Validating EEG source imaging using intracranial electrical stimulation

Localizing hidden Interictal Epileptiform Discharges with simultaneous intracerebral and scalp high-density EEG recordings

BACKGROUND

Scalp EEG is one of the main tools in the clinical evaluation of epilepsy. In some cases intracranial Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) are not visible from the scalp. Recent studies have shown the feasibility of revealing them in the EEG if their timings are extracted from simultaneous intracranial recordings, but their potential for the localization of the epileptogenic zone is not yet well defined.

NEW METHOD

We recorded simultaneous high-density EEG (HD-EEG) and stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) during interictal periods in 8 patients affected by drug-resistant focal epilepsy. We identified IEDs in the SEEG and systematically analyzed the time-locked signals on the EEG by means of evoked potentials, topographical analysis and Electrical Source Imaging (ESI). The dataset has been standardized and is being publicly shared.

RESULTS

Our results showed that IEDs that were not clearly visible at single-trials could be uncovered by averaging, in line with previous reports. They also showed that their topographical voltage distributions matched the position of the SEEG electrode where IEDs had been identified, and that ESI techniques can reconstruct it with an accuracy of ∼2 cm. Finally, the present dataset provides a reference to test the accuracy of different methods and parameters.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Our study is the first to systematically compare ESI methods on simultaneously recorded IEDs, and to share a public resource with in-vivo data for their evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous HD-EEG and SEEG recordings can unveil hidden IEDs whose origins can be reconstructed using topographical and ESI analyses, but results depend on the selected methods and parameters.

Effect of Inverse Solutions, Connectivity Measures, and Node Sizes on EEG Source Network: A Simultaneous EEG Study

Brain network provides an essential perspective for studying normal and pathological brain activities. Reconstructing the brain network in the source space becomes more needed, for example, as a target in non-invasive neuromodulation. Precise estimating source activities from the scalp EEG is still challenging because it is an ill-posed question and because of the volume conduction effect. There is no consensus on how to reconstruct the EEG source network. This study uses simultaneous scalp EEG and stereo-EEG to investigate the effect of inverse solutions, connectivity measures, and node sizes on the reconstruction of the source network. We evaluated the performance of different methods on both source activity and network. Numerical simulation was also carried out for comparison. The weighted phase-lag index (wPLI) method achieved significantly better performance on the reconstructed networks in source space than five other connectivity measures (directed transfer function (DTF), partial directed coherence (PDC), efficient effective connectivity (EEC), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and amplitude envelope correlation (AEC)). There is no significant difference between the inverse solutions (standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA), weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE), and linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamforming) on the reconstructed source networks. The source network based on signal phases can fit intracranial activities better than signal waveform properties or causality. Our study provides a basis for reconstructing source space networks from scalp EEG, especially for future neuromodulation research.

EEG/MEG source imaging of deep brain activity within the maximum entropy on the mean framework: Simulations and validation in epilepsy

Electro/Magneto-EncephaloGraphy (EEG/MEG) source imaging (EMSI) of epileptic activity from deep generators is often challenging due to the higher sensitivity of EEG/MEG to superficial regions and to the spatial configuration of subcortical structures. We previously demonstrated the ability of the coherent Maximum Entropy on the Mean (cMEM) method to accurately localize the superficial cortical generators and their spatial extent. Here, we propose a depth-weighted adaptation of cMEM to localize deep generators more accurately. These methods were evaluated using realistic MEG/high-density EEG (HD-EEG) simulations of epileptic activity and actual MEG/HD-EEG recordings from patients with focal epilepsy. We incorporated depth-weighting within the MEM framework to compensate for its preference for superficial generators. We also included a mesh of both hippocampi, as an additional deep structure in the source model. We generated 5400 realistic simulations of interictal epileptic discharges for MEG and HD-EEG involving a wide range of spatial extents and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels, before investigating EMSI on clinical HD-EEG in 16 patients and MEG in 14 patients. Clinical interictal epileptic discharges were marked by visual inspection. We applied three EMSI methods: cMEM, depth-weighted cMEM and depth-weighted minimum norm estimate (MNE). The ground truth was defined as the true simulated generator or as a drawn region based on clinical information available for patients. For deep sources, depth-weighted cMEM improved the localization when compared to cMEM and depth-weighted MNE, whereas depth-weighted cMEM did not deteriorate localization accuracy for superficial regions. For patients' data, we observed improvement in localization for deep sources, especially for the patients with mesial temporal epilepsy, for which cMEM failed to reconstruct the initial generator in the hippocampus. Depth weighting was more crucial for MEG (gradiometers) than for HD-EEG. Similar findings were found when considering depth weighting for the wavelet extension of MEM. In conclusion, depth-weighted cMEM improved the localization of deep sources without or with minimal deterioration of the localization of the superficial sources. This was demonstrated using extensive simulations with MEG and HD-EEG and clinical MEG and HD-EEG for epilepsy patients.

Recent advances in clinical electroencephalography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical electroencephalography (EEG) is a conservative medical field. This explains likely the significant gap between clinical practice and new research developments. This narrative review discusses possible causes of this discrepancy and how to circumvent them. More specifically, we summarize recent advances in three applications of clinical EEG: source imaging (ESI), high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and EEG in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently published studies on ESI provide further evidence for the accuracy and clinical utility of this method in the multimodal presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and opened new possibilities for further improvement of the accuracy. HFOs have received much attention as a novel biomarker in epilepsy. However, recent studies questioned their clinical utility at the level of individual patients. We discuss the impediments, show up possible solutions and highlight the perspectives of future research in this field. EEG in the ICU has been one of the major driving forces in the development of clinical EEG. We review the achievements and the limitations in this field.

SUMMARY

This review will promote clinical implementation of recent advances in EEG, in the fields of ESI, HFOs and EEG in the intensive care.

Semiautomated electric source imaging determines epileptogenicity of encephaloceles in temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the ability of semiautomated electric source imaging (ESI) from long-term video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring (LTM) to determine the epileptogenicity of temporopolar encephaloceles (TEs) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving 32 temporal lobe epilepsy patients with TEs as potentially epileptogenic lesions in structural magnetic resonance imaging scans. Findings were validated through invasive intracerebral stereo-EEG in six of 32 patients and postsurgical outcome after tailored resection of the TE in 17 of 32 patients. LTM (mean duration = 6 days) was performed using the 10/20 system with additional T1/T2 for all patients and sphenoidal electrodes in 23 of 32 patients. Semiautomated detection and clustering of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) were carried out to create IED types. ESI was performed on the averages of the two most frequent IED types per patient, utilizing individual head models, and two independent inverse methods (sLORETA [standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography], MUSIC [multiple signal classification]). ESI maxima concordance and propagation in spatial relation to TEs were quantified for sources with good signal quality (signal-to-noise ratio > 2, explained signal > 60%).

RESULTS

ESI maxima correctly colocalized with a TE in 20 of 32 patients (62.5%) either at the onset or half-rising flank of at least one IED type per patient. ESI maxima showed propagation from the temporal pole to other temporal or extratemporal regions in 14 of 32 patients (44%), confirming propagation originating in the area of the TE. The findings from both inverse methods validated each other in 14 of 20 patients (70%), and sphenoidal electrodes exhibited the highest signal amplitudes in 17 of 23 patients (74%). The concordance of ESI with the TE predicted a seizure-free postsurgical outcome (Engel I vs. >I) with a diagnostic odds ratio of 2.1.

SIGNIFICANCE

Semiautomated ESI from LTM often successfully identifies the epileptogenicity of TEs and the IED onset zone within the area of the TEs. Additionally, it shows potential predictive power for postsurgical outcomes in these patients.

How to assess the accuracy of volume conduction models? A validation study with stereotactic EEG data

Introduction

Volume conduction models of the human head are used in various neuroscience fields, such as for source reconstruction in EEG and MEG, and for modeling the effects of brain stimulation. Numerous studies have quantified the accuracy and sensitivity of volume conduction models by analyzing the effects of the geometrical and electrical features of the head model, the sensor model, the source model, and the numerical method. Most studies are based on simulations as it is hard to obtain sufficiently detailed measurements to compare to models. The recording of stereotactic EEG during electric stimulation mapping provides an opportunity for such empirical validation.

Methods

In the study presented here, we used the potential distribution of volume-conducted artifacts that are due to cortical stimulation to evaluate the accuracy of finite element method (FEM) volume conduction models. We adopted a widely used strategy for numerical comparison, i.e., we fixed the geometrical description of the head model and the mathematical method to perform simulations, and we gradually altered the head models, by increasing the level of detail of the conductivity profile. We compared the simulated potentials at different levels of refinement with the measured potentials in three epilepsy patients.

Results

Our results show that increasing the level of detail of the volume conduction head model only marginally improves the accuracy of the simulated potentials when compared to in-vivo sEEG measurements. The mismatch between measured and simulated potentials is, throughout all patients and models, maximally 40 microvolts (i.e., 10% relative error) in 80% of the stimulation-recording combination pairs and it is modulated by the distance between recording and stimulating electrodes.

Discussion

Our study suggests that commonly used strategies used to validate volume conduction models based solely on simulations might give an overly optimistic idea about volume conduction model accuracy. We recommend more empirical validations to be performed to identify those factors in volume conduction models that have the highest impact on the accuracy of simulated potentials. We share the dataset to allow researchers to further investigate the mismatch between measurements and FEM models and to contribute to improving volume conduction models.

An in-vivo validation of ESI methods with focal sources

Electrophysiological source imaging (ESI) aims at reconstructing the precise origin of brain activity from measurements of the electric field on the scalp. Across laboratories/research centers/hospitals, ESI is performed with different methods, partly due to the ill-posedness of the underlying mathematical problem. However, it is difficult to find systematic comparisons involving a wide variety of methods. Further, existing comparisons rarely take into account the variability of the results with respect to the input parameters. Finally, comparisons are typically performed using either synthetic data, or in-vivo data where the ground-truth is only roughly known. We use an in-vivo high-density EEG dataset recorded during intracranial single pulse electrical stimulation, in which the true sources are substantially dipolar and their locations are precisely known. We compare ten different ESI methods, using their implementation in the MNE-Python package: MNE, dSPM, LORETA, sLORETA, eLORETA, LCMV beamformers, irMxNE, Gamma Map, SESAME and dipole fitting. We perform comparisons under multiple choices of input parameters, to assess the accuracy of the best reconstruction, as well as the impact of such parameters on the localization performance. Best reconstructions often fall within 1 cm from the true source, with most accurate methods hitting an average localization error of 1.2 cm and outperforming least accurate ones erring by 2.5 cm. As expected, dipolar and sparsity-promoting methods tend to outperform distributed methods. For several distributed methods, the best regularization parameter turned out to be the one in principle associated with low SNR, despite the high SNR of the available dataset. Depth weighting played no role for two out of the six methods implementing it. Sensitivity to input parameters varied widely between methods. While one would expect high variability being associated with low localization error at the best solution, this is not always the case, with some methods producing highly variable results and high localization error, and other methods producing stable results with low localization error. In particular, recent dipolar and sparsity-promoting methods provide significantly better results than older distributed methods. As we repeated the tests with "conventional" (32 channels) and dense (64, 128, 256 channels) EEG recordings, we observed little impact of the number of channels on localization accuracy; however, for distributed methods denser montages provide smaller spatial dispersion. Overall findings confirm that EEG is a reliable technique for localization of point sources and therefore reinforce the importance that ESI may have in the clinical context, especially when applied to identify the surgical target in potential candidates for epilepsy surgery.