Darusentan, a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist, for the oral treatment of resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as failure to lower blood pressure to target when a patient adheres to the maximum tolerated doses of three antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. Notwithstanding the wide availability of several antihypertensive agents and the continued recommendation of dietary and lifestyle modifications, the prevalence of resistant hypertension remains high and is expected to increase thus underscoring the need for potential new treatment modalities in resistant hypertension. Endothelin-1 is a long-lasting potent vasoconstrictor and plays a key role in cardiovascular haemostasis. Endothelin mediates its biological activity in humans through the endothelin A and B receptors. The clinical experience and the evidence for therapy with darusentan in resistant systemic hypertension are reviewed. The leading journals that publish basic science and clinical research in the area of cardiovascular diseases and PubMed were scanned. While results from early clinical studies suggested that darusentan might emerge as new treatment option in patients with resistant hypertension, results from recent studies suggests that darusentan appears unlikely to find its way in the armamentarium for treatment of resistant hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of darusentan: a novel endothelin receptor antagonist

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the role of the endothelin system (ETS) in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and evaluate the potential usefulness of darusentan, a selective endothelin type A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist, in the treatment of hypertension and chronic heart failure (CHF).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (1966-February 2008), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-February 2008), and EMBASE (1990-February 2008) using the search terms endothelin, darusentan, LU 135252, hypertension, and heart failure.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies evaluating the role of the ETS in CVD and the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of darusentan for the treatment of hypertension and CHF were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Darusentan represents a novel treatment strategy for patients with resistant hypertension. Its safety and efficacy have been evaluated in the treatment of hypertension and CHF. Darusentan selectively blocks the ET(A) receptor, promoting vasodilatation and preventing several proliferative and inflammatory processes, while promoting the actions of the ET(B) receptor. Studies in patients with stage 2 or resistant hypertension concluded that darusentan safely and effectively lowers blood pressure. Darusentan's unique mechanism of action, dose-dependent blood pressure-lowering profile, once-daily dosing regimen, and sustained 24-hour blood pressure-lowering effect are valuable features. Darusentan is well tolerated, with only peripheral edema, headache, and nasal symptoms being reported more frequently than with placebo. Endothelin receptor antagonists, including darusentan, have been associated with a decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit and are teratogens. Darusentan does not appear to cause hepatotoxicity. Additional studies in CHF are warranted to assess the safety and efficacy of darusentan, especially given its association with peripheral edema and decreased red blood cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the important role of the ETS in hypertension and available data with darusentan, selective antagonism of the ET(A) receptor represents a promising approach to managing resistant hypertension. Darusentan's role will be more clearly elucidated by ongoing Phase 3 studies.

Inhalation of the ETAreceptor antagonist LU-135252 selectively attenuates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction

Endogenous endothelin (ET)-1 modulates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). Accordingly, intravenously applied ETAreceptor antagonists reduce HPV, but this is accompanied by systemic vasodilation. We hypothesized that inhalation of an ETAreceptor antagonist might act selectively on the pulmonary vasculature and investigated the effects of aerosolized LU-135252 in an experimental model of HPV. Sixteen piglets (weight: 25 ± 1 kg) were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated at an inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) of 0.3. After 1 h of hypoxia at FiO20.15, animals were randomly assigned either to receive aerosolized LU-135252 as bolus (0.3 mg/kg for 20 min; n = 8, LU group), or to receive aerosolized saline ( n = 8, controls). In all animals, hypoxia significantly increased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (32 ± 1 vs. 23 ± 1 mmHg; P < 0.01; means ± SE) and increased arterial plasma ET-1 (0.52 ± 0.04 vs. 0.37 ± 0.05 fmol/ml; P < 0.01) compared with mild hyperoxia at FiO20.3. Inhalation of LU-135252 induced a significant and sustained decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure compared with controls (LU group: 27 ± 1 mmHg; controls: 32 ± 1 mmHg; values at 4 h of hypoxia; P < 0.01). In parallel, mean systemic arterial pressure and cardiac output remained stable and were not significantly different from control values. Consequently, in our experimental model of HPV, the inhaled ETAreceptor antagonist LU-135252 induced selective pulmonary vasodilation without adverse systemic hemodynamic effects.

The endothelin system as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease: great expectations or bleak house?

There is considerable evidence that the potent vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) contributes to the pathogenesis of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. As such, pharmacological manipulation of the ET system might represent a promising therapeutic goal. Many clinical trials have assessed the potential of ET receptor antagonists in cardiovascular disease, the most positive of which have resulted in the licensing of the mixed ET receptor antagonist bosentan, and the selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, sitaxsentan and ambrisentan, for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In contrast, despite encouraging data from in vitro and animal studies, outcomes in human heart failure have been disappointing, perhaps illustrating the risk of extrapolating preclinical work to man. Many further potential applications of these compounds, including resistant hypertension, chronic kidney disease, connective tissue disease and sub-arachnoid haemorrhage are currently being investigated in the clinic. Furthermore, experience from previous studies should enable improved trial design and scope remains for development of improved compounds and alternative therapeutic strategies. Although ET-converting enzyme inhibitors may represent one such alternative, there have been relatively few suitable compounds developed, and consequently, clinical experience with these agents remains extremely limited. Recent advances, together with an increased understanding of the biology of the ET system provided by improved experimental tools (including cell-specific transgenic deletion of ET receptors), should allow further targeting of clinical trials to diseases in which ET is involved and allow the therapeutic potential for targeting the ET system in cardiovascular disease to be fully realized.

Ambrisentan, a Non-peptide Endothelin Receptor Antagonist

Increasing numbers of experimental investigations and recently also of clinical trials strongly suggest an integral involvement of the endothelin (ET)-system in the pathophysiology of a variety of disease states, mainly of the cardiovascular system. Ambrisentan (LU 208075), a selective ET(A)-receptor antagonist, is an orally active diphenyl propionic acid derivative. It has been shown to have a very promising efficacy to safety ratio in the initial clinical trials. Phase II and Phase III trials with ambrisentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension have been performed. The pharmacological properties and data from the experimental investigations suggest additional possible uses of ambrisentan in the prevention of reperfusion injury after organ transplantation and in restenosis following coronary artery dilatation. Furthermore, the pharmacological profile of ambrisentan indicates that this drug may also be suitable in the treatment of cerebrovascular disorders. In the present article basic investigations, animal studies and clinical trials with ambrisentan are reviewed. This review may help to define pathophysiological conditions, in which ambrisentan could be indicated and further evaluated in appropriate preclinical and clinical trials.

Long-term effects of nonselective endothelin A and B receptor antagonism in postinfarction rat: importance of timing

BACKGROUND

Some controversy exists as to the effects of endothelin (ET) receptor antagonism on long-term post-myocardial infarction (MI) evolution, particularly as it relates to the timing of the intervention after MI (<24 hours versus 10 days).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sham rats and rats surviving an acute MI for >20 hours (n=301) were assigned to treatment with saline or the nonselective ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonist LU 420627 (LU) started <24 hours (early) or 10 days (late) after MI and continued for 100 days. Long-term LU treatment led to increased mortality of rats with large MI, regardless of the timing of initiation of therapy. Early initiation of LU reduced survival from 61% to 16% (P<0.001 versus untreated), and later initiation reduced survival to 36% (P=0.012 versus untreated and P<0.001 versus early initiation). Early initiation of LU led to scar thinning, further left ventricular (LV) dilatation, LV dysfunction, and an excessive rise in right ventricular systolic pressure. Later initiation of LU did not modify scar formation but resulted in LV dilatation and dysfunction compared with the untreated group. Cardiac fibrosis tended to increase in the LU-treated MI groups. LU in the sham group reduced cardiac endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase but did not modify the changes that occurred with a large MI.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the nonselective ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonist LU results in reduced survival, ventricular dilatation, and dysfunction whether started early or late after MI. Early initiation of LU resulted in scar expansion and a particularly unfavorable outcome.

Transient involvement of endothelin in hypertrophic remodeling of small arteries

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the capacity of norepinephrine (NE) to induce hypertrophic remodeling of small arteries in rats, and to determine the involvement of endothelin (ET) to initiate and maintain it.

DESIGN AND RESULTS

Treatment with NE (2.5 microg/kg per min) for 14 or 28 days produced a similar inward hypertrophic remodeling, characterized by a smaller lumen, but increased media thickness and cross-sectional area. Arterial stiffness was reduced. Histological evaluation confirmed the hypertrophic nature of remodeling. Concomitant administration of LU135252 (ET-receptor antagonist) for the first 14 days of NE administration prevented the development of hypertrophy, without altering arterial mechanics. Treatment with the same antagonist from day 14 to day 28 of NE or angiotensin II (Ang II) treatment failed to regress established vascular hypertrophy. In contrast, normalization of arterial structure was observed with prazosin, an alpha-adrenergic blocker. Endothelin content in small mesenteric arteries showed a transient elevation following chronic NE administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased circulating NE levels are associated with hypertrophic remodeling of small arteries, in which ET plays an initiating role. However, the maintenance of vascular hypertrophy is ET-independent, either in the presence of augmented circulating levels of NE or Ang II. Thus, early rather than late treatment with ET-receptor antagonists may be a preferable approach to limit small artery-mediated end-organ damage in cardiovascular diseases.

Endothelin A receptor blockade prevents capillary/myocyte mismatch in the heart of uremic animals

In the heart of uremic animals and patients, the number of capillaries per volume of myocardium is reduced. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated increased cardiac endothelin-1 (ET-1) expression in the left ventricle of uremic animals. Therefore, whether treatment with a selective ET(A)-receptor antagonist prevented such capillary-myocyte mismatch was investigated. Twenty-four h after subtotal nephrectomy, rats were left untreated or started on treatment with the ET(A)-receptor antagonist LU 135252 (20 mg/kg per d) and with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor trandolapril (0.3 mg/kg per d), respectively. BP was monitored by telemetry. Myocardial capillary length density was analyzed by stereologic techniques that avoid anisotropy artifacts. In addition, cardiac ET-1 protein and mRNA were measured using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Changes in cardiac ET(A)-and ET(B)-PCR. receptor mRNA were measured using reverse transcription-PCR. Fifteen wk after subtotal nephrectomy, significantly reduced left ventricular capillary length density (3307 +/- 535 mm/mm(3)) was found compared with sham-operated controls (3995 +/- 471 mm/mm(3)); this was also seen in animals that were treated with trandolapril (3503 +/- 533 mm/mm(3)) but not in animals that were treated with LU 135252 (3800 +/- 303 mm/mm(3)). The results support a role of ET-1 in the genesis of left ventricular capillary/myocyte mismatch in uremia.