Disrupted brain gray matter connectome in social anxiety disorder: a novel individualized structural covariance network analysis

Alterations in cortical thickness of frontoparietal regions in patients with social anxiety disorder

Although functional changes of the frontal and (para)limbic area for emotional hyper-reactivity and emotional dysregulation are well documented in social anxiety disorder (SAD), prior studies on structural changes have shown mixed results. This study aimed to identify differences in cortical thickness between SAD and healthy controls (CON). Thirty-five patients with SAD and forty-two matched CON underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging. A vertex-based whole brain and regional analyses were conducted for between-group comparison. The whole-brain analysis revealed increased cortical thickness in the left insula, left superior parietal lobule, left superior temporal gyrus, and left frontopolar cortex in patients with SAD compared to CON, as well as decreased thickness in the left superior/middle frontal gyrus and left fusiform gyrus in patients (after multiple-correction). The results from the ROI analysis did not align with these findings at the statistically significant level after multiple corrections. Changes in cortical thickness were not correlated with social anxiety symptoms. While consistent results were not obtained from different analysis methods, the results from the whole-brain analysis suggest that patients with SAD exhibit distinct neural deficits in areas involved in salience, attention, and socioemotional processing.

Toward individualized connectomes of brain morphology

The morphological brain connectome (MBC) delineates the coordinated patterns of local morphological features (such as cortical thickness) across brain regions. While classically constructed using population-based approaches, there is a growing trend toward individualized modeling. Currently, the methods for individualized MBCs are varied, posing challenges for method selection and cross-study comparisons. Here, we summarize how individualized MBCs are modeled through low-order methods (correlation-, divergence-, distance-, and deviation-based methods) describing relations in brain morphology, as well as high-order methods capturing similarities in these low-order relations. We discuss the merits and limitations of different methods, examining them in the context of robustness, reproducibility, and reliability. We highlight the importance of elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the individualized connectome, and establishing normative benchmarks to assess individual variation in development, aging, and neuropsychiatric disorders.