Measuring intradialyser transmembrane and hydrostatic pressures: pitfalls and relevance in haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration

Disruptive technologies for hemodialysis: medium and high cutoff membranes. Is the future now?

In the past decade, a new class of hemodialysis (HD) membranes (high retention onset class) became available for clinical use. The high cutoff (HCO) and the medium cutoff (MCO) membranes have wider pores and more uniformity in pore size, allowing an increased clearance of uremic toxins. Owing to the mechanism of backfiltration/internal filtration, middle molecules are dragged by the convective forces, and no substitution solution is needed. The HCO dialyzer is applied in septic patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous kidney replacement therapy. The immune response is modulated thanks to the removal of inflammatory mediators. Another current application for the HCO dialyzer is in hematology, for patients on HD secondary to myeloma-kidney, since free light chains are more efficiently removed with the HCO membrane, reducing their deleterious effect on the renal tubules. In its turn, the MCO dialyzer is used for maintenance HD patients. A myriad of clinical trials published in the last three years consistently demonstrates the ability of this membrane to remove uremic toxins more efficiently than the high-flux membrane, an evolutionary disruption in the HD standard of care. Safety concerns regarding albumin loss as well as blood contamination from pyrogens in the dialysate have been overcome. In this update article, we explore the rise of new dialysis membranes in the light of the scientific evidence that supports their use in clinical practice.

Continuous renal replacement therapy and extended indications

Extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) techniques provide support for critically ill patients with single or multiple organ dysfunction. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the modality of choice for kidney support for those patients and orchestrates the interactions between the different artificial organ support systems. Intensive care teams should be familiar with the concept of sequential extracorporeal therapy and plan on how to incorporate new treatment modalities into their daily practices. Importantly, scientific evidence should guide the decision-making process at the bedside and provide robust arguments to justify the costs of implementing new EBP treatments. In this narrative review, we explore the extended indications for CRRT as an adjunctive treatment to provide support for the heart, lung, liver, and immune system. We detail practicalities on how to run the treatments and how to tackle the most frequent complications regarding each of the therapies, whether applied alone or integrated. The physicochemical processes and technologies involved at the molecular level encompassing the interactions between the molecules, membranes, and resins are spotlighted. A clinical case will illustrate the timing for the initiation, maintenance, and discontinuation of EBP techniques.