Dabigatran and the Risk of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Sinensetin interferes with Staphylococcus aureus infections by targeting staphylocoagulase and improves infection survival rates in mouse model of pneumonia

AIMS

Coagulase (Coa), a crucial virulence factor of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), is considered a vital target for anti-virulence strategies. The research aimed to discover a natural compound capable of inhibiting S. aureus infection by targeting the virulence factor Coa.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study showed that sinensetin at a concentration of 128 μg mL-1 effectively inhibited both Coa-induced coagulation and biofilm formation in S. aureus. However, western blot results indicated that sinensetin did not impact the expression of Coa protein, suggesting that sinensetin may directly target Coa to counteract the virulence of S. aureus. Thermal shift assay results demonstrated that sinensetin enhanced the thermal stability of Coa, supporting the theory of direct binding. Molecular docking and point mutation experiments identified two key binding sites for sinensetin to Coa as R73A-Coa and R204A-Coa. In vivo studies on mice revealed that sinensetin not only reduced lung tissue damage caused by S. aureus infection, but also decreased inflammatory factors in the lung lavage fluid. Furthermore, combining sinensetin with oxacillin improved the survival rates of the Galleria mellonella and mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinensetin is a promising natural compound that acts as a direct inhibitor of Coa against S. aureus infections.

Exposure to Non-Antimicrobial Drugs and Risk of Infection with Antibiotic-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has consistently been linked to antibiotic use. However, the roles of commonly prescribed non-antimicrobial drugs as drivers of AMR may be under-appreciated. Here, we studied a cohort of patients with community-acquired pyelonephritis and assessed the association of exposure to non-antimicrobial drugs at the time of hospital admission with infection with drug-resistant organisms (DRO). Associations identified on bivariate analyses were tested using a treatment effects estimator that models both outcome and treatment probability. Exposure to proton-pump inhibitors, beta-blockers, and antimetabolites was significantly associated with multiple resistance phenotypes. Clopidogrel, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and anti-Xa agents were associated with single-drug resistance phenotypes. Antibiotic exposure and indwelling urinary catheters were covariates associated with AMR. Exposure to non-antimicrobial drugs significantly increased the probability of AMR in patients with no other risk factors for resistance. Non-antimicrobial drugs may affect the risk of infection with DRO through multiple mechanisms. If corroborated using additional datasets, these findings offer novel directions for predicting and mitigating AMR.

Propensity-matched analysis of the protective effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on the risk of developing Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

OBJECTIVE

Recent data indicate that ticagrelor, used in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus sp. and other effects that may help management of infection. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of ticagrelor in patients who have had an ACS event and the risk of developing Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) compared to a propensity-matched cohort receiving clopidogrel.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, nationwide analysis of all patients presenting to any percutaneous coronary intervention-performing Veterans Affairs Medical Center with an ACS episode and resultant prescription for clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The primary outcome was the comparative rate of SAB in patients receiving ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel.

RESULTS

Analysis involved 24 456 patients on ticagrelor and 277 277 patients on clopidogrel. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing SAB between the propensity-matched groups (32 [0.13%] of 24 456 for ticagrelor vs. 71 [0.29%] of 24 456 for clopidogrel; odds ratio (OR), 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.65; P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that receipt of clopidogrel, comorbid dermatologic condition, comorbid hematologic condition, and baseline anemia were independently associated with the development of SAB.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings align with recent reports that ticagrelor may have a beneficial role in the prevention of SAB.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia treatment outcomes in patients receiving ticagrelor vs a propensity-matched cohort receiving clopidogrel

OBJECTIVES

Ticagrelor may improve the outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). However, treatment outcome data for these patients remain limited. The primary objective of this study was to characterize the outcomes of patients with SAB who received ticagrelor compared with a cohort who received clopidogrel.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, nationwide propensity-matched analysis of patients with SAB who were prescribed ticagrelor or clopidogrel concomitantly with antistaphylococcal therapy. The primary outcome was the comparative all-cause 30-day mortality rate between propensity-matched groups.

RESULTS

In total, 1509 patients were prescribed concomitantly with ticagrelor or clopidogrel during treatment of S. aureus bacteraemia; of these, 194 patients were excluded from this study due to an inadequate number of antiplatelet doses within the first week of therapy (n=171) or non-admission to hospital (n=23). Of the remaining 1315 patients, 74 patients received ticagrelor and 1241 patients received clopidogrel. There was no significant difference in all-cause 30-day mortality between the groups [6/74 (8.1%) in the ticagrelor group vs 10/74 (13.5%) in the clopidogrel group; P=0.29]. Multi-variate logistic regression demonstrated that elevated aspartate aminotransferase, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, elevated serum creatinine and neurological comorbidity were independently associated with all-cause 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no difference in all-cause 30-day mortality between the two groups, although overall mortality appeared to be lower compared with other reports. Randomized controlled trials of P2Y12 inhibitors as adjunctive agents to antibiotic therapy for the treatment of serious S. aureus infections are warranted.

Native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device-related infective endocarditis: A review and update on current innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening microbial infection of native and prosthetic heart valves, endocardial surface, and/or indwelling cardiac device. Prevalence of IE is increasing and mortality has not significantly improved despite technological advances. This review provides an updated overview using recent literature on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, imaging, causative pathogens, treatment, and outcomes in native valve, prosthetic valve, and cardiac device-related IE. In addition, the experimental approaches used in IE research to improve the understanding of disease mechanisms and the current diagnostic pipelines are discussed, as well as potential innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This will ultimately help towards deriving better diagnostic tools and treatments to improve IE patient outcomes.

Effect of anticoagulant and platelet inhibition on the risk of bacteremia among patients with acute pyelonephritis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

An increasing number of patients are being prescribed anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors (antithrombotic treatment). Basic research has suggested an association between antithrombotic treatment and bacteremia during kidney infection. Here, we investigated the association between antithrombotic treatment, bacteremia and acute kidney injury in patients with acute pyelonephritis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a large university hospital in Sweden. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records for adult patients with acute pyelonephritis in 2016. The main outcome was bacteremia and secondary outcome acute kidney injury. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated through multiple logistic regression. Treatment with different groups of antithrombotic agents were compared to no antithrombotic treatment.

Results

1814 patients with acute pyelonephritis were included, in whom bacteremia developed in 336 (18.5%). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) at prophylactic doses was associated with a lower risk of bacteremia, compared to no antithrombotic treatment (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–0.7). Other antithrombotic treatments were not associated with a risk of bacteremia. Additionally, patients with prophylactic doses of LMWH had a lower risk of acute kidney injury (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3–0.8).

Conclusions

We found no association between antithrombotic treatment and an increased risk of bacteremia during acute pyelonephritis. Conversely, patients with prophylactic doses of LMWH had a slightly reduced risk of bacteremia. LMWH at prophylactic doses was also associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury. Our results suggest that it is safe to continue antithrombotic treatment during acute pyelonephritis, in regards to bacteremia and acute kidney injury risk.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07474-4.

Bloodstream Infection and Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

In a large cohort of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABSI), we aimed to analyze the incidence and risk factors for infective endocarditis (IE) among patients with active cancer (PAC) in comparison with those without cancer (PWC).

METHODS

Multicenter cohort study of patients with SABSI admitted to two tertiary care hospitals, from 2011 to 2019. PAC were defined as those with an active solid organ cancer or hematological malignancies. SABSI and S. aureus IE were compared between PAC and PWC.

RESULTS

Among 978 episodes of SABSI, 217 (22.2%) occurred in PAC. PAC were younger, had fewer comorbidities, carried cardiac devices less often, and had less community-acquired SABSI than PWC. Compared to PWC, PAC more frequently had catheter-related SABSI, less IE (2.8% vs 10.9%, p < 0.001) and osteoarticular infection (2.3% vs 14.3%, p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for IE were cardiopathy (aOR 4.392, 95% CI 2.719-7.094) and persistent bacteremia (aOR 3.545, 95% CI 2.159-5.820). Thirty-day mortality was high, and similar between groups (24.2% vs 25.5%, p = 0.282).

CONCLUSIONS

PAC with SABSI developed IE less frequently than PWC did. This finding seems related to the differences in baseline characteristics and may have significant clinical implications, such as transesophageal echocardiography in PAC without cardiopathy or persistent bacteremia.

Anti-biofilm Approach in Infective Endocarditis Exposes New Treatment Strategies for Improved Outcome

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infective disease with increasing incidence worldwide. From early on, in the antibiotic era, it was recognized that high-dose and long-term antibiotic therapy was correlated to improved outcome. In addition, for several of the common microbial IE etiologies, the use of combination antibiotic therapy further improves outcome. IE vegetations on affected heart valves from patients and experimental animal models resemble biofilm infections. Besides the recalcitrant nature of IE, the microorganisms often present in an aggregated form, and gradients of bacterial activity in the vegetations can be observed. Even after appropriate antibiotic therapy, such microbial formations can often be identified in surgically removed, infected heart valves. Therefore, persistent or recurrent cases of IE, after apparent initial infection control, can be related to biofilm formation in the heart valve vegetations. On this background, the present review will describe potentially novel non-antibiotic, antimicrobial approaches in IE, with special focus on anti-thrombotic strategies and hyperbaric oxygen therapy targeting the biofilm formation of the infected heart valves caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The format is translational from preclinical models to actual clinical treatment strategies.

Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, and the all-cause mortality of dabigatran with those of the control group by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Wanfang database, Clinical trial, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Chinese Scientific Journal database (VIP), and Chinese Biological Medicine database (CBM), for clinical trials on conventional treatments compared with dabigatran, published between January 2014 and July 2020. The reported outcomes, including the endpoints of primary safety, were systematically investigated.

Results: Seven RCTs (n = 10,743) were included in the present systematic review. Compared to the control groups, dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.21, p = 0.06), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.36, p = 0.41), fatal adverse reactions (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.17, p = 0.66), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.11, p = 0.45, I² = 0%), and significantly reduced risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42, p = 0.0007). However, dabigatran is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.13, p = 0.05).

Conclusion: Dabigatran has a favorable safety profile in terms of major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and life-threatening events, among other safety outcomes. The present study suggested that dabigatran may be a suitable alternative to VKAs as an oral anticoagulant. However, more data are necessary to clarify the incidence of other adverse events and serious adverse reactions.