Colistin Resistance Development Following Colistin-Meropenem Combination Therapy Versus Colistin Monotherapy in Patients With Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

Comparison of cefiderocol and colistin-based regimens for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

There are multiple antibiotic regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in clinical practice. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their establishment to April 15, 2024, to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies, and compared the clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of the site of infection and the risk of bias in the studies. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted.

RESULTS

Six observational studies were included, with 251 cases in the cefiderocol-based group and 372 cases in the colistin-based group. Compared to the colistin-based group, the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, P = 0.01) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.95, P = 0.03). However, for the 14-day and 28-day mortality rates, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups. According to the subgroup analysis, among patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality, but it did not reduce the mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients. The result of TSA showed that our conclusions are reliable. There was no significant statistical difference in the microbiological cure rate, clinical cure rate, or duration of hospitalization. In addition, the cefiderocol-based group did not have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the colistin-based regimens, the cefiderocol-based regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality in CRAB-infected patients, especially for patients with BSI. However, they did not show any advantages in terms of the clinical cure rate or microbiological cure rate, nor did they reduce the incidence of AKI.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023487213.

The effect of combining antibiotics on resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

When and under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics. We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to November 24th, 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. A patient was considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials' risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. 42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, were qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio (OR) for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I 2 =77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions. The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall, is compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance.

Microbiologic Cure with a Simplified Dosage of Intravenous Colistin in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Colistin's FDA weight-based dosing (WBD) and frequency are both expressed in a broad range. Therefore, a simplified fixed-dose regimen (SFDR) of intravenous colistin based on three body-weight segments has been established for adults. The SFDR falls within the WBD range of each body-weight segment and accounts for the pharmacokinetic features. This study compared microbiologic cure with colistin SFDR to WBD in critically ill adults.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted for colistin orders from January 2014 to February 2022. The study included ICU patients who received intravenous colistin for carbapenem-non-susceptible, colistin-intermediate Gram-negative bacilli infections. Patients received the SFDR after the protocol was implemented, as the WBD was previously used. The primary endpoint was microbiologic cure. Secondary endpoints were 30-day infection recurrence and acute kidney injury (AKI).

Results

Of the 228 screened patients, 84 fulfilled the inclusion and matching criteria (42 in each group). The microbiologic cure rate was 69% with the SFDR and 36% with the WBD [p=0.002]. Infection recurred in four of the 29 patients who had a microbiologic cure with the SFDR (14%), and in six of the 15 patients with WBD (40%); [p=0.049]. AKI occurred in seven of the 36 SFDR patients who were not on hemodialysis (19%) and 15 of the 33 WBD patients (46%); [p=0.021].

Conclusion

In this study, colistin SFDR was associated with a higher microbiologic cure in carbapenem-non-susceptible, colistin-intermediate Gram-negative bacilli infections and with a lower incidence of AKI in critically ill adults compared to WBD.

Risk Factors for the Development of Colistin Resistance during Colistin Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections

Colistin is one of the last-resort options for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections if novel antibiotics are unavailable, where the development of colistin resistance during treatment represents a major challenge for clinicians. We aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with the development of colistin resistance in patients with CRKP infections following colistin treatment. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of patients with CRKP strains available before and after colistin treatment at a medical center in Taiwan, between October 2016 and November 2020. Cases (n = 35) included patients with an initial colistin-susceptible CRKP (ColS-CRKP) strain and a subsequent colistin-resistant CRKP (ColR-CRKP) strain. Controls (n = 18) included patients with ColS-CRKP as both the initial and subsequent strains. The 30-day mortality rate after the subsequent CRKP isolation was not different between cases and controls (12/35 [34%] versus 5/18 [28%] [P = 0.631]). blaKPC (n = 38) and blaOXA-48 (n = 11) accounted for the major mechanisms of carbapenem resistance. Alterations in mgrB were found in 18/35 (51%) ColR-CRKP strains, and mcr-1 was not detected in any of the strains. More patients received combination therapy in the control group than in the case group (17/18 versus 21/35 [P = 0.008]). The logistic regression model indicated that combination therapy with tigecycline was protective against the acquisition of colistin resistance (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.62 [P = 0.008]). We observed that the inclusion of tigecycline in colistin treatment mitigated the risk of acquiring colistin resistance. These results offer insight into using the combination of tigecycline and colistin for the treatment of CRKP infections in antimicrobial stewardship. IMPORTANCE Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections is challenging due to the limited options of antibiotics. Colistin is one of the last-resort antibiotics if novel antimicrobial agents are not available. It is crucial to identify modifiable clinical factors associated with the emergence of resistance during colistin treatment. Here, we found that the addition of tigecycline to colistin treatment prevented the acquisition of colistin resistance. Colistin-tigecycline combination therapy is therefore considered a hopeful option in antimicrobial stewardship to treat CRKP infections.

Modelling of the transmission dynamics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in hospitals and design of control strategies

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has emerged as a major threat to global public health. Epidemiological and infection controls associated with CRKP are challenging because of several potential elements involved in a complicated cycle of transmission. Here, we proposed a comprehensive mathematical model to investigate the transmission dynamics of CRKP, determine factors affecting the prevalence, and evaluate the impact of interventions on transmission. The model includes the essential compartments, which are uncolonized, asymptomatic colonized, symptomatic colonized, and relapsed patients. Additionally, symptomatic colonized and relapsed patients were further classified into subpopulations according to their number of treatment failures or relapses. We found that the admission of colonized patients and use of antibiotics significantly impacted the endemic transmission in health care units. Thus, we introduced the treatment efficacy, defined by combining the treatment duration and probability of successful treatment, to characterize and describe the effects of antibiotic treatment on transmission. We showed that a high antibiotic treatment efficacy results in a significantly reduced likelihood of patient readmission in the health care unit. Additionally, our findings demonstrate that CRKP transmission with different epidemiological characteristics must be controlled using distinct interventions.

Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins 'intermediate' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.

Agents of Last Resort: An Update on Polymyxin Resistance

Polymyxin resistance is a major public health threat, because the polymyxins represent last-line therapeutics for gram-negative pathogens resistant to essentially all other antibiotics. Minimizing any potential emergence and dissemination of polymyxin resistance relies on an improved understanding of mechanisms of and risk factors for polymyxin resistance, infection prevention and stewardship strategies, together with optimization of dosing of polymyxins (eg, combination regimens).