The Influence of Subclinical Active Inflammation on IFX Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Disease Progression Assessment: Findings from a Prospective Real-World Study in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Vedolizumab Clearance as a Surrogate Marker for Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: Insights from Real-World Pharmacokinetics

Background/Objectives: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is approved in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). VDZ exhibits considerable variability in its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and its exposure-response relationship is not yet fully understood. The aim was to investigate the variability in VDZ trough levels and PK parameters, to assess the relationship between VDZ PK and biochemical response, as well as clinical and endoscopic outcomes. Methods: We included 61 UC and 45 CD patients. Patients' data and trough VDZ concentrations were retrospectively obtained. Population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling with NONMEM (version 7.5). Graphs and statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.3). Results: In total, 116 trough VDZ concentrations from 106 patients were described by a two-compartment model. For a typical patient, clearance (CL) was estimated at 0.159 L/day, while in patients previously treated with anti-TNFα agents, VDZ CL increased by 26.4% on average. In univariate binary logistic regression, VDZ trough concentration was not statistically significant predictor of remission, whereas CL was. Moreover, combined CL and faecal calprotectin (FCP) were a statistically significant predictors of remission. The hazard ratio (HR) for CL above 0.1886 L/day was 0.35 (p = 0.05) and for FCP below 250 µg/g was 2.66 (p = 0.02) in a time-to-event analysis. Conclusions: Our population PK model incorporates the effect of prior anti-TNFα agents on CL, suggesting its association with more severe forms of IBD. VDZ CL emerged as a more robust and clinically relevant predictor of remission in IBD patients than trough concentration.

Treatment Targets Should Influence Choice of Infliximab Dose Intensification Strategy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pharmacokinetic Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision.

OBJECTIVES

This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively.

RESULTS

The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require validation across real-world cohorts.