1
|
Dunn JM, Reyhani A, Santaolalla A, Zylstra J, Gimson E, Pennington M, Baker C, Kelly M, Van Hemelrijck M, Lagergren J, Zeki SS, Gossage JA, Davies AR. Transition from esophagectomy to endoscopic therapy for early esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6321381. [PMID: 34260693 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the outcomes of patients with early esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia comparing esophagectomy, the historical treatment of choice, to endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). METHODS Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with early esophageal cancer/high-grade dysplasia, treated between 2000 and 2018 at a tertiary center. Primary outcomes were all-cause and disease-specific mortality assessed by multivariable Cox regression and a propensity score matching sub analysis, providing hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, tumor grade (G1/2 vs. G3), tumor stage, and lymphovascular invasion. Secondary outcomes included complications, hospital stay, and overall costs. RESULTS Among 269 patients, 133 underwent esophagectomy and 136 received EET. Adjusted survival analysis showed no difference between groups regarding all-cause mortality (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.73, 4.72) and disease-specific mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.26, 4.65). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 0% in both groups. The surgical group had a significantly higher rate of complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3 26.3% vs. endoscopic therapy 0.74%), longer in-patient stay (median 14 vs. 0 days endoscopic therapy) and higher hospital costs(£16 360 vs. £8786 per patient). CONCLUSION This series of patients treated during a transition period from surgery to EET, demonstrates a primary endoscopic approach does not compromise oncological outcomes with the benefit of fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs compared to surgery. It should be available as the gold standard treatment for patients with early esophageal cancer. Those with adverse prognostic features may still benefit from esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Dunn
- Gastroenterology, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK.,Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Arasteh Reyhani
- Esophago-Gastric Surgery, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London UK.,Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Aida Santaolalla
- Gastroenterology Unit,Translational Oncology & Urology Research(TOUR). King's College London, London UK
| | - Janine Zylstra
- Esophago-Gastric Surgery, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London UK
| | - Eliza Gimson
- Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Pennington
- Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Cara Baker
- Esophago-Gastric Surgery, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London UK
| | - Mark Kelly
- Esophago-Gastric Surgery, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Gastroenterology Unit,Translational Oncology & Urology Research(TOUR). King's College London, London UK
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastian S Zeki
- Gastroenterology, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - James A Gossage
- Esophago-Gastric Surgery, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London UK.,Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew R Davies
- Esophago-Gastric Surgery, Guy's and St.Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre, London UK.,Gastroenterology Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Desai M, Rösch T, Sundaram S, Chandrasekar VT, Kohli D, Spadaccini M, Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the long-term efficacy of Barrett's endoscopic therapy-stringent selection criteria and a proposal for definitions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 54:222-233. [PMID: 34165205 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Barrett's endoscopic therapy (BET) is well established for neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus using a concept of complete eradication of all Barrett's. However, long-term efficacy is not known. AIMS To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine long-term efficacy of BET for Barrett's neoplasia. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for studies meeting stringent criteria: (a) subjects with high-grade dysplasia and/or superficial adenocarcinoma who underwent BET (ablation ± endoscopic mucosal resection); (b) BET completion by confirmation of complete eradication of neoplasia (CE-N) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) with systematic sampling and (c) clearly defined follow-up (endoscopy and biopsy) protocol of ≥2 years thereafter for detection of recurrence. Pooled estimates of CE-N and CE-IM after BET completion and follow-up were analysed. RESULTS Eight studies met the stringent criteria (n = 794, males 89%, age 64.6 years). Despite high efficacy of BET at therapy completion (CE-N: 95.9 [91.7-98.7]%; CE-IM: 90.9 [83-96.6]%), this declined (CE-N: 89 [73.4-98.2]%; CE-IM: 77.8 [65.6-88]%) over 3.4 years of follow-up. There was considerable heterogeneity. Only two studies reported a post-BET follow-up of >5 years (CE-IM 50 [41.5%-58.5]%). Higher person years of follow-up seem to correlate with decrease in BET efficacy. CONCLUSION Using stringent criteria for appropriate study selection with sufficient follow-up, a lack of high-quality controlled intervention trials becomes evident for assessment of long-term durable remission rates of BET despite initial high success rates. We plea for a uniform documentation of study details which could be used in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav Desai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Suneha Sundaram
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Divyanshoo Kohli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watts AE, Cotton CC, Shaheen NJ. Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus: Have We Gone Too Far, or Not Far Enough? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22:29. [PMID: 32383077 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00766-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition of the esophagus associated with an increased risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective first-line treatment for dysplastic BE and early stage EAC. This report reviews clinically relevant evidence published over the last 3 years regarding RFA for BE. RECENT FINDINGS Our use of this technology has simultaneously gone too far, in that many patients who may not derive a benefit from these treatments are receiving them, and not far enough, in that many patients who would be eligible for ablative therapy never undergo screening exams to assess them for dysplastic BE, or do not have endoscopic therapy considered part of the treatment of superficial invasive cancer. Research to better identify patients with BE, risk stratify those patients, improve the quality of RFA treatment, and inform surveillance practices has the potential to optimize the benefit of RFA, and minimize the harms, costs, and risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel E Watts
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cary C Cotton
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Persistent intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic eradication therapy of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus increases the risk of dysplasia recurrence: meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:913-925.e6. [PMID: 30529044 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the main treatment for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus and intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Although the goal of EET is to achieve complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM), treatment might achieve complete remission of dysplasia (CR-D) only, without achieving CRIM. Persistent intestinal metaplasia after eradication of dysplasia might carry a higher risk for progression into advanced neoplasia. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis after searching multiple databases to identify studies that evaluated dysplasia recurrence risk after successful eradication of neoplasia with EET. We calculated the pooled cumulative incidence of dysplasia and advanced neoplasia recurrence after CRIM and CR-D only and then compared the two using risk ratios. RESULTS Forty studies were included (4410 patients with total follow-up of 12,976 patient-years). A total of 4061 achieved CRIM and 349 achieved CR-D only. The cumulative incidence of CR-D only was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-19%). The pooled cumulative incidence of any dysplasia recurrence after achieving CRIM was 5% (95% CI, 3%-7%) and 12% (95% CI, 4%-23%) after achieving CR-D only. Comparing dysplasia detection after achieving CR-D only with CRIM, there was a significantly higher risk for detection after CR-D (risk ratio [RR], 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.6). The pooled cumulative incidence rate of high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) recurrence was 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) after achieving CRIM and 6% (95% CI, 0%-16%) after achieving CR-D only. Comparing HGD/EAC recurrence after achieving CR-D only with CRIM, there was a significantly higher risk for recurrence after CR-D (RR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.45-9). When excluding patients who underwent ablation for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus only, these differences persisted with dysplasia recurrence after achieving CR-D only compared with CRIM showing a significantly higher risk for recurrence after CR-D (RR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.66-5). CONCLUSIONS CRIM was associated with a lower risk of dysplasia and advanced neoplasia recurrence compared with CR-D only. Achieving CRIM should remain the goal of EET in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.
Collapse
|