Long-term success of flexible endoscopic septal division with the stag beetle knife for Zenker's diverticulum: a tertiary center study

The impact of prior endoscopic or surgical therapy on open Zenker's diverticulum surgery: analysis on a large single center cohort : Comparison of primary and revisional open surgery for Zenker's diverticulum

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum is an attractive minimally invasive alternative compared to the classic open approach. However, increased recurrence rate were reported. In case of relapse, endoscopic therapy might be repeated, or alternatively open surgery is performed. This study aimed to identify potential differences in the outcomes between primary or secondary surgical treatment in Zenker's diverticulum.

METHODS

From January 2003 to April 2019, 227 subsequent patients underwent surgical diverticulectomy and cervical myotomy at the surgical department of TUM. 41 of 227 patients had received previous therapy, either open or endoscopic. Perioperative parameters in priorly untreated patients were retrospectively compared to those after previous therapy (mostly endoscopic) with special regard to perioperative data and postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We could show that the number of complications (p = 0.047) in pretreated patients is significant higher as well as the severity after Clavien-Dindo (p = 0.025). Stapler line leakage, wound infections, and operative revision rate was higher also pretreated group. Pretreatment and surgery time showed a significant association with postoperative complications in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment remained a significant independent predictor of complications.

CONCLUSION

The present data indicate that endoscopic therapy might represent a risk factor for postoperative complications in case of relapse surgery. Therefore primary open surgery should be debated in patients with an increased high risk of relapse.

Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Septotomy of Zenker's Diverticulum: Early and Long-Term Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Multiple therapeutic modalities including surgery and rigid and flexible endoscopy have been adopted to manage Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Minimally invasive flexible endoscopic septotomy (FES) techniques have been increasingly favored over the past 20 years; however, long-term data are still scanty. The aim of this study is to evaluate early and long-term outcomes of FES for naive ZD in a single-center setting.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, ZD patients treated with FES were included in a prospectively maintained database (NCT03948438). Those who had already been treated surgically or endoscopically were excluded from the analysis. The Dakkak and Bennett dysphagia scale was used to rate the dysphagia. Persistent complete or near-complete resolution of symptoms (Dakkak and Bennett 0 or 1) was defined as clinical success. Postprocedural adverse events were reported according to ASGE lexicon.

RESULTS

Overall, 256 consecutive patients were treated. Mean pouch size was 29.8 ± 11.3 mm. The procedure was successfully completed in all scheduled patients, with an early clinical success of 96.1%. Adverse events occurred in 3.5% (9/256) of patients. Eight of them were mild/moderate with no fatal events, whereas one patient required surgery. Recurrences occurred in 31.3% (80/256) of treated patients after a mean time of 9 ± 3 months and 95% of recurrences were treated by a second FES. At an average follow-up of 5.5 years, 95.3% of patients were asymptomatic after a mean number of 1.3 procedures.

DISCUSSION

FES is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with ZD. Recurrence rate is significant; however, endoscopic reintervention is associated with long-term relief of dysphagia.

Endoscopic septotomy of Zenker's diverticulum with Stag-Beetle Knife™: A descriptive observational study and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a protrusion of the hypopharyngeal mucosa with a prevalence of 2/100,000 inhabitants. The symptoms of the patients determine the need for treatment, which can be surgical or endoscopic. The latter, known as endoscopic septotomy or diverticulotomy (ED), this involves dissecting the diverticular septum, which can be performed with different dissection devices.

AIM

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ED with Stag-Beetle-Knife™ device, as well as to conduct a literature review to assess the position of the technique in the current scientific panorama.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Descriptive retrospective study that includes patients who underwent ED with SB-Knife™ between June 2017 and February 2020. Literature review of the available evidence between January 2013 and April 2020 of ED with SB-Knife™ technique and its variants.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (66% male) with a median age of 70.5 years were collected. The median size of diverticular was 32.5mm and complete remission was observed in 75% of the cases. Fourteen interventions were performed with a technical success of 92.8. There were no serious complications. A literature review was carried out, finding 13 papers, of which 8 were finally included (6 retrospective studies, a series of cases and a clinical case).

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience and the reviewed literature, we consider ED with SB-Knife™ is a safe, effective and reproducible technique, and may be a better alternative to surgery in patients with ZD.