Ultrasensitive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Load as a Marker of Treatment Choice for Simplification Strategies

Four days/week antiretroviral maintenance strategy (ANRS 170 QUATUOR): substudies of reservoirs and ultrasensitive drug resistance

BACKGROUND

In a 4 days/week (4/7 days) maintenance strategy (ANRS-170 QUATUOR trial), the virological impact of an intermittent strategy was assessed by ultrasensitive virological analyses of reservoirs and resistance.

METHODS

HIV-1 total DNA, ultra-sensitive plasma viral load (USpVL) and semen VL were measured in the first 121 participants. Sanger and ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) were performed on the HIV-1 genome (Illumina technology) according to the ANRS consensus. A generalized estimation equation with a Poisson distribution was used to compare changes in the proportion of residual viraemia, detectable semen HIV RNA and HIV DNA within and between the two groups over time.

RESULTS

The proportion of participants with residual viraemia at Day 0 (D0) and Week 48 (W48) was 16.7% and 25.0% in the 4/7 days group and 22.4% and 29.7% in the 7/7 days group, respectively (+8.3% versus +7.3%, P = 0.971). The proportion of detectable DNA (>40 copies/106 cells) at D0 and W48 was 53.7% and 57.4% in the 4/7 days group and 56.1% and 51.8% in the 7/7 days group, respectively (+3.7% versus -4.3%, P = 0.358). Semen HIV RNA was detectable (≥100  copies/mL) in 2.2% of participants at D0 and 4.5% at W48 in the 4/7 days group versus 6.1% and 9.1% in the 7/7 days group, respectively (+2.3% versus +3.0%, P = 0.743). Emerging resistance at failure was more frequent in the 4/7 days group detected by Sanger sequencing: 3/6 participants versus 1/4 in the 7/7 days group, and similar with the UDS assay: 5/6 versus 4/4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the potency of a 4/7 days maintenance strategy on virological suppression at the reservoirs and emergent resistance level, including minority variants.

Kinetics of archived M184V mutation in treatment-experienced virally suppressed HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the kinetics of drug-resistant viral variants (DRVs) harboring the M184V mutation in the proviral DNA of long-term virally suppressed patients, and factors associated with DRV persistence.

METHODS

HIV-DNA from blood cells stored in 2019 and 2016 was sequenced using both Sanger and ultradeep sequencing (SS and UDS, with a detection threshold of 1%) in ART-treated patients with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 5 years, with past M184V mutation documented in HIV-RNA.

RESULTS

Among the 79 tested patients, by combining SS and UDS, the M184V was found to be absent in 26/79 (33%) patients (M184V- patients), and persisted in 53/79 (67%) (M184V+ patients). The M184V+ patients had a longer history of ART, a lower CD4 nadir and higher pretherapeutic HIV-RNA. Among the 37 patients with viral sequences assessed by UDS, the proportion of M184V+ DRVs significantly decreased between 2016 and 2019 (40% versus 14%, p=0.005). The persistence of M184V was associated with the duration and level of HIV-RNA replication under 3TC/FTC (p=0.0009 and p=0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

While it decreased over time in HIV-DNA, the M184V mutation was more frequently persistent in the HIV-DNA of more experienced patients with longer past replication under 3TC/FTC.

Presence of HIV-1 G-to-A mutations linked to APOBEC editing is more prevalent in non-B HIV-1 subtypes and is associated with lower HIV-1 reservoir

OBJECTIVES

APOBEC3 editing activity contributes to sequences variation and viral diversification. We aimed to characterize virological and clinical factors associated with G-to-A mutations and stop codons in the HIV-1 reservoir, markers of APOBEC3 footprints, in order to better understand HIV-1 diversity among virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients.

METHODS

Immuno-virological and clinical factors were compared between 92 patients harbouring G-to-A mutations and stop codons (APOBEC+) in the reverse transcriptase gene and 92 patients without G-to-A mutations (APOBEC-) and stop codons in their DNA genotypes.

RESULTS

Patients were predominantly men (74.5%) and were mostly infected by B-subtype (69.0%), with 44.1% and 55.9% in APOBEC+ and APOBEC- groups, respectively. At time of HIV DNA genotypes, the total cell-associated HIV-1 DNA load was 2.34 log10 copies/106 cells (IQR 1.85-2.67) and 33.2% of them had a detectable ultrasensitive plasma viral load. Hypermutated sequences were identified in 28.2% of the APOBEC+ group. The median total cell-associated HIV-1 DNA level was significantly lower in APOBEC+ than APOBEC- group: 2.13 log10 copies/106 cells (IQR 1.60-2.60) versus 2.52 log10 copies/106 cells (IQR 2.19-2.71) (P < 0.001), respectively. Presence of G-to-A mutations and stop codon was independently associated with HIV-1 subtype non-B (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show an independent association between the presence of G-to-A mutations and stop codons with HIV-1 subtype non-B and low proviral DNA that could be explained by the APOBEC3 footprints and restriction of DNA synthesis and integration. However, further investigations are needed to study the contribution of Vif amino acid variability among HIV-1 subtypes.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)

BACKGROUND

Protease inhibitor monotherapy is a simplified treatment strategy for virally suppressed HIV-positive patients that has the potential for cost savings, as fewer drugs are used than with combination therapy. However, evidence for its economic value is limited.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy followed by treatment intensification in case of viral load rebound versus combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir in HIV-1 infected patients with viral suppression in the ANRS 140 DREAM trial.

METHODS

DREAM was conducted in 36 French Hospitals between 2009 and 2013. For each treatment strategy, we estimated the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted mean costs (in €, year 2010 values) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient, as well as incremental costs and QALYs per patient. We then assessed uncertainty using the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, scenario analyses and cost-effectiveness price-threshold (CEPT) analysis.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis considering 2009-2013 antiretroviral drug (ARV) prices, adjusted incremental costs and QALYs were - €3296 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 5202 to - 1391) and 0.006 (95% CI - 0.021 to 0.033), respectively, over 2 years, suggesting that monotherapy was cost-effective with a probability of 100% at various cost-effectiveness thresholds. In scenario analyses considering 2018 ARV prices, monotherapy remained cost-effective but with a lower probability (94% vs. 100% in the base-case analysis). The current price of cART would have to decrease by 34% to be cost-effective with a probability of 95%.

CONCLUSION

Monotherapy appears to be cost-effective compared with cART for virologically suppressed HIV-positive patients in France. CEPT analysis is a useful tool to identify the preferred strategy to adopt given that ARV prices change rapidly.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00946595.