodies before ICI administration. However, seven controls developed de novo brain-reactive autoantibodies after ICI initiation, therefore, prevalence of brain-reactive autoantibodies was comparable between ICI-treated patients with and without irAE-n (p = .36). While there was no clear association between specific brain-reactive autoantibodies and clinical presentation, presence of at least one of six selected neuromuscular autoantibodies (anti-titin, anti-skeletal muscle, anti-heart muscle, anti-LRP4, anti-RyR, anti-AchR) had a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 0.52-0.96) and a specificity of 88% (95% CI 0.76-0.95) for the diagnosis of myositis, myocarditis, or myasthenia gravis.

Conclusion

Neuromuscular autoantibodies may serve as a feasible marker to diagnose and potentially predict life-threatening ICI-induced neuromuscular disease. However, brain-reactive autoantibodies are common in both ICI-treated patients with and without irAE-n, hence, their pathogenic significance remains unclear.

Rare forms of inflammatory myopathies - part I, generalized forms

INTRODUCTION

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies traditionally comprise dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, anti-synthetase syndrome, and inclusion body myositis. In this review, we aimed to cover the less common forms of generalized myositis.

AREAS COVERED

We identified rare forms of widespread myositis on the basis of list provided by the homepage of the Neuromuscular disease center of Washington University, USA and on the basis of the authors' knowledge. We searched PubMed® and EMBASE® for relevant articles on these forms with the aim of providing as much as possible information on their clinical manifestations as well as guidance on their work-up and treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

There is substantial heterogeneity among the various rare forms of generalized myositis in terms of their frequency and characterization. Some forms are reasonably well defined, while others may not represent truly well-defined diseases, but rather variants of other myopathies. The landscape of rare forms appears to have evolved over time, with some forms now being better characterized, while others, such as SARS-Cov-2- and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis have come to the fore only in recent years. Knowledge about rare forms of myositis can aid in their recognition and treatment.

Exploring the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the etiology of myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: A systematic review

Background

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been revolutionary in the treatment of cancer, their administration has been associated with a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including myasthenia gravis (MG), and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS).

Objective

To provide a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence supporting an etiological role for ICIs in MG and LEMS in patients with no prior history of autoimmune disease.

Hypothesis

ICIs may trigger MG and LEMS in patients with no prior susceptibility to autoimmune disease.

Methods

Relevant primary research on Medline was interrogated using a series of search algorithms. Search terms were constructed based on the PICOS tool endorsed by the Cochrane Collaboration, which describes population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design. Papers were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additional papers were retrieved from the reference lists of screened papers. Each paper included in the qualitative synthesis was assigned an integrated metric of evidence (IME) value, ranging from 0 to 7, based on study design, quality of data, likelihood of a causal link between the immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) and MG/LEMS, confidence of MG/LEMS diagnosis, and the number of patients treated with an ICI prior to MG/LEMS diagnosis.

Results

Ninety-four papers describing at least one patient treated with ICI(s) prior to the onset of MG and/or LEMS were documented. Overall evidence for a causal link between ICI administration and MG/LEMS was low, with a median IME value of 2.88 (range 2.05-6.61).

Conclusions

There is a paucity of evidence in support of an etiological relationship between ICIs and MG/LEMS, due largely to the lack of mechanistic studies and/or prospective clinical trials with relevant study endpoints. The current literature is dominated by case reports and retrospective cohort studies, which inherently yield only low-level evidence, supporting the need for further work in this area. A role of ICIs in the etiology of MG/LEMS remains plausible, arguing for continued vigilance for irAEs in patients treated with these drugs. We argue that there is a need for future mechanistic, high quality, large-scale studies specifically investigating the possible etiological role of ICIs in MG/LEMS.

Checkpoint inhibitor induced myositis - The value of MRI STIR

•Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause serious adverse events.•Myositis combined with myocarditis ad adverse event have a mortality for 50%.•Early diagnosis is important for better outcome.•Employing MRI STIR can rapidly diagnose, guide biopsy, and classify cases of immune-related myositis.

Imaging assessment of toxicity related to immune checkpoint inhibitors

In recent years, a wide range of cancer immunotherapies have been developed and have become increasingly important in cancer treatment across multiple oncologic diseases. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer promising options to improve patient outcomes. However, a major limitation of these treatments consists in the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring in potentially any organ system and affecting up to 76% of the patients. The most frequent toxicities involve the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and endocrine system. Although mostly manageable, potentially life-threatening events, particularly due to neuro-, cardiac, and pulmonary toxicity, occur in up to 30% and 55% of the patients treated with ICI-monotherapy or -combination therapy, respectively. Imaging, in particular computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT), plays an important role in the detection and characterization of these irAEs. In some patients, irAEs can even be detected on imaging before the onset of clinical symptoms. In this context, it is particularly important to distinguish irAEs from true disease progression and specific immunotherapy related response patterns, such as pseudoprogression. In addition, there are irAEs which might be easily confused with other pathologies such as infection or metastasis. However, many imaging findings, such as in immune-related pneumonitis, are nonspecific. Thus, accurate diagnosis may be delayed underling the importance for adequate imaging features characterization in the appropriate clinical setting in order to provide timely and efficient patient management. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and radiomics have demonstrated to reliably detect these toxicities and potentially have predictive value for identifying patients at risk of developing irAEs. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the main immunotherapy-related toxicities and discuss their characteristics on imaging.

Bone-Muscle Crosstalk: Musculoskeletal Complications of Chemotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chemotherapy drugs combat tumor cells and reduce metastasis. However, a significant side effect of some chemotherapy strategies is loss of skeletal muscle and bone. In cancer patients, maintenance of lean tissue is a positive prognostic indicator of outcomes and helps to minimize the toxicity associated with chemotherapy. Bone-muscle crosstalk plays an important role in the function of the musculoskeletal system and this review will focus on recent findings in preclinical and clinical studies that shed light on chemotherapy-induced bone-muscle crosstalk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chemotherapy-induced loss of bone and skeletal muscle are important clinical problems. Bone antiresorptive drugs prevent skeletal muscle weakness in preclinical models. Chemotherapy-induced loss of bone can cause muscle weakness through both changes in endocrine signaling and mechanical loading between muscle and bone. Chemotherapy-induced changes to bone-muscle crosstalk have implications for treatment strategies and patient quality of life. Recent findings have begun to determine the role of chemotherapy in bone-muscle crosstalk and this review summarizes the most relevant clinical and preclinical studies.

A Successful Case of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab with Multisystem Immune-related Adverse Events

A 63-year-old man with hepatitis C was treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After four cycles of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, the diffuse HCC markedly shrank; however, he complained of general fatigue, loss of appetite, and slight loss of muscle strength in the lower legs. He was diagnosed with isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency (IAD), hypothyroidism, and myopathy, suggesting multisystem immune-related adverse events (irAEs). After administration of hydrocortisone, the clinical symptoms rapidly disappeared. Patients with multisystem irAEs can have favorable outcomes; thus, to continue immune-checkpoint inhibitors therapy, a correct diagnosis and management of multisystem irAEs are important.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myositis: A Distinct Form of Inflammatory Myopathy

ABSTRACT

Research on the relationship between inflammatory myopathy and malignancy has grown considerably within the last century. Now, the burgeoning field of inflammatory myopathy has yet another player in the mix: immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis (ICI myositis). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis is indicated by clinical diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy after initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor for cancer management. Current literature reflects low prevalence but high mortality associated with ICI myositis, especially when involving myasthenia gravis and myocarditis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis tends to have muscle pain along with weakness, infrequent presentation with dermatitis, or interstitial lung disease and is typically seronegative with scattered, endomysial inflammatory infiltrates on biopsy. The differential diagnosis of ICI myositis includes myasthenia gravis and other neurological immune-related adverse events. Therapeutic approach involves high doses of corticosteroids with a choice of steroid-sparing immunomodulating agent(s) that is primarily driven by expert opinion due to lack of robust research to support one agent over another. There is wide variation in the inclusion criteria for ICI myositis used in previous studies. We review previously used inclusion criteria and suggest an expertise-based classification criterion to provide a standardized definition and allow comparability between studies. There is a critical need for prospective translational and clinical studies that elucidate the pathophysiology of ICI myositis in order to improve evaluation and management of these patients.

Novel pathophysiological insights in autoimmune myasthenia gravis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent insights into the immunopathogenesis of autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG). Mechanistic understanding is presented according to MG disease subtypes and by leveraging the knowledge gained through the use of immunomodulating biological therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

The past two years of research on MG have led to a more accurate definition of the mechanisms through which muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies induce pathology. Novel insights have also emerged from the collection of stronger evidence on the pathogenic capacity of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 autoantibodies. Clinical observations have revealed a new MG phenotype triggered by cancer immunotherapy, but the underlying immunobiology remains undetermined. From a therapeutic perspective, MG patients can now benefit from a wider spectrum of treatment options. Such therapies have uncovered profound differences in clinical responses between and within the acetylcholine receptor and MuSK MG subtypes. Diverse mechanisms of immunopathology between the two subtypes, as well as qualitative nuances in the autoantibody repertoire of each patient, likely underpin the variability in therapeutic outcomes. Although predictive biomarkers of clinical response are lacking, these observations have ignited the development of assays that might assist clinicians in the choice of specific therapeutic strategies.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in the understanding of autoantibody functionalities are bringing neuroimmunologists closer to a more detailed appreciation of the mechanisms that govern MG pathology. Future investigations on the immunological heterogeneity among MG patients will be key to developing effective, individually tailored therapies.

Association Between Clinical Factors and Result of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Related Myasthenia Gravis: A Single Center Experience and Systematic Review

Background

Neurological immune-related adverse events (nirAEs) are rare toxicities of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). With the increase use of ICIs, incidence of nirAEs is growing, among which ICI related MG (irMG) is causing high fatality rate. Given the limited evidence, data from a large cohort of patients with irMG is needed to aid in recognition and management of this fatal complication.

Objective

This study aimed to summarize clinical characteristics of irMG and explore predictors of irMG clinical outcome.

Methods

We summarized our institution's patients who were diagnosed as irMG between Sep 2019 and Oct 2021. We systematically reviewed the literature through Oct 2021 to identify all similar reported patients who met inclusion criteria. As the control group, patients with idiopathic MG were used. We collected data on clinical features, management, and outcomes of both irMG and idioMG cases. Further statistical analysis was conducted.

Results

Sixty three irMG patients and 380 idioMG patients were included in the final analysis. For irMG patients, six were from our institution while the rest 57 were from reported cases. The average age of irMG patients is 70.16 years old. Forty three were male. Average time from first ICI injection to symptom onset was 5.500 weeks. Eleven patients had a past history of MG. Higher MGFA classification and higher QMGS rates were observed in irMG patients compared to idioMG patients. For complication, more irMG patients had myositis or myocarditis overlapping compared to idioMG patients. The most commonly used treatment was corticosteroids for both idioMG and irMG. Twenty one patients (35%) with irMG had unfavorable disease outcome. Single variate and multivariate binary logistic regression proved that association with myocarditis, high MGFA classification or QMGS rates at first visit were negatively related to disease outcome in irMG patients.

Conclusion

irMG is a life-threatening adverse event. irMG has unique clinical manifestations and clinical outcome compared to idioMG. When suspicious, early evaluation of MGFA classification, QMGS rates and myositis/myocarditis evaluation are recommended.

Neurologic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The clinical use of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the management of cancer and added another effective treatment option for different types of malignancies. The blockade of immune checkpoint pathways triggers an enhanced immune response leading to cancer regression but may also lead to autoimmune toxicities or immune-related adverse events, which may involve skin, endocrine, respiratory, gastrointestinal or neurologic manifestations. Clinically relevant neurologic complications involving the central and/or peripheral nervous system affect up to 1% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Common neurologic complications include aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, hypophysitis, myasthenia, myositis and neuropathies. Neurologic immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoint inhibition should be distinguished from cancer progression or other complications of cancer therapy (e.g. infections). The treatment of neurologic complications may include holding or withdrawing cancer immunotherapy, anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapies with corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents, immunomodulation with intravenous immune globulin or plasmapheresis and symptomatic treatment (e.g. antiepileptic medications, pain medications).

How we identify and treat neuromuscular toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune-related neuromuscular adverse events are rare, but potentially life-threatening side-effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). They usually arise within the first 3 months after initiation of ICIs. Subacute symptom onset with more rapid progression than in idiopathic autoimmune neuromuscular diseases is typical. Prompt clinical diagnosis and treatment is essential for a favourable outcome. The importance of careful medical history and a well-established clinical diagnosis is emphasised rather than antibody detection or radiologic visualisation. Muscle weakness as a leading symptom can give rise to the suspicion of either neuropathy or myositis-myasthenia complex and differentiation may be complicated by their overlap. It is of utmost importance to recognise immune-related myositis and monitor for myocardial as well as bulbar involvement that may rapidly lead to cardiac or respiratory failure, persisting disability or even a fatal outcome.

Symptoms typically improve with ICI discontinuation and early administration of glucocorticoids (prednisolone 1-2 mg/kg/day) in patients markedly affected. Severe and persisting symptoms including myocardial or bulbar affection can require therapy escalation to steroid-sparing agents. In patients with mild symptoms, not influencing functional abilities, careful clinical monitoring while staying on ICI therapy may be sufficient.

Re-challenging with ICIs may be considered in selected cases, based on the initial severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical disease course. Depending on the individual irAE characteristics, the decision should be preferably discussed in an interdisciplinary irAE expert team with an experienced neurologist, rheumatologist and/or cardiologist and take the patient's preferences into account. The yet unmet need of systematic data on treatment, follow-up results and options of re-challenge of ICI treatment in neuromuscular toxicity has to be particularly considered in the shared decision-making process.

•

Immune-related neuromuscular adverse events are rare, but potentially life-threatening side-effects of immunotherapy.

•

Muscle weakness as the leading symptom can give rise to the suspicion of either neuropathy or myositis-myasthenia complex.

•

Symptoms typically improve with ICI discontinuation and early administration of glucocorticoids.

•

Severe persisting symptoms including myocardial or bulbar affection can require therapy escalation to steroid-sparing agents.

Differential diagnosis of necrotizing myopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Necrotizing myopathy is a broad term. It includes patients with the recently described immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNM) who have specific antibodies, such as anti-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase or anti-signal recognition particle, seronegative phenotypes that can be associated with cancer, and other types of myositis and connective tissue diseases involving necrotic muscle fibers as a characteristic pathologic feature. Necrotizing myopathies that are not immune-mediated, such as those caused by drugs, dystrophies, infections, or even hypothyroidism are also included. The purpose of this review is to address the differential diagnosis of these disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

New IMNM have been described over the last few years, some of them related with checkpoint inhibitors, drugs that are being increasingly used in cancer treatment. Necrotizing myopathy has also been reported in association with specific phenotypes and autoantibodies (e.g. anti-Mi2 dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome, and myositis associated with antimitochondrial antibodies). Rarer cases associated with graft-versus-host disease and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection are also emerging.

SUMMARY

Differentiation between patients with IMNM and those without the superimposed autoimmune phenomena helps clinicians determine the best individualized approach to use and the appropriate immunosuppressive therapy, whenever needed.

A review of neurotoxicities associated with immunotherapy and a framework for evaluation

Immuno-oncology agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies, are increasing in use for a growing list of oncologic indications. While harnessing the immune system against cancer cells has a potent anti-tumor effect, it can also cause widespread autoimmune toxicities that limit therapeutic potential. Neurologic toxicities have unique presentations and can progress rapidly, necessitating prompt recognition. In this article, we review the spectrum of central and peripheral neurologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with ICI therapies, emphasizing a diagnostic framework that includes consideration of the therapy regimen, timing of symptom onset, presence of non-neurologic irAEs, pre-existing neurologic disease, and syndrome specific features. In addition, we review the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) associated with CAR-T cell therapy and address diagnostic challenges specific to patients with brain metastases. As immunotherapy use grows, so too will the number of patients affected by neurotoxicity. There is an urgent need to understand pathogenic mechanisms, predictors, and optimal treatments of these toxicities, so that we can manage them without sacrificing anti-tumor efficacy.

Polymyositis: does it really exist as a distinct clinical subset?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize information on polymyositis; diagnosis, definitions, published data and opinions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Polymyositis originally referred to inflammatory muscle diseases presenting with muscle weakness and inflammatory cell infiltrates on muscle tissue visible by microscopy. Over time and with improved technology to immunophenotype infiltrating inflammatory cells and characterize muscle fibres, the meaning of polymyositis changed and became more specific. There is ongoing controversy over the term polymyositis, with proponents for a strict definition based on histopathological and immunohistochemical features on muscle biopsies whereas others advocate for a broader clinical and histopathological phenotype. Over the past decades, the discovery of several myositis-specific autoantibodies together with distinct histopathological features have enabled the identification of new subsets previously labelled as polymyositis notably the antisynthetase syndrome and the immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies thus reducing the number of patients classified as polymyositis.

SUMMARY

There are still a small number of patients among the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies that can be classified as polymyositis as discussed in this review but the entity is now considered relatively rare.

How to diagnose and manage neurological toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors: an update

As the use of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is expanding rapidly for the treatment of many tumor types, it is crucial that both neurologists and oncologists become familiar with the diagnosis and treatment of neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs). These are rare complications, developing in their severe forms in only 1-3% of the patients, but are highly relevant due to their mortality and morbidity burden. The diagnosis of n-irAEs is-however-challenging, as many alternative diagnoses need to be considered in the complex scenario of a patient with advanced cancer developing neurological problems. A tailored diagnostic approach is advisable according to the presentation, clinical history, and known specificities of n-irAEs. Several patterns characterized by distinct clinical, immunological, and prognostic characteristics are beginning to emerge. For example, myasthenia gravis is more likely to develop after anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment, while meningitis appears more frequently after anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) therapy. Also, peripheral neuropathy and Guillain-Barré syndrome seem to be more common in patients with an underlying melanoma. Central nervous system disorders (CNS) are less frequent and are more often associated with lung cancer, and some of them (especially those with limbic encephalitis and positive onconeural antibodies) have a poor prognosis. Herein, we provide an update of the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological toxicities related to ICI use, focusing on the exclusion of alternative diagnoses, diagnostic specificities, and treatment of n-irAEs.

Absence of significant clinical benefit for a systematic routine creatine phosphokinase measurement in asymptomatic patients treated with anti-programmed death protein (ligand) 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to screen cardiac or neuromuscular immune-related toxicities

AIM

Despite unprecedented results of anti-programmed death protein (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) immune checkpoint inhibitor in the oncology's armamentarium, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) represent a therapeutic hurdle. Currently, there is no consensual recommendation on a routinely monitored biomarker to early detect irAE. Biological markers such as serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) are commonly used to measure muscular tissue injury. The potential of routine serum CPK monitoring to predict cardiac or neuromuscular irAE in patients treated with immunotherapy remains unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective study between January 2016 and December 2018 at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 1151 cancer patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy were systematically monitored with serum CPK measurements before each immunotherapy cycle. We considered significant CPK increases according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 (CTCAEV5) of grade ≥2 severity. Comparisons were performed in patients with immune-related CPK (ir-CPK) elevations symptomatic versus asymptomatic.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 of 1151 (4.6%) patients showed a CPK increase. Elevations of CPK were deemed to be immunotherapy-related in 31 of 1151 (2.7%) patients. Among them, 12 of 31 (38.7%) patients experienced symptomatic cardiac or neuromuscular irAE, whereas the other 19 of 31 (61.3%) patients remained asymptomatic. In patients with symptomatic irAE, the mean ir-CPK level was higher compared with asymptomatic patients (1271 versus 771 UI/L, P value = 0.02). In the asymptomatic group, all patients experienced a spontaneous resolution of the ir-CPK increase, and none required medical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with immune-related CPK increase remained asymptomatic. The CPK serum increase did not alter the clinical management of asymptomatic patients. The results of this study did not support a significant clinical interest for a systematic routine CPK monitoring in patients amenable to anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy.

Characterization and management of neurological adverse events during immune-checkpoint inhibitors treatment: an Italian multicentric experience

BACKGROUND

Neurological immune-related adverse events (nirAEs) are rare toxicities of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). With the increase of ICI oncological indications, their incidence is growing. Their recognition and management remain nevertheless challenging.

METHODS

A national, web-based database was built to collect cases of neurological symptoms in patients receiving ICI and not attributable to other causes after an adequate workup.

RESULTS

We identified 27 patients who developed nirAEs (20 males, median age 69 years). Patients received anti-PD1/PDL1 (78%), anti-CTLA4 (4%), or both (19%). Most common cancers were melanoma (30%) and non-small cell lung cancer (26%). Peripheral nervous system was mostly affected (78%). Median time to onset was 43.5 days and was shorter for peripheral versus central nervous system toxicities (36 versus 144.5 days, p = 0.045). Common manifestations were myositis (33%), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies (33%), and myasthenia gravis (19%), alone or in combination, but the spectrum of diagnoses was broad. Most patients received first-line glucocorticoids (85%) or IVIg (15%). Seven patients (26%) needed second-line treatments. At last follow-up, four (15%) patients were deceased (encephalitis, 1; myositis/myasthenia with concomitant myocarditis, 2; acute polyradiculoneuropathy, 1), while seven (26%) had a complete remission, eight (30%) partial improvement, and six (22%) stable/progressing symptoms. ICI treatment was discontinued in most patients (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological irAEs are rare but potentially fatal. They primarily affect neuromuscular structures but encompass a broad range of presentations. A prompt recognition is mandatory to timely withheld immunotherapy and administrate glucocorticoids. In corticoresistant or severely affected patients, second-line treatments with IVIg or plasmapheresis may result in additional benefit.

Neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy include chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN), immune-related neuromuscular complications to immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiation-induced neuropathy/plexopathy. With a wider focus on CIPN, we will discuss new pathogenetic insights, recent predictive biomarkers and emerging therapies for neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Findings from recent preclinical studies have improved our knowledge on new CIPN pathogenetic pathways, including the activation of senescence-like processes in neurons, axonal degeneration and neuroinflammation. Metabolomics and serum neurofilament light chain levels appear the most promising biomarkers to predict CIPN development and severity. There is some recent evidence of promising pharmacological compounds to prevent or treat CIPN, and new drugs are in early development and testing.

SUMMARY

A multimodal assessment, with neurophysiological, imaging and patient-reported outcome measures, coupled with the use of reliable blood or genetic biomarkers, may offer pathogenetic grounds for future preventive and symptomatic strategies for the multidisciplinary treatment of neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy.

Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Beyond Emerging With the Introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Cancer Immunotherapy

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are more commonly seen with malignancies such as small cell lung cancer, thymoma, gynecological malignancies, and breast cancer as well as seminoma. With the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer immunotherapy we see an increase of autoimmune neurological complications in patients with malignancies not traditionally associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance antitumor immune responses resulting often in immune-related adverse effects that can affect any organ, including the central and peripheral nervous system, neuromuscular junction and muscle. Neurological complications are rare; neuromuscular complications are more common than central nervous system ones but multifocal neurological presentations are often encountered. The vast majority of neurological complications appear within 3 months of ICI initiation, but have been described even after ICI cessation. Neural autoantibody testing reveals autoantibodies in approximately half of the patients with CNS complications. Early suspicion and diagnosis is critical to avoid worsening and improve outcomes. Therapeutic strategies depend on the severity of the symptoms and initially typically involve discontinuation of ICI and high dose steroids. Further immunosuppression might be necessary. Outcomes are dependent on patient's characteristics and clinical presentations.

Neurological complications of immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer immunotherapy

Neurological autoimmunity is increasingly recognized as a complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer immunotherapy. ICIs act by enhancing endogenous anti-tumor immune responses and can also lead to autoimmunity affecting all organs. ICI-related neurological autoimmunity is rare, most often manifests with neuromuscular involvement and more rarely affects the central nervous system. Neurological complications often often present in the first three months of ICI treatment but can also appear after ICI discontinuation. These can occur in patients with tumors not traditionally associated with paraneoplastic neurological autoimmunity, such as melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma and should be suspected when a new neurological symptoms present while on ICI and cannot be explained by disease progression or as a consequence of metabolic dysfunction. Treatment consists of ICI discontinuation or withdrawal depending on the severity with or without immunosuppression. Generally, improvement is observed depending on the patient's baseline characteristics and neurological presentation.