1
|
Hernández-Rocha C, Walshe M, Birch S, Sabic K, Korie U, Chasteau C, Miladinova VM, Sabol WB, Mengesha E, Hanna M, Pozdnyakova V, Datta L, Kohen R, Milgrom R, Stempak JM, Bitton A, Brant SR, Rioux JD, McGovern DPB, Duerr RH, Cho JH, Schumm PL, Silverberg MS, Lazarev M. Clinical Predictors of Early and Late Endoscopic Recurrence Following Ileocolonic Resection in Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:615-627. [PMID: 37976264 PMCID: PMC11037109 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Multiple factors are suggested to place Crohn's disease patients at risk of recurrence after ileocolic resection with conflicting associations. We aimed to identify clinical predictors of recurrence at first [early] and further [late] postoperative colonoscopy. METHODS Crohn's disease patients undergoing ileocolic resection were prospectively recruited at six North American centres. Clinical data were collected and endoscopic recurrence was defined as Rutgeerts score ≥i2. A multivariable model was fitted to analyse variables independently associated with recurrence. RESULTS A total of 365 patients undergoing 674 postoperative colonoscopies were included with a median age of 32 years, 189 [51.8%] were male, and 37 [10.1%] were non-Whites. Postoperatively, 133 [36.4%] used anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] and 30 [8.2%] were smokers. At first colonoscopy, 109 [29.9%] had recurrence. Male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-3.40), non-White ethnicity [OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.09-5.63], longer interval between surgery and colonoscopy [OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.002-1.18], and postoperative smoking [OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.16-6.67] were associated with recurrence, while prophylactic anti-TNF reduced the risk [OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.55]. Postoperative anti-TNF prophylaxis had a protective effect on anti-TNF experienced patients but not on anti-TNF naïve patients. Among patients without recurrence at first colonoscopy, Rutgeerts score i1 was associated with subsequent recurrence [OR = 4.43, 95% CI 1.73-11.35]. CONCLUSIONS We identified independent clinical predictors of early and late Crohn's disease postoperative endoscopic recurrence. Clinical factors traditionally used for risk stratification failed to predict recurrence and need to be revised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Hernández-Rocha
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Walshe
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sondra Birch
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ksenija Sabic
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ujunwa Korie
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Colleen Chasteau
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vessela M Miladinova
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - William B Sabol
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Emebet Mengesha
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mary Hanna
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Valeriya Pozdnyakova
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Datta
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rita Kohen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Raquel Milgrom
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne M Stempak
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alain Bitton
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven R Brant
- Crohn’s and Colitis Center of New Jersey, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - John D Rioux
- Research Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dermot P B McGovern
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard H Duerr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Judy H Cho
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Phil L Schumm
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Lazarev
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ollech JE, Yanai H. Navigating Postoperative Management in Crohn's Disease: Insights from the PORCSE Study. J Crohns Colitis 2024:jjae054. [PMID: 38642911 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob E Ollech
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Affiliated with the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Affiliated with the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Does de Willebois EML, Bellato V, Duijvestein M, van Dieren S, Danese S, Sileri P, Buskens CJ, Vignali A, Bemelman WA. How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e397. [PMID: 38883962 PMCID: PMC11175939 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications. Methods A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration's tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208. Results Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56-44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2-59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0-59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3-46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Susan van Dieren
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvio Danese
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Sileri
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy
| | - Christianne J Buskens
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Vignali
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haanappel AEG, Bellato V, Buskens CJ, Armuzzi A, van der Bilt JDW, de Boer NKH, Danese S, van der Does de Willebois EML, Duijvestein M, van der Horst D, Pellino G, Richir MC, Selvaggi F, Spinelli A, Vignali A, Rosati R, Bemelman WA. Optimising surgical anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to recurrence and functionality: two international parallel randomized controlled trials comparing handsewn (END-to-end or Kono-S) to stapled anastomosis (HAND2END and the End2End STUDIES). BMC Surg 2024; 24:71. [PMID: 38408943 PMCID: PMC10895856 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02340-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common intestinal operation in Crohn's disease (CD) is an ileocolic resection. Despite optimal surgical and medical management, recurrent disease after surgery is common. Different types of anastomoses with respect to configuration and construction can be made after resection for example, handsewn (end-to-end and Kono-S) and stapled (side-to-side). The various types of anastomoses might affect endoscopic recurrence and its assessment, the functional outcome, and costs. The objective of the present study is to compare the three types of anastomoses with respect to endoscopic recurrence at 6 months, gastrointestinal function, and health care consumption. METHODS This is a randomized controlled multicentre superiority trial, allocating patients either to side-to-side stapled anastomosis as advised in current guidelines or a handsewn anastomoses (an end-to-end or Kono-S). It is hypothesized that handsewn anastomoses do better than stapled, and end-to-end perform better than the saccular Kono-S. Two international studies with a similar setup will be conducted mainly in the Netherlands (End2End) and Italy (HAND2END). Patients diagnosed with CD, aged over 16 years in the Netherlands and 18 years in Italy requiring (re)resection of the (neo)terminal ileum are eligible. The first part of the study compares the two handsewn anastomoses with the stapled anastomosis. To detect a clinically relevant difference of 25% in endoscopic recurrence, a total of 165 patients will be needed in the Netherlands and 189 patients in Italy. Primary outcome is postoperative endoscopic recurrence (defined as Rutgeerts score ≥ i2b) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes are postoperative morbidity, gastrointestinal function, quality of life (QoL) and costs. DISCUSSION The research question addresses a knowledge gap within the general practice elucidating which type of anastomosis is superior in terms of endoscopic and clinical recurrence, functionality, QoL and health care consumption. The results of the proposed study might change current practice in contrast to what is advised by the guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05246917 for HAND2END and NCT05578235 for End2End ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouck E G Haanappel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Minimally invasive surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Christianne J Buskens
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano - Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Milan C Richir
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano - Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Vignali
- Unit of Coloproctology and IBD Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Unit of Coloproctology and IBD Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bak MT, ten Bokkel Huinink S, Erler NS, Bodelier AG, Dijkstra G, Romberg-Camps M, de Boer NK, Hoentjen F, Stassen LP, van der Meulen–de Jong AE, West RL, van Ruler O, van der Woude CJ, de Vries AC. Prognostic Value of the Modified Rutgeerts Score for Long-Term Outcomes After Primary Ileocecal Resection in Crohn's Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:306-312. [PMID: 37737675 PMCID: PMC10833187 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prognostic value of the modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) needs to be further elucidated. This study assessed the prognostic value of the mRS for long-term outcomes after primary ileocecal resection in patients with CD. METHODS Patients with CD after primary ileocecal resection with an available mRS at first postoperative ileocolonoscopy (index mRS) were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was surgical recurrence. Secondary outcomes were clinical recurrence and progression to severe endoscopic recurrence (≥i3). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between index mRS and outcomes. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-two patients were included (mean follow-up: 6.4 years, SD: 4.6). Surgical recurrence rates were 7.7%, 5.3%, 12.9%, 19.1%, 28.8%, 47.8% for index mRS i0, i1, i2a, i2b, i3, and i4, respectively. Clinical recurrence occurred in 42.2% (i0), 53.7% (i1), 58.5% (i2a), 80.2% (i2b), 79.4% (i3), and 95.3% (i4) of patients. Progression to severe endoscopic recurrence occurred in 21.1% (i0), 33.9% (i1), 26.8% (i2a), and 33.3% (i2b) of patients. An index mRS of i2b (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.0; 1.5-5.6), i3 (aHR 4.0; 2.0-7.9) and i4 (aHR 8.0; 4.0-16.0) were associated with surgical recurrence. An index mRS of i1 (aHR 1.7; 1.2-2.4), i2a (aHR 1.7; 1.2-2.4), i2b (aHR 4.4; 3.2-6.0), i3 (aHR 3.6; 2.5-5.2), and i4 (aHR 7.3; 4.8-10.9) were associated with clinical recurrence. An index mRS of i1 (aHR 2.0; 1.1-3.7) or i2b (aHR 2.5; 1.4-4.6) was associated with progression to severe endoscopic recurrence. DISCUSSION The increasing mRS corresponds closely with the risk of surgical and clinical recurrence. An index mRS ≥ i2b is associated with surgical recurrence, an index mRS ≥ i1 is associated with clinical recurrence, and i1 or i2b with progression to severe endoscopic recurrence. These results support tight monitoring of disease activity and treatment optimization in patients with ileal lesions and a more conservative management in patients with anastomotic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel T.J. Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan ten Bokkel Huinink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S. Erler
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle Romberg-Camps
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Nanne K.H. de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada;
| | - Laurents P.S. Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rachel L. West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Cappelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C. Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C. de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bachour SP, Click BH. Clinical Update on the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease Recurrence. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2024; 26:41-52. [PMID: 38227128 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-023-00911-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite advances in therapeutics, a significant portion of patients with Crohn's disease still require surgical management. In this article, we present updates to the natural history, prognostication and postoperative monitoring, and novel therapeutics in the prevention and treatment of postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical risk factors have been associated with higher rates of postoperative recurrence (POR), and in recent studies demonstrate an increased cumulative risk with presence of additional risk factors. Additional novel clinical, histologic, and "-omic" risk factors for recurrence have recently been elucidated, including the role of the mesentery on recurrence and perioperative intraabdominal septic complications. High-risk patients benefit most from medical prophylaxis, including anti-TNF with or without immunomodulator therapy to prevent recurrence. New biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab have emerging evidence in the use of prophylaxis, especially with recent REPREVIO trial data. Non-invasive disease monitoring, such as cross-sectional enterography, intestinal ultrasound, and fecal calprotectin, have been validated against ileocolonoscopy. Recent advances in the prediction, prevention, and monitoring algorithms of postoperative Crohn's disease may be leading to a reduction in postoperative recurrence. Ongoing trials will help determine optimal monitoring and management strategies for this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salam P Bachour
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Benjamin H Click
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fasulo E, D’Amico F, Osorio L, Allocca M, Fiorino G, Zilli A, Parigi TL, Danese S, Furfaro F. The Management of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease. J Clin Med 2023; 13:119. [PMID: 38202126 PMCID: PMC10779955 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with different phenotypes of presentation, inflammatory, penetrating, or stricturing disease, that significantly impacts patient well-being and quality of life. Despite advances in medical therapy, surgery sometimes represents the only treatment to address complications, such as strictures, fistulas, or abscesses. Minimizing postoperative recurrence (POR) remains a major challenge for both clinicians and patients; consequently, various therapeutic strategies have been developed to prevent or delay POR. The current review outlines an updated overview of POR management. We focused on diagnostic assessment, which included endoscopic examination, biochemical analyses, and cross-sectional imaging techniques, all crucial tools used to accurately diagnose this condition. Additionally, we delved into the associated risk factors contributing to POR development. Furthermore, we examined recent advances in the prophylaxis and treatment of POR in CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Fasulo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
| | - Ferdinando D’Amico
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Osorio
- Gastroenterologist Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Medellín 050010, Colombia;
| | - Mariangela Allocca
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
| | - Alessandra Zilli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
| | - Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Furfaro
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.F.); (F.D.); (M.A.); (G.F.); (A.Z.); (S.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tyrode G, Lakkis Z, Vernerey D, Falcoz A, Clairet V, Alibert L, Koch S, Vuitton L. KONO-S Anastomosis Is Not Superior to Conventional Anastomosis for the Reduction of Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence in Crohn's Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad214. [PMID: 37776562 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection rates remain high in Crohn's disease (CD). Reducing postoperative recurrence (POR) is challenging. Besides drug therapy, the surgical anastomosis technique may reduce POR. We aimed to compare the endoscopic POR rate after Kono-S vs standard ileocolic anastomosis. METHODS The study included all consecutive CD patients operated on for ileocolic resection with a Kono-S anastomosis between February 2020 and March 2022. These patients were prospectively followed, and colonoscopy was performed 6 to 12 months after surgery. Patients were compared with a historical cohort of patients operated on with a conventional anastomosis in the same center. The primary end point was endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts score ≥i2). Factors associated with POR were assessed by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were included, 30 in the Kono-S group and 55 in the control group. At baseline, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding CD characteristics or known POR risk factors, including previous exposure to biologics. At 6 to 12 months, endoscopic POR rate did not differ significantly between groups (56.7% in the Kono-S group vs 49.1% in the control group; P = .50), nor did endoscopic POR according to the modified Rutgeerts score ≥i2b (46.7% in the Kono-S group vs 40% in the control group; P = .55). Severe endoscopic POR rates were 23.3% and 18.2% in each group, respectively. Clinical recurrence rate was similar in both groups, and no recurrent surgery occurred. By multivariable analysis, the type of anastomosis was not associated with endoscopic POR (OR, 1.229; 95% CI, 0.461-3.274, P = .68); however, postoperative treatment with anti-TNF was (OR, 0.337; 95% CI, 0.131-0.865 P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Kono-S anastomosis was not associated with a reduced rate of endoscopic POR. These results warrant confirmation in prospective, randomized, multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle Tyrode
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, INSERM UMR RIGHT, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Besançon, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Dewi Vernerey
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France
| | - Antoine Falcoz
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France
| | - Valentine Clairet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Line Alibert
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Besançon, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Stéphane Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, INSERM UMR RIGHT, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - Lucine Vuitton
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, INSERM UMR RIGHT, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25030 Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bernstein CN, Regueiro M. Postoperative Crohn's Disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:749-753. [PMID: 37224283 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Although surgery rates in Crohn's disease are declining in the past twenty years, bowel resection remains an important and still commonly used therapeutic option in Crohn's disease. Preoperatively, patients clinical status must be optimized including preparation for perioperative recovery including with nutrition optimization and preparation for postoperative pharmacotherapy. Postoperatively a medical therapy is often required and in recent years it has often been a biological therapy. One randomized controlled study suggested that infliximab is more likely to prevent endoscopic recurrence than placebo. But other biologicals have been used as well. Ileocolonoscopy should be undertaken by 6 months after an ileal or ileocecal resection especially. Adjunctive imaging such as transabdominal ultrasound, capsule endoscopy or cross sectional imaging may be required. Biomarker measurement with fecal calprotectin especially, or C-reactive protein, serum ferritin, serum albumin and serum hemoglobin will also be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles N Bernstein
- University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre and Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Miguel Regueiro
- Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute and Department of Medicine in the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Contemporary Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease after Ileocolonic Resection. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226746. [PMID: 36431223 PMCID: PMC9693828 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery remains an important treatment modality in the multidisciplinary management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). To illustrate the recent advances in the management of postoperative CD we outline the contemporary approach to treatment: diagnosing disease recurrence using endoscopy or noninvasive methods and risk stratification underlying decisions to institute treatment. Endoscopic scoring indices are being refined to guide treatment decisions by accurately estimating the risk of recurrence based on endoscopic appearance. The original Rutgeerts score has been modified to separate anastomotic lesions from lesions in the neoterminal ileum. Two further indices, the REMIND score and the POCER index, were recently developed with the same intention. Noninvasive monitoring for recurrence using a method with high negative predictive value has the potential to simplify management algorithms and only perform ileocolonoscopy in a subset of patients. Fecal calprotectin, intestinal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance enterography are all being evaluated for this purpose. The use of infliximab for the prevention of postoperative recurrence is well supported by data, but management decisions are fraught with uncertainty for patients with previous exposure to biologics. Data on the use of ustekinumab and vedolizumab for postoperative CD are emerging, but controlled studies are lacking.
Collapse
|