1
|
Richards HS, Cousins S, Scroggie DL, Elliott D, Macefield R, Hudson E, Mutanga IR, Shah M, Alford N, Blencowe NS, Blazeby J. Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079654. [PMID: 38803251 PMCID: PMC11129025 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The development of new surgical procedures is fundamental to advancing patient care. The Idea, Developments, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term (IDEAL) framework describes study designs for stages of innovation. It can be difficult to apply due to challenges in defining and identifying innovative procedures. This study examined how the IDEAL framework is operationalised in real-world settings; specifically, the types of innovations evaluated using the framework and how authors justify their choice of IDEAL study design. DESIGN Secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review. DATA SOURCES Citation searches (Web of Science and Scopus) identified studies following the IDEAL framework and citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies of invasive procedures/devices of any design citing any of the ten key IDEAL/IDEAL_D papers. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS All relevant text was extracted. Three frameworks were developed, namely: (1) type of innovation under evaluation; (2) terminology used to describe stage of innovation and (3) reported rationale for IDEAL stage. RESULTS 48 articles were included. 19/48 described entirely new procedures, including those used for the first time in a different clinical context (n=15/48), reported as IDEAL stage 2a (n=8, 53%). Terminology describing stage of innovation was varied, inconsistent and ambiguous and was not defined. Authors justified their choice of IDEAL study design based on limitations in published evidence (n=36) and unknown feasibility and safety (n=32) outcomes. CONCLUSION Identifying stage of innovation is crucial to inform appropriate study design and governance decisions. Authors' rationale for choice of IDEAL stage related to the existing evidence base or lack of sufficient outcome data for procedures. Stage of innovation was poorly defined with inconsistent descriptions. Further work is needed to develop methods to identify innovation to inform practical application of the IDEAL framework. Defining the concept of innovation in terms of uncertainty, risk and degree of evidence may help to inform decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hollie Sarah Richards
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Cousins
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Darren L Scroggie
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Rhiannon Macefield
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Hudson
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Ian Rodney Mutanga
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Maximilian Shah
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Natasha Alford
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Natalie S Blencowe
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre Surgical and Orthopaedic Innovation Theme, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stuart SK, Kuypers TJL, Martijnse IS, Heisterkamp J, Matthijsen RA. Implementation of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: learning curve of a single high-volume center. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:6874519. [PMID: 36477804 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Open esophagectomy is considered to be the main surgical procedure in the world for esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing a new surgical technique is associated with learning curve morbidity. The objective of this study is to determine the learning curve based on anastomotic leakage (AL) after implementing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MI-ILE) in January 2015. All 257 patients who underwent MI-ILE in a single high-volume center between January 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. The learning curve was evaluated using the standard CUSUM analysis with an expected AL rate of 11%. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative complications, textbook outcome, and lymph node yield divided by the year of operation. Hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis was used to check for potential confounding variables. The CUSUM analysis showed a learning curve of 179 cases. The mean AL rate decreased from 33.3% in 2015 to 9.5% in 2020 (P = 0.007). There was an increase in the mean lymph node yield from 21 in 2018 to 28 in 2019 (P < 0.001) and textbook outcome from 37.3% in 2015 to 66.7% in 2020 (P = 0.005). A newly implemented MI-ILE has a learning curve of 179 patients based on a reference AL rate of 11% using the CUSUM method. Whether future generation surgeons will show similar learning curve numbers, implicating continuous development of different introduction programs of new techniques, will have to be the focus of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne K Stuart
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Toon J L Kuypers
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S Martijnse
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Matthijsen
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Froiio C, Uzun E, Hadzijusufovic E, Capovilla G, Berlth F, Lang H, Grimminger PP. Semiprone thoracoscopic approach during totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy seems to be beneficial. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:6627608. [PMID: 35780319 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIE) is widely accepted as a surgical treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Aim of this paper is to describe the surgical details of our standardized MIE technique and its safety. We also evaluate the esophageal mobilization in semiprone compared to the left lateral position. A retrospective analysis of 141 consecutive patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer, from February 2016 to September 2021, was conducted. All the procedures were performed by totally thoraco-laparoscopic with an intrathoracic end-to-side circular stapled anastomosis. Thoracic phase was performed in left lateral position (LLP-group, n=47) followed by a semiprone position (SP-group, n=94). The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed. The procedure was completed without intraoperative complication in 94.68% of cases in SP-group and in 93.62% of cases in LLP-group (P=0.99). The total operative time and thoracic operative time were significantly shorter in SP-group (P=0.0096; P=0.009). No statistically significant differences were detected in postoperative outcomes between the groups, except for anastomotic strictures (higher in LLP-group, P=0.02) and intensive care unit stay (longer in LLP-group, P=00.1). No reoperation was needed in any cases. Surgical radicality was comparable; the median of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher in SP-group (P<0.0001). The present semiprone technique of thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is safe and feasible but may also provide some advantages in terms of lymph nodes harvested and total operation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Froiio
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy
| | - Eren Uzun
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| | - Edin Hadzijusufovic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| | - Giovanni Capovilla
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| | - Felix Berlth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schlottmann F, Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Casas MA, Herbella FAM, Patti MG. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2022; 32:380-392. [PMID: 35583556 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three anastomotic techniques are mostly used to create an esophagogastric anastomosis in a transthoracic esophagectomy: hand-sewn (HS), side-to-side linear-stapled (SSLS), and circular-stapled (CS). The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes after HS, SSLS, and CS intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review using the MEDLINE database was performed to identify original articles analyzing outcomes after HS, SSLS, and CS esophagogastric anastomosis. The main outcome was an anastomotic leakage rate. Secondary outcomes included overall morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality. A meta-analysis of proportions and linear regression models were used to assess the effect of each anastomotic technique on the different outcomes. RESULTS A total of 101 studies comprising 12,595 patients were included; 8835 (70.1%) with CS, 2532 (20.1%) with HS, and 1228 (9.8%) with SSLS anastomosis. Anastomotic leak occurred in 10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-15%], 9% (95% CI, 6%-13%), and 6% (95% CI, 5%-7%) of patients after HS, SSLS, and CS anastomosis, respectively. Risk of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher with HS anastomosis (odds ratio=1.73, 95% CI: 1.47-2.03, P<0.0001) and SSLS (odds ratio=1.68, 95% CI: 1.36-2.08, P<0.0001), as compared with CS. Overall morbidity (HS: 52% vs. SLSS: 39% vs. CS: 35%) and major morbidity (HS: 33% vs. CS: 19%) rates were significantly lower with CS anastomosis. Mortality rate was 4% (95% CI, 3%-6%), 2% (95% CI, 2%-3%), and 3% (95% CI, 3%-4%) after HS, SSLS, and CS anastomosis, respectively. CONCLUSION HS and SSLS intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with significantly higher rates of an anastomotic leak than CS anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Cristian A Angeramo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - María A Casas
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Marco G Patti
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Casas MA, Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for prevention of anastomotic leak in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6347566. [PMID: 34378016 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is an emerging technology that might help decreasing anastomotic leakage (AL) rates. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of ICG fluorescence imaging for the prevention of AL after minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. METHODS A systematic literature review of the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases was performed to identify all articles on totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Studies were then divided into two groups based on the use or not of ICG for perfusion assessment. Primary outcome was anastomotic leak. Secondary outcomes included operative time, ICG-related adverse reactions, and mortality rate. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the overall weighted proportion and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for main outcomes. RESULTS A total of 3,171 patients were included for analysis: 381 (12%) with intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging and 2,790 (88%) without ICG. Mean patients' age and proportion of males were similar between groups. Mean operative time was also similar between both groups (ICG: 354.8 vs. No-ICG: 354.1 minutes, P = 0.52). Mean ICG dose was 12 mg (5-21 mg). No ICG-related adverse reactions were reported. AL rate was 9% (95% CI, 5-17%) and 9% (95% CI, 7-12%) in the ICG and No-ICG groups, respectively. The risk of AL was similar between groups (odds ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.53-1.28, P = 0.45). Mortality was 3% (95% CI, 1-9%) in patients with ICG and 2% (95% CI, 2-3%) in those without ICG. Median length of hospital stay was also similar between groups (ICG: 13.6 vs. No-ICG: 11.2 days, P = 0.29). CONCLUSION The use of ICG fluorescence imaging for perfusion assessment does not seem to reduce AL rates in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María A Casas
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Cristian A Angeramo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Nicolás H Dreifuss
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Division of Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Casas MA, Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Schlottmann F. Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:473-481. [PMID: 34955315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A transthoracic esophagectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged to decrease such morbidity. The aim of this study was to accurately determine surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (TMIE). METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles analyzing patients who underwent TMIE. Main outcomes included overall morbidity, major morbidity, pneumonia, arrhythmia, anastomotic leak, chyle leak, and mortality. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the overall weighted proportion and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for each analyzed outcome. RESULTS A total of 5619 patients were included for analysis; 4781 (85.1%) underwent a laparoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomy and 838 (14.9%) a robotic-assisted esophagectomy. Mean age of patients was 63.5 (55-67) years and 75.8% were male. Overall morbidity and major morbidity rates were 39% (95% CI, 33%-45%) and 20% (95% CI, 13%-28%), respectively. Postoperative pneumonia and arrhythmia rates were 10% (95% CI, 8%-13%) and 12% (95% CI, 8%-17%), respectively. Anastomotic leak rate across studies was 8% (95% CI, 6%-10%). Chyle leak rate was 3% (95% CI, 2%-5%). Mortality rate was 2% (95% CI, 2%-2%). Median ICU stay and length of hospital stay were 2 (1-4) and 11.2 (7-20) days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a challenging procedure with high morbidity rates. Strategies to enhance postoperative outcomes after this operation are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María A Casas
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Casas MA, Schlottmann F. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2021; 170:1692-1701. [PMID: 34389164 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence comparing conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (CMIE) via laparoscopy and thoracoscopy with robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is scarce. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare surgical outcomes after CMIE and RAMIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles analyzing outcomes after CMIE and RAMIE. Main surgical outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leak rates, pneumonia, overall morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. Oncologic outcomes included lymph node yield and R0 resections rates. A meta-analysis of proportions and linear regression models were used to assess the effect of each procedure on the different outcomes. RESULTS A total of 6,249 patients were included for analysis; 5,275 (84%) underwent CMIE and 974 (16%) RAMIE. Robotic esophagectomy had longer operative time and less intraoperative blood loss. Anastomotic leakage rates were similar with both approaches. Patients undergoing RAMIE had significantly lower rates of postoperative pneumonia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61, P < .0001) and overall morbidity (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.79, P < .0001). Median LOS was similar in both procedures (RAMIE: 12.1 versus CMIE: 11.9 days, P = .64). Similar mortality rates were found after RAMIE and CMIE (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.34-1.38, P = .29). Lymph node yield was similar in both procedures, but RAMIE was associated with higher rates of R0 resection (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.53-5.26, P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing robotic esophagectomy have less intraoperative blood loss, lower rates of postoperative pneumonia, reduced overall morbidity, and higher rates of R0 resections, as compared with those undergoing a laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophageal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - María A Casas
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Macefield RC, Wilson N, Hoffmann C, Blazeby JM, McNair AGK, Avery KNL, Potter S. Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set. BJS Open 2020; 4:1072-1083. [PMID: 33016009 PMCID: PMC8444278 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for the evaluation of new surgical procedures and devices is inconsistent and lacks standardization. A core outcome set may promote the safe and transparent evaluation of surgical innovations. This systematic review examined outcome selection, measurement and reporting in studies conducted within the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring) framework to examine current practice and inform the development of a core outcome set for early-phase studies of surgical procedures/devices. METHODS Web of Science and Scopus citation searches were performed to identify author-reported IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies for any surgical procedure/device. Outcomes were extracted verbatim, including contextual information regarding outcome selection and measurement. Outcomes were categorized to inform a conceptual framework of outcome domains relevant to evaluating innovation. RESULTS Some 48 studies were identified. Outcome selection, measurement and reporting varied widely across studies in different IDEAL stages. From 1737 outcomes extracted, 22 domains specific to evaluating innovation were conceptualized under seven broad categories: procedure completion success/failure; modifications; unanticipated events; surgeons' experiences; patients' experiences; resource use specific to the innovative procedure/device; and other innovation-specific outcomes. Most innovation-specific outcomes were measured and reported in only a small number of studies. CONCLUSION This review highlighted the need for guidance and standardization in outcome selection and reporting in the evaluation of new surgical procedures/devices. Novel outcome domains specific to innovation have been identified to establish a core outcome set for future evaluations of surgical innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. C. Macefield
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - N. Wilson
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - C. Hoffmann
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - J. M. Blazeby
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - A. G. K. McNair
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryBristolUK
| | - K. N. L. Avery
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - S. Potter
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- Bristol Breast Care CentreNorth Bristol NHS TrustBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Souche R, Nayeri M, Chati R, Huet E, Donici I, Tuech JJ, Borie F, Prudhomme M, Jaber S, Fabre JM. Thoracoscopy in prone position with two-lung ventilation compared to conventional thoracotomy during Ivor Lewis procedure: a multicenter case-control study. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:142-152. [PMID: 30868323 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06742-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative management based on thoracoscopy, prone position and two-lung ventilation could decrease the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to compare this multifaceted approach (MIE-PP) and conventional thoracotomy for Ivor Lewis procedure after a systematic laparoscopic dissection. METHODS Data from 137 consecutive patients undergoing Ivor Lewis procedures between 2010 and 2017 at two tertiary centers was analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes of patients who underwent MIE-PP (n = 58; surgeons group 1) were compared with those of patients undergoing conventional approach (n = 79; surgeons group 2). Our primary outcome was major postoperative pulmonary complications. Our main secondary outcomes were anastomotic leak, quality of resection and mortality. RESULTS Female patients were more prevalent in the MIE-PP group (p = 0.002). Other patient characteristics, cTNM staging and neoadjuvant treatment rate were not different between groups. Major postoperative pulmonary complications were significantly lower in the MIE-PP group compared to Conventional group (24 vs. 44%; p = 0.014). Anastomotic leak occurred in 31 versus 18% in MIE-PP group and Conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.103). Complete resection rate (98 vs. 95%; p = 0.303) and mean number of harvested lymph nodes (16 (4-40) vs. 18 (3-37); p = 0.072) were similar between the two groups. Postoperative mortality rates were 0 versus 2% at day 30 (p = 0.508) and 0 versus 7.6% at day 90 (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis using thoracoscopy, prone position and two-lung ventilation are at least equivalent to the hybrid approach. Anastomotic leak after MIE-PP remains a major concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Souche
- Digestive and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France.
| | - M Nayeri
- Digestive Surgery Department, Carémeau Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, Place du professeur Debré, 30900, Nîmes, France
| | - R Chati
- Digestive Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031, Rouen, France
| | - E Huet
- Digestive Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031, Rouen, France
| | - I Donici
- Digestive Surgery Department, Carémeau Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, Place du professeur Debré, 30900, Nîmes, France
| | - J J Tuech
- Digestive Surgery Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031, Rouen, France
| | - F Borie
- Digestive Surgery Department, Carémeau Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, Place du professeur Debré, 30900, Nîmes, France
| | - M Prudhomme
- Digestive Surgery Department, Carémeau Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, Place du professeur Debré, 30900, Nîmes, France
| | - S Jaber
- Department of Reanimation and Anesthesiology, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - J M Fabre
- Digestive and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier - Nîmes, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Asti E, Bernardi D, Sozzi M, Bonavina L. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:77. [PMID: 30505964 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.09.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive esophagectomy has become the preferred approach for invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma because it can speed recovery and enhance patient's quality of life. Multiple minimally invasive surgical techniques have been described during the last two decades. Preoperative staging, anatomy and physiological patient's status, comorbidity, and experience of the surgical team should drive the choice of the surgical approach. The trans-thoracic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, either hybrid or totally minimal invasive, remains the preferred approach in these patients. Lymph node yield and short-term clinical outcomes have proven similar to open surgery, while quality of life appears improved. To establish a minimally invasive esophagectomy program, a steep learning curve and a multidisciplinary approach are required in order to provide optimal staging, personalized therapy, and adequate perioperative care. The role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma will continue to expand in synergy with enhanced recovery after surgery pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Asti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Bernardi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Sozzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|