1
|
Sampah J, Owusu-Frimpong I, Aboagye FT, Owusu-Ofori A. Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a teaching hospital in Ghana. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0274156. [PMID: 37903118 PMCID: PMC10615269 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production among Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae is an increasing global challenge due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with their infections, especially in developing countries where there are little antibiotic treatment options. Despite these challenges, few studies in Ghana have described the burden of CRE. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from patients at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH) in the Central region of Ghana. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Enterobacteriaceae isolates were collected from April to July 2019 at the bacteriology unit of CCTH using a consecutive sampling method. Isolates were identified by standard microbiological techniques and confirmed using API 20E. Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method was used to determine the antibiogram of isolates. Isolates were also subjected to ESBL testing using the single-disc combination method. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were identified by the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method and then examined genotypically for the presence of blaKPC-1, blaIMP-1, blaVIM-1, blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-48 genes via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of the 230 isolates comprising E. coli (40.9%), Citrobacter spp. (32.6%), K. pneumoniae (9.1%), P. mirabilis (6.1%), P. vulgaris (5.2%), Enterobacter spp (3.5%)., K. oxytoca (2.2%), and Serratia marcenses (0.4%). Most isolates were from urine 162(70.4%) and wound samples. The isolates showed high resistance to ampicillin 171 (74.3%) and cefuroxime 134(58.3%). The prevalence of MDR was 35.2% (81), with E. coli 40(42.6%) being the majority that exhibited MDR. Of the 230 isolates, 113(49.1%) were ESBL producers, with E. coli 54(57.5%) accounting for the majority, while Serratia marcenses was the least. Of the 13 (5.7%) CRE isolates that showed resistance towards carbapenem in the disc diffusion method, 11 showed the presence of the blaNDM-1 gene, while all isolates showed the presence of the blaOXA-48 gene. CONCLUSION The prevalence of carbapenem resistance and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae pathogens among patients at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital is high and alarming. Therefore, it is imperative to consider effective infection prevention and control measures should be implemented at the hospital to prevent the rapid spread of these dangerous organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Sampah
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
- Laboratory Department, St. Patrick’s Hospital, Offinso, Ghana
| | - Isaac Owusu-Frimpong
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Frank Twum Aboagye
- CSIR-Water Research Institute, Biomedical and Public Health Research Unit, Accra, Ghana
| | - Alex Owusu-Ofori
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
- Clinical Microbiology Unit, Laboratory Services Directorate Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marín L, Moya B, Peñalver MJ, Cabanillas B, Barranco R, García-Moguel I, Mielgo R, Fernández-Crespo J. Meropenem allergy testing performed at the bedside of hospitalized patients labelled with a penicillin allergy. Allergol Int 2023; 72:588-593. [PMID: 36894401 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meropenem is a widely prescribed beta-lactam for hospitalized patients. There are few data on meropenem allergy assessments in inpatients with a reported history of penicillin allergy who require a treatment with meropenem. This can lead to the use of less effective second-line antibiotics that may increase antibiotic resistances. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a meropenem allergy assessment in admitted patients with a reported history of penicillin allergy that required meropenem for the treatment of an acute infection. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 182 inpatients labelled with a penicillin-allergy who received meropenem after an allergy assessment. The allergy study was performed bedside if meropenem was required urgently. The study included skin prick tests (SPTs) followed by an intradermal skin test (IDT) to meropenem, and a meropenem drug challenge test (DCT). If a non-immediate reaction to a beta-lactam was suspected, it was initiated with patch tests. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 59.7 years (range 28-95) and 80 (44%) were women. A total of 196 sets of diagnostic workups were performed, with 189 (96.4%) of them being tolerated. Only two patients had a positive meropenem IV DCT, both presenting a non-severe cutaneous reaction that completely resolved after treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study evidenced that a bedside meropenem allergy assessment of hospitalized patients labelled with a 'penicillin allergy' who require a broad-spectrum antibiotic for empiric coverage is a safe and effective procedure, avoiding the use of second-line antimicrobial agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Marín
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Moya
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
| | - María José Peñalver
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Cabanillas
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Barranco
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ismael García-Moguel
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Mielgo
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Fernández-Crespo
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paño-Pardo JR, Rodilla EM, Sacristan SC, Saldaña JLC, Párraga LP, León JLDP, Genti PR, Oviedo AR, Jaén MJT, Vidal-Cortes P, Sanz CC. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. Executive summary of guidance from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Care Units (SEMICYUC). ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2023; 41:181-186. [PMID: 36707291 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy is a frequently encountered clinical circumstance that influences antimicrobial prescribing and often leads to the avoidable use of less efficacious and/or more toxic or costly drugs than first-line antimicrobials. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in patients with antibiotic allergy labels has become one of the priorities of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in several countries. This guidance document aims to make recommendations for the systematic approach to patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy based on current evidence. A panel of eleven members of involved Scientific Societies with expertise in the management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy formulated questions about the management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. A systematic literature review was performed by a medical librarian. The questions were distributed among panel members who selected the most relevant references, summarized the evidence and formulated graded recommendations when possible. The answers to all questions were finally reviewed by all panel members. A systematic approach to patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy is recommended to improve antibiotic selection and, consequently clinical outcomes. A clinically oriented, 3-category risk-stratification strategy was recommended for patients with suspected antibiotic allergy. Complementary assessments should consider both clinical risk category and preferred antibiotic agent. Empirical therapy recommendations for the most relevant clinical syndromes in patients with suspected or confirmed β-lactam allergy were formulated. Recommendations on the implementation and monitoring of the impact of the guidelines were formulated. ASP and allergists should design and implement activities that facilitate the most adequate antibiotic use in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Ramón Paño-Pardo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, CIBER en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Esther Moreno Rodilla
- Allergy Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; IBSAL (Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain; Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, Salamanca Medical School, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; RETIC de Asma, Reacciones adversas y Alérgicas (ARADYAL), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Cobo Sacristan
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Luis Cubero Saldaña
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Leonor Periañez Párraga
- Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, CIBER en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Spain
| | - José Luis Del Pozo León
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Spain
| | - Pilar Retamar Genti
- Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla/Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla/CSIC, Sevilla, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Rodríguez Oviedo
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain; IISPV, CIBERES, Spain
| | - María José Torres Jaén
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga-HRUM, Medicine Department, Universidad de Málaga-UMA, IBIMA-ARADyAL, Málaga, Spain
| | - Pablo Vidal-Cortes
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Orense, Spain
| | - Carlos Colás Sanz
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paño-Pardo JR, Moreno Rodilla E, Cobo Sacristan S, Cubero Saldaña JL, Periañez Párraga L, del Pozo León JL, Retamar Genti P, Rodríguez Oviedo A, Torres Jaén MJ, Vidal-Cortes P, Colás Sanz C. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed antibiotic allergy. Executive summary of guidance from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Care Units (SEMICYUC). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
5
|
Banerji A, Solensky R, Phillips EJ, Khan DA. Drug Allergy Practice Parameter Updates to Incorporate Into Your Clinical Practice. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:356-368.e5. [PMID: 36563781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The drug allergy practice parameter was developed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions. It was last updated in 2010. With the growth of research and evidence-based data since then, experts came together to update the practice parameter with a focus on sections that the work group deemed to have significant changes (or were not addressed) in the previous practice parameter. This review is a focused update on aspects of the practice parameter deemed to have the greatest impact on clinical practice and includes significant updates on diagnosis of antibiotic allergy including penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfonamide, fluoroquinolone, and macrolide allergies. Other topics include the evolution in our management approach to patients with aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy, diagnostic testing for delayed drug hypersensitivity and allergy to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and the key consensus-based statements for clinical practice. Specifically, the updated practice parameter helps allergists understand the place of 1- or 2-step drug challenges that are valuable tools often without the need for skin testing in many clinical situations. A proactive approach to delabeling penicillin allergy as well as unnecessary avoidance of safe antibiotic alternatives for patients with proven penicillin allergy is emphasized. New guidance is provided on management of patients with different phenotypes of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions. Approaches to delayed drug hypersensitivity and use of delayed intradermal and patch testing for specific phenotypes are reviewed. Lastly, practical approaches to management of patients with reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleena Banerji
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
| | - Roland Solensky
- The Corvallis Clinic and Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, Ore
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Departments of Medicine, Dermatology, Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - David A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J, Khan DA, Golden DBK, Shaker M, Stukus DR, Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J. Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:1333-1393. [PMID: 36122788 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
| | - Aleena Banerji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Roland Solensky
- Corvallis Clinic, Oregon State University/Oregon Health Science University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, Ore
| | - Andrew A White
- Department of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, Calif
| | - Jonathan A Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; The Research Institute of St Joe's Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne K Ellis
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - David B K Golden
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Matthew J Greenhawt
- Food Challenge and Research Unit Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Caroline C Horner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy Pulmonary Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
| | - Dennis Ledford
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Fla; James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital, Tampa, Fla
| | - Jay A Lieberman
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tenn
| | - John Oppenheimer
- Division of Allergy, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, NJ
| | - Matthew A Rank
- Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz
| | - Marcus S Shaker
- Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - David R Stukus
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern Allopathic Medical School, Fort Lauderdale, Fla
| | - Julie Wang
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, The Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Overview of Beta-Lactam Allergy and the Role of the Pharmacist in Management. ALLERGIES 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/allergies1020011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Unverified beta-lactam allergies are a substantial public health problem, as the majority of patients labeled as beta-lactam allergic do not have clinically significant allergies that may hinder the use beta-lactam therapy when indicated. Outdated or inaccurate beta-lactam or penicillin allergies can result in serious consequences, including suboptimal antibiotic therapy, increased risk of adverse effects, and use of broader spectrum antibiotics than indicated, which may contribute to antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of beta-lactam allergy and highlight the role of pharmacists in managing beta-lactam allergies. Studies have shown that pharmacists can play a vital role in allergy assessment, penicillin skin testing, beta-lactam desensitization, evaluation of beta-lactam cross-reactivity and recommending appropriate antibiotic therapy in patients with beta-lactam allergies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Caruso C, Valluzzi RL, Colantuono S, Gaeta F, Romano A. β-Lactam Allergy and Cross-Reactivity: A Clinician's Guide to Selecting an Alternative Antibiotic. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:31-46. [PMID: 33500632 PMCID: PMC7822086 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s242061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
β-Lactams which include penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams are the most common antibiotic classes reported to cause allergic reactions to drugs. This review is mainly about published studies assessing the cross-reactivity among β-lactams in penicillin- or cephalosporin-allergic subjects by carrying out diagnostic tests with alternative β-lactams and, if appropriate, graded challenges. Several studies demonstrated that cross-reactivity connected with the β-lactam ring, causing positive responses to allergy tests with all β-lactams, is infrequent in subjects with an IgE-mediated allergy and anecdotal in those with a T-cell-mediated allergy. Identities or similarities of β-lactam side-chain structures are mainly responsible for cross-reactivity among these antibiotics. For example, in aminopenicillin-allergic subjects, cross-reactivity with aminocephalosporins could possibly be over 30%. On the other hand, in a few prospective studies of penicillin-allergic individuals, less than 1% of cases show a cross-reactivity between penicillins and both aztreonam and carbapenems. Particular patterns of allergy-test positivity observed in some studies that assessed cross-reactivity among β-lactams seem to indicate that prior exposures may be responsible for coexisting sensitivities. Therefore, pre-treatment skin tests with the related β-lactams are suggested before administering them via graded challenges to β-lactam-allergic patients who need alternative β-lactams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Caruso
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Luigi Valluzzi
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pediatric Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Vatican City, Italy
| | - Stefania Colantuono
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Gaeta
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonino Romano
- Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy
- Fondazione Mediterranea G.B. Morgagni, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Real-World Use of Generic Meropenem: Results of an Observational Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10010062. [PMID: 33440602 PMCID: PMC7827234 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10010062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To determine the therapeutic effect and tolerability of meropenem in routine clinical practice, in terms of clinical and microbiological response. Methods: A real-world, observational, descriptive, longitudinal study with daily monitoring of clinical history records was conducted on all patients who were medically prescribed meropenem during a period between October 2015 and March 2016 at a university hospital in Bucaramanga (Colombia). Results: The study evaluated 84 patients with an average age of 63.2 years, mostly older adults with multiple comorbidities, of whom 54.8% were men. A positive clinical or microbiological response was obtained in 98.8% of the patients. At the end of the treatments, significant improvements in dysthermia (0% vs. 29% at the beginning, p = 0.000), tachycardia (13% vs. 47%, p = 0.049), and leukocytosis (39% vs. 15% at the beginning, p = 0.008) were evidenced. The improvement in the indicator that combines all the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria was also significant (p = 0.000). The treatment was well tolerated, although we identified some non-serious and expected adverse reactions. Conclusions: Generic meropenem proved to be effective and well tolerated for different types of infection in routine clinical practice. The results are consistent with the findings of the clinical studies with the innovator drug.
Collapse
|
10
|
A Practical Guide for Managing Antibiotic Allergies in the Emergency Department. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2020; 41:306-315. [PMID: 31687994 DOI: 10.1097/tme.0000000000000264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Up to 30% of patients report at least one antibiotic allergy, but oftentimes these antibiotic allergies are misdiagnosed. In fact, of the 10% of patients reporting penicillin allergies, 90%-98% are not truly allergic. In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance coupled with a limited number of new antibiotics, evaluating antibiotic allergies is critical in providing optimal patient care. Differentiating adverse drug reactions from antibiotic allergies may seem like a daunting task for clinicians and providers, especially in the emergency department, where decisions are made quickly. However, a systemic approach, including medical record review coupled with patient and/or family interview, is vital in managing patients with antibiotic allergies. Inappropriate, alternative antibiotics are frequently chosen due to patient allergies, and data suggest higher rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, and poor outcomes as a result. Herein, we review antibiotic selection in patients reporting antibiotic allergies in the emergency department.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee Y, Bradley N. Overview and Insights into Carbapenem Allergy. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7030110. [PMID: 31398843 PMCID: PMC6789495 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7030110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding antibiotic allergies and the risk of cross-sensitivity between and within antibiotic classes can have a substantial impact on patient care. The purpose of this review article is to provide insight into carbapenem allergies, describing the overall incidence, risk factors, and in-class cross-sensitivity. A PubMed search was conducted using the following search terms: carbapenem, allergy, cross-sensitivity, incidence, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, and doripenem. Article bibliographies and relevant drug monographs were also reviewed. The overall reported incidence of carbapenem allergy is 0.3%–3.7%. Risk of cross-sensitivity between penicillins and carbapenems is less than 1% in patients with a positive penicillin skin test. Data on cross-sensitivity between cephalosporins and carbapenems are limited; however, the risk appears to also be low. No clinical studies have described cross-sensitivity between the carbapenem agents thus far. The limited data available from case reports demonstrates a lack of cross-sensitivity between the individual carbapenems, suggesting that an alternative carbapenem may cautiously be used in patients with a reported carbapenem allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuman Lee
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA
| | - Nicole Bradley
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7030103. [PMID: 31362351 PMCID: PMC6789778 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7030103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cephalosporins are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes due to their wide clinical utility and general tolerability, with approximately 1–3% of the population reporting a cephalosporin allergy. However, clinicians may avoid the use of cephalosporins in patients with reported penicillin allergies despite the low potential for cross-reactivity. The misdiagnosis of β-lactam allergies and misunderstanding of cross-reactivity among β-lactams, including within the cephalosporin class, often leads to use of broader spectrum antibiotics with poor safety and efficacy profiles and represents a serious obstacle for antimicrobial stewardship. Risk factors for cephalosporin allergies are broad and include female sex, advanced age, and a history of another antibiotic or penicillin allergy; however, cephalosporins are readily tolerated even among individuals with true immediate-type allergies to penicillins. Cephalosporin cross-reactivity potential is related to the structural R1 side chain, and clinicians should be cognizant of R1 side chain similarities when prescribing alternate β-lactams in allergic individuals or when new cephalosporins are brought to market. Clinicians should consider the low likelihood of true cephalosporin allergy when clinically indicated. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the role of cephalosporins in clinical practice, and to highlight the incidence of, risk factors for, and cross-reactivity of cephalosporins with other antibiotics.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cross-Reactivity to Cephalosporins and Carbapenems in Penicillin-Allergic Patients: Two Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:2722-2738.e5. [PMID: 31170539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no recent systematic review on the risk of cross-reactivity to cephalosporins and carbapenems in penicillin-allergic patients despite many new studies on the subject. All past reviews have several limitations such as not including any patient with a T-cell-mediated penicillin allergy. OBJECTIVES To determine the risk of cross-reactivity to cephalosporins and carbapenems in patients with a proven IgE- or T-cell-mediated penicillin allergy. To measure the association between R1 side chain similarity on cephalosporins and penicillins and the risk of cross-reactivity. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 to March 2019. Studies had to include at least 10 penicillin-allergic subjects whose allergy had been confirmed by a positive skin test (ST) or drug provocation test (DPT) result. Cross-reactivity had to be assessed to at least 1 cephalosporin or carbapenem through ST or DPT. Both random-effects and fixed-effect models were used to combine data. A bioinformatic model was used to quantify the similarity between R1 side chains. RESULTS Twenty-one observational studies on cephalosporin cross-reactivity involving 1269 penicillin-allergic patients showed that the risk of cross-reactivity varied with the degree of similarity between R1 side chains: 16.45% (95% CI, 11.07-23.75) for aminocephalosporins, which share an identical side chain with a penicillin (similarity score = 1), 5.60% (95% CI, 3.46-8.95) for a few cephalosporins with an intermediate similarity score (range, 0.563-0.714), and 2.11% (95% CI, 0.98-4.46) for all those with low similarity scores (below 0.4), irrespective of cephalosporin generation. The higher risk associated with aminocephalosporins was observed whether penicillin allergy was IgE- or T-cell-mediated. Eleven observational studies on carbapenem cross-reactivity involving 1127 penicillin-allergic patients showed that the risk of cross-reactivity to any carbapenem was 0.87% (95% CI, 0.32-2.32). CONCLUSIONS Although it remains possible that these meta-analyses overestimated the risk of cross-reactivity, clinicians should consider the increased risk of cross-reactivity associated with aminocephalosporins, and to a lesser extent with intermediate-similarity-score cephalosporins, compared with the very low risk associated with low-similarity-score cephalosporins and all carbapenems when using beta-lactams in patients with a suspected or proven penicillin allergy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Trubiano JA, Grayson ML, Thursky KA, Phillips EJ, Slavin MA. How antibiotic allergy labels may be harming our most vulnerable patients. Med J Aust 2019; 208:469-470. [PMID: 29902399 DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Karin A Thursky
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | - Monica A Slavin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Savic LC, Khan DA, Kopac P, Clarke RC, Cooke PJ, Dewachter P, Ebo DG, Garcez T, Garvey LH, Guttormsen AB, Hopkins PM, Hepner DL, Kolawole H, Krøigaard M, Laguna JJ, Marshall SD, Mertes PM, Platt PR, Rose MA, Sabato V, Sadleir PHM, Savic S, Takazawa T, Voltolini S, Volcheck GW. Management of a surgical patient with a label of penicillin allergy: narrative review and consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:e82-e94. [PMID: 30916014 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Unsubstantiated penicillin-allergy labels are common in surgical patients, and can lead to significant harm through avoidance of best first-line prophylaxis of surgical site infections and increased infection with resistant bacterial strains. Up to 98% of penicillin-allergy labels are incorrect when tested. Because of the scarcity of trained allergists in all healthcare systems, only a minority of surgical patients have the opportunity to undergo testing and de-labelling before surgery. Testing pathways can be modified and shortened in selected patients. A variety of healthcare professionals can, with appropriate training and in collaboration with allergists, provide testing for selected patients. We review how patients might be assessed, the appropriate testing strategies that can be used, and the minimum standards of safe testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Savic
- Anaesthetic Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - D A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - P Kopac
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - R C Clarke
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Anaesthetic Allergy Referral Centre of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - P J Cooke
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - P Dewachter
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier de Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université Paris 13, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - D G Ebo
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
| | - T Garcez
- Department of Immunology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - L H Garvey
- Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre, Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A B Guttormsen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - P M Hopkins
- Anaesthetic Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D L Hepner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - H Kolawole
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Krøigaard
- Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre, Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - J J Laguna
- Allergy Unit, Allergo-Anaesthesia Unit, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, Faculty of Medicine, Alfonso X El Sabio University, ARADyAL, Madrid, Spain
| | - S D Marshall
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P M Mertes
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | - P R Platt
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Anaesthetic Allergy Referral Centre of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - M A Rose
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal North Shore Hospital, and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - V Sabato
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
| | - P H M Sadleir
- Department of Anaesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Anaesthetic Allergy Referral Centre of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - S Savic
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - T Takazawa
- Intensive Care Unit, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - S Voltolini
- Allergy Unit, Policlinic Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - G W Volcheck
- Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Presumed β-Lactam Allergy and Cross-reactivity in the Operating Theater: A Practical Approach. Anesthesiology 2019; 129:335-342. [PMID: 29762180 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000002252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
A β-lactam allergy is the most common suspected in-hospital drug allergy. This article aims to provide a practical approach to a patient with presumed β-lactam allergy in the perioperative setting.
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vardakas KZ, Kalimeris GD, Triarides NA, Falagas ME. An update on adverse drug reactions related to β-lactam antibiotics. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:499-508. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1462334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Z. Vardakas
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios D. Kalimeris
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos A. Triarides
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew E. Falagas
- Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
How to Manage Antibiotic Allergy in Cystic Fibrosis? Epidemiologic, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Aspects. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-018-0152-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Zagursky RJ, Pichichero ME. Cross-reactivity in β-Lactam Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 6:72-81.e1. [PMID: 29017833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
β-Lactam drugs (penicillins, amoxicillin, and cephalosporins) account for 42.6% of all severe drug-induced anaphylaxis. In this review, we focus on clinically significant immunologic cross-reactivity in patients with confirmed penicillin allergy to cephalosporins, and the structural involvement of the R1 and R2 chemical side chains of the cephalosporins causing IgE-mediated cross-reactivity with penicillin and other cephalosporins. Skin tests predict IgE-mediated reactions and showed cross-reactivity between penicillins and early generation cephalosporins that shared side chains, but confirmatory challenge data are lacking. Later-generation cephalosporins, which have distinct side chains, do not have any skin test cross-reactivity with penicillin/amoxicillin. There is debate as to the involvement of R2 side chains as the antigenic determinants that cause IgE-mediated hypersensitivity with various cephalosporins. Avoidance of cephalosporins, when they are the drug of choice in a penicillin-allergic individual, results in significant morbidity that outweighs the low risk of anaphylaxis. We conclude that there is ample evidence to allow the safe use of cephalosporins in patients with isolated confirmed penicillin or amoxicillin allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Zagursky
- Rochester General Hospital Research Institute, Center for Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Rochester, NY
| | - Michael E Pichichero
- Rochester General Hospital Research Institute, Center for Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Rochester, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia2Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Elizabeth Jane Phillips
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee5Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Tacquard C, Collange O, Gomis P, Malinovsky JM, Petitpain N, Demoly P, Nicoll S, Mertes PM. Anaesthetic hypersensitivity reactions in France between 2011 and 2012: the 10th GERAP epidemiologic survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2017; 61:290-299. [PMID: 28164269 DOI: 10.1111/aas.12855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Revised: 09/25/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate hypersensitivity reactions during anaesthesia are rare but potentially life-threatening. The epidemiology changes with time and evolving professional practice, and hence needs to be monitored. Our objective was to follow this epidemiology. METHODS This was a retrospective, observational study in French hospital clinics, conducted by GERAP members (Groupe d'Étude des Réactions Anaphylactoïdes Périopératoires). Consecutive patients seen in allergo-anaesthesia outpatient clinics, who had experienced a hypersensitivity reaction during anaesthesia between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2012, were included. Demographic data, allergy history, drugs received before the reaction, symptoms of the reaction, results of blood samples (histamine, tryptase, IgE-specific assays), and results of the allergy assessment were recorded. RESULTS The most common causes of allergic reactions were (Neuromuscular Blocking Agents) NMBAs (N = 302; 60.6%), antibiotics (N = 91, 18.2%, Cephalosporin N = 49, 10%) and dyes (N = 27; 5.4%). Latex as an allergic agent was involved in 26 cases (5.2%), hypnotics in 11 cases (2.2%) and opioids in seven cases (1.4%). Of the NMBAs, Rocuronium had the highest proportion of reactions (13.8 reactions/100,000 vials sold) followed by Suxamethonium (13.3/100,000 vials sold). Cisatracurium had the lowest proportion of reactions (0.4/100,000 vials sold). Patients were sensitized to two or more NMBAs in 48.9% of cases and without testing, cross-sensitivity cannot be predicted. CONCLUSIONS When compared with the previous GERAP studies, NMBAs are still the most frequently triggering allergens, with marked differences between individual NMBAs, but they are now followed by antibiotics (of which greater than 50% were cephalosporins) and dyes. Anaesthetists must be aware of the differences between drugs and of the pattern of emerging allergens. For the future of safe anaesthesia, allergy assessment is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Tacquard
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg; Strasbourg France
| | - O. Collange
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg; Strasbourg France
| | - P. Gomis
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; Hôpital Maison Blanche; CHU de Reims; Reims France
| | - J.-M. Malinovsky
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; Hôpital Maison Blanche; CHU de Reims; Reims France
| | - N. Petitpain
- Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance de Lorraine; CHU de Nancy; Nancy France
| | - P. Demoly
- Department of Pulmonology - Division of Allergy; Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
- UPMC Paris 06; UMR-S 1136; IPLESP; Equipe EPAR; Sorbonne Universités; Paris France
| | - S. Nicoll
- Department of anaesthesia; Christchurch Hospital; Christchurch New Zealand
| | - P. M. Mertes
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg; Strasbourg France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trubiano JA, Worth LJ, Urbancic K, Brown TM, Paterson DL, Lucas M, Phillips E. Return to sender: the need to re-address patient antibiotic allergy labels in Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J 2016; 46:1311-1317. [PMID: 27527526 PMCID: PMC5096978 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Antibiotic allergies are frequently reported and have significant impacts upon appropriate prescribing and clinical outcomes. We surveyed infectious diseases physicians, allergists, clinical immunologists and hospital pharmacists to evaluate antibiotic allergy knowledge and service delivery in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS An online multi-choice questionnaire was developed and endorsed by representatives of the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) and the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases (ASID). The 37-item survey was distributed in April 2015 to members of ASCIA, ASID, the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. RESULTS Of 277 respondents, 94% currently use or would utilise antibiotic allergy testing (AAT) and reported seeing up to 10 patients/week labelled as antibiotic-allergic. Forty-two per cent were not aware of or did not have AAT available. Most felt that AAT would aid antibiotic selection, antibiotic appropriateness and antimicrobial stewardship (79, 69 and 61% respectively). Patients with the histories of immediate hypersensitivity were more likely to be referred than those with delayed hypersensitivities (76 vs 41%, P = 0.0001). Lack of specialist physicians (20%) and personal experience (17%) were barriers to service delivery. A multidisciplinary approach was a preferred AAT model (53%). Knowledge gaps were identified, with the majority overestimating rates of penicillin/cephalosporin (78%), penicillin/carbapenem (57%) and penicillin/monobactam (39%) cross-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS A high burden of antibiotic allergy labelling and demand for AAT is complicated by a relative lack availability or awareness of AAT services in Australia and New Zealand. Antibiotic allergy education and deployment of AAT, accessible to community and hospital-based clinicians, may improve clinical decisions and reduce antibiotic allergy impacts. A collaborative approach involving infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists and allergists/immunologists is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - L J Worth
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - K Urbancic
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T M Brown
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D L Paterson
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - M Lucas
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Pathwest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - E Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Consequences of avoiding β-lactams in patients with β-lactam allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 137:1148-1153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Revised: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
25
|
Castellani LR, Gold WL, MacFadden DR. A 25-year-old woman reporting an allergy to penicillin. CMAJ 2015; 187:1065-1066. [PMID: 25897056 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.141123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas R Castellani
- Department of Medicine (Castellani, Gold, MacFadden), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Division of Infectious Diseases (Gold, MacFadden), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Wayne L Gold
- Department of Medicine (Castellani, Gold, MacFadden), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Division of Infectious Diseases (Gold, MacFadden), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont
| | - Derek R MacFadden
- Department of Medicine (Castellani, Gold, MacFadden), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Division of Infectious Diseases (Gold, MacFadden), University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Cunha BA. No need for an initial test dose of meropenem or ertapenem in patients reporting anaphylactic reactions to penicillins. J Chemother 2015; 27:317-8. [PMID: 25566799 DOI: 10.1179/1973947814y.0000000233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|