Captivating a captive audience: a quality improvement project increasing participation in intradialytic exercise across five renal dialysis units

The Use of Quality Improvement in the Physical Therapy Literature: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Quality improvement (QI) is a useful methodology for improving healthcare, often through iterative changes. There is no prior review on the application of QI in physical therapy (PT).

PURPOSE AND RELEVANCE

To characterize and evaluate the quality of the QI literature in PT.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases from inception through September 1, 2022. Included publications focused on QI and included the practice of PT. Quality was assessed using the 16-point QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Seventy studies were included in the review, 60 of which were published since 2014 with most ( n = 47) from the United States. Acute care ( n = 41) was the most prevalent practice setting. Twenty-two studies (31%) did not use QI models or approaches and only nine studies referenced Revised Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. The median QI-MQCS score was 12 (range 7-15).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Quality improvement publications in the PT literature are increasing, yet there is a paucity of QI studies pertaining to most practice settings and a lack of rigor in project design and reporting. Many studies were of low-to-moderate quality and did not meet minimum reporting standards. We recommend use of models, frameworks, and reporting guidelines to improve methodologic rigor and reporting.

Global Policy Barriers and Enablers to Exercise and Physical Activity in Kidney Care

OBJECTIVE

Impairment in physical function and physical performance leads to decreased independence and health-related quality of life in people living with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease. Physical activity and exercise in kidney care are not priorities in policy development. We aimed to identify global policy-related enablers, barriers, and strategies to increase exercise participation and physical activity behavior for people living with kidney disease.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Guided by the Behavior Change Wheel theoretical framework, 50 global renal exercise experts developed policy barriers and enablers to exercise program implementation and physical activity promotion in kidney care. The consensus process consisted of developing themes from renal experts from North America, South America, Continental Europe, United Kingdom, Asia, and Oceania. Strategies to address enablers and barriers were identified by the group, and consensus was achieved.

RESULTS

We found that policies addressing funding, service provision, legislation, regulations, guidelines, the environment, communication, and marketing are required to support people with kidney disease to be physically active, participate in exercise, and improve health-related quality of life. We provide a global perspective and highlight Japanese, Canadian, and other regional examples where policies have been developed to increase renal physical activity and rehabilitation. We present recommendations targeting multiple stakeholders including nephrologists, nurses, allied health clinicians, organizations providing renal care and education, and renal program funders.

CONCLUSIONS

We strongly recommend the nephrology community and people living with kidney disease take action to change policy now, rather than idly waiting for indisputable clinical trial evidence that increasing physical activity, strength, fitness, and function improves the lives of people living with kidney disease.

Sarcopenia and Frailty: Challenges in Mainstream Nephrology Practice

Sarcopenia and frailty are prevalent in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. Sarcopenia is characterised by the loss of muscle mass and function, while frailty is defined as a multi-system impairment associated with increased vulnerability to stressors. There is substantial overlap between the 2 conditions, particularly with regards to physical aspects: low grip strength, gait speed and low muscle mass. Both sarcopenia and frailty have been associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes. Although there is no recommended pharmacological treatment as yet, it is widely accepted that exercise training and nutritional supplementation are the key interventions to maintain skeletal muscle mass and strength. This review aims to present a comprehensive overview of sarcopenia and frailty in patients with CKD.

Addressing feasibility challenges to delivering intradialytic exercise interventions: A theory-informed qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic exercise (IDE) may improve physical function and health-related quality of life. However, incorporating IDE into standard hemodialysis care has been slow due to feasibility challenges. We conducted a multicenter qualitative feasibility study to identify potential barriers and enablers to IDE and generate potential solutions to these factors.

METHODS

We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and patients across twelve hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework and directed content analysis to analyze the data.

RESULTS

We identified eight relevant domains (knowledge, skills, beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, environmental context and resources, goals, social/professional role and identity, and social influences) represented by three overarching categories: 1) Knowledge, skills and expectations: lack of staff expertise to oversee exercise, uncertainty regarding exercise risks, benefits, and patient interest, lack of knowledge regarding exercise eligibility; 2) Human, material and logistical resources: staff concerns regarding workload, perception that exercise professionals should supervise IDE; space, equipment, and scheduling conflict concerns; 3) Social dynamics of the unit: local champions and patient stories contribute to IDE sustainability.We developed a list of actionable solutions by mapping barriers and enablers to behavior change techniques. We also developed a feasibility checklist of 47 questions identifying key factors to address prior to IDE launch.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based solutions to identified barriers and enablers to IDE and a feasibility checklist may help recruit and support units, staff, and patients and address key challenges to the delivery of IDE in diverse clinical and research settings.

Reasons for Nonparticipation in a Sustained Hemodialysis Intradialytic Exercise Program

OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring hemodialysis suffer frailty and poor physical function. Exercise can improve physical function; however, barriers exist to intradialytic exercise programs. The objective of this study was to explore patients' reasons for not exercising in an extant intradialytic exercise program.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis reporting the reasons for not exercising in an intradialytic exercise program in two hemodialysis centers over a 4-week period. We explored whether patient characteristics and the presence of an exercise professional were associated with missed exercise sessions.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients participating in the intradialytic exercise program completed 57% of prescribed intradialytic exercise sessions. The three most frequently reported reasons from patients not exercising were refusal (24%), followed by fatigue (19%) and symptoms (14%). Patients were more than twice as likely to exercise if a kinesiologist was present (odds ratio [OR]: 2.26, confidence interval [CI]: 1.5, 3.4 P = .03). They were less likely to exercise if they were women (OR: 0.66, CI: 0.45, 0.95 P = .002), had been on dialysis greater than 60 months (OR: 0.55, CI: 0.37, 0.80 P < .002), or had more than two comorbid conditions (OR: 0.63, CI: 0.43, 0.90, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Patient adherence to intradialytic exercise programs is strongly associated with the presence of exercise professionals.

An overview of frailty in kidney transplantation: measurement, management and future considerations

The construct of frailty was first developed in gerontology to help identify older adults with increased vulnerability when confronted with a health stressor. This article is a review of studies in which frailty has been applied to pre- and post-kidney transplantation (KT) populations. Although KT is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), KT candidates often must overcome numerous health challenges associated with ESKD before receiving KT. After KT, the impacts of surgery and immunosuppression represent additional health stressors that disproportionately impact individuals with frailty. Frailty metrics could improve the ability to identify KT candidates and recipients at risk for adverse health outcomes and those who could potentially benefit from interventions to improve their frail status. The Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP) is the most commonly used frailty metric in ESKD research, and KT recipients who are frail at KT (~20% of recipients) are twice as likely to die as nonfrail recipients. In addition to the PFP, many other metrics are currently used to assess pre- and post-KT vulnerability in research and clinical practice, underscoring the need for a disease-specific frailty metric that can be used to monitor KT candidates and recipients. Although frailty is an independent risk factor for post-transplant adverse outcomes, it is not factored into the current transplant program risk-adjustment equations. Future studies are needed to explore pre- and post-KT interventions to improve or prevent frailty.

Perceptions and Practices Regarding Frailty in Kidney Transplantation: Results of a National Survey

BACKGROUND

Given the potential utility of frailty, a clinical phenotype of decreased physiologic reserve and resistance to stressors, to predict postkidney transplant (KT) outcomes, we sought to understand the perceptions and practices regarding frailty measurement in US KT programs.

METHODS

Surveys were emailed to American Society of Transplantation Kidney/Pancreas Community of Practice members and 202 US transplant programs (November 2017 to April 2018). Program characteristics were gleaned from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

RESULTS

The 133 responding programs (response rate = 66%) represented 77% of adult KTs and 79% of adult KT candidates in the United States. Respondents considered frailty to be a useful concept in evaluating candidacy (99%) and endorsed a need to develop a frailty measurement specific to KT (92%). Frailty measurement was more common during candidacy evaluation (69%) than during KT admission (28%). Of the 202 programs, 38% performed frailty assessments in all candidates while 23% performed assessments only for older candidates. There was heterogeneity in the frailty assessment method; 18 different tools were utilized to measure frailty. The most common tool was a timed walk test (19%); 67% reported performing >1 tool. Among programs that measure frailty, 53% reported being less likely to list frail patients for KT.

CONCLUSIONS

Among US KT programs, frailty is recognized as a clinically relevant construct and is commonly measured at evaluation. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in the tools used to measure frailty. Efforts to identify optimal measurement of frailty using either an existing or a novel tool and subsequent standardization of its measurement and application across KT programs should be considered.

Report from the American Society of Transplantation on frailty in solid organ transplantation

A consensus conference on frailty in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and endorsed by the American Society of Nephrology (ASN), the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS), and the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) took place on February 11, 2018 in Phoenix, Arizona. Input from the transplant community through scheduled conference calls enabled wide discussion of current concepts in frailty, exploration of best practices for frailty risk assessment of transplant candidates and for management after transplant, and development of ideas for future research. A current understanding of frailty was compiled by each of the solid organ groups and is presented in this paper. Frailty is a common entity in patients with end-stage organ disease who are awaiting organ transplantation, and affects mortality on the waitlist and in the posttransplant period. The optimal methods by which frailty should be measured in each organ group are yet to be determined, but studies are underway. Interventions to reverse frailty vary among organ groups and appear promising. This conference achieved its intent to highlight the importance of frailty in organ transplantation and to plant the seeds for further discussion and research in this field.

Sarcopenia in CKD: a roadmap from basic pathogenetic mechanisms to clinical trials

Sarcopenia and frailty are recognized as key risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on renal replacement therapy or with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is still debate about their pathogenesis and, thus, about the best therapeutic approaches, as well as the impact on outcomes of current approaches based on different exercise programmes. In the past two issues of Clinical Kidney Journal, several manuscripts address the issue of sarcopenia in CKD from the point of view of pathogenesis and new therapeutic approaches, monitoring of results, implementation of exercise programmes and specific potential benefits of exercise programmes in dialysis and non-dialysis CKD patients, as assessed by clinical trials.

Implementing a theory-based intradialytic exercise programme in practice: a quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

Research evidence outlines the benefits of intradialytic exercise (IDE), yet implementation into practice has been slow, ostensibly due to a lack of patient and staff engagement. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve patient outcomes via the introduction of an IDE programme, evaluate patient uptake and sustainability and enhance the engagement of routine haemodialysis (HD) staff with the delivery of the IDE programme.

METHODS

We developed and refined an IDE programme, including interventions designed to increase patient and staff engagement that were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), using a series of 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' (PDSA) cycles. The programme was introduced at two UK National Health Service HD units. Process measures included patient uptake, withdrawals, adherence and HD staff involvement. Outcome measures were patient-reported functional capacity, anxiety, depression and symptomology. All measures were collected over 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were enrolled in the IDE programme; 64 (75%) were still participating at 3 months, decreasing to 41 (48%) at 12 months. Adherence was high (78%) at 3 months, decreasing to 63% by 12 months. The provision of IDE by HD staff accounted for a mean of 2 (5%) sessions per 3-month time point. Patients displayed significant improvements in functional ability (P = 0.01) and a reduction in depression (P = 0.02) over 12 months, but the effects seen were limited to those who completed the programme.

CONCLUSIONS

A theory-based IDE programme is feasible and leads to improvement in functional capacity and depression. Sustaining IDE over time is complicated by high levels of patient withdrawal from the programme. Significant change at an organizational level is required to enhance sustainability by increasing HD staff engagement or access to professional exercise support.

Interaction of healthcare staff's attitude with barriers to physical activity in hemodialysis patients: A quantitative assessment

Background and aim of the study

In hemodialysis patients, sedentarism is a potentially modifiable mortality risk factor. We explored whether healthcare staff’s attitude towards exercise interacts with patient-perceived barriers in modifying the level of physical activity in this population.

Methods

In this prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study we recruited 608 adult patients and 330 members of the healthcare staff in 16 hemodialysis units in Italy. We assessed patient-perceived barriers to, and healthcare staff’s attitude towards, exercise by specific questionnaires. We fitted multilevel linear models to analyze the relationships of either barriers or staff’s attitude, and their interaction, with a measure of patient self-reported physical activity (the Human Activity Profile–Adjusted Activity Score [HAP-AAS]), adjusting for multiple confounders. We also employed latent class analysis to dichotomize patients into those endorsing or not endorsing barriers.

Results

Most barriers were negatively associated with the HAP-AAS (adjusted change attributable to a given barrier ranging between -5.1 [“Feeling too old”, 95% Confidence Interval: -9.4 to -0.8] and -15.6 [“Ulcers on legs and feet”, 95%CI: -24.8 to -6.5]. We found a significant interaction between staff’s attitude and barriers (adjusted P values ranging between 0.03 [“I do not believe that it is physician’s or nurse’s role providing advice on exercise to patients on dialysis”] and 0.001 [“I do not often ask patients about exercise”]). A beneficial effect of a proactive staff’s attitude was evident only in patients not endorsing barriers.

Conclusions

Barriers and non-proactive staff’s attitude reduce physical activity in hemodialysis patients. Patients not endorsing barriers benefit the most from a proactive staff’s attitude.