Comorbidities of scars in China: a national study based on hospitalized cases

Epidemiological and clinical features of paediatric inpatients for scars: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To describe the epidemiological and clinical features of paediatric scar inpatients and then to facilitate therapeutic schedule for children with scars.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, data of patients admitted for scar treatment in 1064 tertiary hospitals from 2013 to 2018 were extracted through the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) database. Demographic and clinical features of children with scars were analysed statistically and highlighted compared with those of adults and the elderly scar cases.

RESULTS

In this study, 53,741 paediatric scar cases, accounting for 30.29% of all hospitalized for scar, were analysed. Compared to adults and the elderly, children with scars were mainly males (62.27% vs 50.98% vs 49.85%, P < 0.001) and were vulnerable to scalds (37.10%) and operative intervention (34.11%). Although the scalp/face/neck was the most common affected location, the proportion of scars involving upper limbs (27.88% vs 21.69% vs 7.28%, P < 0.001), lower limbs (15.14% vs 10.28% vs 6.56%, P < 0.001) and perineum (4.59% vs 3.13% vs 2.65%, P < 0.001) was higher in children than that in other two groups. Scar contracture was the most common complications in children (45.27%). Nearly 66% of paediatric scar cases received surgical treatment during hospitalization, among whom release of lesion was the most frequent operation (56.35%). The proportion of keloids was relatively lower in child cases than in other two groups (6.20% vs 14.48% vs 18.15%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the median LOS in child cases was 9 (5-15) days, slightly exceeding that in adult/elderly cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Scars were common inducing factors of hospitalization and contributed greatly to the disease burden of children. More attention should be paid to those who are males, burn survivors, or skin-injured at extremities and perineum to improve therapeutic strategies and prognoses for paediatric scar patients.

Influence of scar age, laser type and laser treatment intervals on adult burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The study aims to identify whether factors such as time to initiation of laser therapy following scar formation, type of laser used, laser treatment interval and presence of complications influence burn scar outcomes in adults, by meta-analysis of previous studies.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in May 2022 in seven databases to select studies on the effects of laser therapy in adult hypertrophic burn scars. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022347836).

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 491 patients. Laser therapy significantly improved overall VSS/POSAS, vascularity, pliability, pigmentation and scar height of burn scars. Vascularity improvement was greater when laser therapy was performed >12 months (-1.50 [95%CI = -2.58;-0.42], p = 0.01) compared to <12 months after injury (-0.39 [95%CI = -0.68; -0.10], p = 0.01), the same was true for scar height ((-1.36 [95%CI = -2.07; -0.66], p<0.001) vs (-0.56 [95%CI = -0.70; -0.42], p<0.001)). Pulse dye laser (-4.35 [95%CI = -6.83; -1.86], p<0.001) gave a greater reduction in VSS/POSAS scores compared to non-ablative (-1.52 [95%CI = -2.24; -0.83], p<0.001) and ablative lasers (-0.95 [95%CI = -1.31; -0.59], p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of laser therapy is influenced by the time lapse after injury, the type of laser used and the interval between laser treatments. Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies, suggesting the need to explore other factors that may affect scar outcomes.

Clinical status of hospitalized keloid cases from 2013 to 2018

OBJECTS

Keloids are intractable scar diseases and sometimes undergo hospitalization. This study aims to represent current status of keloid management in a national sample of hospitalized scar cases.

METHODS

Data of scar-diagnosed cases admitted in 1064 China's tertiary hospitals between 2013 and 2018, were obtained from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) database. Variables analyzed include sex, age, nationality, occupation, hospital department, accompanied symptoms at admission, surgical treatment, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost. The potential risk factors of keloid diagnosis among scar cases were preliminarily identified through the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and univariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

This study identified 177,586 scar cases including 21,777 keloid cases and 155,809 non-keloid scar cases. The prevalence of scars in the HQMS database was gradually decreased from 0.123% in 2013 to 0.075% in 2018. We found a preponderances of males (54.32%), adults (61.52%), Han nationality (93.38%), and students (17.35%) in scar cases, among whom keloid cases accounted for growing proportions increasing from 9.2% in 2013 to 15.1% in 2018. Comparing non-keloid scar cases, keloid cases consisted of more women (59.1% VS 43.8%), office staffs (13.08% VS 6.75%) and retirees (5.16% VS 2.65%), and less Zhuang (0.79% VS 1.40%) and Hui nationalities (0.76% VS 1.00%), and showed lower incidence of accompanied symptoms (4.51% VS 47.96%) and higher rate of receiving operations (57.96% VS 50.28%, P < 0.001). Both the LOS and cost per hospitalization were lower in keloid cases. Furthermore, the adult and older women, Han and Uyghur nationalities, office staffs and retirees, and admitted in otolaryngology and dermatology departments, were potential predictors of keloid diagnosis among hospitalized scar cases.

CONCLUSION

When viewed at the national level, keloid occupies an important part in scar management in Chinese tertiary hospitals. Demographic and clinical differences between keloids and other scars facilitate understanding and promoting of individualized anti-scar therapeutic strategies.