How biocompatible haemodialysers can conquer the need for systemic anticoagulation even in post-dilution haemodiafiltration: a cross-over study

Hemodialysis patients have signs of a chronic thrombotic burden

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases are the dominant cause of morbidity in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Unless sufficient anticoagulation is used during HD, clotting may appear. The objective was to investigate if levels of fibrin degradation products (D-dimer) were increased before and during HD.

METHODS

The combined observational study included 20 patients performing a total of 60 hemodialysis divided into three sessions of low-flux dialysis. None of the patients suffered from any clinically evident thromboembolic event before or during the study. Median bolus anticoagulation (mainly tinzaparin) doses were 84 Units/kg bow. Blood samples were drawn before HD (predialysis), and at 30min and 180min during HD with focus on analyzing D-dimer levels and its relation to interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and speed of fluid elimination by HD (UF-rate).

RESULTS

Predialysis, D-dimer levels (mean 0.767 ±0.821, min 0.136mg/L) were above the upper reference value in 95% of the sessions. D-dimer levels were lowered at 30min (p<0.001) and returned to predialysis levels at 180min. Predialysis D-dimer correlated with NT-pro-BNP, Troponin T, IDWG and UF-rate. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the D-dimer levels were significantly related to IDWG and the UF-rate.

CONCLUSIONS

D-dimer levels were elevated in a high proportion predialysis and during HD and related to the IDWG and the UF-rate. Awareness of D-dimer levels and future studies will help clarify if optimization of those variables, besides anticoagulation and biocompatibility measures, will eradicate the repeated subclinical thromboembolic events related to each HD; one reason that may explain organ damage and shortened life span of these patients.

Detection and Scoring of Extracorporeal Circuit Clotting During Hemodialysis

Maintaining patency of the extracorporeal hemodialysis (HD) circuit is a prerequisite to perform HD. Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins are the most used anticoagulants in maintenance HD, but their administration comes with a major trade-off of bleeding complications. This narrative review article discusses technical factors impacting on HD circuit patency, such as tubings, dialyzer membranes, priming practices, and treatment settings. Strategies for monitoring extracorporeal circuit clotting during and after treatment are also reviewed, as these are essential tools for optimizing anticoagulation.

Assessment of the Influence of Asymmetric Triacetate Cellulose Membrane on the Rate of Removal of Middle Molecular Weight Uremic Toxins in Patients Treated with Postdilution Online Hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND: Postdilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) effectively removes uremic toxins of middle molecular weight from the blood of patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease. The rate of removal of uremic toxins depends on the type of dialysis membrane, blood flow rate (Qb), net ultrafiltration flow rate (Qnuf), and total convective volume (Vconv). AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of asymmetric triacetate cellulose dialysis membrane in patients on post-dilution OL-HDF. METHODS: Thirty-five patients treated with post-dilution OL-HDF hemodiafiltration for at least 3 months were examined. The main parameters for assessing the efficiency of removal of uremic toxins of middle molecular weight are the concentration of β2-microglobulin (β2-M) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum before and after a single session of post-dilution OL-HDF. The followings were used for statistical analysis: Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Student’s T test for bound samples and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The average Vconv was 20.90 ± 3.30 liters/session. The β2-M reduction index during a single session of postdilution OL-HDF was 71.10 ± 6.39%, the IL-6 reduction index was 43.75 ± 15.60%, and the albumin reduction index was 4.55 ± 2.31%. CONCLUSION: The asymmetric triacetate cellulose dialysis membrane effectively removes β2-M and IL-6 during a single session of postdilution OL-HDF. The β2-M reduction index is ∼70%, the IL-6 reduction index is ∼40%, and albumin loss is <4.0 g/4 h. The examined dialysis membrane and dialysis modality prevent the development of amyloidosis associated with dialysis, microinflammation and reduce the risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in the population of patients treated with regular hemodiafiltration.

Impact of intradialytic fiber clotting on dialyzer extraction and solute removal: a randomized cross-over study

Previous studies revealed the importance of biocompatibility, anticoagulation strategy, and dialysis mode and duration on fiber blocking at the end of a hemodialysis session. The present study was set up in ten hemodialysis patients to relate fiber patency to dialyzer extraction and removal of small and middle molecules. With only 1/4th of the regular anticoagulation dose, and using a Solacea 19H and FX800 CorDiax dialyzer, fiber patency was quantified using 3D micro-CT scanning for different dialysis durations (i.e. 60, 120 and 240 min). While Solacea showed enhanced fiber patency in all test sessions, fiber blocking in the FX800 CorDiax did not follow a linear process during dialysis, but was rather accelerated near the end of dialysis. Dialyzer extraction ratios were correlated with the percentages of open fibers. While the fiber blocking process affected extraction ratios (i.e. for phosphorus and myoglobin in the FX800 CorDiax), it had only minor impact on the removal of toxins up to at least 12 kDa.

Biocompatibility of Surface-Modified Membranes for Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy

Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining therapy for millions of people worldwide. However, despite considerable technical and scientific improvements, results are still not fully satisfactory in terms of morbidity and mortality. The membrane contained in the hemodialyzer is undoubtedly the main determinant of the success and quality of hemodialysis therapy. Membrane properties influence solute removal and the interactions with blood components that define the membrane’s biocompatibility. Bioincompatibility is considered a potential contributor to several uremic complications. Thus, the development of more biocompatible polymers used as hemodialyzer membrane is of utmost importance for improving results and clinical patient outcomes. Many different surface-modified membranes for hemodialysis have been manufactured over recent years by varying approaches in the attempt to minimize blood incompatibility. Their main characteristics and clinical results in hemodialysis patients were reviewed in the present article.