1
|
Watt KD, Rolak S, Foley DP, Plichta JK, Pruthi S, Farr D, Zwald FO, Carvajal RD, Dudek AZ, Sanger CB, Rocco R, Chang GJ, Dizon DS, Langstraat CL, Teoh D, Agarwal PK, Al-Qaoud T, Eggener S, Kennedy CC, D'Cunha J, Mohindra NA, Stewart S, Habermann TH, Schuster S, Lunning M, Shah NN, Gertz MA, Mehta J, Suvannasankha A, Verna E, Farr M, Blosser CD, Hammel L, Al-Adra DP. Cancer Surveillance in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With a Pretransplant History of Malignancy: Multidisciplinary Collaborative Expert Opinion. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00757. [PMID: 38771067 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
With improved medical treatments, the prognosis for many malignancies has improved, and more patients are presenting for transplant evaluation with a history of treated cancer. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a prior malignancy are at higher risk of posttransplant recurrence or de novo malignancy, and they may require a cancer surveillance program that is individualized to their specific needs. There is a dearth of literature on optimal surveillance strategies specific to SOT recipients. A working group of transplant physicians and cancer-specific specialists met to provide expert opinion recommendations on optimal cancer surveillance after transplantation for patients with a history of malignancy. Surveillance strategies provided are mainly based on general population recurrence risk data, immunosuppression effects, and limited transplant-specific data and should be considered expert opinion based on current knowledge. Prospective studies of cancer-specific surveillance models in SOT recipients should be supported to inform posttransplant management of this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stacey Rolak
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David P Foley
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | | | - Deborah Farr
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Fiona O Zwald
- Department of Dermatology, Colorado University School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Richard D Carvajal
- Department of Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, NY
| | | | - Cristina B Sanger
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
- Department of Surgery, William S.Middleton Memorial Veteran's Hospital, Madison, WI
| | - Ricciardi Rocco
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Don S Dizon
- Department of Medicine, Lifespan Cancer Institute and Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | - Deanna Teoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Piyush K Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Talal Al-Qaoud
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC
| | - Scott Eggener
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Nisha A Mohindra
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Shelby Stewart
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Stephen Schuster
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Program, Abraham Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Matthew Lunning
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Nirav N Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Jayesh Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Attaya Suvannasankha
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Maryjane Farr
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Christopher D Blosser
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle WA
| | - Laura Hammel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leung N, Heybeli C. Kidney Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance. Semin Nephrol 2024; 44:151497. [PMID: 38485643 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in the treatment of plasma cell disorders (PCDs) have provided a wealth of therapy alternatives and improved overall survival tremendously. Various types of PCDs are associated with kidney injury and end-stage kidney disease in a considerable number of patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the best option for renal replacement therapy in select patients in terms of both quality of life parameters and overall survival. Even with modern therapies, all PCDs carry the risk of hematologic progression, whereas histologic recurrence and graft loss are other prevailing concerns in these patients. The risk of mortality is also higher in some of these disorders compared with KTx recipients who suffer from other causes of kidney disease. Unlike solid cancers, there is no well-defined "waiting time" after hematologic remission before proceeding to KTx. Thus, clinicians are usually reluctant to recommend KTx to patients who develop end-stage kidney disease due to PCDs. This review aims to provide the current evidence on KTx outcomes in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and multiple myeloma. Although immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance subtype, KTx outcomes in this group are mentioned in another chapter of this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson Leung
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Cihan Heybeli
- Division of Nephrology, Dokuz Eylül University Hospital, Balcova, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang B, Zhang L, Lu X. Kidney Transplantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Evidence From the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Int Neurourol J 2023; 27:207-216. [PMID: 37798888 PMCID: PMC10556433 DOI: 10.5213/inj.2346130.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are prone to developing persistent renal insufficiency. Novel therapeutic medications have improved long-term survival, making kidney transplantation (KT) a viable treatment option for MM survivors with end-stage renal disease. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with MM who have received KT. METHODS Data from hospitalized patients ≥ 40 years of age with MM in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2016-2018 of the United States were queried. Patients were classified as having or not having undergone KT, as well as the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) for those who had not received KT. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the characteristics between the groups. Binary logistic regression was utilized to determine the associations between study variables and inhospital mortality, unfavorable discharges, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and major complications. RESULTS In total, 50,654 hospitalized patients with MM were identified, of whom 165 (0.3%) had received KT and 50,489 had not (5,905 at stage 5 CKD [CKD5D], 11,559 at stage 1-4 CKD [CKD1-4D], and 33,025 who were CKD-free). After PSM, between-group demographic and hospital-related characteristics were balanced. Binary regression analysis revealed that, compared to patients who were CKD-free, patients at CKD5D were significantly more likely to experience a prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.70) after adjusting for relevant confounders. Furthermore, compared to CKD-free patients, those who underwent KT were significantly more likely to have sepsis (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.02-2.14). However, KT showed no association with the other adverse inpatient outcomes. CONCLUSION Although KT is not common in MM patients, those who had undergone KT had comparable hospital outcomes to CKD-free patients. These data will help clinicians deliver better consultations to MM patients attempting to receive KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yang
- Department of Hematology, the Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Zhang
- Department of Hematology, the Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuechun Lu
- Department of Hematology, the Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dimopoulos MA, Merlini G, Bridoux F, Leung N, Mikhael J, Harrison SJ, Kastritis E, Garderet L, Gozzetti A, van de Donk NWCJ, Weisel KC, Badros AZ, Beksac M, Hillengass J, Mohty M, Ho PJ, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Mateos MV, Richardson P, Blade J, Moreau P, San-Miguel J, Munshi N, Rajkumar SV, Durie BGM, Ludwig H, Terpos E. Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e293-e311. [PMID: 37414019 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00223-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Here, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updates its clinical practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment on the basis of data published until Dec 31, 2022. All patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and free light chains (FLCs) measurements together with 24-h urine total protein, electrophoresis, and immunofixation. If non-selective proteinuria (mainly albuminuria) or involved serum FLCs value less than 500 mg/L is detected, then a renal biopsy is needed. The IMWG criteria for the definition of renal response should be used. Supportive care and high-dose dexamethasone are required for all patients with myeloma-induced renal impairment. Mechanical approaches do not increase overall survival. Bortezomib-based regimens are the cornerstone of the management of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment at diagnosis. New quadruplet and triplet combinations, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, improve renal and survival outcomes in both newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed or refractory disease. Conjugated antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and T-cell engagers are well tolerated and effective in patients with moderate renal impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Giampaolo Merlini
- Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Frank Bridoux
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Nelson Leung
- Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joseph Mikhael
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Simon J Harrison
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Alessandro Gozzetti
- Department of Hematology, University of Siena, Policlinico S Maria alle Scotte, Siena, Italy
| | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Katja C Weisel
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ashraf Z Badros
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Meral Beksac
- Department of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Mohamad Mohty
- Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University and INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France
| | - P Joy Ho
- Institute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Paul Richardson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joan Blade
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jesus San-Miguel
- Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nikhil Munshi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Brian G M Durie
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, First Department of Medicine, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma patients with chronic kidney disease: a safe and effective option. Bone Marrow Transplant 2022; 57:959-965. [PMID: 35413986 PMCID: PMC9200631 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01657-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a frequent complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with adverse outcomes. The use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved disease outcomes, however, the safety and efficacy of ASCT in patients with CKD has been the subject of debate. To investigate this, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 370 MM patients who underwent their first ASCT, including those with mild, moderate and severe CKD as well as normal renal function at the time of transplant. No significant difference in ASCT-related mortality, Progression-Free or Overall Survival was noted between the different renal function groups. A decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1-year of >8.79% was associated with poorer overall survival (p < 0.001). The results of this study show that ASCT is a safe and effective option for myeloma patients with CKD, including those on dialysis. Patients who demonstrate renal deterioration at 1-year post-transplant should be closely monitored as this is a predictor for poor survival.
Collapse
|
6
|
Heybeli C, Bentall AJ, Alexander MP, Amer H, Buadi FK, Dispenzieri A, Dingli D, Gertz MA, Issa N, Kapoor P, Kukla A, Kumar S, Lorenz EC, Rajkumar SV, Schinstock CA, Leung N. Kidney Transplant Outcomes of Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:752-762. [PMID: 35497786 PMCID: PMC9039485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Data on kidney transplantation (KTx) outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are very limited. Methods We investigated the outcomes of patients with MM who underwent KTx between 1994 and 2019. Results A total of 12 transplants from 11 patients were included. At the time of KTx, 6 were classified as having stringent complete response (CR), 2 as CR, 2 as very good partial response (VGPR), and 2 as partial response (PR). With a median follow-up of 40 (minimum–maximum, 5–92) months after KTx, hematologic progression occurred in 9 transplants (75%). There were 3 grafts (25%) that failed, and 5 patients (45.5%) experienced death with functioning allografts. Graft survival at 1 and 5 years was 82.5% and 66%, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates of the cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83.3%, 55.6%, and 44.4%, respectively. The estimated median PFS of patients who received bortezomib at any time (pre-KTx and/or post-KTx) was not reached, whereas it was 24 months for those who never received bortezomib (P = 0.281). Overall survival (OS) rates of the cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81.8%, 61.4%, and 61.4%, respectively. OS of patients who received bortezomib at any time was 87.5%, 72.9%, and 72.9%, and that for those who never received bortezomib was 66.7%, 33.3%, and 33.3% (P = 0.136). All deaths occurred owing to hematologic progression or treatment-related complications. Conclusion Kidney transplant outcomes of patients with myeloma who received bortezomib before or after KTx seem to be more favorable. Nevertheless, relapse after KTx in MM is still common. More studies are needed to better determine who benefits from a KTx.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chitty DW, Hartley-Brown MA, Abate M, Thakur R, Wanchoo R, Jhaveri KD, Nair V. Kidney transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: narrative analysis and review of the last 2 decades. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 37:1616-1626. [PMID: 33295615 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been significant advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma in the last 2 decades. Approximately 25% of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma have some degree of kidney impairment. During the course of illness, nearly 50% of myeloma patients will develop kidney disease. Moreover, approximately 10% of myeloma patients have advanced kidney disease requiring dialysis at presentation. Hemodialysis is associated with a significantly reduced overall survival. In the setting of prolonged long-term overall survival due to the use of newer immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of myeloma, patients with myeloma and advanced kidney disease may benefit from more aggressive management with kidney transplantation. Unfortunately, most data regarding outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with myeloma come from single center case series. With the advent of novel treatment choices, it remains unclear if outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with myeloma have improved in recent years. In this descriptive systematic review, we coalesced published patient data over the last 20 years to help inform clinicians and patients on expected hematologic and kidney transplant outcomes in this complex population. We further discuss the future of kidney transplantation in patients with paraproteinemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Chitty
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA.,Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Hematology/Medical Oncology, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Monique A Hartley-Brown
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA.,Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Hematology/Medical Oncology, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Mersema Abate
- Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Richa Thakur
- Divisions of Hematology-Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA.,Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Hematology/Medical Oncology, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Rimda Wanchoo
- Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Kenar D Jhaveri
- Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Vinay Nair
- Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) outcomes in myeloma patients on renal replacement therapy: a report from the Chronic Malignancy Working Party (CMWP) of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant 2020; 56:529-531. [PMID: 32741961 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-01010-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
9
|
Zhang Z, Yuan X, Wu Y, Guo F, Tian J. The Family Attitudes of Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Toward Living Kidney Donation in China. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:1360-1364. [PMID: 32527473 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 12/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organ shortages limit the progress of organ transplantation. The family attitudes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) play an important role in advocating organ transplantation and donation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the family attitudes of patients with ESRD toward living kidney donation in China. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Linyi People's Hospital. This study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. MATERIALS AND METHODS This research was performed at 5 third-level hospitals with hemodialysis and nephrology departments, and a small section comes from urology departments. The participants were surveyed from January to November 2018. Attitudes were evaluated using a validated questionnaire concerning the psychosocial aspects of organ donation. The self-administered questionnaire was completed anonymously. Statistical analyses employed t tests and the χ2 test. RESULTS Regarding living kidney donation, 69.1% (n = 428) of patient families favored it; however, only 30.9% (n = 192) did not support it. A favorable attitude toward living donation was mainly associated with the following variables: 1. the recipient is not more than 50 years old; 2. the recipient is a member of the immediate family; 3. the living donation is from the recipient's family member; 4. the family has previous personal experience with organ transplantation and donation; and 5. the family has a concern about the possibility of needing a transplant within the family unit (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Economic burden and mental stress from long-term dialysis influenced the attitudes and behavioral intentions of the families of patients with ESRD on advocating organ donation. Repeated education and constant advocacy are advised to increase the participation of families of patients with ESRD in organ donation. The results showed favorable attitudes toward living kidney donation among the families of patients with ESRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Zhang
- Department of Blood Purification &Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; Department of Urology, The People's Hospital of Linyi, Linyi, Shandong, China
| | - Xuemin Yuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The People's Hospital of Linyi, Linyi, Shandong, China
| | - Yijin Wu
- School of Translation Studies, Center for Medical Humanities in the Developing World, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China
| | - Fengfu Guo
- Department of Urology, The People's Hospital of Linyi, Linyi, Shandong, China
| | - Jun Tian
- Department of Blood Purification &Transplantation, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Current opinions in nephrology and hypertension: kidney transplantation in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2020; 28:573-580. [PMID: 31403474 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Plasma cell dyscrasias encompass a group of hematological disorders characterized by increased production of immunoglobulins by clonal B cells. Kidney involvement is common. Significant advances in the treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias have resulted in improved survival and may permit kidney transplantation in candidates previously denied transplantation. Treatments may also have effects on kidney transplant recipients who develop plasma cell dyscrasias post transplantation. RECENT FINDING The available evidence suggests that transplantation of candidates with nonmultiple myeloma plasma cell dyscrasias provides good outcome with low recurrence rates, so long as the disease has been treated with a complete or good partial response prior to transplantation. Candidates with a history untreated MGRS or a history of multiple myeloma have a high rate of recurrence posttransplant. Kidney transplant recipients who develop plasma cell dyscrasias post transplantation have an increased risk of death and thalidomide-based regimens may increase the risk of rejection. SUMMARY Transplant candidates with a history of plasma cell dyscrasia who are in remission should not be excluded from transplantation. Individuals with multiple myeloma have a high rate of recurrence and myeloma post kidney transplant must be managed carefully.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lim WH, Au E, Krishnan A, Wong G. Assessment of kidney transplant suitability for patients with prior cancers: is it time for a rethink? Transpl Int 2019; 32:1223-1240. [PMID: 31385629 PMCID: PMC6900036 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients have up to a 100-fold greater risk of incident cancer compared with the age/sex-matched general population, attributed largely to chronic immunosuppression. In patients with a prior history of treated cancers, the type, stage and the potential for cancer recurrence post-transplant of prior cancers are important factors when determining transplant suitability. Consequently, one of the predicaments facing transplant clinicians is to determine whether patients with prior cancers are eligible for transplantation, balancing between the accelerated risk of death on dialysis, the projected survival benefit and quality of life gains with transplantation, and the premature mortality associated with the potential risk of cancer recurrence post-transplant. The guidelines informing transplant eligibility or screening and preventive strategies against cancer recurrence for patients with prior cancers are inconsistent, underpinned by uncertain evidence on the estimates of the incidence of cancer recurrence and the lack of stage-specific outcomes data, particularly among those with multiple myeloma or immune-driven malignancies such as melanomas. With the advent of newer anti-cancer treatment options, it is unclear whether the current guidelines for those with prior cancers remain appropriate. This review will summarize the uncertainties of evidence informing the current recommendations regarding transplant eligibility of patients with prior cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai H Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Eric Au
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anoushka Krishnan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hedvat J, Nair V, Miko L, Menon MC, Santeusanio A. Outcomes of renal transplantation in patients with previous hematologic malignancies. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2399369319865539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Recommendations regarding the appropriateness of renal transplantation in patients with prior hematologic malignancies are limited. Given the lack of available data, studies are needed to assess which of these patients will maximally benefit from renal transplantation. This study was undertaken to describe the incidence of new or recurrent malignancy as well as patient and allograft survival, acute rejection, and serious infections in patients with prior hematologic malignancies receiving renal transplantation. This was a single center retrospective review of all adult patients with a previous hematologic malignancy who received a living or deceased renal transplantation between January 2009 and January 2016. Eight renal transplantation recipients with prior hematologic malignancies were identified and followed for a minimum of 3 years. Six patients received prior chemotherapy and five had a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median time from remission to transplant was 2.6 years. Three-year patient and allograft survival were 87% and 75%, respectively. Three patients were diagnosed with new cancers within 3 years post-renal transplantation; one of which died from cancer-related complications with a functioning allograft. There was concern for recurrent hematologic malignancies in two patients based on serologic studies, but, both of these patients were alive with functioning allografts at 3-year follow-up. Our experience suggests that renal transplantation can be successfully performed in select patients with prior hematologic malignancy but with a significant risk for de novo malignancy post-transplant, which may be associated with an overall poor prognosis. Decisions regarding renal transplantation candidacy should be made based on risk stratification and multidisciplinary discussions with patients, hematologists, and transplant providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Hedvat
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vinay Nair
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Leandra Miko
- Department of Pharmacy, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|