Background and rationale for revised clinical and laboratory standards institute interpretive criteria (Breakpoints) for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: I. Cephalosporins and Aztreonam

Sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibility test method development and quality control ranges for MIC and disk diffusion tests

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination developed to treat hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor with potent activity against Ambler classes A, C, and D serine β-lactamases and restores sulbactam activity against multidrug-resistant ABC. Studies were conducted to establish sulbactam-durlobactam antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for both broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disk diffusion tests as well as quality control (QC) ranges. To establish the MIC test method, combinations of sulbactam and durlobactam were evaluated using a panel of genetically characterized A. baumannii isolates which were categorized as predicted to be susceptible or resistant based on the spectrum of β-lactamase inhibition by durlobactam. MIC testing with doubling dilutions of sulbactam with a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL of durlobactam resulted in the greatest discrimination of the pre-defined susceptible and resistant strains. Similarly, the sulbactam/durlobactam 10/10 µg disk concentration showed the best discrimination as well as correlation with the MIC test. A. baumannii NCTC 13304 was selected for QC purposes because it assesses the activity of both sulbactam and durlobactam with clear endpoints. Multi-laboratory QC studies were conducted according to CLSI M23 Tier 2 criteria. A sulbactam-durlobactam broth MIC QC range of 0.5/4-2/4 µg/mL and a zone diameter QC range of 24-30 mm were determined for A. baumannii NCTC 13304 and have been approved by CLSI. These studies will enable clinical laboratories to perform susceptibility tests with accurate and reproducible methods.

Definitions and implications of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters of antibiotics in pediatric clinical practice

Knowledge of infectious diseases and their treatments is constantly evolving. New infectious agents are regularly discovered, mainly due to improvement of identification techniques, especially the development of molecular biology and mass spectrometry. While changes in the epidemiology of infectious diseases are not always predictable or readily understood, several factors regularly enter into consideration, such as not only the natural history of diseases, the impact of vaccinations, but also the excessive and irrational use of antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is now recognized as one of the major challenges for humanity, especially since few new molecules have been put on the market in recent years. These molecules are reserved for serious infections caused by bacteria resistant to other antibiotics and should only be prescribed by infectious diseases specialists trained in their use. Rationalization of antibiotic therapy is therefore one of the keys to reducing antibiotic resistance and the spread of resistant bacteria. In this guide, for each clinical situation, the bacterial target(s) of antibiotic treatment, the preferred antibiotic choice, and the therapeutic alternatives will be specified. Comments on the diagnosis and treatment of the infection will be added if necessary.

Cefepime in vivo activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent in vitro: implications for clinical microbiology laboratory and clinicians

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a public health concern. Among these isolates, there are reports of isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) in vitro despite presence of a carbapenemase. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of cefepime against carbapenemase-producing (CP-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP-CRE) isolates with a range of cefepime MICs.

METHODS

Reference broth microdilution and modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were performed on genotypically characterized clinical CRE isolates. Ultimately, CP-CRE (n = 21; blaKPC) and non-CP-CRE (n = 19) isolates with a distribution of cefepime MICs (≤0.5 to >256 mg/L) were utilized in the murine thigh infection model. Mice were treated with cefepime human-simulated regimens (HSRs) representative of a standard dose (1 g q12h 0.5 h infusion) or the SDD dose (2 g q8h 0.5 h infusion). Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h compared with 0 h control, where ≥1 log bacterial reduction is considered translational value for clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

Among both cohorts of CRE isolates, i.e. CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE, that tested as SDD to cefepime in vitro, 1 log bacterial reduction was not attainable with cefepime. Further blunting of cefepime efficacy was observed among CP-CRE isolates compared with non-CP-CRE across both susceptible and SDD categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Data indicate to avoid cefepime for the treatment of serious infections caused by CRE isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or SDD. Data also provide evidence that isolates with the same antibiotic MIC may have different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles due to their antimicrobial resistance mechanism.

Uncovering the Important Genetic Factors for Growth during Cefotaxime-Gentamicin Combination Treatment in blaCTX-M-1 Encoding Escherichia coli

Due to the rapid spread of CTX-M type ESBLs, the rate of resistance to third-generation cephalosporin has increased among Gram-negative bacteria, especially in Escherichia coli, and there is a need to find ways to re-sensitize ESBL E. coli to cephalosporin treatment. A previous study showed that genes involved in protein synthesis were significantly up-regulated in the presence of subinhibitory concentration of cefotaxime (CTX) in a CTX-M-1-producing E. coli. In this study, the interaction between CTX and gentamicin (GEN), targeting protein synthesis, was evaluated in MG1655/pTF2, and the MIC of CTX was strongly reduced (128-fold) in the presence of this combnation therapy. Since the underlying mechanism behind this synergy is not known, we constructed a saturated transposon mutant library in MG1655/pTF2::bla_CTX-M-1 containing 315,925 unique transposon insertions to measure mutant depletion upon exposure to CTX, GEN, and combination treatment of CTX and GEN by Transposon Directed Insertion-site Sequencing (TraDIS). We identified 57 genes that were depleted (log₂FC ≤ -2 and with q.value ≤ 0.01) during exposure to CTX, 18 for GEN, and 31 for combination treatment of CTX and GEN. For validation, we deleted eight genes that were either uniquely identified in combination treatment, overlapped with monotherapy of GEN, or were shared between combination treatment and monotherapy with CTX and GEN. Of these genes, we found that the inactivation of dnaK, mnmA, rsgA, and ybeD increased the efficacy of both CTX and GEN treatment, the inactivation of cpxR and yafN increased the efficacy of only CTX, and the inactivation of mnmA, rsgA, and ybeD resulted in increased synergy between CTX and GEN. Thus, the study points to putative targets for helper drugs that can restore susceptibility to these important drugs, and it indicates that genes involved in protein synthesis are essential for the synergy between these two drugs. In summary, the study identified mutants that sensitize ESBL-producing E. coli to CTX and a combination of CTX and GEN, and it increased our understanding of the mechanism behind synergy between β-lactam and aminoglycoside drugs. This forms a framework for developing new strategies to combat infections caused by resistant bacteria.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the β-lactamase harboured. β-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other β-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.

Comparison of the relative efficacy of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors and carbapenems in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales represents a significant clinical challenge. The present study was thus developed to explore the relative efficacy of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) and carbapenems for the treatment of hospitalized patients suffering from cUTIs caused by BLBLI-susceptible ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

METHODS

Data from 557 patients from four Chinese teaching hospitals diagnosed with cUTIs caused by ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales from January 2017 to May 2022 were retrospectively assessed.

RESULT

The 30 day rate of treatment failure, defined by unresolved symptoms or mortality, was 10.4% (58/557). Independent predictors of 30 day treatment failure included immunocompromised status, bacteraemia, septic shock, lack of infection source control and appropriate empirical treatment. When data were controlled for potential confounding variables, BLBLI treatment exhibited a comparable risk of 14 day (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-3.00, P = 0.133) and 30 day treatment failure (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.66-3.15, P = 0.354) relative to carbapenem treatment for the overall cohort of patients. In contrast, BLBLI treatment in immunocompromised patients was associated with an elevated risk of both 14 day (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.43-7.10, P = 0.005) and 30 day treatment failure (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.07-8.80, P = 0.038) relative to carbapenem treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that carbapenem treatment may be superior to BLBLI treatment for immunocompromised patients suffering from cUTIs caused by ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales species. However, these results will need to be validated in appropriately constructed randomized controlled trials to ensure appropriate patient treatment.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two of the three recently approved β-lactam agent (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae wild-type, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs, and 96% (49/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1-log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

Phenotypes, genotypes and breakpoints: an assessment of β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against OXA-48

BACKGROUND

Two out of the three recently approved β-lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) have higher CLSI susceptibility breakpoints (ceftazidime/avibactam 8 mg/L; meropenem/vaborbactam 4 mg/L) compared with the BL alone (ceftazidime 4 mg/L; meropenem 1 mg/L). This can lead to a therapeutic grey area on susceptibility reports depending on resistance mechanism. For instance, a meropenem-resistant OXA-48 isolate (MIC 4 mg/L) may appear as meropenem/vaborbactam-susceptible (MIC 4 mg/L) despite vaborbactam's lack of OXA-48 inhibitory activity.

METHODS

OXA-48-positive (n = 51) and OXA-48-negative (KPC, n = 5; Klebsiella pneumoniae WT, n = 1) Enterobacterales were utilized. Susceptibility tests (broth microdilution) were conducted with ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as their respective BL partner. Antimicrobial activity of all six agents was evaluated in the murine neutropenic thigh model using clinically relevant exposures. Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h, compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

On average, the three BL/BLI agents resulted in robust bacteria killing among OXA-48-negative isolates. Among OXA-48-positive isolates, poor in vivo activity with imipenem/relebactam was concordant with its resistant phenotypic profile. Variable meropenem/vaborbactam activity was observed among isolates with a 'susceptible' MIC of 4 mg/L. Only 30% (7/23) of isolates at meropenem/vaborbactam MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L met the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold predictive of clinical efficacy in serious infections. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in marked bacterial density reduction across the range of MICs and 73% (37/51) of isolates exceeded the ≥1 log bacterial reduction threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrate that current imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam CLSI breakpoints are appropriate. Data also suggest that higher meropenem/vaborbactam breakpoints relative to meropenem can translate to potentially poor clinical outcomes in patients infected with OXA-48-harbouring isolates.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vivo translational biology and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)

This review describes the translational in vivo and non-clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) research that supported clinical trialling and subsequently licensing approval of ceftazidime/avibactam, a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination aimed at the treatment of infections by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The review thematically follows on from the co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac171). Avibactam protected ceftazidime in animal models of infection with ceftazidime-resistant, β-lactamase-producing bacteria. For example, a single subcutaneous dose of ceftazidime at 1024 mg/kg yielded little effect on the growth of ceftazidime-resistant, blaKPC-2-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae in the thighs of neutropenic mice (final counts of 4 × 108 to 8 × 108 cfu/thigh). In contrast, co-administration of avibactam in a 4:1 ratio (ceftazidime:avibactam) was bactericidal in the same model (final counts of 2 × 104 to 3 × 104 cfu/thigh). In a rat abdominal abscess model, therapy with ceftazidime or ceftazidime/avibactam (4:1 w/w) against blaKPC-2-positive K. pneumoniae resulted in 9.3 versus 3.3 log cfu/abscess, respectively, after 52 h. With respect to PK/PD, in Monte Carlo simulations, attainment of unbound drug exposure targets (ceftazidime fT>8 mg/L and avibactam fT>1 mg/L, each for 50% of the dosing interval) for the labelled dose of ceftazidime/avibactam (2 and 0.5 g, respectively, q8h by 2 h IV infusion), including dose adjustments for patients with impaired renal function, ranged between 94.8% and 99.6% of patients, depending on the infection modelled.

Ceftazidime pharmacokinetics in dogs after intravenous injection and delivered with the RxActuator Mini-Infuser infusion pump

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility of an SC mini-infusion pump to deliver ceftazidime in dogs and produce plasma concentrations sufficient to reach a therapeutic target for 48 hours.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

ANIMALS

Six healthy Beagle dogs.

INTERVENTIONS

Ceftazidime was administered by 2 routes to 6 healthy Beagle dogs. The first route was an IV bolus injection into a cephalic vein at a dose of 25 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected for 8 hours following injection. The second route was a SC infusion for 48 hours using the RxActuator Mini-Infuser wearable SC constant rate infusion pump. Blood samples were collected for 58 hours following application of the pump. All plasma samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography and subject to pharmacokinetic analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

After the IV bolus injection, there was rapid distribution and elimination. The elimination half-life was 0.95 hours, and the clearance was rapid at 0.176 ml/h/kg. After the 48-hour SC infusion, the half-life was slightly shorter, and the clearance was higher. The percent bioavailability from the SC infusion was approximately 72%. The SC infusion maintained plasma concentration near our target of 8 μg/ml for most of the dose interval but slightly lower after 24 hours. The concentrations below the target were attributed to slight drug loss, less than 100% bioavailability, and faster clearance from SC administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the successful application of the RxActuator Mini-Infuser wearable SC constant rate infusion pump for delivering an antimicrobial needed for serious, and sometimes resistant, infections in dogs.

Re-evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam to decrease use of carbapenems in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (REDUCE-BSI)

Objective

To re-examine the use of noncarbapenems (NCBPs), specifically piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) and cefepime (FEP), for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (ESBL-E BSIs).

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary-care, academic medical center.

Patients

The study included patients hospitalized between May 2016 and May 2019 with a positive blood culture for ESBL-E. Patients were excluded if they received treatment with antibiotics other than meropenem, ertapenem, PTZ, or FEP. Patients were also excluded if they were aged <18 years, received antibiotics for <24 hours, were treated for polymicrobial BSI, or received concomitant antibiotic therapy for a separate gram-negative infection.

Methods

We compared CBPs with FEP or PTZ for the treatment of ESBL-E BSI. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, microbiologic cure, infection recurrence, and resistance development.

Results

Data from 114 patients were collected and analyzed; 74 (65%) patients received carbapenem (CBP) therapy and 40 (35%) patients received a NCBP (30 received FEP and 10 received PTZ). The overall in-hospital mortality was 6% (N = 7), with a higher death rate in the CBP arm than in the N-CBP arm, (8% vs 3%; P = .42). No difference in mortality was detected between subgroups with Pitt bacteremia score ≥4, those requiring ICU admission, those whose infections were cause by a nongenitourinary source or causative organism (ie, 76 had Escherichia coli and 38 had Klebsiella spp). We detected no differences in secondary outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion

Compared to CBPs, FEP and PTZ did not result in greater mortality or decreased clinical efficacy for the treatment of ESBL-E BSI caused by susceptible organisms.

Raising the Bar: Improving Antimicrobial Resistance Detection by Clinical Laboratories by Ensuring Use of Current Breakpoints

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global challenge detected by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performed by clinical laboratories. AST results are interpreted using clinical breakpoints, which are updated to enable accurate detection of new and emerging AMR. Laboratories that do not apply up-to-date breakpoints impede global efforts to address the AMR crisis, but the extent of this practice is poorly understood.

Methods

A total of 1490 clinical laboratories participating in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey for bacterial cultures were queried to determine use of obsolete breakpoints.

Results

Between 37.9% and 70.5% of US laboratories reported using obsolete breakpoints for the antimicrobials that were queried. In contrast, only 17.7%-43.7% of international laboratories reported using obsolete breakpoints (P < .001 for all comparisons). Use of current breakpoints varied by AST system, with more laboratories reporting use of current breakpoints in the US if the system had achieved US Food and Drug Administration clearance with current breakpoints. Among laboratories that indicated use of obsolete breakpoints, 55.9% had no plans to update to current standards. The most common reason cited was manufacturer-related issues (51.3%) and lack of internal resources to perform analytical validation studies to make the update (23.4%). Thirteen percent of laboratories indicated they were unaware of breakpoint changes or the need to update breakpoints.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate a significant gap in the ability to detect AMR in the US, and to a lesser extent internationally. Improved application of current breakpoints by clinical laboratories will require combined action from regulatory agencies, laboratory accreditation groups, and device manufacturers.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative pathogens are a major cause of resistance to expanded-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Since their discovery in the early 1980s, they have spread worldwide and an are now endemic in Enterobacterales isolated from both hospital-associated and community-acquired infections. As a result, they are a global public health concern. In the past, TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs were the predominant families of ESBLs. Today CTX-M-type enzymes are the most commonly found ESBL type with the CTX-M-15 variant dominating worldwide, followed in prevalence by CTX-M-14, and CTX-M-27 is emerging in certain parts of the world. The genes encoding ESBLs are often found on plasmids and harboured within transposons or insertion sequences, which has enabled their spread. In addition, the population of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli is dominated globally by a highly virulent and successful clone belonging to ST131. Today, there are many diagnostic tools available to the clinical microbiology laboratory and include both phenotypic and genotypic tests to detect β-lactamases. Unfortunately, when ESBLs are not identified in a timely manner, appropriate antimicrobial therapy is frequently delayed, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Several analyses of clinical trials have shown mixed results with regards to whether a carbapenem must be used to treat serious infections caused by ESBLs or whether some of the older β-lactam-β-lactamase combinations such as piperacillin/tazobactam are appropriate. Some of the newer combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam have demonstrated efficacy in patients. ESBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens will continue to be major contributor to antimicrobial resistance worldwide. It is essential that we remain vigilant about identifying them both in patient isolates and through surveillance studies.

Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate

ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS OF CEFTAZIDIME AFTER A SINGLE SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION AND NORMAL ORAL AND CLOACAL BACTERIAL FLORA SURVEY IN EASTERN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS)

Population pharmacokinetics utilizing sparse sampling were used to determine pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) due to their slow growth rate and the limited number of appropriately sized individuals in the zoo-housed population. Twenty-five eastern hellbenders received a single subcutaneous injection of ceftazidime at 20 mg/kg. Each animal had blood samples collected up to four times between 0 and 192 hr postinjection. Plasma samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was fitted to the data to determine typical values for population parameters, an ideal method due to the sampling limitation of each hellbender. Results indicate an elimination half-life of 36.63 hr and volume of distribution of 0.31 L/kg. Antibiotic concentrations were above a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 8 µg/ml for 120 hr. Prior to antibiotic administration, six hellbenders had oral and six other individuals had cloacal swabs taken for aerobic culture. Fifty-five bacterial isolates were obtained (24 cloacal, 31 oral) with 10/12 (83%) individuals growing three or more different isolates and 11/12 (92%) growing Shewanella putrefaciens. Twelve isolates had susceptibility testing performed and all were susceptible to ceftazidime. These results indicate that ceftazidime is an appropriate choice of antibiotic in hellbenders and when given at a dosage of 20 mg/kg subcutaneously, maintains concentrations above the MIC of susceptible bacteria for up to 5 days.

CON: Testing for ESBL production is unnecessary for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

Phenotypic testing for Enterobacterales that harbour ESBLs is not additive to accurate in vitro β-lactam MICs for clinical decision-making. ESBL testing is an outdated practice established in an era of higher cephalosporin breakpoints to prevent resistant Enterobacterales carrying Ambler class A β-lactamases with affinity for later-generation β-lactams from being reported as susceptible to later-generation cephalosporins, leading to clinical failures. ESBL testing is problematic because of inaccuracies when multiple classes of β-lactamases are produced by the same organism, thus limiting the testing application to specific species and resistance types. Clinical laboratories should instead focus finite resources on accurate susceptibility testing using contemporary interpretative criteria to help guide therapeutic decisions. With continued emergence of antimicrobial resistance and in the setting of accurate susceptibility testing and current breakpoints the use of ESBL phenotypic testing is not helpful in clinical decision-making.

Advancing pediatric antimicrobial stewardship: Has pharmacodynamic dosing for gram-negative infections taken effect?

Objective:

To characterize pharmacodynamic dosing strategies used at children’s hospitals using a national survey.

Design:

Survey.

Setting:

Children’s hospitals.

Participants:

Volunteer sample of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) respondents.

Methods:

A nationwide survey was conducted to gain greater insight into the current adoption of nontraditional dosing methods and monitoring of select β-lactam and fluoroquinolone antibiotics used to treat serious gram-negative infections in pediatric populations. The survey was performed through the Sharing Antimicrobial Reports for Pediatric Stewardship (SHARPS) Collaborative.

Results:

Of the 75 children’s hospitals that responded, 68% of programs reported adoption of pharmacodynamically optimized dosing using prolonged β-lactam infusions and 35% using continuous β-lactam infusions, although use was infrequent. Factors including routine MIC monitoring and formal postgraduate training and board certification of ASP pharmacists were associated with increased utilization of pharmacodynamic dosing. In addition, 60% of programs reported using pharmacodynamically optimized ciprofloxacin and 14% reported using pharmacodynamically optimized levofloxacin. Only 20% of programs monitored β-lactam levels; they commonly cited lack of published guidance, practitioner experience, and laboratomory support as reasons for lack of utilization. Less physician time dedicated to ASP programs was associated with lower adoption of optimized dosing.

Conclusions:

Use of pharmacodynamic dosing through prolonged and continuous infusions of β-lactams have not yet been routinely adopted at children’s hospitals. Further guidance from trials and literature are needed to continue to guide pediatric pharmacodynamic dosing efforts. Children’s hospitals should utilize these data to compare practices and to prioritize further research and education efforts.

Old In Vitro Antimicrobial Breakpoints Are Misleading Stewardship Efforts, Delaying Adoption of Innovative Therapies, and Harming Patients

The current antimicrobial market and old (pre-2000) in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test interpretative criteria (STIC) are not working properly. Malfunctioning susceptibility breakpoints and antimicrobial markets have serious implications for both patients (ie, from a safety and efficacy perspective) and antibiotic-focused pharmaceutical and biotechnology company economic viability. Poorly functioning STIC fail both patients and clinicians since they do not discriminate between likely effective and ineffective antimicrobial regimens. Poor economic viability fails patients and clinicians as it decreases the industry's ability to develop antimicrobial agents that clinicians and patients urgently require now and in the future. Herein, we review how STIC for older antimicrobial agents were determined and how their correction can impact the perceived utility of old relative to new antimicrobial agents. Moreover, we describe the data and analysis needs to systematically reevaluate older STIC values. We call for professional infectious diseases societies, government agencies, and other consensus bodies interested in the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents to join an effort to systematically evaluate and, where warranted, correct STIC for all relevant antimicrobial agents. This effort will amplify the effects of other measures designed to increase appropriate antimicrobial use (ie, good antimicrobial stewardship), development, and regulation.

Recommendations of the Spanish Antibiogram Committee (COESANT) for selecting antimicrobial agents and concentrations for in vitro susceptibility studies using automated systems

Automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices are widely implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories in Spain, mainly using EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) breakpoints. In 2007, a group of experts published recommendations for including antimicrobial agents and selecting concentrations in these systems. Under the patronage of the Spanish Antibiogram Committee (Comité Español del Antibiograma, COESANT) and the Study Group on Mechanisms of Action and Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents (GEMARA) from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), and aligned with the Spanish National Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (PRAN), a group of experts have updated this document. The main modifications from the previous version comprise the inclusion of new antimicrobial agents, adaptation of the ranges of concentrations to cover the EUCAST breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs), and the inference of new resistance mechanisms. This proposal should be considered by different manufacturers and users when designing new panels or cards. In addition, recommendations for selective reporting are also included. With this approach, the implementation of EUCAST breakpoints will be easier, increasing the quality of antimicrobial susceptibility testing data and their microbiological interpretation. It will also benefit epidemiological surveillance studies as well as the clinical use of antimicrobials aligned with antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Selecting the dosage of ceftazidime-avibactam in the perfect storm of nosocomial pneumonia

PURPOSE

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), among other indications. In the phase III REPROVE trial (NCT01808092), ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including VAP. As ceftazidime-avibactam was not studied in patients with NP prior to REPROVE, selecting an appropriate dosage regimen in the "perfect storm" of NP required careful consideration of potential determinants and confounders of response specific to the NP patient population.

METHODS

This review describes the series of preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses that supported ceftazidime-avibactam dosage selection for patients with NP/VAP (2000/500 mg by 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h, adjusted for renal function). In parallel, important considerations for antibiotic dosage selection in patients with NP are highlighted, including adequate drug penetration into the lungs, the suitability of murine-derived plasma PK/PD targets, evaluation of MIC distributions against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with NP, and consideration of PK in patients with NP, who are often critically ill. These analyses also supported the European approval of ceftazidime-avibactam for adults with HAP, including VAP, before the completion of REPROVE.

CONCLUSIONS

This work serves as a successful practical example of dosage design for a new antibacterial drug therapy in the indication of NP, including VAP, where previous drug therapies have failed, possibly as a result of evaluation of too few variables, thereby limiting the accuracy of pharmacodynamic predictions.

Characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 Isolates and Their Interactions with Lytic Phages

The bacterial pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae causes urinary tract infections in immunocompromised patients. Generally, the overuse of antibiotics contributes to the potential development and the spread of antibiotic resistance. In fact, certain strains of K. pneumoniae are becoming increasingly resistant to antibiotics, making infection by these strains more difficult to treat. The use of bacteriophages to control pathogens may offer a non-antibiotic-based approach to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections. However, a detailed understanding of phage–host interactions is crucial in order to explore the potential success of phage-therapy for treatment. In this study, we investigated the molecular epidemiology of nine carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates from a local hospital in Shanghai, China. All strain isolates belong to sequence type 11 (ST11) and harbor the bla_KPC-2 gene. The S1-PFGE (S1 nuclease pulsed field gel electrophoresis) pattern of the isolates did not show any relationship to the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiles. In addition, we characterized phage 117 and phage 31 and assessed the potential application of phage therapy in treating K. pneumoniae infections in vitro. The results of morphological and genomic analyses suggested that both phages are affiliated to the T7 virus genus of the Podoviridae family. We also explored phage–host interactions during growth in both planktonic cells and biofilms. The phages’ heterogeneous lytic capacities against K. pneumoniae strains were demonstrated experimentally. Subsequent culture and urine experiments with phage 117 and host Kp36 initially demonstrated a strong lytic activity of the phages. However, rapid regrowth was observed following the initial lysis which suggests that phage resistant mutants were selected in the host populations. Additionally, a phage cocktail (117 + 31) was prepared and investigated for antimicrobial activity. In Luria Broth (LB) cultures, we observed that the cocktail showed significantly higher antimicrobial activity than phage 117 alone, but this was not observed in urine samples. Together, the results demonstrate the potential therapeutic value of phages in treating K. pneumoniae urinary tract infections.

Genetic Characterization and Pathological Analysis of a Novel Bacterial Pathogen, Pseudomonas tructae, in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Pseudomonas species are one of the most prevalent bacterial species globally distributed in forest soil, river water, and human or animal skin. Some species are pathogens or opportunistic pathogens in hospitalized patients, animals, and plants. Various Pseudomonas species, including Pseudomonasputida, P. plecoglossicida, P. aeruginosa, and P. fluorescens, are known fish pathogens; P. fluorescens and P. putida cause severe losses in rainbow trout farming. Therefore, we investigated and isolated the pathogen that is responsible for mortality in a rainbow trout farm in Korea. The isolated bacterium was a strain of P. tructae, which was recently classified in the P. putida group. We performed taxonomical analysis of the bacteria in our previous study. In this study, we investigated the pathogenicity and clinical symptoms of P. tructae and analyzed its genomic characteristics. The pathogenicity of the strain was tested via challenge experiments in healthy rainbow trout and histopathologic analysis of the infected fish. Genome sequence was analyzed to identify the bacterial genes that are involved in antibiotic resistance and virulence. This is the first study reporting P. tructae as an emerging pathogen that is responsible for mortality in rainbow trout fisheries and providing the genome sequence of P. tructae.

Evaluation of Empiric β-Lactam Susceptibility Prediction among Enterobacteriaceae by Molecular β-Lactamase Gene Testing

The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for blood cultures has become standard of care in the United States to inform early antimicrobial optimization. The relative ability of genotypic and phenotypic approaches to identify beta-lactam susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus mirabilis was evaluated, using incidence rates of resistance mechanisms to third-generation cephalosporins, aztreonam, and piperacillin-tazobactam seen across U.S. census regions. Overall, the presence of CTX-M, KPC, and/or NDM genes was 81% (range, 57 to 87%) sensitive for the prediction of ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and aztreonam resistance and 73% (range, 25 to 90%) sensitive for the detection of piperacillin-tazobactam resistance. The sensitivity of KPC or NDM to predict imipenem or meropenem resistance was 94.3% overall, and for meropenem ranged from 70 to 100% across U.S. census regions. Institutions that use genotypic RDTs to inform therapeutic de-escalation decisions should be aware of the incidence-base performance across U.S. geographies and in different patient populations, where resistance rates may vary.

Antibiograms Cannot Be Used Interchangeably Between Acute Care Medical Centers and Affiliated Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether antibiograms for Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes (NHs), termed Community Living Centers, are similar to those from their affiliated acute care medical centers.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We compared the 2017 antibiograms for VA NHs to their affiliated VA medical centers (VAMCs). Antibiograms included antibiotic susceptibility rates for commonly observed bacteria in this setting (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa).

METHODS

Antibiograms were considered to be in complete agreement when the overall susceptibility rate between the NH and affiliated VAMC was either at or above 80% or below 80% across all bacteria and antibiotics. Average percentage of bacteria-antibiotic comparisons in disagreement per facility pair, and number of facilities with agreement for specific bacteria-antibiotic comparisons were also assessed. The chi-square test was used to compare disagreement between NH-VAMC facilities based on geographic proximity of the NH to the VAMC, culture source, and bed size.

RESULTS

A total of 119 NH-VAMC affiliate pairs were included in this analysis, with 71% (84/119) on the same campus and 29% (35/119) on geographically distinct campuses. None of the NH-VAMC pairs demonstrated complete agreement (all bacteria vs all antibiotics) between their antibiograms. On average, 20% of the bacteria-antibiotic comparisons from the antibiogram disagreed clinically per NH-VAMC pair, and almost twice as often the nursing home had lower susceptibility (higher resistance) than the acute care facility. Some bacteria-antibiotic comparisons agreed in all facilities (eg, E coli-imipenem; S aureus-linezolid; S aureus-vancomycin), while others showed greater disagreement (eg, Klebsiella spp-cefazolin; Klebsiella spp-ampicillin-sulbactam; P aeruginosa-ciprofloxacin). Rates of clinical disagreement were similar by geographic proximity of the NH to the VAMC, culture source, and bed size.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Overall, this study showed a moderate lack of agreement between VA NH antibiograms and their affiliate VAMC antibiograms. Our data suggest that antibiograms of acute care facilities are often not accurate approximations of the nursing home resistance patterns and therefore should be used with caution (if at all) in guiding empiric antibiotic therapy.

Understanding and Addressing CLSI Breakpoint Revisions: a Primer for Clinical Laboratories

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised several breakpoints since 2010 for bacteria that grow aerobically. In 2019, these revisions include changes to the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin breakpoints for the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, daptomycin breakpoints for Enterococcus spp., and ceftaroline breakpoints for Staphylococcus aureus Implementation of the revisions is a challenge for all laboratories, as not all systems have FDA clearance for the revised (current) breakpoints, compounded by the need for laboratories to perform validation studies and to make updates to laboratory information system/electronic medical record builds in the setting of limited information technology infrastructure. This minireview describes the breakpoint revisions in the M100 supplement since 2010 and strategies for the laboratory on how to best adopt these in clinical testing.

Dose Selection and Validation for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Adults with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, and Nosocomial Pneumonia

Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. In Europe, ceftazidime-avibactam is also approved for the treatment of Gram-negative infections with limited treatment options. Selection and validation of the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen was guided by an iterative process of population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling, whereby population PK models for ceftazidime and avibactam were developed using PK data from clinical trials and updated periodically. These models were used in probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations using joint pharmacodynamic (PD) targets for ceftazidime and avibactam derived from preclinical data. Joint PTA was calculated based on the simultaneous achievement of the individual PK/PD targets (50% free time above the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC for ceftazidime and free time above a critical avibactam threshold concentration of 1 mg/liter for avibactam). The joint PTA analyses supported a ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000 + 500 mg every 8 h by 2-h intravenous infusion for patients with creatinine clearance (CL_CR) >50 ml/min across all approved indications and modified dosage regimens for patients with CL_CR ≤50 ml/min. Subgroup simulations for individual phase 3 patients showed that the dosage regimen was robust, with high target attainment (>95%) against MICs ≤8 mg/liter achieved regardless of older age, obesity, augmented renal clearance, or severity of infection. This review summarizes how the approved ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimens were developed and validated using PK/PD targets, population PK modeling, and PTA analyses.

Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance and New Drug Development

Surveillance represents an important informational tool for planning actions to monitor emerging antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance (ARS) programs may have many different designs and can be grouped in 2 major categories based on their main objectives: (1) public health ARS programs and (2) industry-sponsored/product-oriented ARS programs. In general, public health ARS programs predominantly focus on health care and infection control, whereas industry ARS programs focus on an investigational or recently approved molecule(s). We reviewed the main characteristics of industry ARS programs and how these programs contribute to new drug development. Industry ARS programs are generally performed to comply with requirements from regulatory agencies responsible for commercial approval of antimicrobial agents, such as the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and others. In contrast to public health ARS programs, which typically collect health care and diverse clinical data, industry ARS programs frequently collect the pathogens and perform the testing in a central laboratory setting. Global ARS programs with centralized testing play an important role in new antibacterial and antifungal drug development by providing information on the emergence and dissemination of resistant organisms, clones, and resistance determinants. Organisms collected by large ARS programs are extremely valuable to evaluate the potential of new agents and to calibrate susceptibility tests once a drug is approved for clinical use. These programs also can provide early evaluations of spectrum of activity and postmarketing trends required by regulatory agencies, and the programs may help drug companies to select appropriate dosing regimens and the appropriate geographic regions in which to perform clinical trials. Furthermore, these surveillance programs provide useful information on the potency and spectrum of new antimicrobial agents against indications and organisms in which clinicians have little or no experience. In summary, large ARS programs, such as the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, contribute key data for new drug development.

A model-based analysis of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present work was to use a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model developed from in vitro time-kill measurements with P. aeruginosa to compare different pharmacodynamic indices derived from simulated human avibactam exposures, with respect to their degree of correlation with the modelled bacterial responses.

METHODS

A mathematical model of the effect of ceftazidime-avibactam on the growth dynamics of P. aeruginosa was used to simulate bacterial responses to modelled human exposures from fractionated avibactam dosing regimens with a fixed ceftazidime dosing regimen (2 or 8 g q8h as a 2-h infusion). The relatedness of the 24-h change in bacterial density and avibactam exposure parameters was evaluated to determine exposure parameter that closely correlated with bacterial growth/killing responses.

RESULTS

Frequent dosing was associated with higher efficacy, resulting in a reduction of avibactam daily dose. The best-fit PD index of avibactam determined from the simulation was fT > C_T of 1 mg/L avibactam and q8h was the longest dosing interval able to achieve 2-log kill: 41-87% (3.3 h to 7.0 h out of 8-h interval, respectively). The avibactam exposure magnitude required to achieve a 2-log kill in the simulations was dependent on the susceptibility of the bacterial isolate to ceftazidime.

CONCLUSIONS

Avibactam activity in combination with ceftazidime against multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa correlated with fT > C_T. Setting a threshold avibactam concentration to 1 mg/L, superimposed over a simulated human-like exposure of ceftazidime, achieved at least 2-log kill for the clinical dose of 500 mg q8h avibactam as a 2-h infusion, depending on the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime alone.

Phenotypic characterization and whole genome analysis of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria isolated from dogs in Germany

Asymptomatic colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae has been described for humans, various mammal species, and birds. Here, antimicrobial resistant bacteria were recovered from dog feces originating in Germany, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Croatia, and Ukraine, with a subset of mostly E. coli isolates obtained from a longitudinal collection over twelve months. In vitro antimicrobial resistance testing revealed various patterns of resistance against single or all investigated beta-lactam antibiotics, with none of the 101 isolates resistant against two tested carbapenem antibiotics. Whole genome sequence analysis revealed bacteria species-specific patterns for 23 antimicrobial resistance coding DNA sequences (CDS) that were unapparent from the in vitro analysis alone. Phylogenetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) revealed clonal bacterial isolates originating from different dogs, suggesting transmission between dogs in the same community. However, individual resistant E. coli clones were not detected over a period longer than seven days. Multi locus sequence typing (MLST) of 85 E. coli isolates revealed 31 different sequence types (ST) with an accumulation of ST744 (n = 9), ST10 (n = 8), and ST648 (n = 6), although the world-wide hospital-associated CTX-M beta-lactamase producing ST131 was not detected. Neither the antimicrobial resistance CDSs patterns nor the phylogenetic analysis revealed an epidemiological correlation among the longitudinal isolates collected from a period longer than seven days. No genetic linkage could be associated with the geographic origin of isolates. In conclusion, healthy dogs frequently carry ESBL-producing bacteria, independent to prior treatment, which may be transmitted between individual dogs of the same community. Otherwise, these antimicrobial resistant bacteria share few commonalities, making their presence eerily unpredictable.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Clinical susceptibility breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000/500 mg every 8 h (q8h) by 2-h intravenous infusion (adjusted for renal function) have been established by the FDA, CLSI, and EUCAST as susceptible (MIC, ≤8 mg/liter) and resistant (MIC, >8 mg/liter). The key supportive data from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, in vitro surveillance, including molecular understanding of relevant resistance mechanisms, and efficacy in regulatory clinical trials are collated and analyzed here.

Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in pediatric clinical practice

Progress in the knowledge of antibiotic mechanisms of action allows to determine the pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) parameters predictive of antibiotic efficacy in bacterial infections. According to the antibiotic compound, the bacterial species implicated, the location of the infection, and the severity of the disease, these parameters may vary. The PK/PD parameters described in this paper, focus only on blood compartments. These PK/PD parameters best predict efficacy in the most frequent infections (e.g., respiratory, bacteremia, skin and soft tissue infections and intra-abdominal infections). Furthermore, they contribute to the determination of doses and number of administrations per day as well as the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints. The time above the MIC (T> MIC) is the main criterion for β-lactams: free drug serum levels of these drugs should be above the MIC for at least 40%-50% of the dosing interval to produce adequate clinical and microbiological efficacy. Peak/MIC ratio is the major determinant of the activity of aminoglycosides: in general, peak/MIC ratios should exceed 8-10. Area under the MIC curve (AUC/MIC) is considered for quinolones, macrolides, and vancomycin as the best predictor of efficacy.

Simplified Aztreonam Dosing in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation

The manufacturer-recommended aztreonam dosing for patients with creatinine clearance values of <10 ml/min/1.73 m² is complex. It is not known whether simpler posthemodialysis dosing administered once daily or thrice weekly can reliably achieve pharmacodynamic goals. We found that 1 or 2 g administered once daily after hemodialysis had >90% probability of target attainment up to MICs of 4 or 8 mg/liter, respectively. Thrice-weekly dosing should generally be avoided, except in nonsevere infections with MICs of ≤0.5 mg/liter.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. Isolates from Urinary Tract Infections in Southern Brazil

The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of different extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) as well as to associate these ESBL with antimicrobial (ATM) resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates from outpatients and inpatients with urinary tract infections. The study included 435 consecutive nonduplicate clinical isolates, including 362 E. coli isolates, 62 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and 11 K. oxytoca isolates. Isolates were obtained from patients who were treated in a University Hospital between August 2012 and July 2013. Three multiplex PCR were performed to identify the ESBL groups. A total of 48 (11%) ESBL-producing isolates were found. The risk for the ESBL presence was significantly higher in males (26.4%) than females (8%), from hospital-acquired infections (29.1%) than community-acquired infections (7.0%) and in Klebsiella spp. (27.4%) than in E. coli (7.7%). ESBL-producing isolates presented a significantly higher percentage of resistance in 21 of the 23 ATMs analyzed. The CTX-M-1 group was the most predominant ESBL identified. The bla_{CTX-M-1-group} gene was found in 56% of the total ESBL producers from community and in 42.4% from hospital origins; it was followed in frequency by the bla_{CTX-M-8/25-group}, also found in both environments. Klebsiella spp. presented the largest variety of β-lactamase enzyme combinations and a higher level of resistance to cefotaxime. These findings contribute to better knowledge of the epidemiology of ESBL enzymes and are alarming for the reduced therapeutic options available for the risk groups identified in the studied populations.

A Systematic Approach to the Selection of the Appropriate Avibactam Concentration for Use with Ceftazidime in Broth Microdilution Susceptibility Testing

Selection of the avibactam concentration to combine with ceftazidime in susceptibility testing was determined using Gram-negative isolates with characterized β-lactamases predefined as susceptible or resistant, based on the known inhibition spectrum of avibactam. MIC values were determined by broth microdilution of ceftazidime with fixed concentrations and ratios of avibactam. A constant concentration of 4 μg/ml of avibactam was selected for susceptibility testing with ceftazidime because of its ability to correctly categorize susceptible and resistant isolates while minimizing categorical errors.

Can the Ceftriaxone Breakpoints Be Increased Without Compromising Patient Outcomes?

Background

In 2010, the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute recommended a 3-fold lowering of ceftriaxone breakpoints to 1 mcg/mL for Enterobacteriaceae. Supportive clinical data at the time were from fewer than 50 patients. We compared the clinical outcomes of adults with Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections treated with ceftriaxone compared with matched patients (with exact matching on ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs]) treated with extended-spectrum agents to determine if ceftriaxone breakpoints could be increased without negatively impacting patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at 3 large academic medical centers and included patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL treated with ceftriaxone or extended-spectrum β-lactams (ie, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, or imipenem/cilastatin) between 2008 and 2014; 1:2 nearest neighbor propensity score matching was performed to estimate the odds of recurrent bacteremia and mortality within 30 days.

Results

Propensity score matching yielded 108 patients in the ceftriaxone group and 216 patients in the extended-spectrum β-lactam group, with both groups well-balanced on demographics, preexisting medical conditions, severity of illness, source of bacteremia, and source control interventions. No difference in recurrent bacteremia (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49–2.73) or mortality (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.56–2.91) between the treatment groups was observed for patients with isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL. Only 6 isolates (1.6%) with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that patient outcomes are similar when receiving ceftriaxone vs extended-spectrum agents for the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections with ceftriaxone MICs of 2 mcg/mL. This warrants consideration of adjusting the ceftriaxone susceptibility breakpoint from 1 to 2 mcg/mL, as a relatively small increase in the antibiotic breakpoint could have the potential to limit the use of large numbers of extended-spectrum antibiotic agents.

Avibactam Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets

Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in the United States and Europe for use in combination with ceftazidime. Combinations of avibactam with aztreonam or ceftaroline fosamil have also been clinically evaluated. Until recently, there has been very little precedence of which pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and magnitudes are appropriate to use for β-lactamase inhibitors in population PK modeling for analyzing potential doses and susceptibility breakpoints. For avibactam, several preclinical studies using different in vitro and in vivo models have been conducted to identify the PK/PD index of avibactam and the magnitude of exposure necessary for effect in combination with ceftazidime, aztreonam, or ceftaroline fosamil. The PD driver of avibactam critical for restoring the activity of all three partner β-lactams was found to be time dependent rather than concentration dependent and was defined as the time that the concentration of avibactam exceeded a critical concentration threshold (%fT>C_T). The magnitude of the C_T and the time that this threshold needed to be exceeded to elicit particular PD endpoints varied depending on the model and the partner β-lactam. This review describes the preclinical studies used to determine the avibactam PK/PD target in combination with its β-lactam partners.

Impact of 21st Century Cures Act on Breakpoints and Commercial Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Systems: Progress and Pitfalls

Antimicrobial resistance is the most pressing medical challenge of the past decade. At the front line are clinical laboratories, which are responsible for accurately reporting antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results to clinicians and public health authorities. The ability of the laboratory to detect resistance has been hampered by several factors. In 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law, marking an important step toward resolving many regulatory dilemmas that hampered development and updates to commercial AST systems (cASTs). We describe the pathway and history of U.S. regulation of cASTs and outline both the rewards and unmet needs possible from the 21st Century Cures Act.

An Improved Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase Detection Test Utilizing Aztreonam plus Clavulanate

Clinical laboratories test for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) for epidemiological and infection control purposes and also for the potential of cephalosporins to cause therapeutic failures. Testing can be problematic, because the CLSI does not recommend the testing of all producers of ESBLs and also falsely negative results may occur with isolates that coproduce AmpC. Boronic acid-supplemented tests can enhance ESBL detection in AmpC producers. Because aztreonam inhibits AmpCs, a study was designed to compare ESBL detection by the CLSI disk test (CLSI), a boronic acid-supplemented CLSI disk test (CLSI plus BA), and an aztreonam plus clavulanate disk test (ATM plus CA). The study tested 100 well-characterized Enterobacteriaceae , Acinetobacter baumannii , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Seventy produced TEM, SHV, or CTX-M ESBLs, with 15 coproducing an AmpC and 11 coproducing a metallo-β-lactamase. Thirty ESBL-negative isolates were also tested. Tests were inoculated by CLSI methodology and interpreted as positive if an inhibitor caused a zone diameter increase of ≥5 mm. The percentages of ESBL producers detected were as follows: ATM plus CA, 95.7%; CLSI plus BA, 88.6%; and CLSI, 78.6%. When AmpC was coproduced, the sensitivities of the tests were as follows: ATM plus CA, 100%; CLSI plus BA, 93.3%; and CLSI, 60%. ATM plus CA also detected an ESBL in 90.1% of isolates that coproduced a metallo-β-lactamase. Falsely positive tests occurred only with the CLSI and CLSI plus BA tests. Overall, the ATM plus CA test detected ESBLs more accurately than the CLSI and CLSI plus BA tests, especially with isolates coproducing an AmpC or metallo-β-lactamase.

Is It Time to Rethink the Notion of Carbapenem-Sparing Therapy Against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections? A Critical Review

OBJECTIVE

To present systematic recommendations for carbapenem-sparing therapy against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections (BSIs) derived from a critical review of clinical data.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE databases (January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2017) was performed using key MESH terms: ESBL or extended-spectrum β-lactamases and bacteremia or bloodstream infection with piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, cefepime, cephamycins, carbapenem, doripenem, meropenem, and ertapenem. References within articles of interest were also evaluated.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English language trials were considered, and results were limited to clinical efficacy trials. Articles were screened by title and abstract for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Studies comparing noncarbapenem versus carbapenem therapy for ESBL BSIs were critically analyzed to identify heterogeneity among studies. Data abstracted included empirical or definitive therapy, patient population, dosing, source of infection and severity, infectious etiology, and outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Completely sparing carbapenem therapy cannot be justified among patients with ESBL BSIs. Determining the source of infection is critical to identify patients for whom carbapenem-sparing therapy is appropriate.

Assessment of the comparability of CLSI, EUCAST and Stokes antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for Escherichia coli uropathogenic isolates

BACKGROUND

As many clinical laboratories convert between Stokes, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methods, the problem of comparing differently derived sets of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data with each other arises, owing to a scarcity of knowledge of inter-method comparability. The purpose of the current study was to determine the comparability of CLSI, EUCAST and Stokes AST methods for determining susceptibility of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, trimethoprim, cephradine/cephalexin, ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin.

METHODS

A total of 100 E. coli isolates were obtained from boric acid urine samples from patients attending GP surgeries. For EUCAST and CLSI, the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used and results interpreted using the respective breakpoint guidelines. For the Stokes method, direct susceptibility testing was performed on the urine samples.

RESULTS

The lowest levels of agreement were for amoxicillin-clavulanate (60%) and ciprofloxacin (89%) between the three AST methods, when using 2017 interpretive guidelines for CLSI and EUCAST. A comparison of EUCAST and CLSI without Stokes showed 82% agreement for amoxicillin-clavulanate and 94% agreement for ciprofloxacin. Discrepancies were compounded by varying breakpoint susceptibility guidelines issued during the period 2011-2017, and through the inclusion of a definition of intermediate susceptibility in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the discrepancies generated through using different AST methods and different interpretive guidelines may result in confusion and inaccuracy when prescribing treatment for urinary tract infection.

Frequency of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Cultured From Urine of Children Undergoing Clean Intermittent Catheterization

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing CIC frequently have positive urine culture results and receive many antimicrobial agents. Subsequently, this population is at high risk for infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Resistant pathogens, such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and organisms that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), which are third-generation cephalosporin resistant (3GCR), are of particular concern.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all urine culture results and antimicrobial-susceptibility testing results were obtained between January 2008 and December 2014 from the electronic health record of children ≤18 years of age who were undergoing CIC (n = 14 832). Isolates were identified as VRE, CRE, or 3GCR. Organisms of the same type that were obtained in the same year and with identical antibiotic susceptibilities from the same patient were excluded. Simple linear regression was used to determine the association between year and rates of resistance.

RESULTS

A total of 3997 positive culture results were included in this analysis. Of all Enterococcus isolates for which susceptibility results were available, 4.6% were VRE, 11.1% of all isolates that belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae family were 3GCR, and 0.4% of eligible isolates were CRE. There were significantly higher rates of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and CRE in 2014 than in 2008 (P < .01). Simple linear regression revealed a significant association between year and rate for resistance to third-generation cephalosporins but not for CRE or VRE. The rate of increase in resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in patients who required CIC was higher than that in patients who did not need CIC.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins has increased significantly in the past 7 years in children undergoing CIC, which indicates that careful monitoring is warranted for continued increases in antimicrobial-resistant organisms in this unique patient population.

Potentiation of ceftazidime by avibactam against β-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro infection model

Objectives

This study evaluated the in vitro pharmacodynamics of combinations of ceftazidime and the non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam, against ceftazidime-, piperacillin/tazobactam- and meropenem-multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a quantitative time-kill method.

Methods

MICs of ceftazidime plus 0-16 mg/L avibactam were determined against eight isolates of P. aeruginosa . Single-compartment, 24 h time-kill kinetics were investigated for three isolates at 0-16 mg/L avibactam with ceftazidime at 0.25-4-fold the MIC as measured at the respective avibactam concentration. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS during the time-kill kinetic studies to evaluate drug degradation.

Results

Avibactam alone displayed no antimicrobial activity. MICs of ceftazidime decreased by 8-16-fold in the presence of avibactam at 4 mg/L. The changes in log 10 cfu/mL at both the 10 h and 24 h timepoints (versus 0 h) revealed bacterial killing at ≥1-fold MIC. Significantly higher concentrations of ceftazidime alone, as compared with those of ceftazidime in combination, were required to produce any given kill. Without avibactam, ceftazidime degradation was significant (defined as degradation t 1/2  <   24 h), with as little as 19%   ±   18% of the original concentration remaining at 8 h for the most resistant strain. In combination with avibactam, ceftazidime degradation at ≥ 1-fold MIC was negligible.

Conclusion

The addition of avibactam protected ceftazidime from degradation in a dose-dependent manner and restored its cidal and static activity at concentrations in combination well below the MIC of ceftazidime alone.

Impact of appropriateness of empiric therapy on outcomes in community-onset bacteremia by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebisella pneumoniae definitively treated with carbapenems

Despite a significant increase of bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the community-setting, information regarding clinical outcomes of inappropriate empiric therapy (IAT) in patients with those infections is limited. A multicenter-retrospective cohort study was conducted in four hospitals. A total of 249 adults were identified to have community-onset bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and definitively treated with carbapenems. According to the appropriateness of empiric therapy, individuals were divided into an appropriate empiric therapy (AT) group (n = 106) and IAT group (n = 143). Patients who received AT showed more severe underlying conditions including underlying solid cancer, healthcare-association and intensive care unit (ICU) care, compared to the IAT group. Primary bacteremia was more commonly found in the AT group than in the IAT group, while urinary tract infection predominated more frequently in the IAT group than in the AT group. Multivariate analysis using propensity score analysis indicated that inappropriateness of empiric therapy was not an independent risk factor for 30-day death. ICU care, respiratory tract infection and underlying liver, renal and connective tissue diseases were significantly associated with mortality. In patients with bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae in the community-setting, delay in appropriate therapy was not associated with an increased rate of death if the patients were definitively treated with carbapenems.

WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) Antimicrobial Activity against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria Collected Worldwide in 2015

WCK 5222 consists of cefepime combined with zidebactam, a bicyclo-acyl hydrazide β-lactam enhancer antibiotic with a dual action involving binding to Gram-negative bacterial PBP2 and β-lactamase inhibition. We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-zidebactam against 7,876 contemporary (2015) clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5,946), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,291), and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 639) from the United States (n = 2,919), Europe (n = 3,004), the Asia-Pacific (n = 1,370), and Latin America (n = 583). The isolates were tested by a reference broth microdilution method for susceptibility against cefepime-zidebactam (1:1 and 2:1 ratios) and comparator agents. Cefepime-zidebactam was the most active compound tested against Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50/90, ≤0.03/0.12 μg/ml [1:1] and 0.06/0.25 μg/ml [2:1]; 99.9% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 [1:1] and ≤8 μg/ml [2:1]). Cefepime-zidebactam was active against individual Enterobacteriaceae species (MIC50/90, ≤0.03 to 0.06/≤0.03 to 0.5 μg/ml [1:1]) and retained potent activity against carbapenem-resistant isolates (MIC50/90, 1/4 μg/ml; 99.3% of isolates were inhibited at ≤8 μg/ml [1:1]). Cefepime-zidebactam activity was consistent among geographic regions, and only one isolate showed MIC values of >8 μg/ml (1:1). Cefepime-zidebactam was also very active against P. aeruginosa with MIC50/90 values of 1/4 μg/ml, and 99.5% of isolates were inhibited at ≤8 μg/ml (1:1). The MIC values for cefepime-zidebactam at the 1:1 ratio were generally 2-fold lower than those for cefepime-zidebactam at the 2:1 ratio (MIC50/90, 2/8 μg/ml) and zidebactam alone (MIC50/90, 4/8 μg/ml). Against Acinetobacter spp., cefepime-zidebactam at 1:1 and 2:1 ratios (MIC50/90, 16/32 μg/ml for both) was 4-fold more active than cefepime or ceftazidime. Zidebactam exhibited potent in vitro antimicrobial activity against some organisms. These results support the clinical development of WCK 5222 for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant isolates.

Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014

Cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) is currently under clinical development for use at a dosage of 2 g/2 g every 8 h. A total of 7,981 isolates were collected from 146 medical centers (39 countries) in 2014 as a part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, and their susceptibilities to cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at fixed concentrations of 4 and 8 μg/ml) were tested by a reference broth microdilution method. Isolates were mainly from patients with pneumonia (29.5%) and bloodstream infections (26.9%). Cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml) and cefepime inhibited 96.9 and 87.9% of Enterobacteriaceae strains at ≤8 μg/ml. The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against Enterobacteriaceae strains was comparable to that of meropenem (96.7% of isolates were susceptible) and greater than that of piperacillin-tazobactam (87.7% susceptible). All Enterobacteriaceae species from the United States except Klebsiella pneumoniae had >99.0% of isolates inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml. The prevalence of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-screening-positive phenotype was the highest among Escherichia coli isolates in China (66.3%) and among K. pneumoniae isolates (58.0%) in Latin America. Cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml inhibited 98.7 and 71.3% of ESBL-screening-positive phenotype E. coli strains and K. pneumoniae strains, respectively. Meropenem showed limited activity against ESBL-screening-positive phenotype K. pneumoniae strains (69.6% susceptible). Cefepime-tazobactam was active against Enterobacter spp. (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, 0.06 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively), including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates (96.1% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml). The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (82.4 and 91.6% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 and ≤16/8 μg/ml, respectively) was comparable to that of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam (79.2% susceptible). In summary, cefepime-tazobactam was highly active against P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae strains, including ESBL-screening-positive phenotype E. coli strains and ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacter spp. These results support the further clinical development of the cefepime-tazobactam combination.