Same-day discharge in benign esophageal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Same day discharge does not lead to worse outcomes in patients undergoing uncomplicated laparoscopic foregut surgery

INTRODUCTION

With the advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques surgeons have moved away from elective open foregut surgeries. Despite studies demonstrating the safety of same day discharge in appropriate patient populations, ambulatory surgery has yet to be established as the practice norm for patients undergoing uncomplicated laparoscopic foregut surgery.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP database was queried from 2005 to 2018 for patients who had undergone elective and non-emergent laparoscopic Heller myotomy, fundoplication, and paraesophageal hernia repairs with and without mesh. The primary endpoints in this study included number and severity of complications as classified by the Clavien-Dindo Classification, readmission, and return to the operating room.

RESULTS

6893 patients who met inclusion criteria were identified, 696 (10.1%) of which were discharged on the day of surgery. Patients who were discharged on post-operative day one were matched at a 3:1 ratio producing 2088 comparisons. There was no difference in overall morbidity (p = 0.264), readmission (OR 0.849, 95% CI 0.522-1.419), or return to the operating room (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.531-2.761) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Same day discharge for patients without life threatening comorbidities undergoing elective minimally invasive Heller myotomy, Nissen and Toupet fundoplication, and paraesophageal hernia repairs is safe and feasible.

Same-day discharge for laparoscopic Heller myotomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is an effective treatment for achalasia. There are little data on the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the experience with same-day discharge after laparoscopic Heller myotomy at one hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy between 2007 and 2016 at University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Canada. There was no consent required as the study was retrospective study. This study was approved by the UHN IRB. Planned same-day discharge patients were compared to planned inpatient with respect to post-op complications, length of stay, and number of emergency visits.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients were identified. Same-day discharge was planned in 67 (33.5%) cases compared to 133 (66.5%) cases that were planned for inpatient. The study population was 49% male. On average, inpatients had 2.3 pre-operative comorbidities and same-day discharge patients had 1.6 pre-operative comorbidities. The average length of stay for the inpatient group was 3.5 days. Among the same-day surgery group, 15 had an unplanned admission following surgery (22%). Of those who were admitted, the average length of stay was 1.27 days. Only 1 same-day discharge was readmitted after hospital discharge, while 4 in inpatient group were readmitted. The post-operative complication rate was (15%) 20 of inpatient compared to four (6.0%) of same-day discharge. Number of emergency visits for inpatient group were 7 (5.3%) compared to 3 (4.5%) for same-day discharge group. There was one mortality case in inpatient group due to post-op complication.

CONCLUSION

Same-day surgery is feasible for laparoscopic Heller myotomy, with a similar complication and readmission rate as inpatient surgery.

Perioperative outcomes of inpatient laparoscopic Heller myotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in the United States

BACKGROUND

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is an alternative to pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy to treat lower esophageal sphincter diseases. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy perioperative outcomes data come from relatively small retrospective series and 1 randomized trial. We aimed to estimate the number of inpatient procedures performed in the United States and compare perioperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy using a nationally representative database.

METHODS

Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for laparoscopic Heller myotomy or per-oral endoscopic myotomy from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample. Patient and hospital characteristics, concurrent antireflux procedures, perioperative adverse events (any adverse event and those associated with extended length of stay ≥3 days), mortality, length of stay, and costs were compared. Logistic regression evaluated factors independently associated with adverse events.

RESULTS

An estimated 11,270 patients had laparoscopic Heller myotomy (n = 9,555) or per-oral endoscopic myotomy (n = 1,715) without significant differences in demographics and comorbidities. A concurrent anti-reflux procedure was more frequent with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (72.8% vs 15.5%, P < .001). Overall adverse event rate was higher with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (13.3% vs 24.8%, P < .001), and mortality was similar. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy had higher rates of adverse events associated with extended length of stay (9.3% vs 16.6%, P < .001), infectious adverse events (3.5% vs 8.2%, P < .001), gastrointestinal bleeding (3.4% vs 5.8%, P = .04), accidental injuries (3% vs 5.5%, P = .03), and thoracic adverse events (4.5% vs 9%, P < .01). Rates of adverse events of both procedures remained similar during the years of the study. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy was independently associated with adverse events. Length of stay (laparoscopic Heller myotomy: 3.2 ± 0.1 vs per-oral endoscopic myotomy: 3.7 ± 0.3 days, P = .17) and costs (laparoscopic Heller myotomy: $15,471 ± 406 vs per-oral endoscopic myotomy: $15,146 ± 1,308, P = .82) were similar.

CONCLUSION

In this national database review, laparoscopic Heller myotomy had a lower rate of perioperative adverse events at similar length of stay and costs than per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy remains a safer procedure than per-oral endoscopic myotomy for a myotomy of the distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter in the United States.

Assessing the Clinical Utility of the Early Postoperative Pharyngogram in Hypopharyngeal Surgery for Dysphagia

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the clinical utility of postoperative contrast x-ray pharyngograms (XRP) for detecting pharyngoesophageal leaks following hypopharyngeal dysphagia surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed of patients undergoing endoscopic (E-) or open (O-) Zenker's diverticulectomy (-ZD) with cricopharyngeal myotomy (-CPM) and CPM alone from 2008 to 2020 at one academic institution. Exclusion criteria were patients who were fed enterally or underwent repair of epiphrenic diverticula or O-CPM during laryngectomy. XRP clinical indication, impact on clinical care, and factors associated with use patterns were examined using descriptive statistics and logistic regression (LR).

RESULTS

Of 152 subjects, 52% underwent O-ZD, 30% O-CPM, 15% E-ZD, and 3% E-CPM. An XRP was ordered for 65% of subjects, mostly routinely (94%). Among the four clinically apparent leaks observed in this cohort, early postoperative XRP confirmed one. It did not identify any clinically silent leaks. In univariate LR, undergoing XRP was associated with increasing day of diet advancement (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-10.5) and hospital stay duration (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.1-5.2), as well as surgeon specialty of otolaryngology compared to general surgery (OR 12.8, 95% CI 4.8-40.8) and procedure sub-type (O-CPM: OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.002-0.16). In multivariate LR, the following variables were significantly associated with XRP use: hospital stay (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-3.0), otolaryngology (OR 105; 95% CI 15.4-2193), O-CPM (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.002-0.16), and E-CPM (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.002-0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective, multi-institutional studies are needed to confirm the low clinical utility we observed of early, postoperative XRP following hypopharyngeal surgery for dysphagia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Feasibility of Early Discharge after Open Hypopharyngeal Surgery for Dysphagia

Objective:

To determine the rate of surgical complications, unplanned readmission, and functional status after open hypopharyngeal surgery for dysphagia with early return to oral diet and hospital discharge.

Methods:

Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open hypopharyngeal surgery for management of dysphagia from March 2013 to June 2018 at a single academic institution. A clear liquid diet is restarted the day of surgery and is advanced to a soft diet on postoperative day one. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and unplanned readmission.

Results:

Ninety patients met eligibility criteria; 62 patients underwent open cricopharyngeal myotomy, 13 underwent Zenker’s diverticulectomy, 15 had a Zenker’s diverticulopexy. Mean inpatient length of stay was 2.0 ± 2.0 days (range 0-11 days); 57 patients (63.3%) were discharged on the same day as surgery or on postoperative day one. Seven patients (7.8%) had postoperative complications; the most common complication was esophageal leak (n = 6). Six patients (6.7%) had unplanned readmissions within 30 days. Mean time to unplanned readmission was 12 days (range 2-19 days). Open diverticulectomy was associated with an increased risk of unplanned readmission with an OR = 7.63 (95% CI 1.29, 45.45, P = .025). At last follow-up, 70% of patients had an increased functional oral intake by at least one scale score (FOIS) after surgery (mean follow-up 0.8 ± 1.1 years, range 0.02-5.1 years).

Conclusion:

An early diet and discharge may be safe for patients undergoing open surgery without a mechanical or suture closure of their esophageal mucosa, whereas in those undergoing diverticulectomy, NPO status and a radiological check before resuming drinking and eating are advised.

Level of Evidence:

4

Adverse Events after Rigid and Flexible Endoscopic Repair of Zenker’s Diverticula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

To determine adverse events after endoscopic flexible vs endoscopic rigid cricopharyngeal myotomy for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD).

Data Sources

Systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all years according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Additional studies were identified from review citations and a by hand search of manuscripts referencing ZD.

Review Methods

A structured literature search was conducted to identify studies for this systematic review. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were applied to assess study quality. For inclusion, each study had to provide data for at least 10 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic ZD repair reporting clear association with the postprocedure course in each case. Data extracted included all reported adverse events, recurrences, follow-up, and operative times.

Results

In total, 115 studies were included. All but 8 were retrospective case series. Sixty-one reported series of patients after rigid endoscopic stapler repair, 31 after rigid laser repair, and 13 with other rigid endoscopic instruments. Twenty-nine flexible endoscopic studies were included. Mortality, infection, and perforation were not significantly more likely in either the rigid or the flexible group, but bleeding and recurrence were more likely after flexible endoscopic techniques (20% vs <10% and 4% vs 0%, respectively). Dental injury and vocal fold palsy were reported rarely in the rigid endoscopic groups.

Conclusions

Adverse events are rare after endoscopic Zenker’s repair. The flexible approach minimizes exposure limitations and can be completed in some patients without general anesthesia. Transoral rigid approaches result in fewer revision surgeries compared with flexible diverticulotomy.

Healthcare spending and utilization following antireflux surgery: examining costs and reasons for readmission

BACKGROUND

While clinical outcomes have been reported for anti-reflux surgery (ARS), there are limited data on post-operative encounters, including readmission, and their associated costs. This study evaluates healthcare utilization during the 90-day post-operative period following ARS including fundoplication and/or paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from the Truven Health MarketScan^® Databases. Patients older than 16 years with an ICD-9 procedure code or Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for ARS and a primary diagnosis of GERD during 2012-2014 were selected. Healthcare spending and utilization on emergency department (ED) visits, performance of outpatient endoscopy, and readmission were examined. Reasons for readmission were classified based on ICD-9 code.

RESULTS

A total of 40,853 patients were included in the cohort with a mean age of 49 years and females comprising 76.0%. Mean length of stay was 1.4 days, and 93.0% of patients underwent a laparoscopic approach. The mean cost of the index surgical admission was $24,034. Readmission occurred in 4.2% of patients, and of those, 26.3% required a surgical intervention. Patients requiring one or more related readmissions accrued additional costs of $29,513. Some of the most common reasons for readmission were related to nutritional, metabolic, and fluid and electrolyte disorders. Presentation to the ED occurred in 14.0% of patients, and outpatient upper endoscopy was required in 1.5% of patients, but with much lower associated costs as compared to readmission ($1175).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients undergoing ARS do not require additional care within 90 days of surgery. Patients who are readmitted accrue costs that almost double the overall cost of care compared to the initial hospitalization. Measures to attenuate potentially preventable readmissions after ARS may reduce healthcare utilization in this patient population.

Open Diverticulectomy and Cricopharyngotomy for Symptomatic Zenker's Diverticulum after Endoscopic Diverticuloesophagostomy

Two of the accepted treatments for symptomatic Zenker's diverticula are open resection of the diverticulum with cricopharyngotomy and transoral, endoscopic diverticuloesophagostomy with cricopharyngotomy. We report our experience with open surgical resection of the diverticulum with repeat cricopharyngotomy in patients with persistent symptoms after endoscopic diverticuloesophagostomy. This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent open surgical resection of the diverticulum, with repeat cricopharyngotomy in patients with persistent symptoms after endoscopic diverticuloesophagostomy. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, surgical detail, short-term complications, and symptomatic outcomes. Four patients underwent open resection of a Zenker's diverticulum with repeat cricopharyngotomy. There were two men and two women, with a mean age of 77.5 years. The mean operative time was 56 minutes and median length of stay was two days. All patients had improvement in dysphagia. Surgical diverticulectomy with cricopharyngotomy after failed endoscopic diverticuloesophagostomy is a technically challenging operation. However, symptomatic improvement can be achieved.

Management of failure after surgery for gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Surgical treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (ST-GERD) is well-codified and offers an alternative to long-term medical treatment with a better efficacy for short and long-term outcomes. However, failure of ST-GERD is observed in 2-20% of patients; management is challenging and not standardized. The aim of this study is to analyze the causes of failure and to provide a treatment algorithm. The clinical aspects of ST-GERD failure are variable including persistent reflux, dysphagia or permanent discomfort leading to an important degradation of the quality of life. A morphological and functional pre-therapeutic evaluation is necessary to: (i) determine whether the symptoms are due to recurrence of reflux or to an error in initial indication and (ii) to understand the cause of the failure. The most frequent causes of failure of ST-GERD include errors in the initial indication, which often only need medical treatment, and surgical technical errors, for which surgical redo surgery can be difficult. Multidisciplinary management is necessary in order to offer the best-adapted treatment.