Development of an immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of GADA and ZnT8A in autoimmune diabetes using a ZnT8/GAD65 chimeric molecule

Introduction

The combined presence of autoantibodies to the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) and to the islet-specific cation efflux transporter ZnT8 (ZnT8A) in serum is the best predictive sign of the loss of immune tolerance and the clinical manifestation of autoimmune diabetes mellitus (DM). The screening of GADA and ZnT8A could help to reach to a correct diagnosis and to start an early and adequate treatment. The aim of the study was to develop an immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of these autoantibodies using a chimera molecule that includes the immunodominant regions of ZnT8 and GAD65, expressed by baculovirus-insect cells system.

Materials and Methods

ZnT8/GAD65 was expressed using the Bac to Bac™ baculovirus expression system. The recombinant chimera was purified by an His6-tag and identified by SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis, and by an indirect ELISA using specific antibodies against ZnT8 and GAD65. A fraction of ZnT8/GAD65 was biotinylated. A bridge ELISA (b-ELISA) was developed using ZnT8/GAD65 immobilized in polystyrene microplates, human sera samples from healthy individuals (n = 51) and diabetic patients (n = 49) were then incubated, and afterwards ZnT8/GAD65-biotin was added. Immune complexes were revealed with Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase. Results were calculated as specific absorbance and expressed as standard deviation scores: SDs.

Results

ZnT8/GAD65 was efficiently produced, yielding 30 mg/L culture medium, 80% pure. This recombinant chimera retains the immunoreactive conformation of the epitopes that are recognized by their specific antibodies, so it was used for the development of a high sensitivity (75.51%) and specificity (98.04%) b-ELISA for the detection of ZnT8A and/or GADA, in a one-step screening assay. The ROC curves demonstrated that this method had high accuracy to distinguish between samples from healthy individuals and diabetic patients (AUC = 0.9488); the cut-off value was stablished at 2 SDs.

Conclusions

This immunoassay is useful either to confirm autoimmune diabetes or for detection in routine screening of individuals at risk of autoimmune DM. As DM is a slow progress disease, remaining asymptomatic for a long preclinical period, serological testing is of importance to establish a preventive treatment.

Detection of four diabetes specific autoantibodies in a single radioimmunoassay: an innovative high-throughput approach for autoimmune diabetes screening

Highly sensitive and specific radioimmunoassays have been validated for autoantibodies reacting with the four major autoantigens identified so far in autoimmune diabetes. However, the analysis of this large number of autoantigens has increased the costs and time necessary for complete autoantibody screenings. Our aim was to demonstrate that it is possible to detect the immunoreactivity against a combination of four different autoantigens by a single assay, this representing a rapid, low-cost first approach to evaluate humoral autoimmunity in diabetes. By using this novel multi-autoantigen radioimmunoassay (MAA), in subsequent steps we analysed 830 sera, 476 of known and 354 of unknown diabetes-specific immunoreactivity, collected from various groups of individuals including type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients, autoantibody-positive patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (LADA), prediabetic subjects, individuals at risk to develop autoimmune diabetes, siblings of type 1 diabetic patients, coeliac patients and healthy control subjects. All sera reacting with one or more of the four autoantigens by single assays also resulted positive with MAA, as well as eight of 24 type 1 diabetic patients classified initially as autoantibody-negative at disease onset based on single autoantibody assays. In addition, MAA showed 92% sensitivity and 99% specificity by analysing 140 blinded sera from type 1 diabetic patients and control subjects provided in the 2010 Diabetes Autoantibody Standardization Program. MAA is the first combined method also able to evaluate, in addition to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and tyrosine phosphatase (IA)-2, insulin and islet beta-cell zinc cation efflux transporter (ZnT8) autoantibodies. It appears to be particularly appropriate as a first-line approach for large-scale population-based screenings of anti-islet autoimmunity.

Time-resolved immunofluorometric dual-label assay for simultaneous detection of autoantibodies to GAD65 and IA-2 in children with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADAs), specifically the 65-kDa isoform GAD65, and autoantibodies to the protein tyrosine phosphatase-like molecule IA-2 (IA-2As) predict development of diabetes. Our aim was to develop a time-resolved immunofluorometric (TR-IFMA) dual-label assay method for the simultaneous detection of these autoantibodies and to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of the method compared with single-label TR-IFMA and fluid-phase radiobinding assay (RBA) in screening children with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

We incubated combined biotinylated GAD65 and IA-2 proteins, glutathione S-transferase (GST)-IA-2, europium-labeled GAD65, terbium-labeled anti-GST antibody, and serum sample or calibrator and transferred aliquots to a streptavidin-coated 96-well microtiter plate for a second incubation. After washing, we added Delfia Enhancement solution to each well and measured the fluorescence of Eu. We developed the Tb fluorescence signal by use of the Delfia Enhancer solution and measured it. We analyzed serum samples from a cohort of 100 children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients between the autoantibody concentrations measured by dual- and single-label TR-IFMA assays were 0.962 for GADA and 0.874 for IA-2A. Among 100 children with newly diagnosed diabetes, 65 of them were GADA positive in the dual-label assay, 64 in the single-label assay, and 66 in the RBA GADA assay. Seventy-four of the children tested positive for IA-2A in both TR-IFMA assay types, and 79 in the RBA IA-2A assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel dual-label immunofluorometric assay performed comparably to the separate, single-label GADA and IA-2A assays in screening for beta-cell autoimmunity in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.

Sensitive non-isotopic assays for autoantibodies to IA-2 and to a combination of both IA-2 and GAD65

BACKGROUND

A sensitive ELISA for measurement of IA-2 autoantibodies has been developed and assessed. Also, a combination ELISA for detection of both GAD65 autoantibodies and IA-2 autoantibodies is described.

METHODS

The IA-2 autoantibody assay is based on the ability of IA-2 autoantibodies to form a bridge between IA-2 intracellular fragment coated onto ELISA plate wells and liquid-phase IA-2 labelled with biotin. The combination ELISA uses plates coated with both IA-2 and GAD65 and a mixture of IA-2-biotin and GAD65-biotin. Assay sensitivity was assessed using the WHO reference (NIBSC 97/550) for islet cell antibodies. IA-2 autoantibody measurements by ELISA were compared with measurements in immunoprecipitation assays (IPAs) based on 125I or 35S labelled IA-2. Combination ELISA results were compared with results obtained for individual autoantibodies.

RESULTS

As little as 15 units/mL of NIBSC 97/550 was detectable in the IA-2 autoantibody ELISA compared to 125 units/mL by 125I-IA-2 IPA. 110/216(51%) sera from patients with type 1 DM were positive in the IA-2 autoantibody ELISA while 97/216 (45%) and 91/216 (42%) were positive in the 125I-IA2 and 35S-IA-2 IPAs, respectively. The IA-2 autoantibody ELISA showed 100% specificity for type 1 DM. The combination ELISA was able to detect GAD65 and/or IA-2 autoantibodies in 183/216 (85%) diabetic sera and 183/216 (85%) were also found positive for autoantibodies to IA-2 and/or to GAD65 in the assays for individual antibodies. Autoantibody measurements in the individual autoantibody assays and in the combination ELISA showed good agreement by Pearson correlation (r=0.92, n=216, p<0.001) and by Bland and Altman analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitive and specific ELISAs for measurement of autoantibodies to IA-2 and to a combination of IA-2 and GAD65 have been developed. These assays are suitable for screening large numbers of samples in diabetes prediction and prevention trials.

Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Background: The application of epidemiologic principles to clinical diagnosis has been less developed than in other clinical areas. Knowledge of the main flaws affecting diagnostic laboratory test research is the first step for improving its quality. We assessed the methodologic aspects of articles on laboratory tests.

Methods: We included articles that estimated indexes of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and were published in Clinical Chemistry or Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in 1996, 2001, and 2002. Clinical Chemistry has paid special attention to this field of research since 1996 by publishing recommendations, checklists, and reviews. Articles were identified through electronic searches in Medline. The strategy combined the Mesh term “sensitivity and specificity” (exploded) with the text words “specificity”, “false negative”, and “accuracy”. We examined adherence to seven methodologic criteria used in the study by Reid et al. (JAMA1995;274:645–51) of papers published in general medical journals. Three observers evaluated each article independently.

Results: Seventy-nine articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The percentage of studies that satisfied each criterion improved from 1996 to 2002. Substantial improvement was observed in reporting of the statistical uncertainty of indices of diagnostic accuracy, in criteria based on clinical information from the study population (spectrum composition), and in avoidance of workup bias. Analytical reproducibility was reported frequently (68%), whereas information about indeterminate results was rarely provided. The mean number of methodologic criteria satisfied showed a statistically significant increase over the 3 years in Clinical Chemistry but not in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Conclusions: The methodologic quality of the articles on diagnostic test research published in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine is comparable to the quality observed in the best general medical journals. The methodologic aspects that most need improvement are those linked to the clinical information of the populations studied. Editorial actions aimed to increase the quality of reporting of diagnostic studies could have a relevant positive effect, as shown by the improvement observed in Clinical Chemistry.

Detection of autoantibodies to protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein IA-2 with a novel time-resolved fluorimetric assay

BACKGROUND

Circulating autoantibodies to pancreatic glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65; the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase), protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein IA-2, and insulin can be used as predictive markers of type 1 diabetes. We developed a novel assay for the detection of IA-2 autoantibodies (IA-2As) in serum based on time-resolved fluorimetry, hypothesizing that this kind of assay could provide several advantages over methods described to date, including radiobinding assays (RBAs) and ELISAs.

METHODS

The intracellular part of IA-2 (IA-2ic) was biotinylated and bound to streptavidin-coated 96-well plates by simultaneous incubation with serum samples and glutathione S-transferase (GST)-IA-2ic fusion protein. GST-IA-2ic captured by autoantibodies in the serum was detected with europium-labeled anti-GST antibody, and the signal was measured in a time-resolved fluorimeter. A serum sample panel from 100 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and 100 unaffected controls was analyzed with the new assay and a conventional RBA.

RESULTS

Among the 100 serum samples from patients with type 1 diabetes, the time-resolved fluorimetric assay identified 74 IA-2A-containing sera, whereas the RBA detected 80 IA-2A-positive samples. Five of the six samples positive in the RBA but not detected by the time-resolved fluorimetric assay were only weakly positive in the RBA. The performance time of the time-resolved fluorimetric assay was 2.5 h compared with 10-12 h required by the RBA.

CONCLUSIONS

The time-resolved fluorimetric assay provides a simple, nonradioactive analysis method for the detection of IA-2As with a specificity and a sensitivity comparable to the RBA method. This assay allows substantial reduction in performance time compared with the conventional RBA.