Cigarette sidestream smoke delays nucleotide excision repair: inhibited accumulation of repair proteins at DNA lesions

What are the DNA lesions underlying formaldehyde toxicity?

Formaldehyde is a highly reactive organic compound. Humans can be exposed to exogenous sources of formaldehyde, but formaldehyde is also produced endogenously as a byproduct of cellular metabolism. Because formaldehyde can react with DNA, it is considered a major endogenous source of DNA damage. However, the nature of the lesions underlying formaldehyde toxicity in cells remains vastly unknown. Here, we review the current knowledge of the different types of nucleic acid lesions that are induced by formaldehyde and describe the repair pathways known to counteract formaldehyde toxicity. Taking this knowledge together, we discuss and speculate on the predominant lesions generated by formaldehyde, which underly its natural toxicity.

Protective role of electrophile-reactive glutathione for DNA damage repair inhibitory effect of dibromoacetonitrile

Dibromoacetonitrile (DBAN) is a disinfection byproduct (DBP) and linked with cancer in rodents, but the mechanism of its carcinogenicity has not been fully elucidated. We recently reported that DBAN induced inhibition of nucleotide excision repair (NER). In this study, we investigated if glutathione (GSH) is involved in the DBAN-induced inhibition of NER. Human keratinocytes HaCaT were pretreated with L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine (BSO) to deplete intracellular GSH. BSO treatment markedly potentiated the DBAN-induced NER inhibition as well as intracellular oxidation. The recruitment of NER proteins (transcription factor IIH, and xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G) to DNA damage sites was inhibited by DBAN, which was further exacerbated by BSO treatment. Our results suggest that intracellular GSH protects cells from DBAN-induced genotoxicity including inhibition of DNA damage repair.

Environmental exposures associated with elevated risk for autism spectrum disorder may augment the burden of deleterious de novo mutations among probands

Although the full aetiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is unknown, familial and twin studies demonstrate high heritability of 60-90%, indicating a predominant role of genetics in the development of the disorder. The genetic architecture of ASD consists of a complex array of rare and common variants of all classes of genetic variation usually acting additively to augment individual risk. The relative contribution of heredity in ASD persists despite selective pressures against the classic autistic phenotype; a phenomenon thought to be explained, in part, by the incidence of spontaneous (or de novo) mutations. Notably, environmental exposures attributed as salient risk factors for ASD may play a causal role in the emergence of deleterious de novo variations, with several ASD-associated agents having significant mutagenic potential. To explore this hypothesis, this review article assesses published epidemiological data with evidence derived from assays of mutagenicity, both in vivo and in vitro, to determine the likely role such agents may play in augmenting the genetic liability in ASD. Broadly, these exposures were observed to elicit genomic alterations through one or a combination of: (1) direct interaction with genetic material; (2) impaired DNA repair; or (3) oxidative DNA damage. However, the direct contribution of these factors to the ASD phenotype cannot be determined without further analysis. The development of comprehensive prospective birth cohorts in combination with genome sequencing is essential to forming a causal, mechanistic account of de novo mutations in ASD that links exposure, genotypic alterations, and phenotypic consequences.

Low extracellular pH inhibits nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the main pathway to repair bulky DNA damages including pyrimidine dimers, and the genetic dysregulation of NER associated proteins is well known to cause diseases such as cancer and neurological disorder. Other than the genetic defects, 'external factors' such as oxidative stress and environmental chemicals also affect NER. In this study, we examined the impact of extracellular pH on NER. We prepared the culture media, whose pH values are 8.4 (normal condition), 7.6, 6.6 and 6.2 under atmospheric CO₂ conditions. Human keratinocytes, HaCaT, slightly died after 48 h incubation in DMEM at pH 8.4, 7.6 and 6.6, while in pH 6.2 condition, marked cell death was induced. UV-induced pyrimidine dimers, pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs) and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), were effectively repaired at 60 min and 24 h, respectively, which were remarkably inhibited at pH 6.6 and 6.2. The associated repair molecule, TFIIH, was accumulated to the damaged sites 5 min after UVC irradiation in all pH conditions, but the release was delayed as the pH got lower. Furthermore, accumulation of XPG at 5 min was delayed at pH 6.2 and 6.6, and the release at 60 min was completely suppressed. At the low pH, the DNA synthesis at the gaps created by incision of oligonucleotides containing pyrimidine dimers was significantly delayed. In this study, we found that the low extracellular pH inhibited NER pathway. This might partially contribute to carcinogenesis in inflamed tissues, which exhibit acidic pH.

Cell line-dependent difference in glutathione levels affects the cigarette sidestream smoke-induced inhibition of nucleotide excision repair

We recently reported that cigarette sidestream smoke (CSS) induced inhibition of nucleotide excision repair (NER) and the cause was NER molecule degradation by aldehydes contained in CSS [Carcinogenesis39, 56-65, 2018; Mutat. Res.834, 42-50, 2018]. In this study, we examined the relationship between intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels and CSS-induced NER inhibition. CSS treatment decreased the intracellular GSH level in human keratinocytes HaCaT, in which the repair of pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs) after UVB irradiation was suppressed. We used l-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine (BSO) to artificially deplete intracellular GSH level. BSO treatment remarkably accelerated the CSS-induced NER inhibition. The NER inhibition by CSS was attributed to the delay of accumulation of NER molecules (TFIIH and XPG) to DNA damaged sites, which was further enhanced by BSO treatment. CSS degraded TFIIH, and BSO promoted it as expected. Formaldehyde (FA), a major constituent of CSS, showed similar intracellular GSH reduction and NER inhibition, and BSO promoted its inhibitory effect. Five cultured cell lines showed considerable variability in intrinsic GSH levels, and CSS-induced NER inhibitory effect was significantly correlated with the GSH levels. Chemicals like aldehydes are known to react not only with proteins but also with DNA, causing DNA lesions targeted by NER. Our results suggest that the tissues and cells with low intrinsic GSH levels are susceptible to treatment with CSS and electrophilic compounds like aldehydes through NER inhibition, thus leading to higher genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Formaldehyde inhibits UV-induced phosphorylation of histone H2AX

Formaldehyde (FA) is widely known to cause DNA damage. Recently, our study showed that FA can also inhibit a repair process of DNA damage, nucleotide excision repair (NER). DNA damage response (DDR) involving activation of phosphorylation pathways is important for the accuracy of the repair process, and the inhibition of the accurate repair would raise mutation rate, leading to cancer. We herein investigated whether FA influences phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), an intermediate player of DDR signaling pathways. Human keratinocytes HaCaT were treated with FA and then exposed to UV known to generate clear γ-H2AX signal. UV-induced γ-H2AX was inhibited by FA in a dose-dependent manner. The repair of pyrimidine dimers was inhibited by FA, while the recruitments of γ-H2AX-related proteins, Mre11 and 53BP1, to damaged sites were also delayed. Mre11, Nbs-1, H2AX and ATM were not degraded after treatment with FA as opposed to NER-related protein, TFIIH. On the other hand, FA inhibited phosphorylation of ATM which acts upstream of γ-H2AX. These results suggest that FA can affect the repair of DNA damage via inhibition of the phosphorylation pathways of H2AX.