Corticosteroids and mycophenolic acid analogs in IgA nephropathy with progressive decline in kidney function

Immunosuppressant Agents as Add-On Therapy Failed to Improve the Outcome of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy with Crescent Score C1

INTRODUCTION

The renoprotective benefits of adding immunosuppressant therapy to corticosteroid (CS) treatment for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients with less than 25% crescent formation (C1) remain uncertain, warranting further research.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on IgAN patients with crescent C1 lesions confirmed by renal biopsy at Xinqiao Hospital between May 1, 2017, and May 1, 2020. Patients were stratified into either the CS treatment group or the CS combined with an additional immunosuppressant therapy group. Follow-up assessments were conducted within 24 months. Propensity score analysis was used to match patients receiving CS and CS + immunosuppressant drug treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcomes included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the benefits of different populations. Composite endpoint outcomes comprised a 30% eGFR decrease, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) necessitating dialysis or transplant, or kidney disease-related mortality. Adverse events were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

296 IgAN patients with C1 lesions were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics indicated that IgAN patients in the CS + immunosuppressant group exhibited poorer renal function and higher UACR levels. Propensity score analysis effectively minimized the influence of baseline clinical characteristics, including age, serum creatinine, initial eGFR, UACR, and 24-h proteinuria. Both treatment groups demonstrated continuous eGFR improvement and significant UACR reduction during follow-up, especially at 6 months. However, no significant differences in eGFR and UACR reduction rates were observed between the two groups throughout the entire follow-up period, both before and after matching. Subgroup analysis revealed improved eGFR in both treatment groups, notably among patients with an initial eGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, IgAN patients with C1 lesions and a cellular crescent ratio exceeding 50% treated with CS and immunosuppressant therapy experienced a significant improvement in renal function and a decline in urinary protein creatinine ratio. Composite endpoint outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups, while the incidence of adverse events was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the addition of immunosuppressant therapy to corticosteroid monotherapy did not confer significant therapeutic advantages in patients with C1 lesions compared to CS monotherapy, although some specific patient populations appeared to derive modest benefits from this combined approach.

Drugs in Development to Treat IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is a common glomerulonephritis consequent to the autoimmune response to aberrant glycosylated immunoglobulin (Ig) A antibodies. Although it has historically been considered a benign disease, it has since become clear that a substantial percentage of patients reach end-stage kidney failure over the years. Several therapeutic attempts have been proposed, with systemic steroids being the most prevalent, albeit burdened by possible serious adverse events. Thanks to the more in-depth knowledge of the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy, new treatment targets have been identified and new drugs developed. In this narrative review, we summarise the molecules under clinical development for the treatment of IgA nephropathy. As a search strategy, we used PubMed, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and abstracts from recent international congresses. TRF budesonide and sparsentan are the two molecules at a more advanced stage, just entering the market. Other promising agents are undergoing phase III clinical development. These include anti-APRIL and anti-BLyS/BAFF antibodies and some complement inhibitors. Other new possible strategies include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-CD40 ligands and anti-CD38 antibodies. In an era increasingly characterised by 'personalised medicine' and 'precision therapy' approaches and considering that the potential therapeutic armamentarium for IgA nephropathy will be very broad in the near future, the identification of biomarkers capable of helping the nephrologist to select the right drug for the right patient should be the focus of future studies.

Points of view in nephrology: personalized management of IgA nephropathy, beyond KDIGO

IgA nephropathy is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, and an important cause of kidney failure, as 20-40% of patients progress to renal replacement therapy 20-30 years after diagnosis. Its clinical presentation ranges from isolated microscopic hematuria to nephrotic syndrome, and even to a rapidly progressive course. Ethnicity and epigenetics play a key role in its clinical aggressiveness. Selection of patients at risk needing immunosuppressive treatment is a challenge for the nephrologist. Some active and chronic kidney lesions detected on kidney biopsy have been demonstrated to have prognostic value according to the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy, later validated by numerous studies. However, KDIGO 2021 guidelines still consider persistent proteinuria > 1 g/24 h to be the most relevant risk factor for the progression of IgA nephropathy and the only one requiring immunosuppressive treatment. KDIGO guidelines have proposed a therapeutic algorithm, but many patients present peculiar characteristics that are not addressed by the current guidelines, pointing to the need for alternative approaches. In these cases, a tailored approach to each patient should be followed in which clinical, histological, laboratory, social and ethical aspects must be considered. In this manuscript we present three cases of IgA nephropathy from different countries, highlighting many of the aspects encountered in clinical practice that illustrate an individualized approach to the treatment of these patients.

Clinical Practice Patterns in IgA Nephropathy: A Global Questionnaire-Based Survey

Introduction

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) displays ethnic differences in disease phenotype. We aimed to examine how this common disease is managed worldwide.

Methods

An online 2-step questionnaire-based survey was conducted among nephrologists globally focusing on various management strategies used in IgAN.

Results

A total of 422 nephrologists responded to the initial survey and 339 to the follow-up survey. Of the nephrologists, 13.7% do not get MEST-C scores in biopsy reports; 97.2% of nephrologists use renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) / angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) as initial treatment. Other supportive treatments commonly employed are fish oil (43.6%) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (48.6%) with regional differences. Immunosuppression is generally (92.4%) initiated when proteinuria >1 g/d persists for ≥3 months.Main considerations for initiating immunosuppression are level of proteinuria (87.9%), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (78.7%), lack of response to RAAS blockade (57.6%) and MEST-C score (64.9%). Corticosteroids (89.1%) are universally used as first-line immunosuppression; mycophenolate mofetil is commonly used in resistant patients (49.3%). Only 30.4% nephrologist enroll patients with persistent proteinuria >1 g/d in clinical trials. Nephrologists in Europe (63.6%), North America (56.5%), and Australia (63.6%) are more likely to do so compared to South America (31.3%) and Asia (17.2%). Only 8.1% nephrologists in lower-middle income countries (LMICs) enroll patients in clinical trials, though 40% of them are aware of such trials in their nations.

Conclusion

Although most nephrologists agree on common parameters to assess clinical severity of IgAN, use of RAAS blockade, and blood pressure control, there is heterogeneity in use of other supportive therapies and initiation of immunosuppression. There is reluctance to enroll patients in clinical trials with novel treatments, principally in LMICs.

Microscopic hematuria as a risk factor for IgAN progression: considering this biomarker in selecting and monitoring patients

Hematuria-either macroscopic hematuria or asymptomatic microscopic hematuria-is a clinical feature typical but not specific for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). The only biomarker supported by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes group as a predictor of progression, identifying patients needing treatment, is proteinuria >1 g/day persistent despite maximized supportive care. However, proteinuria can occur in the setting of active glomerulonephritis or secondary to sclerotic renal lesions. Microscopic hematuria is observed in experimental models of IgAN after IgA-IgG immunocomplex deposition, activation of inflammation and complement pathways. Oxidative damage, triggered by hemoglobin release, is thought to contribute to the development of proteinuria and progression. Despite being a clinical hallmark of IgAN and having a rational relationship with its pathophysiology, the value of microscopic hematuria in assessing activity and predicting outcomes in patients with IgAN is still debated. This was partly due to a lack of standardization and day-to-day variability of microhematuria, which discouraged the inclusion of microhematuria in large multicenter studies. More recently, several studies from Asia, Europe and the USA have highlighted the importance of microhematuria assessment over longitudinal follow-up, using a systematic approach with either experienced personnel or automated techniques. We report lights and shadows of microhematuria evaluation in IgAN, looking for evidence for a more consistent consensus on its value as a marker of clinical and histological activity, risk assessment and prediction of treatment response. We propose that hematuria should be included as part of the clinical decision-making process when considering when to use immunosuppressive therapy and as part of criteria for enrollment into clinical trials to test drugs targeting the inflammatory reaction elicited by immune pathway activation in IgAN.

IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most prevalent primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, carries a considerable lifetime risk of kidney failure. Clinical manifestations of IgAN vary from asymptomatic with microscopic or intermittent macroscopic haematuria and stable kidney function to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. IgAN has been proposed to develop through a 'four-hit' process, commencing with overproduction and increased systemic presence of poorly O-glycosylated galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), followed by recognition of Gd-IgA1 by antiglycan autoantibodies, aggregation of Gd-IgA1 and formation of polymeric IgA1 immune complexes and, lastly, deposition of these immune complexes in the glomerular mesangium, leading to kidney inflammation and scarring. IgAN can only be diagnosed by kidney biopsy. Extensive, optimized supportive care is the mainstay of therapy for patients with IgAN. For those at high risk of disease progression, the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline suggests considering a 6-month course of systemic corticosteroid therapy; however, the efficacy of systemic steroid treatment is under debate and serious adverse effects are common. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of IgAN have led to clinical trials of novel targeted therapies with acceptable safety profiles, including SGLT2 inhibitors, endothelin receptor blockers, targeted-release budesonide, B cell proliferation and differentiation inhibitors, as well as blockade of complement components.

Efficacy and safety of sequential immunosuppressive treatment for severe IgA nephropathy: A retrospective study

Background: This study compared the efficacy and safety of sequential immunosuppressive therapy in patients with non-end-stage IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with Lee’s classification of IV ∼ V and provided evidence for the use of immunotherapy in patients with severe IgAN.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with Lee’s IV ∼ V non-end-stage IgA nephropathy.

Results: 436 patients were diagnosed with IgAN, and 98 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective study. Of these, 17 were in the supportive care group, 20 in the P group (prednisone-only), 35 in P + CTX group (the prednisone combined with cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil), and 26 in the P + MMF group (prednisone combined with mycophenolate mofetil). The four groups showed differences in the segmental glomerulosclerosis score and the proportion of patients with Lee’s grade IV (p < 0.05), but no differences in other indicators. Compared with the baseline values, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR) significantly decreased and serum albumin increased (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups. The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) of the P, P + MMF, and P + CTX groups were higher than that of the supportive care group at the 6th and 24th month after treatment (all p < 0.05). At the 24th month, the eGFR in the P + CTX group was higher than that in the P + MMF group (p < 0.05). The effective remission rate of the P + CTX group was higher than that of the supportive care group (p < 0.05). At 12 months, the effective remission rate of the P group was higher than that of the supportive care group (p < 0.05). At the 24th month, there was no significant difference in the effective remission rates among the three groups (P, P + MMF, and P + CTX). Nine patients with severe IgA nephropathy reached the endpoint.

Conclusion: This study showed that immunosuppressive therapy insevere IgAN patient scan effectively reduce urinary protein, increase albumin, and protect renal function in the early stages of IgAN. P + CTX is the most commonly used, which has a high effective remission rate of urine protein and a low incidence of end-point events.

Crescents and IgA Nephropathy: A Delicate Marriage

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a progressive disease with great variability in the clinical course. Among the clinical and pathologic features contributing to variable outcomes, the presence of crescents has attracted particular interest as a distinct pathological feature associated with severity. Several uncontrolled observations have led to the general thought that the presence and extent of crescents was a prognostic indicator associated with poor outcomes. However, KDIGO 2021 guidelines concluded that either the presence or the relative number of crescents should not be used to determine the progression of IgAN nor should they suggest the choice of immunosuppression. Our aim is to report and discuss recent data on the debated issue of the value of active (cellular and fibrocellular) crescents in the pathogenesis and clinical progression of IgAN, their predictive value, and the impact of immunosuppression on renal function. We conclude that the value of crescents should not be disregarded, although this feature does not have an independent predictive value for progression in IgAN, particularly when considering immunosuppressed patients. An integrated overall evaluation of crescents with other active MEST scores, clinical data, and novel biomarkers must be considered in achieving a personalized therapeutic approach to IgAN patients.