Game-theoretical mapping of fundamental brain functions based on lesion deficits in acute stroke

Information decomposition and the informational architecture of the brain

To explain how the brain orchestrates information-processing for cognition, we must understand information itself. Importantly, information is not a monolithic entity. Information decomposition techniques provide a way to split information into its constituent elements: unique, redundant, and synergistic information. We review how disentangling synergistic and redundant interactions is redefining our understanding of integrative brain function and its neural organisation. To explain how the brain navigates the trade-offs between redundancy and synergy, we review converging evidence integrating the structural, molecular, and functional underpinnings of synergy and redundancy; their roles in cognition and computation; and how they might arise over evolution and development. Overall, disentangling synergistic and redundant information provides a guiding principle for understanding the informational architecture of the brain and cognition.

Cortical involvement in essential tremor with and without rest tremor: a machine learning study

INTRODUCTION

There is some debate on the relationship between essential tremor with rest tremor (rET) and the classic ET syndrome, and only few MRI studies compared ET and rET patients. This study aimed to explore structural cortical differences between ET and rET, to improve the knowledge of these tremor syndromes.

METHODS

Thirty-three ET patients, 30 rET patients and 45 control subjects (HC) were enrolled. Several MR morphometric variables (thickness, surface area, volume, roughness, mean curvature) of brain cortical regions were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images and compared among groups. The performance of a machine learning approach (XGBoost) using the extracted morphometric features was tested in discriminating between ET and rET patients.

RESULTS

rET patients showed increased roughness and mean curvature in some fronto-temporal areas compared with HC and ET, and these metrics significantly correlated with cognitive scores. Cortical volume in the left pars opercularis was also lower in rET than in ET patients. No differences were found between ET and HC. XGBoost discriminated between rET and ET with mean AUC of 0.86 ± 0.11 in cross-validation analysis, using a model based on cortical volume. Cortical volume in the left pars opercularis was the most informative feature for classification between the two ET groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated higher cortical involvement in fronto-temporal areas in rET than in ET patients, which may be linked to the cognitive status. A machine learning approach based on MR volumetric data demonstrated that these two ET subtypes can be distinguished using structural cortical features.

Use of multi-perturbation Shapley analysis in lesion studies of functional networks: The case of upper limb paresis

Understanding the impact of variation in lesion topography on the expression of functional impairments following stroke is important, as it may pave the way to modeling structure-function relations in statistical terms while pointing to constraints for adaptive remapping and functional recovery. Multi-perturbation Shapley-value analysis (MSA) is a relatively novel game-theoretical approach for multivariate lesion-symptom mapping. In this methodological paper, we provide a comprehensive explanation of MSA. We use synthetic data to assess the method's accuracy and perform parameter optimization. We then demonstrate its application using a cohort of 107 first-event subacute stroke patients, assessed for upper limb (UL) motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale). Under the conditions tested, MSA could correctly detect simulated ground-truth lesion-symptom relationships with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of ~90%. For real behavioral data, MSA disclosed a strong hemispheric effect in the relative contribution of specific regions-of-interest (ROIs): poststroke UL motor function was mostly contributed by damage to ROIs associated with movement planning (supplementary motor cortex and superior frontal gyrus) following left-hemispheric damage (LHD) and by ROIs associated with movement execution (primary motor and somatosensory cortices and the ventral brainstem) following right-hemispheric damage (RHD). Residual UL motor ability following LHD was found to depend on a wider array of brain structures compared to the residual motor ability of RHD patients. The results demonstrate that MSA can provide a unique insight into the relative importance of different hubs in neural networks, which is difficult to obtain using standard univariate methods.

Systematic perturbation of an artificial neural network: A step towards quantifying causal contributions in the brain

Lesion inference analysis is a fundamental approach for characterizing the causal contributions of neural elements to brain function. This approach has gained new prominence through the arrival of modern perturbation techniques with unprecedented levels of spatiotemporal precision. While inferences drawn from brain perturbations are conceptually powerful, they face methodological difficulties. Particularly, they are challenged to disentangle the true causal contributions of the involved elements, since often functions arise from coalitions of distributed, interacting elements, and localized perturbations have unknown global consequences. To elucidate these limitations, we systematically and exhaustively lesioned a small artificial neural network (ANN) playing a classic arcade game. We determined the functional contributions of all nodes and links, contrasting results from sequential single-element perturbations with simultaneous perturbations of multiple elements. We found that lesioning individual elements, one at a time, produced biased results. By contrast, multi-site lesion analysis captured crucial details that were missed by single-site lesions. We conclude that even small and seemingly simple ANNs show surprising complexity that needs to be addressed by multi-lesioning for a coherent causal characterization.

The motto “No causation without manipulation” is canonical to scientific endeavors. In particular, neuroscience seeks to identify which brain elements are causally involved in cognition and behavior, by perturbing them. However, due to multi-dimensional interactions among the elements, this goal has remained challenging. Here, we used an Artificial Neural Network as a ground-truth model to compare the inferential capacities of two principal approaches, lesioning a system one element at a time versus sampling from the set of all possible combinations of lesions. We show that lesioning one element at a time provides misleading results. Hence, we argue for employing exhaustive perturbation regimes. We further advocate using simulation experiments and ground-truth models to verify the assumptions and limitations of current approaches for brain mapping by perturbation.