Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits in two kidney allografts successfully treated with rituximab

Proliferative Glomerulonephritis With Monoclonal IgG Deposits: Another Unusual Presentation

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) deposits (PGNMID) is a relatively rare diagnosis with variable presentation. When detectable, the disease is typically indolent rather than malignant and recurs in transplant cases. Here, we report a case of PGNMID, which presented clinically as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN). The patient presented to his primary care physician's office with diarrhea for one day and was admitted for acute kidney injury. Urine sediment was active, and the patient had nephrotic range proteinuria. Serologic workup was negative for any monoclonality: ANA, c-ANCA, and p-ANCA. Kidney biopsy showed diffuse proliferative and crescentic glomerulonephritis with IgG3-kappa restricted deposits, consistent with PGNMID. The patient required dialysis initiation, and corticosteroids were administered. The patient declined further immunomodulatory treatment and remains hemodialysis-dependent. This case highlights the potential for severe renal damage from monoclonal proteins despite an indolent or even undetectable hematologic clone. This entity needs further studies to better understand its immuno-physiological background and develop a standard treatment regimen.

Kidney Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance

Recent advances in the treatment of plasma cell disorders (PCDs) have provided a wealth of therapy alternatives and improved overall survival tremendously. Various types of PCDs are associated with kidney injury and end-stage kidney disease in a considerable number of patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the best option for renal replacement therapy in select patients in terms of both quality of life parameters and overall survival. Even with modern therapies, all PCDs carry the risk of hematologic progression, whereas histologic recurrence and graft loss are other prevailing concerns in these patients. The risk of mortality is also higher in some of these disorders compared with KTx recipients who suffer from other causes of kidney disease. Unlike solid cancers, there is no well-defined "waiting time" after hematologic remission before proceeding to KTx. Thus, clinicians are usually reluctant to recommend KTx to patients who develop end-stage kidney disease due to PCDs. This review aims to provide the current evidence on KTx outcomes in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and multiple myeloma. Although immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance subtype, KTx outcomes in this group are mentioned in another chapter of this issue.

Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) defines disorders characterized by direct or indirect kidney injury caused by a monoclonal immunoglobulin produced by a B-cell or plasma-cell clone that does not meet current hematologic criteria for therapy. MGRS-associated kidney diseases are diverse and can result in the development of end-stage kidney disease. The current paradigm states that the underlying hematologic condition should be treated and in deep remission before kidney transplantation can be performed because recurrence has been reported for all MGRS-associated kidney diseases. However, we suggest that decisions regarding kidney transplantation in MGRS patients should be individualized considering many factors such as the subtype of MGRS-associated kidney disease, patient age and comorbidity, presence and risk of extrarenal complications, estimated waiting time, the availability of a living kidney donor, and previous hematological treatment and response. Thus, kidney transplantation should be considered even in treatment-naive patients, with hematological treatment initiated after successful kidney transplantation.

Steroid-sensitive recurrent mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) deposits (PGNMID) is a rare kidney disease. The predominant pathological finding of PGNMID is the presence of monoclonal Ig deposits on the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). However, there is some variation in deposition pattern in this kidney disease. We report a case of steroid-sensitive recurrent mesangial proliferative type of PGNMID. A 40-year-old female noticed lower leg pitting edema and polyuria. Approximately 10 days prior to the first clinic visit, she was diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome based on the laboratory data of urine and blood. Immunological and hematological examination revealed no abnormality. However, kidney biopsy specimens showed mild mesangial cell proliferation and mesangial matrix accumulation on light microscopic findings. Regarding immunofluorescence staining, granular deposits of IgG, C1q, and β1c were observed on GBM and mesangial area. Granular deposits of IgG3 and λ were also observed on GBM and mesangial area. Moreover, negative results were obtained for the phospholipase A2 receptor antibody and thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A. Electron microscopy revealed highly electron dense deposits mainly in the mesangial region. Kidney biopsy showed mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis characterized by monoclonal Ig deposition of IgG3/λ. Steroid therapy was initiated, and complete remission was achieved on day 36. After the discontinuation of steroid therapy, proteinuria recurred and second kidney biopsy findings were almost similar to the first biopsy. However, complete remission was achieved with steroid therapy. This is a rare recurrent case of steroid-sensitive PGNMID. The pathological feature of this case was mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis with Ig deposition of IgG3/λ.

The clinical implication of monoclonal gammopathies: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of renal significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) has introduced a new perspective to several well-known disease entities impacting nephrology, haematology and pathology. Given the constantly changing disease spectrum of these entities, it is clinically imperative to establish diagnostic and treatment pathways supported by evidence-based medicine. MGRS is a disease of the kidney, secondary to plasma cell clonal proliferation or immune dysfunction, requiring therapeutic intervention to eradicate the offending clone. To fully understand the disease(s), it is prerequisite to determine the significance of the findings. The diagnostic work up should be extensive due to the wide heterogeneity of clinical presentation, ultimately necessitating kidney biopsy. Particular patient profiles such as AL amyloidosis, which may be diagnosed through biopsies of other tissues/organs, may be an exception. Treatment decisions should be formulated by multi-disciplinary consensus: nephrologists, haematologists and pathologists. The ultimate goal in managing MGRS is eradication of the offending plasma cell clone which requires targeted chemotherapy and, in eligible cases, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We present a review of diagnostic procedures, treatment options and advances in the last few years in the management of MGRS in an effort to acquaint specialists with this new face of several older diseases.

Chronological change of renal pathological findings in the proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits considered to have recurred early after kidney transplantation

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) deposits (PGNMID) is a rare disease that recently became recognized. Its pathological findings are characterized by the deposition of a single heavy chain subclass and a single light chain isotype. PGNMID has been proven to recur in renal allografts. Herein, the authors describe the case of a 46-year-old man who presented with nephrotic syndrome and progressive kidney injury following kidney transplantation. One month after transplantation, his clinical condition stabilized; however, the protocol biopsy showed depositions of IgG and complement on the glomeruli by immunofluorescence staining. Electron microscopy (EM) revealed granular electron-dense deposits (EDD) in the mesangium. Thereafter, renal biopsy was repeated because his proteinuria level increased. Proliferative glomerulonephritis, mainly in the mesangium, with IgG and complement deposits and mesangial and subendothelial EDD were observed; however, the pathological diagnosis was difficult. Renal dysfunction then became apparent, and renal biopsy was performed again 4 years and 10 months after kidney transplantation. Glomerular deposits on a single IgG subclass and a single light chain isotype (IgG3 kappa) with membranoproliferative features were observed. Abundant subendothelial EDD were detected on EM. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with PGNMID. Since it seemed that PGNMID had already developed at 1 month after transplantation, we considered recurrent PGNMID case in the allograft. The treatment for PGNMID has not been established yet, and even in this case, the graft function was eventually lost. For improving renal prognosis, early diagnosis and further investigation on the treatment are necessary.

Successful management of proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immune deposits with combined immunosuppressive therapy

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immune deposits (PGNMID) is a newly described entity characterised by monoclonal IgG deposits consisting of single light chain isotype and single heavy chain subtype (IgG1-4) in the kidneys. We are presenting two cases of patients who presented with acute kidney injury and worsening proteinuria. Kidney biopsy showed membranoproliferative pattern. Special staining for subclass of IgG showed monoclonal IgG3-kappa (case 1) and IgG1-kappa deposits (case 2) suggestive of PGNMID. Workup for underlying infection, malignancy, monoclonal gammopathy was negative. Since pathogenesis of PGNMID involves clonal proliferation of B-cells, we treated both patients with rituximab along with steroids that led to improvement of proteinuria and renal function. We also reviewed current literature to assess efficacy of rituximab in treatment of PGNMID. However, a larger pool of patients and a longer follow-up period is required to establish a role of rituximab and steroids in the treatment of this disease entity.

Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G deposits is associated with high rate of early recurrence in the allograft

The characteristics of allograft proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin G deposits (PGNMID) are not well defined. To better characterize this disease we retrospectively identified 26 patients with allograft PGNMID, including 16 followed with early protocol biopsies. PGNMID was found to be a recurrent disease in most (89%) patients. A diagnostic biopsy was done for proteinuria and/or increased creatinine in most patients. Median time from transplant to diagnostic biopsy was 5.5 months, with detection within three to four months post-transplant in 86% of patients. Mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis was the most common pattern on the diagnostic biopsy with 89% of cases showing immunoglobulin G3 subtype restriction. A detectable serum paraprotein was present in 20% of patients. During a mean follow up of 87 months from implantation, 11 of 25 patients lost their allograft largely due to PGNMID within a mean of 36 months from diagnosis. Median graft survival was 92 months. Independent predictors of graft loss were a higher degree of peak proteinuria and longer time from implantation to diagnosis. Sixteen patients were treated with immunosuppressive therapy which resulted in over 50% reduction in proteinuria in 60%, and improvement of glomerular pathology in nine of 13 patients. However, 44% of responders subsequently relapsed. Thus, PGNMID has a high recurrence rate in renal allografts occurring early with detection enhanced by protocol biopsies. Graft outcome is guarded as nearly half of patients lose their graft within three years from diagnosis. Hence, there is a need for better treatment strategies for this disease.

De novo glomerular diseases after renal transplantation: How is it different from recurrent glomerular diseases?

The glomerular diseases after renal transplantation can occur de novo, i.e., with no relation to the native kidney disease, or more frequently occur as a recurrence of the original disease in the native kidney. There may not be any difference in clinical features and histological pattern between de novo glomerular disease and recurrence of original glomerular disease. However, structural alterations in transplanted kidney add to dilemma in diagnosis. These changes in architecture of histopathology can happen due to: (1) exposure to the immunosuppression specifically the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI); (2) in vascular and tubulointerstitial alterations as a result of antibody mediated or cell-mediated immunological onslaught; (3) post-transplant viral infections; (4) ischemia-reperfusion injury; and (5) hyperfiltration injury. The pathogenesis of the de novo glomerular diseases differs with each type. Stimulation of B-cell clones with subsequent production of the monoclonal IgG, particularly IgG3 subtype that has higher affinity to the negatively charged glomerular tissue, is suggested to be included in PGNMID pathogenesis. De novo membranous nephropathy can be seen after exposure to the cryptogenic podocyte antigens. The role of the toxic effects of CNI including tissue fibrosis and the hemodynamic alterations may be involved in the de novo FSGS pathophysiology. The well-known deleterious effects of HCV infection and its relation to MPGN disease are frequently reported. The new concepts have emerged that demonstrate the role of dysregulation of alternative complement pathway in evolution of MPGN that led to classifying into two subgroups, immune complex mediated MPGN and complement-mediated MPGN. The latter comprises of the dense deposit disease and the C3 GN disease. De novo C3 disease is rather rare. Prognosis of de novo diseases varies with each type and their management continues to be empirical to a large extent.