1
|
Voronin BA, Tennyson J, Yurchenko SN, Chesnokova TY, Chentsov AV, Bykov AD, Makarova MV, Voronina SS, Cruz FC. The infrared absorption spectrum of radioactive water isotopologue H 215O. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA. PART A, MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY 2024; 311:124007. [PMID: 38354674 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2024.124007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
A room temperature line list for the H215O radioactive isotopologue of the water molecule is computed using the variational nuclear-motion DVR3D program suite and an empirical high-precision potential energy function. The line list consists of rotation-vibrational energies and Einstein-A coefficients, covering a wide spectral range from 0 to 25000 cm-1 and the total angular momenta J up to 30. Estimates of air-broadening coefficients are provided. Experimentally derived energies of H216O, H217O and H218O from the literature are used to provide improved energies for important states with uncertainty estimates for the H215O. A number of the wmost promising spectroscopic ranges for the detection of H215O are proposed. The calculated absorption spectrum should be useful for the study gaseous radioactive water at IR region, determining concentration, etc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris A Voronin
- Instituto de Fisica Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-859, Brazil; V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS, sq. Ak. Zuev 1, 643021 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Jonathan Tennyson
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Sergey N Yurchenko
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Tatyana Yu Chesnokova
- V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS, sq. Ak. Zuev 1, 643021 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Aleksei V Chentsov
- V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS, sq. Ak. Zuev 1, 643021 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Aleksandr D Bykov
- V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS, sq. Ak. Zuev 1, 643021 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Maria V Makarova
- Faculty of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Svetlana S Voronina
- V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics SB RAS, sq. Ak. Zuev 1, 643021 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Flávio C Cruz
- Instituto de Fisica Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-859, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peter N, Treyer V, Probst R, Kleinjung T. Auditory Cortical Plasticity in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness Before and After Cochlear Implantation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2024; 25:79-88. [PMID: 38253897 PMCID: PMC10907329 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00928-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated neuroplastic changes induced by postlingual single-sided deafness (SSD) and the effects of a cochlear implantation for the deaf ear. Neural processing of acoustic signals from the normal hearing ear to the brain was studied before and after implantation using a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scanner. METHODS Eight patients with postlingual SSD received a cochlear implant (CI) in a prospective clinical trial. Dynamic imaging was performed in a PET/CT scanner using radioactively labeled water ([15O]H2O) to localize changes in the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) with and without an auditory task of logatomes containing speech-like elements without meaningful context. The normal hearing ear was stimulated before implantation and after the use of the cochlear implant for at least 8 months (mean 13.5, range 8.1-26.6). Eight age- and gender-matched subjects with normal hearing on both sides served as healthy control subjects (HCS). RESULTS When the normal hearing ear of SSD patients was stimulated before CI implantation, the [15O]H2O-PET showed a more symmetrical rCBF in the auditory regions of both hemispheres in comparison to the HCS. The use of CI increased the asymmetry index (AI) in six of eight patients indicating an increase of activity of the contralateral hemisphere. Non-parametric statistics revealed a significant difference in the AI between patients before CI implantation and HCS (p < .01), which disappeared after CI implantation (p = .195). CONCLUSION The functional neuroimaging data showed a tendency towards normalization of neuronal activity after CI implantation, which supports the effectiveness of CI in SSD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01749592, December 13, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Peter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Valerie Treyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rudolf Probst
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kleinjung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pantaleo A, Murri A, Cavallaro G, Pontillo V, Auricchio D, Quaranta N. Single-Sided Deafness and Hearing Rehabilitation Modalities: Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices, Bone Conduction Devices, and Cochlear Implants. Brain Sci 2024; 14:99. [PMID: 38275519 PMCID: PMC10814000 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14010099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Single sided deafness (SSD) is characterized by significant sensorineural hearing loss, severe or profound, in only one ear. SSD adversely affects various aspects of auditory perception, including causing impairment in sound localization, difficulties with speech comprehension in noisy environments, and decreased spatial awareness, resulting in a significant decline in overall quality of life (QoL). Several treatment options are available for SSD, including cochlear implants (CI), contralateral routing of signal (CROS), and bone conduction devices (BCD). The lack of consensus on outcome domains and measurement tools complicates treatment comparisons and decision-making. This narrative overview aims to summarize the treatment options available for SSD in adult and pediatric populations, discussing their respective advantages and disadvantages. Rerouting devices (CROS and BCD) attenuate the effects of head shadow and improve sound awareness and signal-to-noise ratio in the affected ear; however, they cannot restore binaural hearing. CROS devices, being non-implantable, are the least invasive option. Cochlear implantation is the only strategy that can restore binaural hearing, delivering significant improvements in speech perception, spatial localization, tinnitus control, and overall QoL. Comprehensive preoperative counseling, including a discussion of alternative technologies, implications of no treatment, expectations, and auditory training, is critical to optimizing therapeutic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Pantaleo
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (A.P.); (A.M.); (V.P.); (D.A.)
| | - Alessandra Murri
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (A.P.); (A.M.); (V.P.); (D.A.)
| | - Giada Cavallaro
- Otolaryngology Unit, Madonna delle Grazie Hospital, 75100 Matera, Italy;
| | - Vito Pontillo
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (A.P.); (A.M.); (V.P.); (D.A.)
| | - Debora Auricchio
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (A.P.); (A.M.); (V.P.); (D.A.)
| | - Nicola Quaranta
- Otolaryngology Unit, Department of BMS, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (A.P.); (A.M.); (V.P.); (D.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ullah MN, Cevallos A, Shen S, Carver C, Dunham R, Marsiglia D, Yeagle J, Della Santina CC, Bowditch S, Sun DQ. Cochlear implantation in unilateral hearing loss: impact of short- to medium-term auditory deprivation. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1247269. [PMID: 37877013 PMCID: PMC10591100 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1247269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Single sided deafness (SSD) results in profound cortical reorganization that presents clinically with a significant impact on sound localization and speech comprehension. Cochlear implantation (CI) has been approved for two manufacturers' devices in the United States to restore bilateral function in SSD patients with up to 10 years of auditory deprivation. However, there is great variability in auditory performance and it remains unclear how auditory deprivation affects CI benefits within this 10-year window. This prospective study explores how measured auditory performance relates to real-world experience and device use in a cohort of SSD-CI subjects who have between 0 and 10 years of auditory deprivation. Methods Subjects were assessed before implantation and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-CI activation via Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition and Arizona Biomedical Institute (AzBio) sentence recognition in varying spatial speech and noise presentations that simulate head shadow, squelch, and summation effects (S0N0, SSSDNNH, SNHNSSD; 0 = front, SSD = impacted ear, NH = normal hearing ear). Patient-centered assessments were performed using Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ), and Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3). Device use data was acquired from manufacturer software. Further subgroup analysis was performed on data stratified by <5 years and 5-10 years duration of deafness. Results In the SSD ear, median (IQR) CNC word scores pre-implant and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-implant were 0% (0-0%), 24% (8-44%), 28% (4-44%), and 18% (7-33%), respectively. At 6 months post-activation, AzBio scores in S0N0 and SSSDNNH configurations (n = 25) demonstrated statistically significant increases in performance by 5% (p = 0.03) and 20% (p = 0.005), respectively. The median HUI3 score was 0.56 pre-implant, lower than scores for common conditions such as anxiety (0.68) and diabetes (0.77), and comparable to stroke (0.58). Scores improved to 0.83 (0.71-0.91) by 3 months post-activation. These audiologic and subjective benefits were observed even in patients with longer durations of deafness. Discussion By merging CI-associated changes in objective and patient-centered measures of auditory function, our findings implicate central mechanisms of auditory compensation and adaptation critical in auditory performance after SSD-CI and quantify the extent to which they affect the real-world experience reported by individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed N. Ullah
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ashley Cevallos
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sarek Shen
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Courtney Carver
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Rachel Dunham
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Dawn Marsiglia
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jennifer Yeagle
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Charles C. Della Santina
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Steve Bowditch
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Daniel Q. Sun
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|