Outcome, complication and follow-up of patients with esophageal foreign body impaction: an academic institute's 15 years of experience

Efficacy of cola ingestion for oesophageal food bolus impaction: open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of cola in resolving complete oesophageal food bolus impaction.

DESIGN

Open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Emergency departments of five Dutch hospitals at the secondary and tertiary level, between 22 December 2019 and 16 June 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

51 adults presenting with complete oesophageal food bolus impaction, defined as a sudden inability to pass saliva after consumption of foods. Patients who ingested meat that contained bones, and patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of IV or higher were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

28 patients in the intervention group were instructed to consume 25 mL cups of cola at intervals up to a maximum total volume of 200 mL. 23 patients in the control group awaited spontaneous passage. In either group, if complete resolution of symptoms did not occur, endoscopic removal was performed following current guidelines: within 6 hours for patients with complete obstruction, and within 24 hours for partial obstruction. In case of complete resolution of symptoms, elective diagnostic endoscopy was required.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Improvement of oesophageal food bolus obstruction as reported by patients (ie, aggregate of complete and partial passage), and evaluation of complete passage. The secondary outcome was any intervention related adverse event.

RESULTS

Cola did not have a meaningful effect on the improvement of food bolus obstruction (17/28 (61%) intervention v 14/23 (61%) control; odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 3.1; relative risk reduction 0.0, 95% confidence interval -0.55 to 0.36; P>0.99). Complete passage was reported more often in the intervention group but this difference was not significant (12/28 (43%) intervention v 8/23 (35%) control; odds ratio 1.4 (0.45 to 4.4); relative risk reduction -0.23 (-1.5 to 0.39); P=0.58). No severe adverse events occurred. However, six (21%) patients in the intervention group experienced temporary discomfort after drinking cola.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, cola consumption did not lead to a higher rate of improvement of complete oesophageal food bolus impaction. Given the lack of adverse events in the treatment group and some events of resolution after treatment, cola might be considered as a first line treatment, but should not delay any planning of endoscopic management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register (currently International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) NL8312.

Combination of gastroscopy and fibro‑bronchoscopy facilitates removal of incarcerated fish bone in the esophagus: A case report

Esophageal foreign body impaction is a notable clinical emergency. If the high-risk esophageal foreign bodies are not removed in time, life-threatening complications, such as perforation, infection and injury to the vessels, may occur. In the present study, the case of a patient experiencing a foreign body sensation in the throat after ingesting a fish bone by mistake is presented. A high risk of impending arterial puncture was confirmed using thoracic CT and thoracic aorta CT angiography scanning. The ends of the fish bone were first confirmed using a fibro-bronchoscopy light source passing through the bronchial and esophageal walls, before biopsy forceps were used to successively free the thoracic aorta and bronchial ends under gastroscopy. Finally, the fish bone was safely removed using a combination of gastroscopy and the rarely used fibro-bronchoscopy, and the patient recovered well after standard care. In certain cases of foreign bodies, it is necessary to use multiple strategies in a timely manner according to the type and location of the ingested foreign body.

British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) joint consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of dysphagia in both children and adults, as well as one of the most prevalent oesophageal diseases with a significant impact on physical health and quality of life. We have provided a single comprehensive guideline for both paediatric and adult gastroenterologists on current best practice for the evaluation and management of EoE.

METHODS

The Oesophageal Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology was commissioned by the Clinical Standards Service Committee to develop these guidelines. The Guideline Development Group included adult and paediatric gastroenterologists, surgeons, dietitians, allergists, pathologists and patient representatives. The Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes process was used to generate questions for a systematic review of the evidence. Published evidence was reviewed and updated to June 2021. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. Two rounds of voting were held to assess the level of agreement and the strength of recommendations, with 80% consensus required for acceptance.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven statements on EoE presentation, diagnosis, investigation, management and complications were produced with further statements created on areas for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

These comprehensive adult and paediatric guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition are based on evidence and expert consensus from a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including patient advocates and patient support groups, to help clinicians with the management patients with EoE and its complications.

Association of eosinophil-mediated inflammatory biomarkers with the presence of the Schatzki ring

PURPOSE

The study aimed to assess the level of inflammatory biomarkers related to eosinophilia: interleukins 5 (IL-5) and 13 (IL-13), eotaxin 3, major basic protein (MBP) and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) in patients with dysphagia and Schatzki ring (SR), as well as the characteristics of this group of patients in terms of the features differentiating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 42 patients with dysphagia, each of whom underwent panendoscopy with an assessment of the occurrence of SR, retrospectively assessed EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) total, inflammatory and fibrostenotic and serum concentrations of IL-5 and 13, TGF-β1, eotaxin 3 and MBP. All of them completed a symptom and comorbid questionnaire. Patients diagnosed with SR constituted the SR group (n ​= ​8), the rest - the non-SR group. The quantification of the biomarkers was performed by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). In the data analysis, p ​≤ ​0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We demonstrated a significant increase in terms of exceeding the reference values of TGF-β1 (37.5% vs 8.8%) and MBP (75% vs 35.3%) in patients with SR compared to the non-SR group (qualitative analysis). There was also a statistically significant increase in the concentration of each of the determined biomarkers (quantitative analysis) in the SR group.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in TGF-β1 and MBP concentrations indicates the inflammatory and probably fibrostenotic pathogenesis of SR. Obtained results do not allow for an unequivocal classification of SR as a complication typical only for GERD or EoE.

Endoscopic removal of entirely embedded esophagus-penetrating foreign bodies (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Traditionally, surgery is the only choice for esophageal foreign bodies (FBs) penetrating into the mediastinum or cervical para-esophageal space. Recent progress in endoscopic techniques and devices has made it possible to perform endoscopic procedures in the mediastinum. Here, we describe a novel method to remove the entirely embedded esophagus-penetrating FBs through an endoscopic approach.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic removal of entirely embedded esophagus-penetrating FBs were prospectively enrolled between December 2018 and June 2020. All procedures were performed by using five major steps: localization of the FB; mucosal incision; wound debridement, myotomy, and FB exposure; FB extraction; and closure of the esophageal wound.

RESULTS

A total of five cases of entirely embedded esophagus-penetrating FBs were evaluated, two in children and three in adults. All FBs were successfully removed and extracted using a therapeutic endoscope and a hook knife or a hybrid knife and a grasping forceps as accessories. The average procedure time was 19.0 ± 12.4 min (range 10-40 min). The major surgical procedure was avoided in all patients. The average length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 2.5 days (range 2-8 days). There were no severe short-term adverse events after all procedures. During the 1 month and 3 months follow-up, no patient developed long-term adverse events including stenosis of the esophagus and fistula formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic approach was a safe and effective way to remove entirely embedded esophagus-penetrating FBs.