Macrotroponin-Analytical Anomaly or Clinical Confounder

Practical approaches to the detection of macrotroponin

INTRODUCTION

Macrotroponin is increasingly recognised as a cause of confusion in interpreting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnI) results. In this study, we sought to evaluate two practical approaches to detecting macrotroponin. These two approaches are PEG precipitation and SVM (support vector machine) analysis to classify discrepancies between hs-cTn assays.

METHOD

Residual serum and heparin plasma specimens (n = 483) with initially elevated hs-cTnI from hospital and community laboratories were retested on multiple hs-cTn platforms before and after PEG precipitation and Protein A immunoglobulin depletion. SVM analysis was conducted to identify a linear equation that best discriminated specimens with macrotroponin using a combination of results from two different hs-cTn assays.

FINDINGS

The diagnostic performance of PEG precipitation was carried out using Protein A immunoglobulin depletion as the reference comparator. When a cutoff residual activity after PEG precipitation of ≤ 20% was used, this threshold carried a high specificity of 92% (confidence interval 83-98%; n = 189) using the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista assay and 95% specificity (86%-98%; n = 242) using the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect assay. SVM analysis generated a linear equation identifying macrotroponin specimens from results obtained on two hs-cTn assays. This approach can be highly specific, comparable to PEG precipitation when certain assay combinations and concentrations are used.

CONCLUSION

We describe and identify practical alternatives to detecting macrotroponin. These approaches can be optimised for high specificity, reducing the need for more complex laboratory methods.

"Troponinosis", the Cardiologist's Curse-When Clinic-Laboratory Interaction Unveils the Mystery: A Case Report

Cardiac troponins are key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction and, more generally, for the detection of myocardial injury. Since the introduction of the first immunochemistry methods, there has been a remarkable evolution in analytical performance, especially concerning a progressive improvement in sensitivity. However, the measurement of circulating troponins remains rarely susceptible to analytical interferences. We report a case of persistently elevated troponin I concentrations in a patient with known ischemic heart disease, which almost led to unnecessary diagnostic-therapeutic interventions. A prompt laboratory consultation by the cardiologist ultimately led to the identification of an analytical interference due to troponin macrocomplexes (macrotroponin) causing elevated troponin values in the absence of a clinical presentation compatible with myocardial damage.