[-2]proPSA is an early marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between preoperative [-2]proPSA, the Gleason Score (GS) and the risk of non-organ-confined (NOC) disease in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Beckman Coulter Access immunoassay was used to study serum specimens of 381 patients enrolled in a prostate cancer (PCa) early detection program. Inclusion criteria were three or more available serum specimens over 4 years before diagnosis. The values obtained were correlated with the GSs and pathological stages of specimens obtained at RP.

RESULTS

[-2]proPSA levels were significantly higher in the cancer group (n=208) than in the benign group (n=173). Already 4 years before diagnosis [-2]proPSA differed significantly between PCa and benign prostate in all measured time points, however, highest prediction value was 2 and 1 years before diagnosis (P<0.001). When stratified [-2]proPSA levels according to GS of RP specimens, [-2]proPSA was highest in patients with ≥GS8 and lowest in those with ≤GS6.The difference in [-2]proPSA values between GS≥8 and GS≤7 was highly significant (P<0.01) already 3 years before diagnosis. Investigating the correlation between extraprostatic extension and the preoperative [-2]proPSA levels we found preoperative [-2]proPSA values significantly higher in men with NOC PCa compared with organ-confined (OC) cancers.The highest predictive value of [-2]proPSA to differ between OC and extraprostatic extension was found 3 and 2 years before RP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high [-2]proPSA levels in the years before cancer diagnosis are at a higher risk of having aggressive PCas. Thus, the [-2]proPSA should be included in the treatment decision-making for managing screen-detected PCa.

Intact free prostate-specific antigen and free and total human glandular kallikrein 2. Elimination of assay interference by enzymatic digestion of antibodies to F(ab')2 fragments

Various blood constituents can interfere with immunoassays, usually by binding the Fc portion of antibodies. Our previously developed assays for intact free prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free human kallikrein 2 (hK2), and total hK2 frequently yielded falsely high results despite including an excess of scavenger antibodies. We investigated whether this interference could be eliminated by replacing monoclonal capture or tracer antibodies with F(ab')2 or recombinant Fab fragments. Female heparin plasma samples (n = 1092), which should have negligible PSA and hK2, and male samples (n = 957) were analyzed to identify samples manifesting interference, which then were used to optimize protocols for the immunoassays. We compared original assays (monoclonal antibodies) versus optimized assays (F(ab')2 fragments: denatured mouse IgG added as scavenger) using another set of EDTA plasma (n = 113), heparin plasma (n = 160), and serum samples (n = 171). With the original assays, the frequency of falsely elevated hK2 and intact free PSA was 15 and 13%, respectively. The optimized assays eliminated 70-85% of these falsely elevated results and importantly reduced the magnitude in the remainder. F(ab')2 fragmentation was the most important factor in reducing interference. The optimized intact free PSA, free hK2, and total hK2 assays manifested high accuracy close to the lower limit of detection.

Free and total human glandular kallikrein 2 in patients with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

The use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA, hK3) results in the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Markers are needed that could identify aggressive, fast-growing tumors and help decide which patients would benefit most from aggressive treatment. Human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) could be such a marker. The aim of this study was to test how PSA and hK2 could predict the pathologic stage and grade in a set of patients with clinically organ-confined disease.

METHODS

Heparin plasma was collected from 188 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy at the Turku University Central Hospital. Total and free PSA, as well as total and free hK2, were measured and the results compared with the pathologic TNM stage, tumor World Health Organization grade, and Gleason score.

RESULTS

Free and total hK2 performed similarly to PSA in their ability to separate groups of patients with different stages or grades. Concentrations of both kallikreins were significantly different in patients with World Health Organization grade 1 cancer compared with grade 2. Neither marker could separate patients with different Gleason scores. Although PSA concentrations increased most between patients with Stage pT2b and those with pT3a, the increase in hK2 was most pronounced between those with Stage pT3a and those with pT3b.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hK2 could not predict the cancer stage or grade better than PSA, changes in the hK2 and PSA concentrations occurred at different points in cancer progression. hK2 may have a role in the prognosis of prostate cancer, but additional studies with longer follow-up are required to determine whether hK2 can help when selecting treatment options.

Clinical utility of human glandular kallikrein 2 within a neural network for prostate cancer detection

OBJECTIVE

To assess, using artificial neural networks (ANNs), human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage free/total PSA (f/tPSA), for discriminating between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Serum samples from 475 patients with prostate cancer (n = 347) or BPH (n = 128) within the PSA range of 1-20 ng/mL were analysed for tPSA, fPSA and hK2 (research assay, Toronto, Canada). Data were analysed in the ranges of 1-4, 2-4, 4-10, and 2-20 ng/mL tPSA. Back-propagation ANN models with the variables PSA, f/tPSA, and hK2, hK2/fPSA and hK2/(f/tPSA) were constructed. The diagnostic validity was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Whereas the median concentration of hK2 was not significantly different between patients with BPH or prostate cancer in any of the tPSA ranges, the f/tPSA, hK2/fPSA and hK2/(f/tPSA), and the hK2-based ANN outputs were always significantly different between patients with prostate cancer or BPH. Using ROC curve comparison, all variables were significantly better than hK2 in all ranges. The hK2-based ANN performed better than f/tPSA except in the 4-10 ng/mL tPSA range. At 90% and 95% sensitivity, the hK2-based ANN was also significantly better than f/tPSA in the 1-4 ng/mL tPSA range. hK2/(f/tPSA) achieved equal results to the hK2-based ANN except in the range 2-20 ng/mL tPSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The hK2-based ANN improves the outcome of f/tPSA but not hK2/(f/tPSA) in almost all analysed subgroups. When comparing the results at 90% and 95% sensitivity the hK2-based ANN only performed significantly better than f/tPSA in the lowest tPSA range. Only in lower tPSA ranges do hK2-based ANNs show an advantage for further improving prostate cancer detection.

Comparison of predictive accuracy for pathologically organ confined clinical stage T1c prostate cancer using human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen combined with clinical stage and Gleason grade

PURPOSE

Previously human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) has been implicated to predict pathologically organ confined prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with stage T2 disease. Now we evaluated the usefulness of hK2, as measured by 2 entirely different immunoassay designs, to enhance the discrimination of pathologically organ from nonorgan confined clinical stage T1c PCa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of pretreatment serum from 148 men with clinical stage T1c PCa was used in 2 equally sensitive and specific methods to measure total hK2 with independent reagents and entirely different assay designs. Total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were measured and percent fPSA was calculated. We determined the algorithm, hK2*tPSA/fPSA, from data generated by each hK2 assay, calculated means, medians and ranges for each analyte and algorithm, and calculated the significance of differences on univariate analysis. Using pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason grade we then developed a multivariate logistic regression base model to predict organ confined cancer and we compared predictions of the base model supplemented by the different hK2 measurements.

RESULTS

hK2 and hK2 based algorithms obtained by each hK2 assay were significantly different for pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa (p = 0.034 to 0.0001) compared to tPSA (p = 0.06), fPSA (p = 0.90) or percent fPSA (p = 0.059). However, AUC (0.67 to 0.70) calculated by ROC analysis of the 4 models containing hK2 derived information was not significantly larger than that of the base model (AUC = 0.64, p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The current data confirm that hK2 alone or hK2*tPSA/fPSA measured by 2 immunoassays is significantly lower in men with pT2a/b vs pT3a or greater PCa compared to tPSA, fPSA or percent fPSA on univariate analysis of a validation set of clinical stage T1c prostate cancer treated at an American center of excellence for prostate cancer surgery. However, the incorporation of preoperative hK2 into multiparameter predictive models for pT2 cancers did not increase predictive accuracy in this cohort of men.

Development of sensitive immunoassays for free and total human glandular kallikrein 2

BACKGROUND

Free and total human kallikrein 2 (hK2) might improve the discrimination between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Concentrations of hK2 are 100-fold lower than concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA); therefore, an hK2 assay must have a low detection limit and good specificity.

METHODS

PSA- and hK2-specific monoclonal antibodies were used in solid-phase, two-site immunofluorometric assays to detect free and total hK2. The total hK2 assay used PSA-specific antibodies to block nonspecific signal. The capture antibody of the free hK2 assay did not cross-react with PSA. To determine the hK2 concentrations in the male bloodstream, total hK2 was measured in a control group consisting of 426 noncharacterized serum samples. Free and total hK2 were measured in plasma from 103 patients with confirmed prostate cancer.

RESULTS

All 426 males in the control group had a total hK2 concentration above the detection limit of 0.0008 microg/L. The median total hK2 concentration was 0.022 microg/L (range, 0.0015-0.37 microg/L). hK2 concentrations were 0.1-58% of total PSA (median, 3.6%). hK2 concentrations were similar in men 41-50 and 51-60 years of age. The ratio of hK2 to PSA steadily decreased from 5-30% at PSA <1 microg/L to 1-2% at higher PSA concentrations. In 103 patients with prostate cancer, the median hK2 concentration in plasma was 0.079 microg/L (range, 0.0015-16.2 microg/L). The median free hK2 concentration was 0.070 (range, 0.005-12.2) microg/L. The proportion of free to total hK2 varied from 17% to 131% (mean, 85%).

CONCLUSIONS

The wide variation in the free-to-total hK2 ratio suggests that hK2 in blood plasma is not consistently in the free, noncomplexed form in patients with prostate cancer. The new assay is sufficiently sensitive to be used to study the diagnostic accuracies of free and total hK2 for prostate cancer.

Are multiple markers the future of prostate cancer diagnostics?

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the most successful and widely employed cancer serum marker in use today. There is growing evidence that the introduction of wide PSA screening and earlier detection can result in decreased cancer mortality associated with a decline in metastatic disease. PSA circulates in a number of distinct forms. Measurement of these in addition to total PSA significantly increases diagnostic utility. Diagnostic utility is likely to be further increased by adding kallikreins, cytokines, growth factors, receptors and cellular adhesion factors to the biomarker panel. The need for multiple markers reflects the multidimensional nature of prostate disease which ranges from metastatic cancer to indolent cancer to benign hyperplasia and inflammation, all of which require distinct treatments and medical interventions.

The value of (−7, −5)pro-prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein-2 as serum markers for grading prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of the precursor form (-7,5pro) of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and human kallikrein-2 (hK2) for detecting and grading prostate cancer, as better serum markers with improved specificity are needed in men with lower ranges of total (t)PSA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

tPSA, free PSA (fPSA), the precursor (-7,5)proPSA and hK2 were measured in a subset of participants of the European Randomised Study of Screening of Prostate Cancer. In a pilot study, sera from 143 men biopsied but with no prostate cancer, 142 with BPH, and 146 with prostate cancer were analysed to determine the relative value of serum markers for differentiating between the groups. Then, in 141 men with prostate cancer who had a radical prostatectomy, these serum markers were related to the pathological grading to analyse their value as prognostic variables.

RESULTS

Levels of (-7,5)proPSA, hK2 and fPSA could be used to distinguish between BPH and cancer, but proPSA and hK2, alone or combined, did not improve the specificity of fPSA for discriminating BPH and cancer. There was also no correlation between these serum markers and pathological tumour grade.

CONCLUSION

The clinical effect of using (-7,5)proPSA or hK2 for detecting and grading prostate cancer remains limited.

Proenzyme forms of prostate-specific antigen in serum improve the detection of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pro or precursor forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have emerged as potentially important diagnostic serum markers for prostate cancer detection. Immunoassays were developed to measure specific proPSA forms containing propeptides of 2, 4, and 7 amino acids [(-2)proPSA, (-4)proPSA, and (-7)proPSA, respectively].

METHODS

Research-use dual monoclonal antibody immunoassays using europium-labeled detection monoclonal antibodies were developed for each form of proPSA. Sera from patients with prostate cancer or benign prostate disease containing 4-10 microg/L PSA were assayed and analyzed by area under the ROC curve (AUC) for specificity and sensitivity.

RESULTS

The proPSA forms had quantification limits of 0.015-0.025 microg/L in serum, with cross-reactivities <1% with PSA. The sum of the proPSA forms divided by free PSA (percentage proPSA) had a higher AUC than did percentage of (-2)proPSA, free PSA, and complexed PSA with AUC (95% confidence intervals) of 0.69 (0.64-0.74), 0.64 (0.58-0.68), 0.63 (0.58-0.68), and 0.57 (0.51-0.62), respectively. The proPSA comprised a median of 33% of the free PSA in cancer and 25% in noncancer sera (P <0.0001). One-third (33%) of cancer samples had >40% proPSA, whereas only 8% of noncancer samples did (P <0.0001). In men with cancer and >25% free PSA, the (-2)proPSA had an AUC of 0.77 (0.66-0.86), with 90% sensitivity and 36% specificity at 0.04 microg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of proPSA gave better cancer detection in the 4-10 microg/L range than did percentage of free PSA and complexed PSA. (-2)proPSA significantly discriminated cancer in men whose serum had >25% free PSA, for whom there is currently no good marker for cancer detection.

Single nucleotide polymorphism of the human kallikrein-2 gene highly correlates with serum human kallikrein-2 levels and in combination enhances prostate cancer detection

PURPOSE

We examined the relationship between a mutant (T) for wild-type (C) allele substitution of the human kallikrein-2 gene (KLK2), circulating human kallikrein-2 (hK2) levels and prostate cancer risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 1,287 consecutive men who underwent prostate biopsies because of an abnormal prostate-specific antigen level. Serum and DNA were obtained before biopsy. Cases were patients with cancer, and controls were patients with no cancer. The mutant and wild-type alleles of the KLK2 gene were designated as the T and C alleles, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 1,287 men, 616 had cancer, and 671 had no cancer. The overall distribution of the CC, CT, and TT KLK2 genotypes was 55.1%, 38.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. The median hK2 levels for men with the CC, CT, and TT genotypes were 0.24, 0.18, and 0.062 ng/mL and correlated with the genotypes, respectively (P =.0001). The adjusted odds ratios for prostate cancer for patients with the TT and CT genotypes compared with patients with the CC genotype, were 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.5; P =.004) and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0; P =.002), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for prostate cancer for patients in the fourth quartile of hK2 compared with the first quartile was 4.33 (95% CI, 2.9 to 6.4; P =.0001). When combined, the adjusted odds ratio for having prostate cancer was 13.92 (95% CI, 6.6 to 29.2; P =.0001) for patients with high hK2 levels and at least one T allele.

CONCLUSION

The C/T polymorphism of the KLK2 gene and circulating levels of hK2 are correlated and, in combination, are highly predictive for prostate cancer.

Standardization of two immunoassays for human glandular kallikrein 2

BACKGROUND

Measurement of human kallikrein 2 (hK2) has improved early detection and staging of prostate cancer. However, reported concentrations of hK2 among currently used assays have not been standardized in any way. We compared two hK2 assays and five different recombinant hK2 variants (rhK2) and suggest a common calibrator as an important step and putative reference substance in hK2 assay standardization.

METHODS

We measured 146 sera by two hK2 assays, using assay-specific calibrators to assess the difference between the two assays. Serial dilutions of five rhK2 preparations were measured repeatedly, with one preparation assigned as calibrator and the others as unknowns to define which variant provided the closest match between the two assays. This rhK2 variant was used to recalibrate both assays. We measured hK2 concentrations in the same 146 patients to evaluate the change in the difference.

RESULTS

Use of assay-specific calibrators for comparison of the two assays yielded a Deming regression equation of: y = 0.789 (95% confidence interval, 0.674-0.922)x + 0.014 (0.004-0.025) micro g/L; R(2) = 0.667. Analysis of five rhK2 variants revealed that the enterokinase (ek)-rhK2 form provided the best match between both assays. Using the ek-rhK2 as a common calibrator, we observed a change in the slope of the regression curve to: y = 1.106 (0.872-1.340)x + 0.006 (-0.002 to 0.016) micro g/L; R(2) = 0.648, suggesting an increase in the mean estimate of agreement between the two assays.

CONCLUSION

Calibration with a common calibrator substantially increased agreement between the assays. The ek-rhK2 variant provided the best performance of all tested rhK2 variants and should undergo mass spectrometry and amino acid analysis for exact mass determination and value assignment to evaluate its potential as a reference material for immunoassays for hK2.

Dissociation between androgen responsiveness for malignant growth vs. expression of prostate specific differentiation markers PSA, hK2, and PSMA in human prostate cancer models

BACKGROUND

A detailed understanding is evolving as to how androgen receptor (AR) functions as a transcriptional regulator via its binding to androgen response elements (ARE) within promoter and enhancer regions of prostate-specific differentiation markers such as PSA, hK2, and PSMA. It has been assumed that an understanding of regulation of expression of these marker proteins would also provide an understanding of the mechanisms whereby AR interactions regulate proliferation and survival of malignant prostate cells. In order to validate this hypothesis, we used a series of human prostate cancer models [i.e., LAPC-4, CWR22Rv1, MDA PCA-2b, LNCaP, and C4-2B (derived from LNCaP)] to test whether there is a consistent concordance between androgen responsive regulation for malignant growth vs. regulation of expression of prostate differentiation specific markers PSA, hK2, and PSMA.

METHODS

In order to define androgen growth responsiveness in vivo, human prostate cancer cell lines were inoculated as xenografts into intact vs. surgically castrated adult male nude mice and the subsequent tumor growth response monitored. To assess androgen regulation of PSA and hK2 expression in these cell lines, the concentration of PSA and hK2 in the conditioned standard media and charcoal stripped media +/- androgen from each cell line was determined using an immunoassay system. PSMA enzymatic activity was determined using the PSMA substrate (3)H N-acetylaspartylglutamate ((3)H NAAG).

RESULTS

Wild-type AR expressing LAPC-4 cells are androgen responsive for their in vivo growth. This cell line is also androgen sensitive for the expression of both PSA and hK2 in vitro and express PSMA. CWR22Rv1 cells have a mutated AR and are androgen responsive for growth in vivo and androgen sensitive for hk2 but not PSA expression. CWR22Rv1 produce approximately 1.4-fold more PSA, approximately 18-fold more hK2, and have 21-fold higher PSMA activity than LAPC-4 cells. MDA PCA-2b cells are androgen responsive for growth in vivo and androgen sensitive for PSA expression. MDA PCA-2b cells produce approximately 250-fold more PSA but almost equivalent amounts of hK2 compared to LAPC-4 and have approximately 19-fold higher PSMA activity. Both late passage LNCaP and C4-2B are androgen independent for growth in vivo but remain androgen sensitive for both PSA and hK2 expression. LNCaP cells produce approximately 50-fold more PSA, approximately 35-fold more hK2, and have 28-fold higher PSMA activity compared to LAPC-4. C4-2B cells produce approximately 80-fold higher levels of PSA, approximately 250-fold higher levels of hK2. C4-2B also the highest PSMA activity of the cell lines with 105-fold higher PSMA activity than LAPC-4 and approximately 4-fold higher activity than late passage LNCaP cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Androgen can coordinately regulate both the tumor growth and expression of prostate specific marker genes as observed for the LAPC-4 human prostate cancer cells. Such coordinated regulation, however, is not universal. In all of the other cell lines, there is a dissociation between androgen responsive regulation of malignant growth vs. regulation of expression of prostate specific markers PSA and hK2. In addition, PSMA activity in these cell lines increases as cells become more androgen independent for growth in vivo. These results emphasize that tumor growth and the expression of the specific secretory genes are independently regulated molecular events even if they share a requirement for androgen and/or AR function. Additional independent mechanisms occur in prostate cancer cells for regulation of expression for even the highly related PSA and hK2 genes. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms for androgen ligand-independent, AR-dependent regulation of the genes that directly effect the growth of androgen (i.e., ligand) independent prostate cancer cells. Unfortunately, the data in this present report do not validate the use of the PSA or hK2 gene as surrogates for a model system for such critically important mechanistic studies. Prostate prostate cancer cells. Unfortunately, the data in this present report do not validate the use of the PSA or hK2 gene as surrogates for a model system for such critically important mechanistic studies.

Comparison of two assays for human kallikrein 2

BACKGROUND

We compared two recently developed research assays for the measurement of human kallikrein 2 (hK2) in serum: one fully automated assay (Beckman Coulter Access immunoanalyzer) and one manual assay based on the DELFIA technology.

METHODS

We used two subsets of clinical specimens consisting of 48 samples from prostate cancer patients and 210 samples from participants in an ongoing screening study (ERSPC). Both subsets were measured in the Rotterdam laboratory, and the prostate cancer samples were used for analytical comparison with the originating sites for the assays: Beckman Coulter Research Department (San Diego, CA) and Turku University (Turku, Finland).

RESULTS

Both the Beckman Coulter and the Turku assays performed very similarly between the Rotterdam laboratory and the originating sites: the R(2) value for both comparisons was 0.99, and the slope difference between sites was <20%. Deming regression analysis of the DELFIA (y) and Access (x) assays yielded the following: for the prostate cancer group, y = 1.17x - 0.01 (R(2) = 0.88; n = 48); and for the ERSPC group, y = 0.62x - 0.01 (R(2) = 0.77). Breakdown of the latter group into subgroups (nondiseased, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer samples) gave only minor differences. The Access calibrators were underrecovered by 13% in the DELFIA assay, whereas the DELFIA calibrators were overrecovered by 45% in the Access assay.

CONCLUSION

The DELFIA and Access assays for hK2, which have similar analytical features, show differences that cannot be explained by calibration.

Morphologic and molecular prognostic markers in prostate cancer

In this review, a series of traditional morphology-based measurements, relatively well-documented ancillary biomarkers, and emerging molecular assays are evaluated for their relative ability to predict prognosis in prostate cancer. Prognostic factors that have achieved widespread use and are classified as category I by the College of American Pathologists' Solid Tumor Prognostic Factor Consensus Conference are compared with newer tests that are beginning to be used in clinical practice (category II) and emerging molecular-based assays that have yet to be widely validated in the published literature or in clinical trials (category III).