1
|
Weinstein CLJ, Meehan AG, Govoni M, Lin J, Reinisch W. Low Occurrence of Colectomy With Long-Term (up to 4 Years) Golimumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis: Data From the PURSUIT Maintenance and Long-Term Extension Studies. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2023; 5:otad044. [PMID: 37691729 PMCID: PMC10492447 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otad044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This analysis evaluated the incidence of all-cause colectomies (total or partial) among patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) in the golimumab (GLM) Program of Ulcerative Colitis Utilizing an Investigational Treatment (PURSUIT)-maintenance (-M) and long-term extension (-LTE) studies. Methods Eligible PURSUIT-M trial participants completed a 6-week GLM induction trial without requiring colectomy. Responders to GLM induction were randomized 1:1:1 to GLM 50 mg, GLM 100 mg, or placebo (PBO) maintenance for up to 1 year, administered every 4 weeks (q4w). Nonresponders to GLM or PBO induction received GLM 100 mg; responders to PBO induction received PBO (each administered q4w for up to 1 year). Participants who completed PURSUIT-M were eligible to continue their treatment in the 3-year PURSUIT-LTE study. Results A total of 60 (4.9%) colectomies were reported among the 1228 patients who enrolled in the 1-year PURSUIT-M study, which included 672 participants who continued into the 3-year PURSUIT-LTE LTE study (of which 666 were treated). The colectomy rate during the 3-year extension was lower than that observed during the maintenance phase of the study (9/666 [1.4%] compared to 51/1228 [4.2%]). The majority (43/60 [71.7%]) of the reported colectomies occurred in patients who had not responded to induction therapy and who tended to have had more severe disease characteristics at baseline. Conclusions This retrospective evaluation of colectomy data from the PURSUIT-M and -LTE studies in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC demonstrated a low (<5%) occurrence of colectomy with long-term (up to 4 years) GLM treatment. PURSUIT-M (NCT00488631; EudraCT, 2006-003399-37).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Walter Reinisch
- Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin III, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanzel J, Drobne D. Editorial: golimumab dosing intensification effective in ulcerative colitis with no need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:1469-1470. [PMID: 37243472 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jurij Hanzel
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - David Drobne
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fumery M, Nancey S, Filippi J, Altwegg R, Hébuterne X, Boshetti G, Barraud M, Meynier J, Paul S, Roblin X. Effectiveness of golimumab intensification in ulcerative colitis: A multicentric prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:1290-1298. [PMID: 36849714 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Loss of response to golimumab occurs in nearly 40% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Unlike others anti-TNF, no study has reported a correlation between serum golimumab level and response to drug intensification. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of golimumab intensification and to identify the best threshold of serum golimumab before drug intensification predictive of response. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included all consecutive patients with active UC with loss of response to golimumab in a prospective multicentric cohort study. Patients with loss of response at 50 mg q4 weeks (W) and 100 mg q4W underwent therapeutic intensification at 100 mg q4W and 100 mg q2W, respectively. Effectiveness and safety were assessed between Weeks 2 and 4 (visit 2) and between Weeks 4 and 8 (visit 3) after intensification. Serum level and anti-golimumab antibodies were evaluated at each medical visit (Lisa Tracker, Theradiag France). RESULTS A total of 47 UC patients (Female, 50%; median age, 39 years (IQR, 27-52)) treated with golimumab for a median of 20.4 weeks (IQR, 10.7-38.3) were included. The median partial Mayo score was 6 (IQR, 5-7), and the median endoscopic Mayo score was 3 (IQR, 2-3). The median golimumab serum level before intensification was 2.23 μg/mL (IQR, 1.02-3.96) and only one patient (2.1%) had anti-drug antibodies. At Visit 2 (Week 2-4), 40% patients experienced clinical response, 10% clinical remission, 33% endoscopic response and 23% endoscopic remission. At Visit 3 (Week 4-8), 44% of patients had clinical response, 22% of patients had clinical remission, 45% of patients had endoscopic response, and 41% of patients had endoscopic remission. The median golimumab levels before intensification do not differ between responders and non-responders (2.13 μg/ml (0.76-2.76) and 3.37 μg/ml (IQR, 1.08-4.67), respectively; p = 0.14) assessed at Visit 3. Golimumab intensification to 100 mg q4W (vs q2W) (OR 1.98, 95% CI [1.06-3.70]; p = 0.032) was significantly associated with clinical remission at Visit 3. Serum drug level at baseline or the presence of antidrug antibodies were not associated with clinical or endoscopic remission/response. Two serious adverse events (one infection and one UC flare) were reported during the 24-week follow-up. CONCLUSION In this prospective multicentric study, half of patients recaptured response following golimumab intensification in UC. Therapeutic drug monitoring did not predict response after optimisation of golimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathurin Fumery
- Gastroenterology Department, Amiens University Hospital, Peritox, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Stéphane Nancey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and 2 INSERM U1111, CIRI, Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Filippi
- Gastroenterology Department, Polyclinique Saint Jean, Cagnes sur Mer, France
| | - Romain Altwegg
- Montpellier University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Montpellier, France
| | - Xavier Hébuterne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Gilles Boshetti
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and 2 INSERM U1111, CIRI, Lyon, France
| | - Mathilde Barraud
- St Etienne University Hospital, Gastroenterology, St Etienne, France
| | - Jonathan Meynier
- Biostatistics Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Stéphane Paul
- St Etienne University Hospital, Immunology, St Etienne, France
| | - Xavier Roblin
- St Etienne University Hospital, Gastroenterology, St Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mantzaris GJ, Papamichael K. Editorial: golimumab thresholds to achieve stringent medium- and long-term therapeutic outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:735-736. [PMID: 35879902 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Konstantinos Papamichael
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pugliese D, Privitera G, Rogai F, Variola A, Viola A, Laterza L, Privitera AC, Allocca M, Bossa F, Cappello M, Daperno M, Lorenzon G, Mazzuoli S, Principi M, Sablich R, Moser L, Ferronato A, Traini S, Tapete G, Bodini G, Di Girolamo M, Grossi L, Mocci G, Ricci C, Saibeni S, Festa S, Spagnuolo R, Cortelezzi CC, Mocciaro F, Rizzello F, Armuzzi A. Two-year effectiveness and safety of golimumab in ulcerative colitis: An IG-IBD study. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:102-109. [PMID: 33203342 PMCID: PMC8259241 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620974308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few data exist regarding the long‐term effectiveness of golimumab in ulcerative colitis. No data have been reported on real‐world continuous clinical response. Objective This study aimed to describe the long‐term outcomes in a large cohort of patients on golimumab who had ulcerative colitis. Methods Consecutive patients with active ulcerative colitis, started on golimumab, were enrolled and prospectively followed up. The primary end point was to evaluate the long‐term persistence on golimumab therapy. Results A total of 173 patients with ulcerative colitis were studied. Of these, 79.2% were steroid dependent, and 46.3% were naïve to anti‐tumour necrosis factor alpha agents. The median duration of golimumab therapy was 52 weeks (range: 4–142 weeks). The cumulative probability of maintaining golimumab treatment was 47.3% and 22.5% at 54 and 108 weeks, respectively. Biological‐naïve status (odds ratio [OR] = 3.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44–6.29; p = 0.003) and being able to discontinue steroids at Week 8 (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.34–8.30; p = 0.010) and Week 14 (OR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.08–8.02; p = 0.036) were associated with longer persistence on therapy. At Week 54, 65/124 (52.4%) postinduction responders were in continuous clinical response. A continuous clinical response was associated with a lower likelihood of golimumab discontinuation throughout the subsequent year of therapy (p < 0.01). Overall, 40 (23.1%) patients were in clinical remission at the last follow‐up visit. Twenty‐six adverse events were recorded, leading to golimumab withdrawal in 9.2% of patients. Conclusions : Biological‐naïve status and not requiring steroids at Weeks 8 and 14 seem to be associated with a longer persistence on golimumab therapy in ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Pugliese
- CEMAD - IBD Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Privitera
- Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Rogai
- Gastroenterology Department, IBD Referral Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Anna Viola
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Laterza
- CEMAD - IBD Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Fabrizio Bossa
- Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Maria Cappello
- AO Ordine Mauriziano, SC Gastroenterologia, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Daperno
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo School of Medicine, Palermo, Italy
| | - Greta Lorenzon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Section, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Silvia Mazzuoli
- Gastroenterology and Artificial Nutrition Department, 'San Nicola Pellegrino' Hospital, Trani, Italy
| | - Mariabeatrice Principi
- Emergency and Organ Transplantation Department, Section of Gastroenterology, AOU Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Renato Sablich
- Gastroenterology Unit, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Luisa Moser
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sara Traini
- UOC Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Ospedale Civile A, Murri, Italy
| | - Gherardo Tapete
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Di Girolamo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Laurino Grossi
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | - Giammarco Mocci
- Division of Gastroenterology, 'Brotzu' Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Chiara Ricci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Simone Saibeni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate, Milanese, Italy
| | | | - Rocco Spagnuolo
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Mocciaro
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, A.R.N.A.S Civico-Di Cristina- Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Fernando Rizzello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- CEMAD - IBD Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stefanovic S, Detrez I, Compernolle G, Brouwers E, Sever N, Stabuc B, Smrekar N, Kurent T, Novak G, Kozelj M, Ferrante M, Gils A, Drobne D. Endoscopic remission can be predicted by golimumab concentrations in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with the changed label. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:54-61. [PMID: 32804854 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2018, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) replaced a fixed 50 mg every 4-week maintenance regimen of golimumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients weighing <80 kg with new, flexible dosing that allows reactive dose optimization to 100 mg if clinically needed. We analyzed the endoscopic remission rates and pharmacokinetics of this new dosing regimen in real-life settings. METHODS We prospectively recruited 30 consecutive (17 with body weight <80 kg) patients with UC who received golimumab with the new EMA label. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission (Mayo ≤1) assessed by centrally-read endoscopy at week 14 and year 1. Golimumab concentrations, measured at nine prespecified timepoints, were correlated with endoscopic remission and identified cut-offs. RESULTS Endoscopic remission was achieved in 15/30 (50%) and 10/30 (33%) patients at week 14 and year 1, respectively. Reactive dose optimization to 100 mg maintenance was needed in 13/17 (76%) patients. Golimumab concentrations at week 6 predicted week 14 and year 1 endoscopic remission. Week 6 concentrations >10.7 µg/ml were a strong predictor for achievement and maintenance of endoscopic remission during the first year of treatment, while concentrations <5.1 µg/ml identified the opposite. CONCLUSION One-third of the patients reached and maintained endoscopic remission during the first year of golimumab treatment, but the need for dose optimization to 100 mg every 4 weeks of maintenance was high in patients weighing <80 kg. Golimumab concentrations <5.1 µg/ml at week 6 identified patients who are unlikely to reach and maintain endoscopic remission with the new, flexible EMA label.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Stefanovic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Iris Detrez
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Griet Compernolle
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Brouwers
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nejc Sever
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Borut Stabuc
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Natasa Smrekar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina Kurent
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gregor Novak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Matic Kozelj
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Gils
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Drobne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iborra M, García-Morales N, Rubio S, Bertoletti F, Calvo M, Taxonera C, Boscá-Watts MM, Sierra M, Mancenido N, Beltrán B, Nantes Castillejo Ó, García-Planella E, Vera I, Alba C, Martí-Aguado D, Ballester MP, Cano-Sanz N, Pajares-Villarroya R, Cerrillo E, Cañada A, Nos P. Real-life experience with 4 years of golimumab persistence in ulcerative colitis patients. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17774. [PMID: 33082359 PMCID: PMC7576126 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73577-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Golimumab has demonstrated its long-term efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis in clinical trials, but no data of long-term persistence has been published from real world. To estimate long-term persistence of golimumab, as well as factors associated with longer persistence, in patients with ulcerative colitis in real life. Observational multicentre study including adult patients with ulcerative colitis treated with golimumab and with at least twelve months of follow-up. We included 190 patients, 105 (55.26%) naive to anti-TNF, with mean disease duration of 9.32 ± 8.09 years. Probability of persistence was 63%, 46%, 39% and 27% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Persistence was lower in patients with primary failure to previous anti-TNF. Eighty-two (43.16%) patients needed dose intensification during follow-up, with a mean time until intensification of 8.03 ± 8.64 months. Dose intensification and lower disease duration predicted higher persistence with golimumab (p = 0.037 and p = 0.008, respectively). During a follow-up of 17.25 ± 15.83 months, 32 (16.5%) patients needed hospitalisation and 11 (6%) underwent colectomy. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Golimumab has demonstrated good persistence and safety profile for long treatment in ulcerative colitis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Iborra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain. .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Natalia García-Morales
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain
| | - Saoia Rubio
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Federico Bertoletti
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Calvo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Taxonera
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mónica Sierra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain
| | - Noemí Mancenido
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Belén Beltrán
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Isabel Vera
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Alba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Martí-Aguado
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Noelia Cano-Sanz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain
| | - Ramón Pajares-Villarroya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Cerrillo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Cañada
- Deparment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pilar Nos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Samaan MA, Cunningham G, Tamilarasan AG, Beltran L, Pavlidis P, Ray S, Mawdsley J, Anderson SH, Sanderson JD, Arkir Z, Irving PM. Therapeutic thresholds for golimumab serum concentrations during induction and maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis: results from the GO-LEVEL study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:292-302. [PMID: 32506695 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant associations between serum golimumab concentrations and favourable outcomes have been observed during both induction and maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, data regarding optimal therapeutic serum golimumab concentration thresholds are limited. AIMS To identify optimal serum golimumab concentration thresholds during induction and maintenance treatment with golimumab. METHODS GO-LEVEL was an open label, phase IV study that included a prospective cohort of UC patients commencing golimumab, as well as a cross-sectional cohort receiving maintenance treatment. Patients commencing induction for active UC (defined as a simple clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] >5 in addition to a raised faecal calprotectin [FC] >59μg/g or, raised C-reactive protein [CRP] [>5mg/L] or, Mayo endoscopic disease activity 2 or 3) were evaluated at weeks 6, 10 and 14. Patients receiving maintenance therapy were recruited either at the point of flare or during remission. Combined clinical-biochemical remission was defined as SCCAI ≤2 and FC <250μg/g. Serum golimumab concentrations were measured using a commercially available ELISA (LISATRACKER, Theradiag). RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were included in the induction cohort, of whom 15 (38%) achieved combined clinical-biochemical remission at week 6. The median serum golimumab concentration of those in combined clinical-biochemical remission was significantly higher than those who were not (5.0 vs 3.1 μg/mL, respectively, P = 0.03). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated 3.8 μg/mL as the optimal threshold (sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.65, area under curve [AUC] 0.72, positive predictive value [PPV] 0.59 and negative predictive value [NPV] 0.79). Sixty-three patients were included in the maintenance cohort; 31 (49%) were in combined remission, 32 (51%) were not. The median serum golimumab concentration of those in combined remission was significantly higher (2.9 vs 2.1 μg/mL, respectively, P = 0.01). ROC curve analysis demonstrated 2.4 μg/mL as the optimal threshold (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.66, AUC 0.68, PPV 0.65 and NPV 0.66). CONCLUSIONS GO-LEVEL (NCT03124121) offers further evidence regarding golimumab's exposure-response relationship. Clinicians may consider using therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise golimumab dosing aiming to achieve our suggested therapeutic thresholds of 3.8 μg/mL at week 6 and 2.4 μg/mL during maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Samaan
- Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Luisa Beltran
- Viapath Laboratories, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Polychronis Pavlidis
- Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shuvra Ray
- Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joel Mawdsley
- Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Zehra Arkir
- Viapath Laboratories, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Gastroenterology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bento-Miranda M, Perdigoto DN, Mendes S, Portela F. Sweet's Syndrome as Manifestation of Active Ulcerative Colitis. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2019; 27:138-140. [PMID: 32266314 DOI: 10.1159/000501399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Bento-Miranda
- Serviço de Gastrenterologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - David N Perdigoto
- Serviço de Gastrenterologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sofia Mendes
- Serviço de Gastrenterologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Francisco Portela
- Serviço de Gastrenterologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|