Feasibility of a hemodialysis safety checklist for nurses and patients: a quality improvement study

Advancing crush syndrome management: the potent role of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in early hyperkalemia intervention and survival enhancement in a rat model

Background: Crush Syndrome (CS), a severe trauma resulting from prolonged muscle compression, is commonly seen in large-scale disasters such as earthquakes. It not only causes localized tissue damage but also triggers electrolyte imbalances, particularly hyperkalemia, increasing the risk of early mortality. This study aims to assess the early intervention effects of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate (SZC) on hyperkalemia in rat CS model. Methods: A rat CS model was established using a self-developed multi-channel intelligent small-animal crush injury platform. Rats in the experimental groups were treated with varying doses of SZC before compression and immediately post-decompression. The efficacy of SZC was evaluated by continuous monitoring of blood potassium levels and survival rates. Serum creatinine (Cre) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were analyzed, and renal damage was assessed through histopathological examination. Results: SZC treatment significantly reduced blood potassium levels and improved survival rates in rats. Compared to the placebo group, the SZC-treated rats showed a significant decrease in blood potassium levels at 6 and 12 h post-decompression, maintaining lower levels at 24 h. Biochemical analysis indicated no significant impact of SZC on renal function, with no notable differences in Cre and BUN levels between groups. Histopathological findings revealed similar levels of renal damage in both groups. Conclusion: SZC demonstrates significant early intervention effects on hyperkalemia in a rat model of crush injury, effectively improving survival rates without adverse effects on renal function. These results provide a new strategic direction for the clinical treatment of Crush Syndrome and lay the foundation for future clinical applications.

A Systematic Literature Review of Safety Culture in Hemodialysis Settings

Background

Safety culture is an important aspect of quality in healthcare settings. There are many risks that patients can encounter in hemodialysis settings one of which is the infection risks due to the regular need to access bloodstreams using catheters and needles. Implementation of prevention guidelines, protocols and strategies that reinforce safety culture excellence are essential to mitigate risks. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize the main strategies that enhance and improve patient safety culture in hemodialysis settings.

Methods

Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus were searched from 2010 to 2020 in English. Terms defining safety culture, patient safety were combined with the term hemodialysis during the search. The studies were chosen based on inclusion criteria.

Results

A total of 17 articles reporting on six countries were identified that met inclusion criteria following the PRISMA statement. From the 17 papers, practices that were successfully applied to improve safety culture in hemodialysis settings included (i) training of nurses on the technologies used in hemodialysis treatment, (ii) proactive risk identification tools to prevent infections (iii) root cause analysis in evaluating the errors, (iv) hemodialysis checklist to be used by the dialysis nurses to reduce the adverse events, and (v) effective communication and mutual trust between the employee and leadership to support no-blame environment, and improve the safety culture.

Conclusion

This systematic review provided significant insights on the strategies that healthcare safety managers and policy makers can implement to enhance safety culture in hemodialysis settings.

Construction of haemodialysis nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study

AIMS

To establish a sensitive, scientific and practical evaluation system for haemodialysis nursing and to provide a reference for the evaluation of haemodialysis nursing quality.

DESIGN

Through a literature review and Delphi method.

METHOD

According to the literature review, a preliminary nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis were established, and an expert survey questionnaire was designed. Finally, the evaluation system for the nursing-sensitive quality indicators was determined using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

Thirteen nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis were finally constructed, including two structural indicators, three process indicators and eight outcome indicators. The effective recovery rate of the two rounds of expert survey questionnaires was 100%, the coefficient of judgement basis is 0.956, the coefficient of familiarity is 0.833, the coefficient of authority is 0.895, and the Kendall's harmony coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 0.158 ~ 0.307 and 0.170 ~ 0.315, respectively, with statistical significance (p < .05).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, the nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis were developed by the Delphi method and included structural indicators, outcome indicators and process indicators, which made up for some deficiencies noted in previous studies. The authors have provided a more reliable and comprehensive basis for evaluating the quality and safety of haemodialysis nursing in the future.

Hemodialysis Bleeding Events and Deaths: An 18-Year Retrospective Analysis of Patient Safety and Root Cause Analysis Reports in the Veterans Health Administration

OBJECTIVES

Eighteen years of patient safety (PS) and root cause analysis reports for hemodialysis bleeding events and deaths in the Veterans Health Administration were analyzed with dual purpose: to determine the impact of a 2008 Veterans Health Administration Patient Safety Advisory on event reporting rates and to identify actions to mitigate risk and inform policy.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2020, 281 bleeding events (248 PS reports and 33 root cause analyses) including 14 deaths during hemodialysis treatments were identified. Events were characterized by the type of vascular access, patient mental status, and whether the access site was visible or obscured from view by staff.

RESULTS

Of the 281 bleeding events reviewed, 188 (67%) were unwitnessed and 54 (19%) were associated with an alteration in mental status. Most deaths (n = 11; 79%) were associated with central venous catheter access. Root cause analyses reported 83 root causes, of which 33% identified physical barriers to direct observation or an equipment issue.Action plans addressed policy/procedures (30%), training/education (20%), and changes to environment/equipment (19%). Patient Safety Advisory publication was associated with a significant increase in low-harm PS reports, from 9 to 18 per year (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding events during hemodialysis treatments occur and may be fatal. Heightened vigilance is required when physical barriers obscure continuous direct observation, the patient exhibits an altered mental status, and vascular access is through a central venous catheter.Provider staff should consider a safety checklist and training on equipment operation. Patient Safety Advisory publication was associated with increased low-harm event reporting.