1
|
Zhu Z, Kong W, Lu Y, Shi Y, Gan L, Tang H, Wang H, Sun Y. Epidemiological and clinical features of paediatric inpatients for scars: A retrospective study. Burns 2023; 49:1719-1728. [PMID: 36918334 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the epidemiological and clinical features of paediatric scar inpatients and then to facilitate therapeutic schedule for children with scars. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, data of patients admitted for scar treatment in 1064 tertiary hospitals from 2013 to 2018 were extracted through the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) database. Demographic and clinical features of children with scars were analysed statistically and highlighted compared with those of adults and the elderly scar cases. RESULTS In this study, 53,741 paediatric scar cases, accounting for 30.29% of all hospitalized for scar, were analysed. Compared to adults and the elderly, children with scars were mainly males (62.27% vs 50.98% vs 49.85%, P < 0.001) and were vulnerable to scalds (37.10%) and operative intervention (34.11%). Although the scalp/face/neck was the most common affected location, the proportion of scars involving upper limbs (27.88% vs 21.69% vs 7.28%, P < 0.001), lower limbs (15.14% vs 10.28% vs 6.56%, P < 0.001) and perineum (4.59% vs 3.13% vs 2.65%, P < 0.001) was higher in children than that in other two groups. Scar contracture was the most common complications in children (45.27%). Nearly 66% of paediatric scar cases received surgical treatment during hospitalization, among whom release of lesion was the most frequent operation (56.35%). The proportion of keloids was relatively lower in child cases than in other two groups (6.20% vs 14.48% vs 18.15%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the median LOS in child cases was 9 (5-15) days, slightly exceeding that in adult/elderly cases. CONCLUSIONS Scars were common inducing factors of hospitalization and contributed greatly to the disease burden of children. More attention should be paid to those who are males, burn survivors, or skin-injured at extremities and perineum to improve therapeutic strategies and prognoses for paediatric scar patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Zhu
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China; Clinic of the 91681 troop of PLA, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weishi Kong
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Yahuan Lu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai 411 Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Shi
- China Standard Medical Information Research Centre, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lanxia Gan
- China Standard Medical Information Research Centre, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hongtai Tang
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| | - Haibo Wang
- Clinical Trial Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Centre for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma Y, Barnes SP, Chen YY, Moiemen NS, Lord JM, Sardeli AV. Influence of scar age, laser type and laser treatment intervals on adult burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292097. [PMID: 37756273 PMCID: PMC10529539 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The study aims to identify whether factors such as time to initiation of laser therapy following scar formation, type of laser used, laser treatment interval and presence of complications influence burn scar outcomes in adults, by meta-analysis of previous studies. METHODS A literature search was conducted in May 2022 in seven databases to select studies on the effects of laser therapy in adult hypertrophic burn scars. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022347836). RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 491 patients. Laser therapy significantly improved overall VSS/POSAS, vascularity, pliability, pigmentation and scar height of burn scars. Vascularity improvement was greater when laser therapy was performed >12 months (-1.50 [95%CI = -2.58;-0.42], p = 0.01) compared to <12 months after injury (-0.39 [95%CI = -0.68; -0.10], p = 0.01), the same was true for scar height ((-1.36 [95%CI = -2.07; -0.66], p<0.001) vs (-0.56 [95%CI = -0.70; -0.42], p<0.001)). Pulse dye laser (-4.35 [95%CI = -6.83; -1.86], p<0.001) gave a greater reduction in VSS/POSAS scores compared to non-ablative (-1.52 [95%CI = -2.24; -0.83], p<0.001) and ablative lasers (-0.95 [95%CI = -1.31; -0.59], p<0.001). CONCLUSION Efficacy of laser therapy is influenced by the time lapse after injury, the type of laser used and the interval between laser treatments. Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies, suggesting the need to explore other factors that may affect scar outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangmyung Ma
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Yung-Yi Chen
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Naiem S. Moiemen
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Scar Free Foundation Centre for Burns Research, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janet M. Lord
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Scar Free Foundation Centre for Burns Research, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda V. Sardeli
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu Z, Kong W, Wang H, Xiao Y, Shi Y, Gan L, Sun Y, Tang H, Xia Z. Clinical status of hospitalized keloid cases from 2013 to 2018. Burns 2021; 48:1874-1884. [PMID: 34980519 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTS Keloids are intractable scar diseases and sometimes undergo hospitalization. This study aims to represent current status of keloid management in a national sample of hospitalized scar cases. METHODS Data of scar-diagnosed cases admitted in 1064 China's tertiary hospitals between 2013 and 2018, were obtained from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) database. Variables analyzed include sex, age, nationality, occupation, hospital department, accompanied symptoms at admission, surgical treatment, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost. The potential risk factors of keloid diagnosis among scar cases were preliminarily identified through the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and univariate regression analyses. RESULTS This study identified 177,586 scar cases including 21,777 keloid cases and 155,809 non-keloid scar cases. The prevalence of scars in the HQMS database was gradually decreased from 0.123% in 2013 to 0.075% in 2018. We found a preponderances of males (54.32%), adults (61.52%), Han nationality (93.38%), and students (17.35%) in scar cases, among whom keloid cases accounted for growing proportions increasing from 9.2% in 2013 to 15.1% in 2018. Comparing non-keloid scar cases, keloid cases consisted of more women (59.1% VS 43.8%), office staffs (13.08% VS 6.75%) and retirees (5.16% VS 2.65%), and less Zhuang (0.79% VS 1.40%) and Hui nationalities (0.76% VS 1.00%), and showed lower incidence of accompanied symptoms (4.51% VS 47.96%) and higher rate of receiving operations (57.96% VS 50.28%, P < 0.001). Both the LOS and cost per hospitalization were lower in keloid cases. Furthermore, the adult and older women, Han and Uyghur nationalities, office staffs and retirees, and admitted in otolaryngology and dermatology departments, were potential predictors of keloid diagnosis among hospitalized scar cases. CONCLUSION When viewed at the national level, keloid occupies an important part in scar management in Chinese tertiary hospitals. Demographic and clinical differences between keloids and other scars facilitate understanding and promoting of individualized anti-scar therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Zhu
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Weishi Kong
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Haibo Wang
- Clinical Trial Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Centre for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongqiang Xiao
- Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The 970th Hospital of PLA, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Ying Shi
- China Standard Medical Information Research Center, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lanxia Gan
- China Standard Medical Information Research Center, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| | - Hongtai Tang
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhaofan Xia
- Department of Burn Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Burn Institute of PLA, Research Unit of key techniques for treatment of burns and combined burns and trauma injury, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|