Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Promising Treatment for Insomnia, Pain, and Depression in Patients With IBD

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pain Interference: A Conceptual Model for the Role of Insomnia, Fatigue, and Pain Catastrophizing

Background

People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly experience pain influenced by complex interactions among factors, including disease activity, sleep, psychopathology, and changes in pain processing pathways. Treatments for pain in IBD are limited, highlighting the need for research that explores modifiable factors linked to pain. The aim of this study was to investigate relationships among multiple patient factors and to construct a conceptual model for pain interference in IBD.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of adults with IBD. Study domains included demographic, comorbidity, psychological, IBD, insomnia, fatigue, and pain features. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine relationships and interactions among active IBD, insomnia, fatigue, pain experiences (severity, catastrophizing, and interference), and additional patient factors (demographics and psychological).

Results

One hundred and seventy-four participants, aged 18-85 years, reported the presence of pain. Combining the questionnaire data using SEM resulted in a final model with an excellent fit (χ ²(8) = 9.579, P = .297, χ ²/N = 1.197, CFIN = 0.997, TLI = 0.987, RMSEA = 0.034). The presence of anxiety and depression was the additional patient factors to be retained in the path analysis. SEM results indicated that greater pain interference was directly influenced by greater fatigue, worse pain catastrophizing, and worse pain severity. Pain interference was indirectly impacted by IBD activity, worse insomnia, and the presence of depression and anxiety.

Conclusions

The proposed conceptual model highlights the role of multiple potentially modifiable factors, including insomnia, pain catastrophizing, and fatigue, contributing to worse pain interference in people with IBD.

Poor Sleep in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Reflective of Distinct Sleep Disorders

BACKGROUND

Poor sleep is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), predicting increased risk of flares, surgery, and/or hospitalization and reducing quality of life.

AIMS

To profile specific sleep disorder symptoms in IBD, informing intervention efforts.

METHODS

312 adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis were recruited from an academic medical center in New Hampshire, USA. Participants completed online surveys about sleep including well-validated measures of sleep quality, insomnia, restless leg syndrome, sleep apnea, and circadian rhythms. Participants also answered questions about IBD-related problems that could interfere with sleep.

RESULTS

69.4% of participants reported experiencing poor sleep and 50% reported clinically significant insomnia. Participants with active IBD symptoms were more likely to have poor sleep and insomnia. Of those with poor sleep, 67.8% met the clinical threshold for insomnia disorder and 31.3% met criteria for two or more sleep disorders. IBD-related sleep disruptions (e.g., nighttime awakenings due to bowel movements) were not significantly related to poor sleep quality, but significantly related to insomnia severity for participants with active Crohn's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

While poor sleep in IBD is reflective of a number of different sleep problems, it is most frequently related to insomnia. IBD symptom severity contributes to insomnia, but insomnia is also distinct from IBD-related sleep disruptions. Future research on the treatment of insomnia disorder in particular in individuals with IBD is warranted.

A pilot feasibility trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia in people with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Poor sleep is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), associated with worse overall disease course and predominantly attributable to insomnia. While cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment for chronic insomnia, it is untested in IBD. It is unclear if CBT-I will be as effective in this group given the extent of night-time symptoms people with IBD experience. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of CBT-I in IBD.

DESIGN

We comprehensively assessed sleep in people with mild-to-moderately active IBD using questionnaires, daily diaries and actigraphy. People with significant insomnia symptoms were allocated to a single-arm, uncontrolled pilot feasibility study of gold-standard CBT-I treatment. They were then reassessed post-treatment.

RESULTS

20 participants with IBD completed a baseline assessment. 10 were experiencing insomnia and were allocated to CBT-I. All participants who were offered CBT-I elected to complete it, and all completed 5/5 sessions. Participants rated treatment acceptability highly and daily diary and actigraphy completion rates were >95%. At baseline, participants with insomnia evidenced significantly worse sleep than participants without insomnia. Following CBT-I, participants reported significant improvements in diary and actigraphy measures of sleep continuity, dysfunctional sleep-related beliefs and IBD disease activity.

CONCLUSION

CBT-I was feasible and acceptable and demonstrated a signal for efficacy in the treatment of insomnia in IBD. Importantly, the improvements in sleep continuity were consistent with the extant literature. Future fully powered randomised controlled studies should evaluate whether treatment of insomnia can improve other aspects of IBD, including pain and inflammation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04132024.