Genotype-Guided Thiopurine Dosing Does not Lead to Additional Costs in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Landscape of TPMT and NUDT15 Pharmacogenetic Variation in a Cohort of Canadian Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit considerable interindividual variability in medication response, highlighting the need for precision medicine approaches to optimize and tailor treatment. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) offers the ability to individualize dosing by examining genetic factors underlying the metabolism of medications such as thiopurines. Pharmacogenetic testing can identify individuals who may be at risk for thiopurine dose-dependent adverse reactions including myelosuppression. We aimed to evaluate PGx variation in genes supported by clinical guidelines that inform dosing of thiopurines and characterize differences in the distribution of actionable PGx variation among diverse ancestral groups.

METHODS

Pharmacogenetic variation in TPMT and NUDT15 was captured by genome-wide genotyping of 1083 pediatric IBD patients from a diverse Canadian cohort. Genetic ancestry was inferred using principal component analysis. The proportion of PGx variation and associated metabolizer status phenotypes was compared across 5 genetic ancestral groups within the cohort (Admixed American, African, East Asian, European, and South Asian) and to prior global estimates from corresponding populations.

RESULTS

Collectively, 11% of the cohort was categorized as intermediate or poor metabolizers of thiopurines, which would warrant a significant dose reduction or selection of alternate therapy. Clinically actionable variation in TPMT was more prevalent in participants of European and Admixed American/Latino ancestry (8.7% and 7.5%, respectively), whereas variation in NUDT15 was more prevalent in participants of East Asian and Admixed American/Latino ancestry (16% and 15% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the considerable interpopulation variability in PGx variation underlying thiopurine metabolism, which should be factored into testing diverse patient populations.

Preemptive TPMT Genotyping and Adherence to Genotype-Based Therapeutic Recommendations Reduces the Healthcare Cost in Patients Receiving Azathioprine or 6-Mercaptopurine for Autoimmune Diseases

A cost analysis of thiopurine treatment was carried out in 257 patients, with 153 preemptively genotyped for TPMT and 104 retrospectively genotyped in a Spanish setting. The healthcare cost was significantly higher in patients retrospectively genotyped compared to those who were preemptively genotyped (p < 0.001). TPMT intermediate metabolizers (IMs) (n = 23) showed a 3.3-fold higher healthcare cost when compared to normal metabolizers (NMs) (p < 0.001). The healthcare cost in patients with a TPMT IM phenotype whose physician adhered to the genotype-informed recommendation was similar than the cost in TPMT NMs and was significantly lower than IMs whose physician did not adhere to the therapeutic recommendation (3.8-fold, p = 0.016). Myelotoxicity occurrence was significantly lower in patients preemptively vs. retrospectively genotyped (2.0% and 21.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients who developed myelotoxicity showed a significantly higher healthcare cost than those who did not (4.10-fold, p < 0.001). Overall, 87% of patients whose dose was not adjusted despite being TPMT IMs suffered myelotoxicity, while only one of the eight patients (13%) whose dose was adjusted suffered myelotoxicity (p < 0.001). In conclusion, TPMT preemptive genotyping and physician adherence to genotype-informed therapeutic recommendations prevents myelotoxicity and significantly reduces the healthcare cost, and it is therefore essential for the sustainability of the Spanish healthcare system.

Safety and efficacy of personalized versus standard initial dosing of thiopurines: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Pretherapy assessment of specific genetic polymorphism (TPMT, NUDT15, FTO, RUNX1, etc) or enzyme levels (for TPMT) may help personalize the dose of thiopurines and avoid adverse effects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing personalized versus standard strategy for initial thiopurine dosing was performed. The electronic databases were searched on 27 September 2022. The outcomes were overall adverse effects, myelotoxicity, drug interruptions, and therapeutic efficacy with either strategy. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

We included six randomized trials, done dominantly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The personalized strategies were genotype testing in 4 trials (TPMT in three trials, NUDT15 in two) and enzyme levels for TPMT in two trials. The pooled risk of myelotoxicity in personalized dosing was lower [RR = 0.72 (95%CI, 0.55-0.94, I2 = 0%)]. The pooled risk of pancreatitis (RR = 1.10I, 0.78-1.56, I2 = 0%), hepatotoxicity (RR = 1.13, 0.69-1.88, I2 = 45), and GI intolerance (RR = 1.01, 0.92-1.10, I2 = 0) were similar in two groups. The pooled risk of drug interruption in individualized dosing was similar to the standard dosing group (RR = 0.97, I2 = 68%).

CONCLUSION

Personalized testing-based initial thiopurine dosing is protective against myelotoxicity as compared to standard weight-based dosing.

Feasibility of Reduced Clinical Monitoring in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Thiopurine Therapy

BACKGROUND

Outpatient visits and laboratory assessments are routinely scheduled every 3 to 4 months in thiopurine-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to timely detect thiopurine-related adverse events (AEs). AEs that require therapy adjustment beyond 12 months of treatment are rare.

AIM AND METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort study evaluated the safety of a reduced 6-monthly monitoring strategy in steroid-free patients with quiescent IBD on stable dose of azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or thioguanine monotherapy. The primary outcome was thiopurine-related AEs requiring therapy adjustments during a follow-up period of 24 months. Secondary outcomes included all AEs including laboratory toxicity, disease flares until 12 months, and the net monetary benefit from this strategy concerning IBD-related health care use.

RESULTS

We enrolled 85 patients with IBD (median age 42 years, 61% Crohn's disease, 62% female), with a median disease duration of 12.5 years and median thiopurine treatment duration of 6.7 years. During follow-up, 3 patients (4%) ceased thiopurines due to AEs: recurrent infections, non-melanoma skin cancer, and gastrointestinal complaints (nausea, vomiting). At 12 months, 25 laboratory toxicities were observed (including 13% myelotoxicity, 17% hepatotoxicity); none required therapy adjustments and all were transient. A reduced monitoring strategy had a net benefit of €136 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Three patients (4%) ceased thiopurine therapy due to thiopurine-related AEs, while no laboratory toxicity required therapy adjustments. Monitoring frequency of every 6 months seems feasible in patients with stable IBD on long-term (median duration > 6 years) maintenance thiopurine therapy and may contribute to reduced patient-burden and health care costs.

Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review

The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence on cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx)-guided treatment for drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. A systematic review was conducted using multiple biomedical literature databases from inception to June 2021. Full articles comparing PGx-guided with nonguided treatment were included for data extraction. Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) was used to assess robustness of each study (0-100). Data are reported using descriptive statistics. Of 108 studies evaluating 39 drugs, 77 (71%) showed PGx testing was cost-effective (CE) (N = 48) or cost-saving (CS) (N = 29); 21 (20%) were not CE; 10 (9%) were uncertain. Clopidogrel had the most articles (N = 23), of which 22 demonstrated CE or CS, followed by warfarin (N = 16), of which 7 demonstrated CE or CS. Of 26 studies evaluating human leukocyte antigen (HLA) testing for abacavir (N = 8), allopurinol (N = 10), or carbamazepine/phenytoin (N = 8), 15 demonstrated CE or CS. Nine of 11 antidepressant articles demonstrated CE or CS. The median QHES score reflected high-quality studies (91; range 48-100). Most studies evaluating cost-effectiveness favored PGx testing. Limited data exist on cost-effectiveness of preemptive and multigene testing across disease states.

The Thiopurine Tale: An Unexpected Journey

Exactly 70 years ago [1951] mercaptopurine was discovered by Gertrude Elion as a novel treatment option for acute leukaemia. A total of three thiopurines (also thioguanine [1950] and azathioprine [1957]) were developed over time. These immunosuppressive drugs were also successfully introduced a few decades later to prevent rejection of transplanted organs and to treat several autoimmune diseases. For her discovery of thiopurines and other antimetabolite drugs, in 1988 Elion was rewarded, together with George Hitchings and James Black, with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Important steps have been made in recent years to unravel its metabolism, mode of action and pharmacogenetics. Today thiopurine [based] therapy remains an essential immunosuppressive approach in treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomics-Guided Prescribing to Prevent Gene-Drug-Related Deaths: A Decision-Analytic Model

Aim: Prospective studies support the clinical impact of pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided prescribing to reduce severe and potentially fatal adverse effects. Drug-gene interactions (DGIs) preventing potential drug-related deaths have been categorized as “essential” by the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG). The collective clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of this sub-set is yet undetermined. Therefore, we aim to assess impact and cost-effectiveness of “essential” PGx tests for prevention of gene-drug-related deaths, when adopted nation-wide.

Methods: We used a decision-analytic model to quantify the number and cost per gene-drug-related death prevented, from a 1-year Dutch healthcare perspective. The modelled intervention is a single gene PGx-test for CYP2C19, DPYD, TPMT or UGT1A1 to guide prescribing based on the DPWG recommendations among patients in the Netherlands initiating interacting drugs (clopidogrel, capecitabine, systemic fluorouracil, azathioprine, mercaptopurine, tioguanine or irinotecan).

Results: For 148,128 patients initiating one of seven drugs in a given year, costs for PGx-testing, interpretation, and drugs would increase by €21.4 million. Of these drug initiators, 35,762 (24.1%) would require an alternative dose or drug. PGx-guided prescribing would relatively reduce gene-drug related mortality by 10.6% (range per DGI: 8.1–14.5%) and prevent 419 (0.3% of initiators) deaths a year. Cost-effectiveness is estimated at €51,000 per prevented gene-drug-related death (range per DGI: €-752,000–€633,000).

Conclusion: Adoption of PGx-guided prescribing for “essential” DGIs potentially saves the lives of 0.3% of drug initiators, at reasonable costs.

Current status and future perspectives on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite new treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), conventional thiopurines remain a common treatment option for maintaining remission, particularly in non-Westernized countries. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised in standard care for optimizing therapy strategies to improve effectiveness, reveal nonadherence and reduce toxicity. Still, the rationale of TDM is debated.

AREAS COVERED

Key insights on TDM of thiopurine metabolites are discussed. The pharmacology of thiopurines is described, emphasizing the interindividual differences in pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacological differences between conventional thiopurines and tioguanine are outlined. Finally, several optimization strategies for thiopurine therapy in IBD are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM has been a useful, but limited, tool to individualize thiopurine therapy. Pharmacokinetic data on the active thiopurine metabolites, derived from measurements in erythrocytes, associated with clinical response only partially predict effectiveness and toxicity. An additional pharmacodynamic marker, such as Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in leukocytes, may improve applicability of TDM in the future.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype screening and therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine therapy: a Chinese healthcare perspective using real-world data

Background

This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of combining screening for thiopurine methyl transferase (TPMT) and nucleotide triphosphate diphosphatase (NUDT15) defective alleles with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in Chinese patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with azathioprine (AZA).

Methods

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of combining screening for NUDT15 and TPMT deficiency with TDM in patients receiving AZA treatment over a 1-year horizon by developing a decision tree model. Real-world data and published literature were used to derive model inputs. The model’s primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to address uncertainty.

Results

Compared to NUDT15 genotyping, the combined TPMT/NUDT15 genotyping strategy cost an additional $13.83, yielding an ICER of $3,929.54/QALY, which was under the willingness-to-pay level of $30,425 per QALY in China. Compared to strategies with singular TPMT genotyping or no genotyping, the combined TPMT/NUDT15 genotyping strategy gained 0.00406 and 0.00782 QALYs and reduced the cost by $25.15 and $99.06, respectively. Additionally, incorporating TDM of AZA was more effective and less expensive than strategies without TDM. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed the expense attached to severe myelotoxicity to be the factor with the greatest influence in the present research. The application of the combined genotype screening strategy with TDM of AZA treatment was found to have a 91.7% chance of being cost-effective.

Conclusions

For Chinese patients with IBD who receive an AZA regimen, a strategy involving combined NUDT15/TPMT genotype screening prior to treatment initiation and incorporating TDM for treatment management is cost-effective compared to strategies involving genotyping of NUDT15 or TPMT alone or genotyping without TDM.

Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. How to Optimize Thiopurines in the Biologic Era?

Thiopurines have been a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although they have been used for more than 50 years, there are still some unsolved issues about their efficacy and, also, some safety concerns, mainly the risk of myelosuppression and life-threatening lymphoproliferative disorders. Furthermore, the development of biological therapy raises the question whether there is still a role for thiopurines in the IBD treatment algorithm. On the other hand, limited cost and wide availability make thiopurines a reasonable option in settings of limited resources and increasing prevalence of IBD. In fact, there is a growing interest in optimizing thiopurine therapy, since pharmacogenomic findings suggest that a personalized approach based on the genotyping of some molecules involved in its metabolism could be useful to prevent side effects. Polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme (TPMT) that result in low enzymatic activity have been associated with an increased risk of myelotoxicity, especially in Caucasians; however, in Asians it is assumed that the variants of nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) are more relevant in the development of toxicity. Age is also important, since in elderly patients the risk of complications seems to be increased. Moreover, the primo-infection of Epstein Barr virus and cytomegalovirus under thiopurine treatment has been associated with severe lymphoproliferative disorders. In addition to assessing individual characteristics that may influence thiopurines treatment outcomes, this review also discusses other strategies to optimize the therapy. Low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol can be used in hypermethylators and in thiopurine-related hepatotoxicity. The measurement of metabolites could be useful to assess compliance, identify patients at risk of adverse events and also facilitating the management of refractory patients. Thioguanine is also a rescue therapy in patients with toxicity related to conventional thiopurine therapy. Finally, the current indications for thiopurines in monotherapy or in combination with biologics, as well as the optimal duration of treatment, are also reviewed.

Personalized Medicine of Monoclonal Antibodies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pharmacogenetics, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, and Beyond

The pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) has experienced significant progress with the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mABs). As therapeutic proteins, mABs display peculiar pharmacokinetic characteristics that differentiate them from chemical drugs, such as aminosalicylates, antimetabolites (i.e., azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate), and immunosuppressants (corticosteroids and cyclosporine). However, clinical trials have demonstrated that biologic agents may suffer from a pharmacokinetic variability that could influence the desired clinical outcome, beyond primary resistance phenomena. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) protocols have been elaborated and applied to adaptation drug doses according to the desired plasma concentrations of mABs. This activity is aimed at maximizing the beneficial effects of mABs while sparing patients from toxicities. However, some aspects of TDM are still under discussion, including time-changing therapeutic ranges, proactive and reactive approaches, the performance and availability of instrumental platforms, the widely varying individual characteristics of patients, the severity of the disease, and the coadministration of immunomodulatory drugs. Facing these issues, personalized medicine in IBD may benefit from a combined approach, made by TDM protocols and pharmacogenetic analyses in a timeline that necessarily considers the frailty of patients, the chronic administration of drugs, and the possible worsening of the disease. Therefore, the present review presents and discusses the activities of TDM protocols using mABs in light of the most recent results, with special attention on the integration of other actions aimed at exploiting the most effective and safe therapeutic effects of drugs prescribed in IBD patients.

Pharmacogenetics of inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) show large variability in disease course, and also treatment response. The variability in treatment response has led to many initiatives in search of genetic markers to optimize treatment and avoid severe side effects. This has been very successful for thiopurines, one of the drugs used to induce and maintain remission in IBD. However, for the newer treatment options for IBD, like biologicals, the search for genetic predictors has not yielded any candidate biomarkers with clinical utility. In this review, a summary of recent advances in pharmacogenetics focusing on thiopurines and anti-TNF agents is given.

Clinical Application and Educational Training for Pharmacogenomics

Pharmacogenomics—defined as the study of how genes affect a person’s response to drugs—is growing in importance for clinical care. Many medications have evidence and drug labeling related to pharmacogenomics and patient care. New evidence supports the use of pharmacogenomics in clinical settings, and genetic testing may optimize medication selection and dosing. Despite these advantages, the integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical decisions remains variable and challenging in certain practice settings. To ensure consistent application across settings, sufficient education amongst current and future healthcare providers is necessary to further integrate pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice. This review highlights current evidence supporting clinical application of medications with pharmacogenomic labeling. The secondary objective is to review current strategies for educating health professionals and student trainees. One national organization predicts that most regions in the United States will soon contain at least one healthcare system capable of applying pharmacogenomic information. Applying genotype-guided dosing to several FDA-approved medications may help produce beneficial changes in patient outcomes. Identifying best practices for educating health care professionals and trainees remains vitally important for continuing growth of pharmacogenomic services. As pharmacogenomics continues to expand into more areas of healthcare, current and future practitioners must pursue and maintain competence in pharmacogenomics to ensure better outcomes for patients.

Safety of Thiopurine Use in Paediatric Gastrointestinal Disease

Thiopurines, alone or in combination with other agents, have a pivotal role in the treatment of specific gastrointestinal and hepatological disorders. In inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune hepatitis thiopurines have proven their value as steroid sparing agents for the maintenance of remission and may be considered for preventing postoperative Crohn disease recurrence where there is moderate risk of this occurring. Their use with infliximab therapy reduces antibody formation and increases biologic drug levels. The routine clinical use of thiopurines has, however, been questioned due to a number of potential adverse effects. The aim of this article is to provide information regarding the use, and in particular, safety of these agents in clinical practice in the light of such potentially severe, albeit rare, effects.

Thiopurine S-methyltransferase genetic polymorphisms in adult patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Latvian population

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) plays a significant role in the metabolism of thiopurines, and, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is useful to perform TPMT genotyping prior to azathioprine (AZA) treatment. In this study, we determined TPMT gene polymorphisms in a cohort of IBD patients in Latvia.

METHODS

DNA samples were obtained from 244 IBD patients, and qPCR was performed for detection of rs1800462, rs1800460, and rs1142345 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Three common, non-functional TPMT alleles (TPMT*2, *3B, and *3C) were identified (women, 51%; men, 49%). TPMT*2, *3A, *3B, and *3C allelic variants detected using qPCR were consistent with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) data.

RESULTS

Among patients, 78% had ulcerative colitis and 22% had Crohn's disease, with 93.9% of the former carrying a wild-type homozygous TPMT*1/*1 genotype and 6.1% carrying heterozygous genotypes. The most frequent polymorphisms were TPMT*1/*3A (5.3%: two variants: TPMT*3B and TPMT*3C), TPMT*1/*3C (0.4%), and TPMT*1/*2 (0.4%). None of the patients carried a TPMT*3B polymorphism and no patients were homozygous for any mutation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to identify TPMT gene polymorphisms in adult IBD patients in Latvia. The results indicate that the frequency of common TPMT alleles is similar to that of other European populations.

Severe pancytopenia and aspergillosis caused by thioguanine in a thiopurine S-methyltransferase deficient patient: a case report

Azathioprine and mercaptopurine are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, its use is limited by adverse drug event related to the relatively narrow therapeutic index of the active metabolites. Several patients discontinue treatment because of intolerable adverse events or toxicity such as leucopenia and hepatotoxicity. High 6-thioguanine nucleotides and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels are associated with toxicity. Variations in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene can lead to diminished TPMT enzyme activity and to an increased incidence of myelotoxicity due to high 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels after treatment with azathioprine and mercaptopurine. Unlike azathioprine and mercaptopurine, thioguanine is more directly metabolized to the active metabolites without formation of the toxic 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides. Taking this into account, it seems likely that thioguanine is less associated with myelotoxicity due to TPMT deficiency. However, we report the case of a Crohn's disease patient with life-threatening complications on 6TG treatment due to TPMT deficiency. Our patient developed a severe pancytopenia on thioguanine therapy, with 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels more than 10 times higher than the upper limit of the therapeutic window and was found to be a TPMT poor metabolizer (TPMT *3A/*3A). This case strongly illustrates that knowledge of TPMT enzyme activity is very important in the use of all thiopurines, including thioguanine. In conclusion, clinicians should be aware of the impact of TPMT deficiency on the metabolism of thioguanine and should consider performing preemptive TPMT genotyping in combination with frequent blood test monitoring when using thiopurines in general.