High frequency of valganciclovir underdosing for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis after renal transplantation

Pitfalls in Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Valganciclovir (VGC) is administered as prophylaxis to kidney transplant recipients (KTR) CMV donor (D)+/recipient (R)- and CMV R+ after thymoglobulin-induction (R+/TG). Although VGC dose adjustments based on renal function are recommended, there is paucity of real-life data on VGC dosing and associations with clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective Swiss Transplant Cohort Study-embedded observational study, including all adult D+/R- and R+/TG KTR between 2010 and 2020, who received prophylaxis with VGC. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of inappropriately (under- or over-) dosed VGC week-entries. Secondary objectives included breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) and potential associations between breakthrough-csCMVi and cytopenias with VGC dosing. Among 178 KTR, 131 (73.6%) patients had ≥2 week-entries for the longitudinal data of interest and were included in the outcome analysis, with 1,032 VGC dose week-entries. Overall, 460/1,032 (44.6%) were appropriately dosed, while 234/1,032 (22.7%) and 338/1,032 (32.8%) were under- and over-dosed, respectively. Nineteen (14.5%) patients had a breakthrough-csCMVi, without any associations identified with VCG dosing (p = 0.44). Unlike other cytopenias, a significant association between VGC overdosing and lymphopenia (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.71-16.22, p = 0.004) was shown. VGC prophylaxis in KTR is frequently inappropriately dosed, albeit without meaningful clinical associations, neither in terms of efficacy nor safety.

Slaying the "Troll of Transplantation"-new frontiers in cytomegalovirus management: A report from the CMV International Symposium 2023

The 2023 International CMV Symposium took place in Barcelona in May 2023. During the 2-day meeting, delegates and faculty discussed the ongoing challenge of managing the risk of cytomegalovirus infection (the Troll of Transplantation) after solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Opportunities to improve outcomes of transplant recipients by applying advances in antiviral prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy, immunotherapy, and monitoring of cell-mediated immunity to routine clinical practice were debated and relevant educational clinical cases presented. This review summarizes the presentations, cases, and discussions from the meeting and describes how further advances are needed before the Troll of Transplantation is slain.

Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic administration of valganciclovir (VG) is an accepted method for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation (KTx). The standard dosage of oral VG is 900 mg/day, adjusted to renal function. There is growing evidence that low-dose 450 mg/day VG might be safe and effective. We compared low-dose vs standard-dose prophylaxis after KTx in a single-center follow-up study.

METHODS

Data from 603 renal transplantations at a single center were retrospectively analyzed (2011-2014, 12-month follow-up). Recipients with donor IgG positive-recipient IgG positive (D+/R+), (D+/R-), and (D-/R+) CMV serostatus were routinely treated with 450 mg/day VG for 3 months. Based on the same prophylactic dose, patients could be categorized into two groups according to their postoperative renal function: those receiving standard-dose VG due to a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (average eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and those receiving low-dose VG due to higher eGFR (average eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m2).

RESULTS

Estimated glomerular filtration rate-based VG serum alterations significantly affected the risk of CMV infection with a higher incidence in higher VG levels (standard-dose: 357 patients, CMV: 33 cases (9.2 %); low-dose: 246 patients, CMV: 10 cases (4.1%). The occurrence of known risk factors: serologic risk distribution and rate of induction therapy were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Treatment of an acute rejection episode influenced the infection rate significantly in the standard-dose group. As a side effect of prophylaxis, leucopenia (<3G/L) was 2.46 times higher in standard-dose vs low-dose group.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose VG administration is safe and non-inferior to the standard dose in the prophylaxis of CMV infection after KTx.

Letermovir Rescue Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Refractory/Resistant CMV Disease

(1) Background: CMV infections remain a problem after kidney transplantation, particularly if patients are refractory or resistant (r/r) to treatment with valganciclovir (VGCV) or ganciclovir (GCV). (2) Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving letermovir (LTV) as rescue therapy for VGCV-/GCV-r/r CMV disease were analyzed regarding CMV history, immunosuppression, and outcomes. (3) Results: Of 201 KTR treated for CMV between 2017 and 2022, 8 patients received LTV following treatment failure with VGCV/GCV. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with VGCV according to the center's protocol, and 7/8 patients had a high-risk (D+/R-) CMV constellation. In seven of eight cases, rising CMV levels occurred during prophylaxis. In seven of eight patients, a mutation in UL97 associated with a decreased response to VGCV/GCV was detected. In four of eight patients, LTV resulted in CMV clearance after 24 ± 10 weeks (16-39 weeks), two of eight patients stabilized at viral loads <2000 cop/mL (6-20 weeks), and two of eight patients developed LTV resistance (range 8-10 weeks). (4) Conclusion: LTV, which is currently evaluated for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplantation, also shows promising results for the treatment of patients with VGCV/GCV resistance despite the risk of developing LTV resistance. Additional studies are needed to further define its role in the treatment of patients with CMV resistance.

Letermovir vs Valganciclovir for Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Valganciclovir for 200 days is standard care for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, but its use is limited by myelosuppression.

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of letermovir with valganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease in CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in adult CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor at 94 participating sites between May 2018 and April 2021 (final follow-up in April 2022).

Interventions

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio (stratified by receipt of lymphocyte-depleting induction immunosuppression) to receive letermovir, 480 mg, orally daily (with acyclovir) or valganciclovir, 900 mg, orally daily (adjusted for kidney function) for up to 200 days after transplant, with matching placebos.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was CMV disease, confirmed by an independent masked adjudication committee, through posttransplant week 52 (prespecified noninferiority margin, 10%). CMV disease through week 28 and time to onset of CMV disease through week 52 were secondary outcomes. Exploratory outcomes included quantifiable CMV DNAemia and resistance. The rate of leukopenia or neutropenia through week 28 was a prespecified safety outcome.

Results

Among 601 participants randomized, 589 received at least 1 dose of the study drug (mean age, 49.6 years; 422 [71.6%] men). Letermovir (n = 289) was noninferior to valganciclovir (n = 297) for prevention of CMV disease through week 52 (10.4% vs 11.8% of participants with committee-confirmed CMV disease; stratum-adjusted difference -1.4% [95% CI, -6.5% to 3.8%]). No participants who received letermovir vs 5 participants (1.7%) who received valganciclovir developed CMV disease through week 28. Time to onset of CMV disease was comparable between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.56-1.47]). Quantifiable CMV DNAemia was detected in 2.1% of participants in the letermovir group vs 8.8% in the valganciclovir group by week 28. Of participants evaluated for suspected CMV disease or CMV DNAemia, none (0/52) who received letermovir and 12.1% (8/66) who received valganciclovir had resistance-associated substitutions. The rate of leukopenia or neutropenia through week 28 was lower with letermovir vs valganciclovir (26% vs 64%; difference, -37.9% [95% CI, -45.1% to -30.3%]; P < .001). Fewer participants in the letermovir group than the valganciclovir group discontinued prophylaxis due to adverse events (4.1% vs 13.5%) or drug-related adverse events (2.7% vs 8.8%).

Conclusion and Relevance

Among adult CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, letermovir was noninferior to valganciclovir for prophylaxis of CMV disease over 52 weeks, with lower rates of leukopenia or neutropenia, supporting its use for this indication.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03443869; EudraCT: 2017-001055-30.

Burden of neutropenia and leukopenia among adult kidney transplant recipients: A systematic literature review of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia and neutropenia (L/N) may affect treatment decisions, potentially resulting in poor clinical and economic outcomes among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The burden of L/N is poorly quantified systematically. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize the incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical and economic outcomes associated with L/N post-KT.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from database inception-June 14, 2021) and conferences (past 3 years) to identify observational studies examining epidemiology, risk factors, or outcomes associated with L/N among adult KTRs.

RESULTS

Of 2081 records, 82 studies met inclusion criteria. Seventy-three studies reported the epidemiology of L/N post-KT. Pooled incidence of neutropenia, defined as absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) <1000/μl, ranged from 13% to 48% within 1-year post-transplant; ANC <500/μl ranged from 15% to 20%. Leukopenia, defined as white blood cell counts <3500/μl, was 19% to 83%. Eleven studies reported independent risk factors associated with L/N post-KT. D+/R- cytomegalovirus status, mycophenolic acid (MPA), and tacrolimus use were the most consistent risk factors across studies. Fourteen studies reported L/N-associated clinical outcomes. We noted a trend toward a positive association between neutropenia and acute rejection/opportunistic infections. Mixed findings were noted on the association between L/N and graft failure or mortality. Dosage modifications of valganciclovir, MPA, cotrimoxazole, and anti-thymoglobulin and the need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use were common with L/N.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest post-transplant L/N were common and associated with frequent modifications of immunosuppressive agents, requiring G-CSF use, and rejection or opportunistic infections. Findings highlight the need for interventions to reduce risk of L/N post-KT.

CMV specific T cell immune response in hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients receiving transplant from hepatitis C viremic donors and hepatitis C aviremic donors

Kidney transplants (KT) from hepatitis C (HCV) viremic donors to HCV negative recipients has shown promising renal outcomes, however, high incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia were reported. We performed a prospective cohort study of 52 HCV negative KT recipients from Methodist University Hospital including 41 receiving transplants from HCV aviremic donors and 11 from HCV viremic donors. CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immunity was measured by intracellular flow cytometry assay. Primary outcome was the development of positive CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response in the entire cohort and each subgroup. The association between donor HCV status and CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models. Mean recipient age was 48 ± 13 years, with 73% male and 82% African American. Positive CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response was found in 53% and 47% of the cohort at 1 month, 65% and 70% at 2 months, 80% and 75% at 4 months, 89% and 87% at 6 months, and 94% and 94% at 9 months post-transplant, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of positive CMV specific T cell immune response between recipients of transplants from HCV aviremic donors compared to HCV viremic donors in unadjusted (for CD8+: HR = 1.169, 95%CI: 0.521-2.623; for CD4+: HR = 1.208, 95%CI: 0.543-2.689) and adjusted (for CD8+: HR = 1.072, 95%CI: 0.458-2.507; for CD4+: HR = 1.210, 95%CI: 0.526-2.784) Cox regression analyses. HCV viremia in donors was not associated with impaired development of CMV specific T cell immunity in this cohort.

Outcomes among CMV-mismatched and highly sensitized kidney transplants recipients who develop neutropenia

Limited data exist on the incidence and clinical outcomes of neutropenia among kidney transplant recipients. Our study included 572 adults who received a kidney transplant at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center between 2012 and 2018, and were CMV-mismatched or had a PRA ≥ 80%. Recipients with HIV, Hepatitis B and C, and primary non-function were excluded. Participants were followed for at least one year after transplantation. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count < 1000 cells/μL. Cox proportional hazards regression models using neutropenia as a time-varying predictor were used to determine the risk of mycophenolic acid and valganciclovir changes, rejection, hospitalizations and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Models were adjusted for demographics and transplant characteristics. Mean follow-up was 3.7 (SD, 1.8) years. The mean age of the cohort was 50.4 (13.1) years, and 57.5% were female. A total of 208 (36.3%) participants had neutropenia. Neutropenia was associated with an increased risk of valganciclovir or MPA dose reductions or discontinuations [adjusted hazard ratio, aHR: 7.78, 95% CI: 4.73- 12.81], rejection [aHR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.10-3.64] and hospitalizations [aHR 3.32, 95% CI: 2.12-5.19]. Neutropenia occurs frequently after kidney transplantation and leads to more medication changes and adverse clinical outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Low-Dose Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Is Safe and Cost-Saving in CMV-Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients

Introduction: Observational studies suggest that low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg daily for normal renal function) is as effective as and perhaps safer than standard-dose valganciclovir (900 mg daily) in preventing CMV infection among kidney transplant recipients. However, this practice is not supported by current guidelines due to concerns for breakthrough infection from resistant CMV, mainly in high-risk CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative kidney transplant recipients. Standard-dose valganciclovir is costly and possibly associated with higher incidence of neutropenia and BKV DNAemia. Our institution adopted low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis for intermediate-risk (seropositive) kidney transplant recipients in January 2018. Research Question: To analyze the efficacy (CMV DNAemia), safety (BK virus DNAemia, neutropenia, graft loss, and death), and cost savings associated with this change. Design: We retrospectively compared the above outcomes between CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients who received low-dose and standard-dose valganciclovir, transplanted within our institution, between 1/19/2014 and 7/15/2019, using propensity score-adjusted competing risk analyses. We also compared cost estimates between the two dosing regimens, for 3 months of prophylaxis, and for different percentage of patient-weeks with normal renal function, using the current average wholesale price of valganciclovir. Results: We studied 179 CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients, of whom 55 received low-dose and 124 standard-dose valganciclovir. The majority received nonlymphocyte depleting induction (basiliximab). Low-dose valganciclovir was at least as effective and safe as, and more cost-saving than standard-dose valganciclovir. Conclusion: This single-center study contributes to mounting evidence for future guidelines to be adjusted in favor of low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients.

Care for the organ transplant recipient on the intensive care unit

All transplant recipients receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate and glucocorticoids and these drugs have many side-effects and drug-drug interactions. Common complications include surgical complications, infections, rejection and acute kidney injury. Infections as CMV and PJP can be prevented with prophylactic treatment. Given the complexity of organ transplant recipients a multi-disciplinary team of intensivists, surgeons, pharmacists and transplant specialists is essential. After heart transplantation a temporary pacemaker is required until the conduction system recovers. Stiffening of the heart and increased cardiac markers indicate rejection. An endomyocardial biopsy is performed via the right jugular vein, necessitating its preservation. For lung transplant patients, early intervention for aspiration is warranted to prevent chronic rejection. Risk of any infection is high, requiring active surveillance and intensive treatment, mainly of fungal infections. The liver is immunotolerant requiring lower immunosuppression. Transplantation surgery is often accompanied by massive blood loss and coagulopathy. Other complications include portal vein or hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary leakage or stenosis. Kidney transplant recipients have a high risk of cardiovascular disease and posttransplant anemia should be treated liberally. After postmortal transplantation, delayed graft function is common and dialysis is continued. Ureteral anastomosis complications can be diagnosed with ultrasound.

Sex-Associated Differences in Cytomegalovirus Prevention: Prophylactic Strategy is Potentially Associated With a Strong Kidney Function Impairment in Female Renal Transplant Patients

Post-transplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) syndrome can be prevented using the antiviral drug (val)ganciclovir. (Val)ganciclovir is typically administered following a prophylactic or a pre-emptive strategy. The prophylactic strategy entails early universal administration, the pre-emptive strategy, early treatment in case of infection. However, it is not clear which strategy is superior with respect to transplantation outcome; sex-specific effects of these prevention strategies are not known. We have retrospectively analyzed 540 patients from the multi-centre Harmony study along eight pre-defined visits: 308 were treated according to a prophylactic, 232 according to a pre-emptive strategy. As expected, we observed an association of prophylactic strategy with lower incidence of CMV syndrome, delayed onset and lower viral loads compared to the pre-emptive strategy. However, in female patients, the prophylactic strategy was associated with a strong impairment of glomerular filtration rate one year post-transplant (difference: -11.8 ± 4.3 ml min-1·1.73 m-2, p = 0.006). Additionally, we observed a tendency of higher incidence of acute rejection and severe BK virus reactivation in the prophylactic strategy group. While the prophylactic strategy was more effective for preventing CMV syndrome, our results suggest for the first time that the prophylactic strategy might lead to inferior transplantation outcomes in female patients, providing evidence for a strong association with sex. Further randomized controlled studies are necessary to confirm this potential negative effect.

Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus infection after lung transplantation: Incidence, characteristics, and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and development of CMV drug resistance can cause significant morbidity and mortality in patients with lung transplantation (LTX). We investigated the incidence of CMV drug resistance in adult patients with LTX and characterized this patient group and its outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed a single-center retrospective cohort of 735 patients who received LTX between January 2012 and October 2017. We assessed the incidences of CMV UL97 and UL54 genotyping for clinically suspected drug resistance and confirmed drug resistance. Case-matched controls (3 control patients for each resistant patient) were identified by matching for CMV serological status, development of CMV disease or significant viremia (≥3,000 IU/ml), and transplantation date.

RESULTS

The incidence of drug-resistant CMV was 1.98% (11/556) in donor and/or recipient CMV-positive patients and 4.7% (7/150) in donor-positive/recipient-negative patients. Altogether, 27 patients were tested for drug resistance, and 11 strains were resistant, 8 sensitive, and 8 inconclusive. No differences in immunosuppression, acute rejection, or pre-transplant sensitization were seen between case-matched groups. The peak CMV viral load and mean duration of viremia were significantly higher in the resistant group (324,000 vs. 117,000 mean IU/ml, p = 0.048 and 140 vs. 55 days, p < 0.001, respectively). The resistant group had increased overall mortality after onset of viremia compared with controls (3-year mortality 70% vs. 30%; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-resistant CMV infection is rare, but patients who develop it have decreased overall survival. Peak CMV viral load and duration of CMV viremia were associated with development of resistant CMV infection.