Accuracy-based proficiency testing for estradiol measurements

OBJECTIVES

Accuracy of estradiol measurements is important but conventional proficiency testing (PT) cannot assess accuracy when possibly non-commutable samples are used and method peer-group means are the targets. Accuracy-based assessment of estradiol measurements is needed.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Five serum samples were prepared from single donors, frozen, and distributed overnight to 76 New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)-certified laboratories. Participants analyzed samples for estradiol. The biases of group means were assessed against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined targets, evaluated using the Hormone Standardization Program (HoSt) E2 performance criterion of ±12.5 %. Each laboratory's performance was evaluated using total allowable error (acceptance limits) of target ±25 % or ±15 pg/mL (55 pmol/L) (whichever was greater, NYSDOH), target ±30 % (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [CLIA]), and target ±26 % (minimal limit based on biological variation [BV]).

RESULTS

The biases (range) were 34 % (-17 % to 175 %), 40 % (-33 % to 386 %), 16 % (-45 % to 193 %), 5 % (-27 % to 117 %), and -4% (-31 % to 21 %), for samples at estradiol of 24.1, 28.4, 61.7, 94.1, and 127 pg/mL, or 89, 104, 227, 345, and 466 pmol/L, respectively. Large positive method/analytical systematic biases were revealed for 9 commonly used method/analytical systems in the United States at low estradiol concentrations. Of the 9 analytical systems, 0, 0, 3, 7 and 6 met the HoSt criterion for the samples with estradiol at the five respective concentrations. PT evaluation showed that 59 %, 69 % and 87 % of laboratories would receive a PT event passing (satisfactory) score when the CDC-defined target and a criterion of NYSDOH, CLIA or BV was used, respectively. However, >95 % laboratories would obtain PT passing score if method peer-group means were used as targets regardless of the criterion used.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in accuracy of estradiol measurements is needed, particularly at low estradiol concentrations. Accuracy-based PT provides unambiguous information about the accuracy of methods/analytical systems.

Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part II-Operations

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly utilized in clinical laboratories because it has advantages in terms of specificity and sensitivity over other analytical technologies. These advantages come with additional responsibilities and challenges given that many assays and platforms are not provided to laboratories as a single kit or device. The skills, staff, and assays used in LC-MS/MS are internally developed by the laboratory, with relatively few exceptions. Hence, a laboratory that deploys LC-MS/MS assays must be conscientious of the practices and procedures adopted to overcome the challenges associated with the technology. This review discusses the post-development landscape of LC-MS/MS assays, including validation, quality assurance, operations, and troubleshooting. The content knowledge of LC-MS/MS users is quite broad and deep and spans multiple scientific fields, including biology, clinical chemistry, chromatography, engineering, and MS. However, there are no formal academic programs or specific literature to train laboratory staff on the fundamentals of LC-MS/MS beyond the reports on method development. Therefore, depending on their experience level, some readers may be familiar with aspects of the laboratory practices described herein, while others may be not. This review endeavors to assemble aspects of LC-MS/MS operations in the clinical laboratory to provide a framework for the thoughtful development and execution of LC-MS/MS applications.