Gram-negative Bacteria With Difficult-to-Treat Resistance: A Moving Target

Membrane-targeting, ultrashort lipopeptide acts as an antibiotic adjuvant and sensitizes MDR gram-negative pathogens toward narrow-spectrum antibiotics

Globally, infections due to multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) pathogens are on the rise, negatively impacting morbidity and mortality, necessitating urgent treatment alternatives. Herein, we report a detailed bio-evaluation of an ultrashort, cationic lipopeptide 'SVAP9I' that demonstrated potent antibiotic activity and acted as an adjuvant to potentiate existing antibiotic classes towards GNBs. Newly synthesized lipopeptides were screened against ESKAPE pathogens and cytotoxicity assays were performed to evaluate the selectivity index (SI). SVAP9I exhibited broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against critical MDR-GNB pathogens including members of Enterobacteriaceae (MIC 4-8 mg/L), with a favorable CC50 value of ≥100 mg/L and no detectable resistance even after 50th serial passage. It demonstrated fast concentration-dependent bactericidal action as determined via time-kill analysis and also retained full potency against polymyxin B-resistant E. coli, indicating distinct mode of action. SVAP9I targeted E. coli's outer and inner membranes by binding to LPS and phospholipids such as cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol. Membrane damage resulted in ROS generation, depleted intracellular ATP concentration and a concomitant increase in extracellular ATP. Checkerboard assays showed SVAP9I's synergism with narrow-spectrum antibiotics like vancomycin, fusidic acid and rifampicin, potentiating their efficacy against MDR-GNB pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), a WHO critical priority pathogen. In a murine neutropenic thigh infection model, SVAP9I and rifampicin synergized to express excellent antibacterial efficacy against MDR-CRAB outcompeting polymyxin B. Taken together, SVAP9I's distinct membrane-targeting broad-spectrum action, lack of resistance and strong in vitro andin vivopotency in synergism with narrow spectrum antibiotics like rifampicin suggests its potential as a novel antibiotic adjuvant for the treatment of serious MDR-GNB infections.

The prevalence of gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance and utilization of novel β-lactam antibiotics in the southeastern United States

Objective

To evaluate temporal trends in the prevalence of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) in the southeastern United States. Secondary objective was to examine the use of novel β-lactams for GNB with DTR by both antimicrobial use (AU) and a novel metric of adjusted AU by microbiological burden (am-AU).

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, cohort.

Setting

Ten hospitals in the southeastern United States.

Methods

GNB with DTR including Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. from 2015 to 2020 were tracked at each institution. Cumulative AU of novel β-lactams including ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and cefiderocol in days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days was calculated. Linear regression was utilized to examine temporal trends in the prevalence of GNB with DTR and cumulative AU of novel β-lactams.

Results

The overall prevalence of GNB with DTR was 0.85% (1,223/143,638) with numerical increase from 0.77% to 1.00% between 2015 and 2020 (P = .06). There was a statistically significant increase in DTR Enterobacterales (0.11% to 0.28%, P = .023) and DTR Acinetobacter spp. (4.2% to 18.8%, P = .002). Cumulative AU of novel β-lactams was 1.91 ± 1.95 DOT per 1,000 patient-days. When comparing cumulative mean AU and am-AU, there was an increase from 1.91 to 2.36 DOT/1,000 patient-days, with more than half of the hospitals shifting in ranking after adjustment for microbiological burden.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of GNB with DTR and the use of novel β-lactams remain low. However, the uptrend in the use of novel β-lactams after adjusting for microbiological burden suggests a higher utilization relative to the prevalence of GNB with DTR.

Efficacy and safety of novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam results from randomized controlled trials

Background

Gram-negative bacteria is a global public health problem. Treatment options include novel beta-lactamase inhibitors.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to collect information on the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL).

Methods

In order to comprehensively evaluate the clinical, microbiological, and adverse events outcomes, a meta-analysis was conducted on clinical trials comparing novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with existing comparator therapies.

Results

Four studies comprising 948 patients were included in the analysis. IMI/REL therapy demonstrated similar clinical responses to comparators across various treatment visits, including discontinuation of intravenously administered therapy visits [DCIV, RR = 1.00 (0.88, 1.12)], early follow-up visits [EFU, RR = 1.00 (0.89, 1.14)], late follow-up visits [LFU, RR = 1.00 (0.88, 1.13)]. Moreover, no significant difference in the microbiologic response of MITT patients was observed between IMI/REL and comparators across DCIV [RR = 0.99 (0.89, 1.11)], EFU [RR = 1.01 (0.95, 1.07)], and LFU visits [RR = 1.00 (90.94, 1.07)]. In terms of safety, therapy with IMI/REL and comparators exhibited similar risks of at least one adverse event (AE), drug-related AEs, and discontinuation due to AEs. The incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) was significantly lower in the IMI/REL group compared to the comparison groups. The predominant AEs were gastrointestinal disorders, with no significant difference observed between the IMI/REL group and comparators.

Conclusion

The clinical and microbiologic response to IMI/REL in the treatment of bacterial infection was comparable to that of the comparator. Furthermore, the incidence of AEs and the tolerability of IMI/REL were similar among the comparators. Based on these findings, IMI/REL can be considered as a viable alternative treatment option.

Difficult-to-treat resistant gram-negative blood stream infections - the beginning of a superbug era - a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacterial infections are a growing concern worldwide. However, India is already in the era of a shortage of effective antibiotics for the management of these infections. Moreover, Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR) gram-negative infections, which are not much studied, further complicate the scenario. This study emphasized the incidence and outcomes of DTR infections.

METHODOLOGY

This is a single-center prospective observational study. The study included hospitalised patients aged ≥18 years with gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI). Blood cultures with the growth of contaminants and/or single positive culture taken from the femoral site were excluded. Incidences of DTR infections and outcomes in the form of 30-day mortality were analysed.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty patients with GNBSI episodes were recorded. The Incidence of DTR GNBSI was 37.9% (91/240). Multivariate analysis found that Hospital-acquired infections, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for DTR GNBSI. The most common DTR GNB isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae (31/49, 63.3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (26/52, 50%). The adjusted relative risk of mortality was remarkably high in DTR GNBSI (aRR 3.9; 95% CI 1.9-7.9) as compared to CR+/DTR- GNBSI (aRR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-1.0) and ESCR/CS GNBSI (aRR 1.1; 95% CI 0.5-2.4).

CONCLUSION

DTR GNB infections are growing concern in India and this need to be evaluated in multicentric studies. Moreover, DTR GNBSI was associated with significantly higher mortality and there is need of further empowerment of antibiotic stewardship practices.

Eravacycline infusion–related hypoesthesia: A case report

Disclaimer

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose

Eravacycline (ERV) is often used for drug-resistant gram-negative and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections, but infusion site reactions are a potential adverse effect. We report a case of severe hypoesthesia secondary to ERV infusion.

Summary

A 74-year-old man presented with dyspnea, shortness of breath, and hemoptysis after being treated for community-acquired pneumonia. On the basis of respiratory cultures performed several weeks before the index hospitalization, he was diagnosed with Mycobacterium chelonae pneumonia. On hospital day (HD) 2, the infectious diseases consult team, guided by susceptibilities, initiated a regimen of azithromycin, levofloxacin, and ERV 80 mg (1 mg/kg) intravenously every 12 hours infused over 1 hour in 250 mL of normal saline. Approximately 25 minutes after the ERV infusion began, the patient reported tingling and numbness in his fingers, hands, and mouth, with shooting pain in his head. Symptoms resolved with cessation of the ERV infusion. On HD 3, the same ERV dose and volume was administered with an extended infusion time of 2 hours. The patient experienced the same reaction after 58 minutes, which ceased shortly after the infusion was stopped. Use of ERV was subsequently discontinued. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale score was 9, indicating a definite reaction. A review of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System through March 2021 identified 22 ERV-associated events. Among these, 18% appear to be related to ERV infusions. Published results from phase 3 clinical trials did not document any hypoesthesia. It is unknown whether there is a correlation between concentration, dose, or infusion time and associated reactions.

Conclusion

This is a unique case of severe hypoesthesia secondary to ERV infusion leading to drug discontinuation. More data are needed to determine effective mitigation strategies.