Ascorbic acid and tetrahydrobiopterin: looking beyond nitric oxide bioavailability

Low Levels of Vitamin C during Pregnancy; a Risk Marker of Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Women?

Pregnancy is a risk factor for the development or aggravation of diabetic retinopathy. Here, we suggest a relationship between plasma vitamin C (vitC) status during pregnancy and into postpartum in type 1 diabetes and the possible progression of diabetic retinopathy based on data of 29 women. VitC was measured in first, second, and third trimesters and three months postpartum. The women had visual acuity testing and fundus photography performed at least twice during pregnancy and onto four months after birth. An overall retinopathy grade was assigned on a scale from 0 (no retinopathy) to four according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy scale. At baseline in 1st trimester, 12 women had no retinopathy; seventeen women had retinopathy in grade 1–3. The retinopathy grade increased in nine women; remained unchanged in 17 women, and improved in three women. No women had or developed proliferative retinopathy (grade 4). The level of vitC in 1st trimester predicted the possible progression of retinopathy—the lower the vitC, the more probable the progression (p = 0.03; OR 1.6 (95% CI:1.06–3.2); n = 29 (multiple logistic regression))—while the combined levels of 1st and 2nd trimesters and the mean vitC level of the whole pregnancy did not. The diabetes duration, retinopathy grade per se in 1st trimester, 24-h blood pressure measurements, kidney function, urinary protein, HbA1c, or lipid profile were not independent predictors of progression of retinopathy during pregnancy. Retrospectively, the women who experienced progression of their retinopathy during and into postpartum had significantly lower vitC levels in 1st trimester (p = 0.02; n = 9/20), combined level of vitC in 1st and 2nd trimester (p = 0.032; n = 7/18), and mean vitC level of the whole pregnancy (p = 0.036; n = 7/9), respectively. In conclusion, our results suggest that low vitC status in pregnancy could be associated with progression of diabetic retinopathy.

Effect of vitamin C on endothelial function in health and disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Observational studies indicate that higher vitamin C intake is associated with reduced risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, randomised controlled trials (RCT) examining the effect of vitamin C on endothelial function (EF) have reported inconsistent results. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to determine the effect of vitamin C supplementation on EF and to investigate whether the effect was influenced by health status, study duration, dose and route of vitamin C administration.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases from inception to May 2013 for studies that met the following criteria: 1) RCT with adult participants, 2) vitamin C administered alone, 3) studies that quantified EF using commonly applied methods including ultrasound, plethysmography and pulse wave analysis.

RESULTS

Pooling the data from 44 clinical trials showed a significant positive effect of vitamin C on EF (SMD: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.66, P < 0.001). Stratification of the analysis by health outcome revealed improved EF in atherosclerotic (SMD: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.26, P < 0.001), diabetic (SMD: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.82, P < 0.001) and heart failure patients (SMD: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.88, P < 0.02) after vitamin C supplementation. The effect size appeared to be unaffected by study design, duration, baseline plasma vitamin C concentration or route of administration of vitamin C. The meta-regression showed a significant positive association between vitamin C dose and improvement in EF (β: 0.00011, 95% CI: 0.00001, 0.00021, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin C supplementation improved EF. The effect of vitamin C supplementation appeared to be dependent on health status, with stronger effects in those at higher cardiovascular disease risk. PROSPERO Database registration: CRD42013004567, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/