Clinical utility of exhaled carbon monoxide in assessing preoperative smoking status and risks of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy

Smoking status predicts anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major contributor to surgery-related morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if positive-smoking status is associated with the incidence of this complication.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed on April 4th, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised human participants undergoing esophagectomy, age ≥ 18, n ≥ 5, and identification of smoking status. The primary outcome was incidence of anastomotic leak. Sub-group analysis by ex- or current smoking status was performed. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1 using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Publication bias was evaluated visually with funnel plots and through the Egger test.

RESULTS

A total of 220 abstracts were screened, of which 69 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, with 13 studies selected for final inclusion. This included 16,103 patients, of which 4433 were ex- or current smokers, and 9141 were never smokers. Meta-analysis revealed an increased odds of anastomotic leak in patients with a positive-smoking status (current or ex-smokers) compared to never smokers (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-1.76, I2 = 44%, p < 0.001. Meta-analysis of six studies comparing active smokers alone to never smokers identified a significant increased odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25-2.59, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis of five studies comparing ex-smokers to never smokers identified a significant increased odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.82, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). The odds of anastomotic leak decreased among ex-smokers compared to active smokers.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the association between positive-smoking status and the risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Results further emphasize the importance of preoperative smoking cessation to reduce post-operative morbidity.

Preoperative Smoking Cessation and Prognosis After Curative Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Several cohort studies have reported that post-esophagectomy morbidities may worsen prognosis. Smoking cessation is an effective prophylactic measure for reducing post-esophagectomy morbidity; however, whether smoking cessation can contribute to the improvement of prognosis is unknown due to the absence of reliable databases covering the cessation period. This study aimed to elucidate whether sufficient preoperative smoking cessation can improve prognosis after esophageal cancer surgery by reducing post-esophagectomy morbidity.

METHODS

This study included 544 consecutive patients who underwent curative McKeown and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies for esophageal cancer between May 2011 and June 2021. Data on smoking status and cessation period were prospectively accumulated. Survival data were finally updated on 30 January 2022. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the cut-off value of appropriate cessation period in reducing post-esophagectomy respiratory morbidity as well as analyses for the association of cessation period with short- and long-term outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

Post-esophagectomy morbidity significantly diminished overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy (p = 0.0003). A short preoperative smoking cessation period of ≤ 2 months was associated with frequent post-esophagectomy morbidity of Clavien-Dindo classification ≥IIIb (p = 0.0059), pneumonia (p = 0.016), respiratory morbidity (p = 0.0057), and poor OS in clinical stages II and III (p = 0.0015). Moreover, it was an independent factor for poor OS (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.068-3.197; p = 0.028), along with body mass index <18.5 and R1 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient preoperative smoking cessation > 2 months may be effective in improving not only short-term outcomes but also prognosis after esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

High Pretreatment Mean Corpuscular Volume Can Predict Worse Prognosis in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma who Have Undergone Curative Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Objective

To establish the prognostic value of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have undergone esophagectomy.

Background

The MCV increases in patients with high alcohol and tobacco consumption. Such a lifestyle can be a risk factor for malnutrition, comorbidities related to those habits, and multiple primary malignancies, which may be associated with frequent postoperative morbidity and poor prognosis.

Methods

This study included 1673 patients with ESCC who underwent curative esophagectomy at eight institutes between April 2005 and November 2020. Patients were divided into normal and high MCV groups according to the standard value of their pretreatment MCV. Clinical background, short-term outcomes, and prognosis were retrospectively compared between the groups.

Results

Overall, 26.9% of patients had a high MCV, which was significantly associated with male sex, habitual smoking and drinking, multiple primary malignancies, and malnutrition, as estimated by the body mass index, hemoglobin and serum albumin values, and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index. Postoperative respiratory morbidity (P = 0.0075) frequently occurred in the high MCV group. A high MCV was an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.049-1.533; P = 0.014) and relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.047-1.455; P = 0.012).

Conclusions

A high MCV correlates with habitual drinking and smoking, malnutrition, and multiple primary malignancies and could be a surrogate marker of worse short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with ESCC who undergo esophagectomy.

Clinical Significance of Pretreatment Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Predictive Marker for Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Background

Clinical significance of red blood cell distribution (RDW) as a predictive marker for the incidence of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has not been established.

Methods

This study included 634 consecutive patients who underwent three-incisional esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2005 and November 2020. Correlation between pretreatment RDW and patient background, cancer background, and short-term outcome after esophagectomy were retrospectively investigated.

Results

Eighty patients (12.6%) had a high pretreatment RDW (> 14.2), which correlated with malnutrition estimated by body mass index, hemoglobin, total lymphocyte count, albumin, and total cholesterol. High pretreatment RDW was an independent risk factor for postoperative severe morbidity of grade IIIb or higher based on the Clavien–Dindo classification (hazard ratio [HR] 3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.707–8.887; p = 0.0012) and reoperation (HR 4.39, 95% CI 1.552–12.390; p = 0.0053) after open esophagectomy (OE). However, RDW was not associated with postoperative morbidity incidence after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

Conclusions

Pretreatment RDW may be a surrogate marker for nutritional status and could be a predictive marker for postoperative severe morbidity, reoperation, and possibly pneumonia after OE. On the contrary, the lower invasiveness of MIE may have reduced the effect of pretreatment malnutrition on morbidity incidence, which could explain the insignificant relationship between RDW and poor short-term outcomes in MIE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10719-2.

Precautions for avoiding pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy

Pulmonary morbidity is the most common complication after esophagectomy. Importantly, it is the main cause of surgery-related mortality and possibly adversely affects the long-term outcome after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. There is considerable accumulated evidence on multidisciplinary approaches to reduce post-operative pulmonary morbidity. A comprehensive review of the precautionary measures that have so far been shown to be effective in previous literature is of utmost importance. We herein update and summarize the perioperative and surgical approaches to diminish pulmonary morbidity. Pre-operative smoking cessation, respiratory rehabilitation, maintaining oral hygiene, perioperative nutritional intervention, enforcement of less invasive surgery, perioperative administration of steroid, and total management by a multidisciplinary team could be the key factors contributing to reduction in pulmonary morbidity.

Clinical Importance of Sputum in the Respiratory Tract as a Predictive Marker of Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Respiratory morbidity is common after esophagectomy and can be a major cause of surgery-related mortality. Thus, it is important to identify novel predictors that can preoperatively estimate the incidence of postoperative respiratory morbidity. Asymptomatic sputum in the respiratory tract is sometimes observed on preoperative computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to determine the clinical importance of sputum in the respiratory tract as a predictor of postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 609 consecutive patients who underwent three-incisional esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2005 and November 2018.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 76 (12.5%) had sputum in the respiratory tract on preoperative CT. This finding was significantly associated with older age, more extreme smoking habit, worse performance status, lower forced expiratory volume 1%, and more frequent pulmonary comorbidities. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was higher in these patients than in those without sputum (16 vs 8%, p = 0.028). Sputum in the main bronchus was associated with higher frequencies of morbidity of Clavien-Dindo classification (CDc) ≥ II (p = 0.019), severe morbidity of CDc ≥ IIIb (p = 0.058), pneumonia (p = 0.10), and pulmonary morbidity (p = 0.19) compared with the finding of sputum in the trachea alone. On multivariate analysis, sputum in the respiratory tract was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.019-4.207; p = 0.044) for postoperative pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Sputum in the respiratory tract is a novel predictor of postesophagectomy pneumonia. Patients with sputum in the more distal respiratory tract might have high risk of postoperative morbidities.

Optimizing health before elective thoracic surgery: systematic review of modifiable risk factors and opportunities for health services research

Despite progress in many different domains of surgical care, we are still striving toward practices which will consistently lead to the best care for an increasingly complex surgical population. Thoracic surgical patients, as a group, have multiple medical co-morbidities and are at increased risk for developing complications after surgical intervention. Our healthcare systems have been focused on treating complications as they occur in the hopes of minimizing their impact, as well as aiding in recovery. In recent years there has emerged a body of evidence outlining opportunities to optimize patients and likely prevent or decrease the impact of many complications. The purpose of this review article is to summarize four major domains-optimal pain control, nutritional status, functional fitness, and smoking cessation-all of which can have a substantial impact on the thoracic surgical patient's course in the hospital-as well as to describe opportunities for improvement, and areas for future research efforts.