Prognostic Risk Factors of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients: A 7-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infection (CRGNB-BSI) has gradually become a major threat worldwide due to its treatment difficulty and high mortality. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for CRGNB-BSI in immunosuppressed patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 427 immunosuppressed patients with CRGNB-BSI were retrospectively investigated from 2015 to 2021. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to evaluate independent risk factors for CRGNB-BSI.

Results

The most common etiology was Klebsiella Pneumoniae (50.59%; 216/427), while the Acinetobacillus baumannii infection was associated with the highest mortality (58.25%) among all etiologies. The 60-day mortality of immunosuppressed patients with CRGNB-BSI was 52.48% (224/427). Procalcitonin (PCT) > 0.5 μg/L (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.28-4.19, P = 0.005) and age > 55 years (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.17-3.64, P = 0.012) were found to be predictors of 60-day mortality of CRGNB-BSI, and tigecycline regimen (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.81-5.67, P < 0.001) was associated with higher mortality. Multivariate analysis also revealed that patients who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.11-4.30, P = 0.023), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.10-9.16, P = 0.032), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (OR = 12.11, 95% CI: 2.61-56.19, P = 0.001), and septic shock (OR = 3.24, 95% CI: 1.77-5.94, P < 0.001) showed worse outcomes. The risk factors were also significantly associated with mortality in the different subgroups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that PCT > 0.5 μg/L, age > 55 years, and the tigecycline regimen were significantly associated with higher 60-day mortality among immunosuppressed patients with CRGNB- BSI. Patients developing MODS, septic shock, or AKI had worse clinical outcomes. .

Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline: A Systematic Review

Although tigecycline is widely used in clinical practice, its efficiency and optimal dosage regimens remain controversial. The purpose of this article was to help guide tigecycline dosing in different patient subpopulations through comparing the published population pharmacokinetic models of tigecycline, as well as summarizing and determining the potential covariates that markedly influence tigecycline pharmacokinetics. In this review, literature was systematically searched from the PubMed database from inception to March 2022. The articles focusing on population pharmacokinetics for tigecycline in healthy volunteers or patients were included; finally, a total of eight studies were included in this review. NONMEM methods were used in five studies to generate the population pharmacokinetic models. Tigecycline pharmacokinetics were mostly described by a two-compartment model in these included studies. Estimated clearance and volumes of distribution of tigecycline at steady state (Vss) varied widely in different target patient populations, with a range of 7.5–23.1 L/h and 212.7–1087.7 L, respectively. Body-weight and creatinine clearance were the most important predictors of clearance in these studies, while other predictors include age, gender, bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase. In conclusion, this review showed the large variability of tigecycline population pharmacokinetics, which can provide guide dosing in different target populations. For clinicians, the individual dosing adjustment should be based not only on the indication and pathogen susceptibility but also on the potential important predictors. However, more studies were needed to confirm the necessity of modified dosage regimens in different patient subpopulations.

[Off label uses of tigecycline]

INTRODUCTION

Tigecycline is a relatively new antibiotic that have very limited valid indications. When no other alternative is available, this drug is widely used off label with promising results. The objective of this study is to summarize the different off label uses of tigecycline so that we can decide when and how to prescribe it in the absence of guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study a revue of the literature collecting all the articles concerning the off label uses of tigecycline.

RESULTS

Tigecycline was widely prescribed, off label, to treat infections with controversial results. Randomised clinical trials were conducted to evaluate its use to treat pneumonia. The results for this indication have a respectable level of evidence. For the other indications, the data collected was insufficient to support tigecycline prescription. In fact, different protocols were used which makes it hard to evaluate the efficacy and to conclude to the best treatment regimen. A tendency to prescribe high doses of the molecule was noted in different studies. When prescribed off label, tigecycline prescriptions were associated with a higher mortality and incidence of side effects.

CONCLUSION

The tigecycline remains a valid option for the treatment of infections dues to multi-resistant bacteria especially when other alternatives are scarce or in cases of renal failure.

Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins 'intermediate' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.

Evaluation of the ratio of the estimated area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (estimated AUIC) as a predictor of the outcome for tigecycline treatment for pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant bacteria in an intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

Based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tigecycline (TGC), dose increases have been advocated to maximize the efficacy against pneumonia that is suspected to be due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in an intensive care unit. This practice-based study explored the relationship between the predicted PK parameter, the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to the 24 h of dosing/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC_0-24/MIC or AUIC), and the clinical and microbiological outcomes in critically ill patients with pneumonia due to MDR bacteria.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of the treatment of pneumonia due to MDR bacteria in an intensive care unit. The study patients were recruited and assigned to either TGC standard dose (SD, 50 mg q12 h) or high dose (HD, 100 mg q12 h) for the treatment of pneumonia due to MDR bacteria depending on the doctors' decisions. The relationships between the PK/PD parameters and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 105 patients were included in the study. Whereas C1/2, Cmin, MIC and AUC were dramatically higher in the HD group than in the SD group (all P < 0.05), the Cmax and AUIC had no difference in both groups (all P > 0.05). The patients in the HD group had a higher clinical cure rate than those in the SD group (P = 0.029), but the bacterial eradication rate and survival rate of the patients in the HD group were not better than those in SD group (P = 0.279 and 0.416, respectively). The Cmax, C1/2, Cmin and AUC in the cured group were higher than those in failure group (all P < 0.05). The MICs were dramatically higher in the failure group than those in cure group (P = 0.0001), which led to significantly lower AUICs (P = 0.0001). In the ROC analysis, the areas of Cmax, C1/2, Cmin, AUC, negative-MIC and AUIC under the ROC curve were 0.64, 0.69, 0.67, 0.66, 0.73 and 0.82, respectively. The sensitivity was ascertained to be 75% and the specificity was 89% when the AUIC cut-off value was considered to be 10.12. Moreover, the sensitivity was ascertained to be 63% and the specificity was 80% when the MIC cut-off value was considered to be 1.75 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUIC and MIC are associated with tigecycline treatment outcomes in pneumonia due to MDR bacteria, and aiming to achieve an individualized AUIC ≥ 10.12 when MIC < 1.75 mg/L could improve outcomes.

Adverse events of high-dose tigecycline in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant pathogens

The off-label uses of tigecycline (TGC) to treat ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) have aroused worldwide concerns. The efficacy about TGC has been recently reported. However, the adverse events (AEs) remain controversial. Our study aims to analyze the safety of the high-dose (HD) regimens in the treatment of VAP due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.The clinical data of 134 patients who were diagnosed with VAP from January 2013 to December 2015 in the NeuroScience Care Unit (NCU) were analyzed retrospectively. The incidence and the occurrence time of AEs, 28-day mortality, and the factors of clinical effectiveness were explored.A total of 54 patients received the standard dose group (SD), 69 in the HD, and 11 in the nonstandard HD group (NHD). Acinetobacter baumannii were the main pathogenic bacteria. There was no statistic difference in the incidence of AEs and the 28-day mortality among the 3 groups (P > .05). Total bilirubin (TBIL) increased significantly after SD of TGC treatment (P = .004). Liver dysfunction occurred the latest (10.83 ± 7.08), not in the duration of HD group (9.63 ± 3.92), whereas in the SD group (13.00 ± 7.57) and NHD group (12.64 ± 3.70). Patients with septic shock, MODS, and higher APACHE II score were of high risk in mortality. The HD group was associated with higher clinical effective rate and bacteria clearance rate.HD TGC was relatively safe and tolerable in ICU patients. The risk of side effects was related to the TGC duration, although not increased as the dosage rose. Full course of the HD regimen was associated with better outcomes for the treatment of VAP patients, especially for the MDR gram-negative bacilli infection. Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment might lead to clinical treatment failure.

Population Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Tigecycline in Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock

Tigecycline is a glycylcycline often used in critically ill patients as the antibiotic of last resort. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of tigecycline in intensive care unit (ICU) patients can be affected by severe pathophysiological changes so that standard dosing might not be adequate. The aim of this study was to describe population PK of high-dose tigecycline in patients with sepsis or septic shock and evaluate the relationship between individual PK parameters and patient covariates. The study population consisted of 37 adult ICU patients receiving a 200-mg loading dose of tigecycline followed by multiple doses of 100 mg every 12 h. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after dose administration. A two-compartment model with interindividual (IIV) and interoccasion (IOV) variability in PK parameters was used to describe the concentration-time course of tigecycline. The estimated values of mean population PK parameters were 22.1 liters/h and 69.4 liters/h for elimination and intercompartmental clearance, respectively, and 162 liters and 87.9 liters for volume of the central and peripheral compartment, respectively. The IIV and IOV in clearance were less than 20%. The estimated values of distribution volumes were different from previously published values, which might be due to pathophysiological changes in ICU patients. No systematic relationship between individual PK parameters and patient covariates was found. The developed model does not show evidence that individual tigecycline dosing adjustment based on patient covariates is necessary to obtain the same target concentration in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Dosing adjustments should be based on the pathogens, their susceptibility, and PK targets.

Multicenter Study of Clinical Features of Breakthrough Acinetobacter Bacteremia during Carbapenem Therapy

Breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy is not uncommon, and it creates therapeutic dilemmas for clinicians. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy and to assess the efficacy of various antimicrobial therapies. We analyzed 100 adults who developed breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy at 4 medical centers over a 6-year period. Their 30-day mortality rate was 57.0%, and the carbapenem resistance rate of their isolates was 87.0%. Among patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter bacteremia, breakthrough bacteremia during carbapenem therapy was associated with a significantly higher 14-day mortality (51.7% versus 37.4%, respectively; P = 0.025 by bivariate analysis) and a higher 30-day mortality (P = 0.037 by log rank test of survival analysis) than in the nonbreakthrough group. For the treatment of breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality (80.0%) than those with continued carbapenem therapy (52.5%) and colistin-based therapy (57.9%) by survival analysis (P = 0.047 and 0.045 by log rank test, respectively). Cox regression controlling for confounders, including severity of illness indices, demonstrated that treatment with tigecycline-based therapy for breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 3.659; 95% confidence interval, 1.794 to 7.465; P < 0.001). Patients with breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia during carbapenem therapy posed a high mortality rate. Tigecycline should be used cautiously for the treatment of breakthrough Acinetobacter bacteremia that develops during carbapenem therapy.

Activity of cefiderocol (S-649266) against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from inpatients in Greek hospitals

Background

Cefiderocol (S-649266), a siderophore cephalosporin, utilizes a novel mechanism of entry into the periplasmic space of Gram-negative bacteria and is broadly stable to ESBLs and carbapenemases.

Methods

A collection of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria isolated from clinical specimens in 18 Greek hospitals was tested for susceptibility to cefiderocol, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, aztreonam, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin and tigecycline. Broth microdilution plates were used to determine MICs.

Results

In total 189 non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria (107 Acinetobacter baumannii and 82 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ) and 282 Enterobacteriaceae (including 244 Klebsiella pneumoniae , 14 Enterobacter cloacae and 11 Providencia stuartii ) were studied. For both A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa the MIC 90 of cefiderocol was 0.5 mg/L. For K. pneumoniae , E. cloacae and P. stuartii the MIC 90 of cefiderocol was 1, 1 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Tigecycline was the second most active antibiotic, followed by colistin.

Conclusions

Cefiderocol exhibited greater antimicrobial activity in vitro against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria than comparator antibiotics.

The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence-based guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) were published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) in 1992, 2002, and 2010. At the time the most recent guideline was released, the plan was to update the guideline every five years to ensure the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommendations.

METHODS

Based on the previous guidelines, the task force outlined a number of topics related to the treatment of patients with IAI and then developed key questions on these various topics. All questions were approached using general and specific literature searches, focusing on articles and other information published since 2008. These publications and additional materials published before 2008 were reviewed by the task force as a whole or by individual subgroups as to relevance to individual questions. Recommendations were developed by a process of iterative consensus, with all task force members voting to accept or reject each recommendation. Grading was based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system; the quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, or weak, and the strength of the recommendation was graded as strong or weak. Review of the document was performed by members of the SIS who were not on the task force. After responses were made to all critiques, the document was approved as an official guideline of the SIS by the Executive Council.

RESULTS

This guideline summarizes the current recommendations developed by the task force on the treatment of patients who have IAI. Evidence-based recommendations have been made regarding risk assessment in individual patients; source control; the timing, selection, and duration of antimicrobial therapy; and suggested approaches to patients who fail initial therapy. Additional recommendations related to the treatment of pediatric patients with IAI have been included.

SUMMARY

The current recommendations of the SIS regarding the treatment of patients with IAI are provided in this guideline.

The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high mortality rates. Due to tigecycline has shown excellent in vitro activity against most pathogens, tigecycline is selected as one of the candidate drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant organisms infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of tigecycline for the treatment of patients with BSI. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched, to identify published studies, and we searched clinical trial registries to identify completed unpublished studies, the results of which were obtained through the manufacturer. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the rate of clinical cure and microbiological success. 24 controlled studies were included in this systematic review. All-cause mortality was lower with tigecycline than with control antibiotic agents, but the difference was not significant (OR 0.85, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-2.33; P = 0.745]). Clinical cure was significantly higher with tigecycline groups (OR 1.76, [95% CI 1.26-2.45; P = 0.001]). Eradication efficiency did not differ between tigecycline and control regimens, but the sample size for these comparisons was small. Subgroup analyses showed good clinical cure result in bacteremia patients with CAP. Tigecycline monotherapy was associated with a OR of 2.73 (95% CI 1.53-4.87) for mortality compared with tigecycline combination therapy (6 studies; 250 patients), without heterogeneity. Five studies reporting on 398 patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae BSI showed significantly lower mortality in the tigecycline arm than in the control arm. The combined treatment with tigecycline may be considered the optimal option for severely ill patients with BSI.

Tigecycline : a critical safety review

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections has been extensively observed worldwide and has become a priority issue over past decade. Tigecycline , a broad spectrum antibiotic covering against many MDR organisms, has been widely used. However, recent meta-analysis studies have raised a concern for its efficacy and safety. Reviewing tigecycline safety data would enhance the appropriate use of this medication.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the safety profile of tigecycline, including its side effects and drug interactions.

EXPERT OPINION

The increased mortality associated with tigecycline is not yet well understood. Based on current evidence, alternative options must be prioritized over tigecycline if available. When tigecycline use is warranted, vigilant observation to identify any breakthrough infections and careful monitoring of progression of the original infection are highly recommended. Considering a second agent (either for synergism or enhancing coverage) may be required.

Tigecycline use in critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective observational study in the intensive care setting

PURPOSE

This prospective observational study aimed at describing prescription patterns of tigecycline and patient outcomes in 26 French intensive care units (ICU).

METHODS

Data of consecutive cases of adult patients treated with tigecycline were collected from the initiation until 7 days after the end of treatment. Response to treatment was classified as success, failure or undetermined and analyses were presented according to severity (SOFA score <7 or ≥7). Survival was recorded at 28 days.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included (64% male, age 60 ± 15 years). At inclusion, 53% had a SOFA score ≥7; 93% had received prior anti-infective agents. Tigecycline was given as first-line treatment in 47% of patients, mostly in combination (67%), for intra-abdominal (IAI 56%), skin and soft tissue (SSTI 19%) or other infections. A total of 76% of the treated infections were hospital-acquired. Bacteraemia was reported in 12% of patients. Median treatment duration was 9 days. Tigecycline was prematurely stopped in 42% patients. The global success rate was 60% at the end of treatment, and significantly higher with treatment duration more than 9 days (76 vs. 47%, P < 0.001). Success rate was 65% for patients alive at the end of treatment. Success rates tended to decrease with illness severity, immunosuppression, bacteraemia and obesity. Survival rate at day 28 was 85% in the whole cohort and significantly higher in the less severely ill patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline success rates appear comparable to those reported in clinical studies in ICU with severe infections. Tigecycline could be an alternative in ICU patients.

Efficacy of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in real-life clinical practice from five European observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). The efficacy of tigecycline when administered as monotherapy or in combination with other antibacterials in the treatment of cIAIs in routine clinical practice is described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient-level data were pooled from five European observational studies (July 2006 to October 2011).

RESULTS

A total of 785 cIAI patients who received tigecycline were included (mean age 63.1 ± 14.0 years). Of these, 56.6% were in intensive care units, 65.6% acquired their infection in hospital, 88.1% had at least one comorbidity and 65.7% had secondary peritonitis. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at the beginning of treatment were 16.9 ± 7.6 (n = 614) and 7.0 ± 4.2 (n = 108), respectively, indicating high disease severity. Escherichia coli (41.8%), Enterococcus faecium (40.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis (21.1%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens; 49.1% of infections were polymicrobial and 17.5% were due to resistant pathogens. Overall, 54.8% (n = 430) received tigecycline as monotherapy and 45.2% (n = 355) as combination therapy for a mean duration of 10.6 days. Clinical response rates at the end of treatment were 77.4% for all patients (567/733), 80.6% for patients who received tigecycline as monotherapy (329/408), 75.2% for patients with a nosocomial infection (354/471), 75.8% for patients with an APACHE II score >15 (250/330) and 54.2% (32/59) for patients with a SOFA score ≥ 7.

CONCLUSIONS

In these real-life studies, tigecycline, alone and in combination, achieved favourable clinical response rates in patients with cIAI with a high severity of illness.

Safety and tolerability of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue and intra-abdominal infections: an analysis based on five European observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Tigecycline is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) in adults. In this analysis the safety and tolerability profile of tigecycline (used alone or in combination) for the treatment of patients with approved indications of cSSTI and cIAI were examined under real-life clinical conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient-level data were pooled from five European observational studies (July 2006 to October 2011). A total of 254 cSSTI and 785 cIAI patients were included. The mean age was 63 years; 34.4% and 56.6% were in intensive care units, 90.9% and 88.1% had at least one comorbidity and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores at the beginning of treatment were 15.0 ± 7.9 and 16.9 ± 7.6, respectively.

RESULTS

Data on adverse events (AEs) were available for 198 cSSTI and 590 cIAI patients in three studies. Nausea and vomiting were reported in ≤ 2% of patients. The most common serious AEs were multi-organ failure (4.0% and 10.0% in cSSTI and cIAI patients, respectively) and sepsis (4.0% and 6.1%, respectively). Death was recorded for 24/254 (9.4%) cSSTI and 147/785 (18.7%) cIAI patients. Mortality rates were higher in the group with a baseline APACHE II score of >15 compared with those with a score of ≤ 15 (18.7% versus 3.5% for cSSTI patients and 23.8% versus 16.0% for cIAI patients). A similar trend was seen when cIAI patients were stratified by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and tolerability of tigecycline, alone and in combination, are consistent with the level of critical illness among patients in these real-life studies.

Efficacy of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in real-life clinical practice from five European observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Tigecycline is an approved treatment for complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs). The efficacy of tigecycline as monotherapy or in combination with other antibacterials in the treatment of cSSTI in routine practice is described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient-level data were pooled from five European observational studies (July 2006 to October 2011).

RESULTS

A total of 254 cSSTI patients who received tigecycline were included (mean age 63.2 ± 14.9 years). Of these, 34.4% were in intensive care units, 54.5% acquired their infection in hospital and 90.9% had at least one comorbidity. Infection most commonly affected the limbs (62.4%) and 43.8% of infections were classified as necrotizing. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at the beginning of treatment were 15.0 ± 7.9 (n = 205) and 5.8 ± 3.9 (n = 32), respectively, indicating high disease severity. Staphylococcus aureus (52.7%), Escherichia coli (18.0%) and Enterococcus faecium (12.0%) were the most frequently isolated pathogens; 32.9% of infections were polymicrobial and 30.5% were due to resistant pathogens. Overall, 71.8% received tigecycline as monotherapy and 28.2% as combination therapy for a mean duration of 12 days. Clinical response rates at the end of treatment were 79.6% for all patients who received the standard dosage (183/230), 86.7% for patients who received tigecycline as monotherapy (143/165), 75.0% for patients with a nosocomial infection (96/128), 75.3% for patients with an APACHE II score >15 (61/81) and 58.3% for patients with a SOFA score ≥ 7 (7/12).

CONCLUSIONS

In these real-life studies, tigecycline, alone and in combination, achieved favourable clinical response rates in patients with cSSTI with a high severity of illness.

Prescription behaviours for tigecycline in real-life clinical practice from five European observational studies

OBJECTIVES

There is limited information on the use of tigecycline in real-life clinical practice. This analysis aims to identify and understand tigecycline prescribing patterns and associated patient outcomes for approved indications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pooled analysis of patient-level data collected on the prescription of tigecycline in five European observational studies (July 2006 to October 2011) was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 1782 patients who received tigecycline were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 61.6% were male, the mean age was 63.4 ± 14.7 years, 56.4% were in intensive care units, 80.2% received previous antibiotic treatment and 91% had one or more comorbid conditions. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at the beginning of treatment were 17.7 ± 7.9 and 7.0 ± 4.0, respectively. The majority of patients (58.3%) received tigecycline for treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs; n = 254) or complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs; n = 785). Tigecycline was given at the standard dose (100 mg plus 50 mg twice daily) to 89.3% of patients for a mean duration of 11.1 ± 6.4 days. The main reasons for prescribing tigecycline were failure of previous therapy (46.1%), broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage (41.4%) and suspicion of a resistant pathogen (39.3%). Tigecycline was prescribed first-line in 36.3% of patients and as monotherapy in 50.4%. Clinical response rates to treatment with tigecycline alone or in combination were 79.6% (183/230; cSSTIs) and 77.4% (567/733; cIAIs).

CONCLUSIONS

Although tigecycline prescription behaviour showed some heterogeneity across the study sites, these results confirm a role for tigecycline in real-life clinical practice for the treatment of complicated infections, including those in critically ill patients, across Europe.

Resistance mechanisms and epidemiology of multiresistant pathogens in Europe and efficacy of tigecycline in observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial drug resistance is a growing problem in Europe and, even with differences in epidemiology, it is of great concern. The treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) is hindered further by pathogens that are resistant to methicillin, carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins and glycopeptides.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An analysis of the microbiological results from five European observational studies (July 2006 to October 2011) evaluating the efficacy of tigecycline (prescribed as monotherapy or in combination with other antibacterials) for the treatment of cSSTI and cIAI is presented.

RESULTS

In total, 213 cSSTI and 623 cIAI patients were included; 34.4% and 56.6%, respectively, were critically ill in intensive care units. At baseline, at least one pathogen was isolated in 167 (78.4%) cSSTI and 464 (74.5%) cIAI patients, and 32.9% and 49.1% of infections were polymicrobial. In cSSTI, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (52.7% and 18.0%, respectively) were the most frequently isolated pathogens, whereas in cIAI most infections were due to E. coli (41.8%), Enterococcus faecium (40.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis (21.1%). Clinical response was observed in >80% of patients with E. coli in both cIAI and cSSTI. In cSSTI patients, the clinical response rate to S. aureus was 80.8%. For cIAI, 77.4% of E. faecium and 79.5% of E. faecalis patients responded to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline when given alone or in combination with other antibacterials appeared to be efficacious against multiple pathogens, affirming its role in real-life clinical practice as a broad-spectrum antibacterial for the treatment of patients with cSSTI and cIAI, including the critically ill, across Europe.

In vivo evaluation of antibiotic activity against Mycobacterium abscessus

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of Mycobacterium abscessus infections is poor due to the lack of effective drug treatment. The objective of this study was to set up an animal model suitable to test antibiotic activity against M. abscessus.

METHODS

The following mouse strains were evaluated: Swiss, BALB/c, C57BL/6, nude, beige, A/J, and GKO. Antibiotic activity was tested for clarithromycin, amikacin, cefoxitin, tigecycline, and bedaquiline (TMC207). Finally, we evaluated the 3-drug combination clarithromycin, cefoxitin, and amikacin.

RESULTS

Nude and GKO mice fulfilled criteria for the model but only nude mice offered sufficient availability for large therapeutic experiments. Among the 3 drugs usually combined for treatment of M. abscessus infection, cefoxitin was the most active because it improved survival and reduced bacillary loads in spleen whereas clarithromycin and amikacin prevented death but had little impact on bacillary loads. The triple-drug combination was not more active than cefoxitin alone. Tigecycline displayed bactericidal activity whereas bedaquiline was almost inactive.

CONCLUSIONS

Nude mice are an adequate model for in vivo chemotherapy studies. Among tested drugs, cefoxitin and tigecycline showed promising in vivo activity against M. abscessus. The best drug combination remains to be determined.

Antibiotic treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: systematic evaluation of the available evidence

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the antibiotic treatment administered for infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Articles reporting the clinical outcomes of patients infected with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae according to the antibiotic treatment administered were eligible. Twenty nonrandomized studies comprising 692 patients who received definitive treatment were included. Almost all studies reported on Klebsiella spp. In 8 studies, the majority of infections were bacteremia, while pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most common infections in 12 studies. In 10 studies, the majority of patients were critically ill. There are methodological issues, including clinical heterogeneity, that preclude the synthesis of the available evidence using statistical analyses, including meta-analysis. From the descriptive point of view, among patients who received combination treatment, mortality was up to 50% for the tigecycline-gentamicin combination, up to 64% for tigecycline-colistin, and up to 67% for carbapenem-colistin. Among the monotherapy-treated patients, mortality was up to 57% for colistin and up to 80% for tigecycline. Certain regimens were administered to a small number of patients in certain studies. Three studies reporting on 194 critically ill patients with bacteremia showed individually significantly lower mortality in the combination arm than in the monotherapy arm. In the other studies, no significant difference in mortality was recorded between the compared groups. Combination antibiotic treatment may be considered the optimal option for severely ill patients with severe infections. However, well-designed randomized studies of specific patient populations are needed to further clarify this issue.

All-cause mortality imbalance in the tigecycline phase 3 and 4 clinical trials

In 12 of 13 phase 3 and 4 comparative clinical trials, all-cause mortality was higher in the tigecycline group versus the comparator group. Study-level mortality risk differences were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical models evaluated the association between patient-level all-cause mortality and baseline factors using logistic regression, recursive partitioning [classification and regression tree (CART) analysis] and survival techniques. The estimated risk difference (tigecycline minus comparator) in all-cause mortality from the meta-analysis was 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.1-1.2%). Statistical modelling identified baseline bacteraemia associated with mortality only in the tigecycline group. In patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and baseline bacteraemia, mortality was 50.0% (9/18) for tigecycline versus 7.7% (1/13) for the comparator group. Study-level and patient-level analyses have identified that patients in the hospital-acquired pneumonia trial, particularly those with VAP with baseline bacteraemia, were at a higher risk of clinical failure and mortality.

Therapy of 1,025 severely ill patients with complicated infections in a German multicenter study: safety profile and efficacy of tigecycline in different treatment modalities

This large prospective non-interventional study investigated the effects of tigecycline either as single agent or in combination with other antimicrobial agents in 1,025 patients treated in clinical routine at German hospitals. Sixty-five percent of the patients had APACHE II scores > 15, indicating high overall disease severity. Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) or complicated skin and skin tissue infections (cSSTI) were the most common indications, with Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Escherichia coli being the most frequently isolated pathogens. Clinical success was reported at the end of tigecycline therapy in 74.2% of the total population, in 75.4% of the cIAI and in 82.2% of the cSSTI patients. The subpopulation (28.0% of the patients) infected with multidrug-resistant pathogens (methicillin-resistant S. aureus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) were treated with similar success rates as the overall population. Tigecycline was generally well tolerated. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 7.7% of the total population; 2.5% had serious AEs mostly attributable to inefficacy of therapy or deterioration of the disease. Mortality rates were consistent with the types of infection and severity of illness. There was no indication of excessive mortality associated with tigecycline as had been suggested in previously performed meta-analyses. In this large non-interventional study performed in the clinical routine setting, tigecycline achieved favorable clinical success rates in a patient population with high severity of illness and a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant pathogens and showed a good safety and tolerability profile.