The impact of age on patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer

Esophagectomy in the Older Adult: A Systematic Review

Current management of esophageal carcinoma (EC) involves combining different modalities, offering the opportunity of personalized strategies. This is particularly enticing in the geriatric population, where tailoring treatment modalities remains key to achieve good outcomes in terms of both quality of life and survival. Primary outcomes of our review included (1) evidence on short-term outcomes following esophagectomy, and (2) evidence on long-term outcomes following esophagectomy. Secondary review questions compared outcomes of (1) neoadjuvant treatment versus upfront surgery for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma, (2) endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal carcinoma, and (3) definitive radiation with or without chemotherapy versus surgery. Twenty-six articles were included in the review for the main review questions. Our systematic review underscores the need for comprehensive geriatric evaluations to guide decision-making. Despite concerns about perioperative risks, well-selected older patients can derive survival benefits from surgical intervention.

Usefulness of the Modified Frailty Index for Predicting Pneumonia Occurrence After Esophagectomy

Background

Esophagectomy is an invasive and complication-prone surgical procedure. Therefore, a tool that can predict the occurrence of postoperative complications may be useful for perioperative management. In this study, we investigated whether the modified frailty index (mFI) could be a useful tool for predicting the postoperative complications of esophagectomy.

Methods

In this study, 162 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from 2004 to 2019 at our institution were included. The patients were divided into the high mFI (≥ 0.27) and low mFI (< 0.27) groups, and the short-term postoperative outcomes of each group were examined retrospectively.

Results

Regarding background factors, age and the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification were significantly higher in the high mFI group (P = 0.049 and P = 0.002, respectively); however, the other items were not significantly different between the two groups. Regarding surgical outcomes, no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were observed between the two groups. Regarding postoperative complications, pneumonia was significantly more common in the high mFI group (P = 0.035). In multivariate analysis, high mFI (P = 0.034) was an independent predictor of pneumonia, along with operative time ≥ 613 min (P = 0.03) and preoperative BMI < 20.48 (P = 0.006).

Conclusion

The mFI is useful for predicting pneumonia after esophagectomy.

Patient-derived xenograft: a developing tool for screening biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for human esophageal cancers

Esophageal cancer (EC) represents a human malignancy, diagnosed often at the advanced stage of cancer and resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The development of precision medicine allows for the identification of more personalized therapeutic strategies to improve cancer treatment. By implanting primary cancer tissues into immunodeficient mice for expansion, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models largely maintain similar histological and genetic representations naturally found in patients' tumor cells. PDX models of EC (EC-PDX) provide fine platforms to investigate the tumor microenvironment, tumor genomic heterogeneity, and tumor response to chemoradiotherapy, which are necessary for new drug discovery to combat EC in addition to optimization of current therapeutic strategies for EC. In this review, we summarize the methods used for establishing EC-PDX models and investigate the utilities of EC-PDX in screening predictive biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. The challenge of this promising research tool is also discussed.

Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative, surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients, which may lead to patient selection based on age. However, only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included. Therefore, it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.

AIM

To perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

METHODS

Studies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included. Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript, studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak, pulmonary and cardiac complications, delirium, 30- and 90-d, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

Seven studies (4847 patients) using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients. Older patients (9.05%) had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients (3.92%), (confidence interval = 1.10-5.56). In addition, older patients (9.45%) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients (3.68%), (confidence interval = 1.01-5.91). In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy, older and younger patients had comparable 30-d, 90-d and in-hospital mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Older patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.