Bayesian network meta-analysis of head-to-head trials for complete resolution of nail psoriasis

[Monoclonal antibodies for inflammatory, autoimmune and oncological skin diseases]

In 1997 rituximab, a genetically engineered chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting CD20 expressed on B cells was approved for treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Since then, pharmacological improvements combined with increased knowledge on the immunopathogenesis of diseases led to the development of specific mAb targeting different antigens (e.g., interleukins or transmembrane receptors). This approach reshaped the therapeutic methodology in many fields, including dermatology. Nowadays, the treatment of frequent and possibly impairing inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis or hidradenitis suppurativa have different mAbs approved for both adult and pediatric patients. This class of drugs often shows a more favorable outcome and a better safety profile than routine immunosuppressants, such as steroids and steroid-sparing substances. For many years mAbs also represented a pillar of oncological treatment for severe diseases such as malignant melanoma or Merkel cell carcinoma. This review summarizes the current knowledge on already approved and promising new mAbs for the treatment of inflammatory and oncological skin diseases.

Comparative efficacy of oral Janus kinase inhibitors and biologics in adult alopecia areata: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disorder that affects the hair follicles, resulting in patchy recurrent hair loss. A large body of evidence has demonstrated the favourable clinical response of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biologics, but a lack of comprehensive comparison among these therapies exists in the current literature. This study aimed to compare their efficacy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed including randomized trials that report the outcomes of the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT)50 and/or the mean change in SALT. These articles were pooled and a network meta-analysis (NAM) was conducted. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve estimates obtained for the mean change in SALT score, baricitinib_4 mg (0.7949656) had the best probability of being the most effective therapy, followed by ritlecitinib_200_50 mg (0.7391906) and ivarmacitinib_4 mg (0.7292594). In contrast, dupilumab, secukinumab, tralokinumab and apremilast were less likely to be effective. Targeting the JAK signalling pathway holds great potential for restoring hair regrowth, albeit the contribution of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2 inhibition to the therapeutic effect on AA is apparently different. Baricitinib_4 mg and ritlecitinib 200_50 mg demonstrated notable efficacy, and both molecules displayed a dose-dependent effect, which is not observed with ivarmacitinib. Further investigations into the specific mechanisms of action of these JAK inhibitors are warranted to elucidate the reasons behind these differences.

Comparative efficacy and therapeutic positioning of biologics in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of head-to-head comparative trials makes it difficult to determine the real value of each biological intervention. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy among biologics in treating moderate-to-severe HS throughout a network meta-analysis (NMA) and, to identify which pathogenetic pathways may be the most appropriate to target. Methods We comprehensively identified studies in 3 databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the efficacy of moderate-to-severe HS. Results The NMA comprised 13 studies comprising 14 interventions on 2,748 participants in the network. The NMA showed the odds of achieving the clinical response were significantly superior with adalimumab (RR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.06-0.63), adalimumab QW (RR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.87), MAB1p (RR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.03-3.12), secukinumab (RR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.47) and secukinumabQ2W (RR: 0.24, 95% CI = 0.1-0.46) compared to placebo. Conclusion Based on the NMA, inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a with adalimumab appears to be the best strategy, followed by the blockade of IL--17 with secukinumab. Data for bimekizumab and CJM112 are promising. Infliximab has inconsistent clinical response, and more data are necessary to confirm this molecule as a potential third-line therapy in HS. The blockade of IL-23 and CD5a pathways is not relevant, or at least the current evidence is insufficient to recommend further investigation of guselkumab, risankizumab, and vilobelimab in phase III trials.

Network meta-analyses comparing the efficacy of biologic treatments for achieving complete resolution of nail psoriasis at 24-28 and 48-52 weeks

BACKGROUND

Available network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis (NP) have not included recently approved biologics such as bimekizumab nor have they provided comparisons up to 1 year.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted two NMAs that update and extend results from a previous NMA comparing biologics for achieving complete resolution of NP.

METHODS

Bayesian NMAs were performed using a generalized linear model with a logit link to model the binary outcome of nail clearance at weeks 24-28 and 48-52.

RESULTS

For the NMA at weeks 24-28, which included seven biologics and placebo, the absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.4%; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 35.2-58.0), followed by brodalumab (37.1%; 95% CrI 17.1-62.2) and bimekizumab (30.3%; 95% CrI 12.7-53.9). For the NMA at weeks 48-52, which included six biologics, the absolute probability was highest for ixekizumab (77.2%; 95% CrI 51.1-93.4), followed by adalimumab (75.6%; 95% CrI 61.5-87.3) and brodalumab (71.9%; 95% CrI 38.4-93.2).

CONCLUSION

Among biologics included in these two NMAs, ixekizumab has the highest absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP. Results may help to inform treatment decisions for patients with NP.

Brodalumab in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis Localized in Difficult-to-Treat Areas: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a common chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory skin disease that in certain localization results difficult to treat. Psoriatic lesions in difficult-to-treat areas might be hardly managed as no standardized therapeutic approach and the application of topical treatments might have great limitations. Systemic agents, including biologic therapies, have been proven effective in treating this subgroup of patients. In particular, current evidence has shown beneficial effects with the use of brodalumab, a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody antagonizing the IL-17 receptor A subunit (IL-17RA).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this narrative review was to collect published data about efficacy and safety of brodalumab in the treatment of psoriasis occurring in difficult-to-treat areas.

METHODS

Data on brodalumab effectiveness and safety deriving from both trials and real-world setting that had been published in the last 15 years were collected for this review, together with clinical findings issued during international meetings.

RESULTS

In phase 3 trials, brodalumab demonstrated to be effective in promoting a rapid response in scalp psoriasis as well as in generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis. Nail psoriasis demonstrated marked clinical improvement after treatment with brodalumab. Amelioration of palmoplantar psoriasis was also described in brodalumab-treated patients. Various retrospective real-world studies reported a complete clearance of psoriatic lesions in difficult-to-treat areas, including genitalia, through short-term brodalumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Brodalumab, combining rapid and sustained efficacy with a favorable safety profile, may be a valid therapeutic option for severe variants of psoriasis as well as for psoriasis localized in difficult-to-treat areas.