1
|
Drummond FA, Averill AL, Eitzer BD. Pesticide Contamination in Native North American Crops, Part II-Comparison of Flower, Honey Bee Workers, and Native Bee Residues in Lowbush Blueberry. INSECTS 2024; 15:567. [PMID: 39194772 DOI: 10.3390/insects15080567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
In lowbush blueberry fields, we conducted residue analysis comparing flowers, trapped pollen (honey bee and Osmia spp.), and collected bees (honey bee workers, bumble bee queens, and non-Bombus spp. wild native bees). The study was conducted from 2012 to 2014. The number of pesticide residues, total concentrations, and risk to honey bees (Risk Quotient) on flowers were not significantly different from those determined for trapped honey bee pollen (except in one study year when residues detected in flower samples were significantly lower than residue numbers detected in trapped pollen). The compositions of residues were similar on flowers and trapped pollen. The number of residues detected in honey bee pollen was significantly greater than the number detected in Osmia spp. pollen, while the total concentration of residue was not different between the two types of pollen. The risk to honey bees was higher in trapped honey bee pollen than in trapped Osmia spp. pollen. The analysis of honey bee workers, native bumble bee queens, and native solitary bees showed that although more pesticide residues were detected on honey bee workers, there were no differences among the bee taxa in total residue concentrations or risk (as estimated in terms of risk to honey bees).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis A Drummond
- School of Biology and Ecology, and Cooperative Extension, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
| | - Anne L Averill
- Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
| | - Brian D Eitzer
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT 06504, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kemmerling LR, Rutkoski CE, Evans SE, Helms JA, Cordova-Ortiz ES, Smith JD, Vázquez Custodio JA, Vizza C, Haddad NM. Prairie Strips and Lower Land Use Intensity Increase Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.833170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Agricultural landscapes can be managed to protect biodiversity and maintain ecosystem services. One approach to achieve this is to restore native perennial vegetation within croplands. Where rowcrops have displaced prairie, as in the US Midwest, restoration of native perennial vegetation can align with crops in so called “prairie strips.” We tested the effect of prairie strips in addition to other management practices on a variety of taxa and on a suite of ecosystem services. To do so, we worked within a 33-year-old experiment that included treatments that varied methods of agricultural management across a gradient of land use intensity. In the two lowest intensity crop management treatments, we introduced prairie strips that occupied 5% of crop area. We addressed three questions: (1) What are the effects of newly established prairie strips on the spillover of biodiversity and ecosystem services into cropland? (2) How does time since prairie strip establishment affect biodiversity and ecosystem services? (3) What are the tradeoffs and synergies among biodiversity conservation, non-provisioning ecosystem services, and provisioning ecosystem services (crop yield) across a land use intensity gradient (which includes prairie strips)? Within prairie strip treatments, where sampling effort occurred within and at increasing distance from strips, dung beetle abundance, spider abundance and richness, active carbon, decomposition, and pollination decreased with distance from prairie strips, and this effect increased between the first and second year. Across the entire land use intensity gradient, treatments with prairie strips and reduced chemical inputs had higher butterfly abundance, spider abundance, and pollination services. In addition, soil organic carbon, butterfly richness, and spider richness increased with a decrease in land use intensity. Crop yield in one treatment with prairie strips was equal to that of the highest intensity management, even while including the area taken out of production. We found no effects of strips on ant biodiversity and greenhouse gas emissions (N2O and CH4). Our results show that, even in early establishment, prairie strips and lower land use intensity can contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services without a disproportionate loss of crop yield.
Collapse
|
3
|
Drummond FA, Collins JA, Bushmann SL. Movement of Rhagoletis mendax (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Fruit-Bearing Wild Blueberry Fields. Part II. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2020; 113:1323-1336. [PMID: 32207827 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toaa046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
During dispersal into fruit-bearing wild blueberry fields, blueberry maggot flies were highly active during all daylight hours as revealed by trap captures, although in one trial afternoon activity was greater than morning activity. Flies were not captured in traps at night, although observations in growth chambers showed that their activity at night, measured as displacement of position, was equal to daylight conditions. Flies were shown to fly at low altitude, just above the crop canopy, and screen fencing was shown to be effective at reducing colonization of plots, presumably due to their low height during flight. Over a 4-yr mark-capture study, colonization rate was shown to be low at 9.7 m/d, although a separate 2010 study showed higher rates at 14.1 and 28.0 m/d. Movement was shown to be nondirectional or random in the field, but a constrained random walk exhibiting direction into the field. Weed cover and high fruit density were associated with higher fly relative abundance, suggesting these field characteristics served as attractors slowing colonization rate into a field. Transect trap studies showed the temporal and spatial pattern of fly colonization into commercial wild blueberry fields, one of a slow wave that penetrates into the field interior as the season progresses. There is also an increase in fly abundance within-field edges and adjacent forest. The 'stacking' of flies along a field edge and slow movement rate into a field was shown through simulation to be a result of nondirectional short-distance dispersal of flies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis A Drummond
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Deering, Orono, ME
- Cooperative Extension, University of Maine, Deering, Orono, ME
| | - Judith A Collins
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Deering, Orono, ME
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drummond FA, Collins JA. Temporal Dynamics of the Blueberry Maggot Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and its Primary Parasitoid, Biosteres melleus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in the Maine Wild Blueberry System. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2020; 113:720-730. [PMID: 31813980 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toz326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Between 1998 and 2017, we conducted studies in wild blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton (Ericales: Ericaceae), to elucidate the temporal dynamics of the blueberry maggot fly, Rhagoletis mendax Curran, and its parasitoid, Biosteres melleus (Gahan). A predictive model for the emergence of R. mendax was validated at two sites over 3 yr. A second predictive model for the major parasitoid, B. melleus, of R. mendax was constructed and suggests that the delay in emergence of the parasitoid relative to its host provides a period or 'biological window' of 9 d where insecticide sprays can be applied to manage R. mendax with a limited impact on the parasitoid. A 20-yr study on the parasitoid/host dynamics showed parasitism rates ranging from 0.5 to 28.2%. It appears that R. mendax populations in Maine wild blueberry are characterized by stable equilibrium dynamics, significantly affected by stochastic processes. There was a weak, but significant relationship between B. melleus density and R. mendax intrinsic rates of growth. Our data suggest that R. mendax population dynamics in wild blueberry is characterized by an unstable equilibrium tipping point of 7.9 maggots per liter of blueberries or an average of 10 flies per trap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis A Drummond
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, 5722 Deering, Orono, ME
- Cooperative Extension, University of Maine, 5722 Deering, Orono, ME
| | - Judith A Collins
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, 5722 Deering, Orono, ME
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Drummond FA. Common St. John's Wort (Malpighiales: Hypericaceae): An Invasive Plant in Maine Wild Blueberry Production and Its Potential for Indirectly Supporting Ecosystem Services. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY 2019; 48:1369-1376. [PMID: 31713600 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvz129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Common St. John's wort, Hypericum perforatum L. (Malpighiales: Hypericaceae), is a weed in Maine wild blueberry fields. A survey of its presence and relative density in 55 wild blueberry fields was conducted from 2013 to 2016. The objectives of this study were to determine how widespread it is as a weed in wild blueberry and whether it might indirectly contribute to beneficial ecosystem services for wild blueberry. It was found that St. John's wort occurs in about half (45.5%) of all wild blueberry fields surveyed. The crop cycle (prune vs cropping year) affected its relative abundance, significantly less St. John's wort was found in prune fields. St. John's wort relative abundance in wild blueberry fields was not affected by farming system (conventional vs organic) or landscape surrounding blueberry fields. Geographical distribution modeling was performed using the software Maxent. In Maine, the most likely areas predicted to be infested with St. John's wort were the two major blueberry production regions: Mid-coast and Downeast, Maine. Insects associated with St. John's wort were diverse. This weed appears to be under considerable herbivore pressure, especially hemipterans and Chrysolina spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) beetles that have been released for biological control. Insect predators and parasitoids were abundant and may not only reduce herbivory on St. John's wort but may also provide a valuable ecosystem service in terms of predator spillover, resulting in reduction of wild blueberry insect pests. Bumble bees (Bombus spp., Hymenoptera, Apidae) are the most efficient pollinator of blueberry and were the predominant bee taxa found foraging on the flowers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis A Drummond
- School of Biology and Ecology, and Cooperative Extension, University of Maine, Orono, ME
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Conover D, Dubeux J, Martini X. Phenology, Distribution, and Diversity of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North Florida's Pastures and Forests. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY 2019; 48:847-855. [PMID: 31188428 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvz068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Dung beetles are important to ecosystems as they aid in nutrient recycling and waste removal. In North Florida, there is a high diversity of dung beetles due to the intentional and accidental introduction of non-native species. Understanding patterns and processes on local scales is important for conservational planning. The aim of this study was to evaluate how dung beetle communities respond to different dung sources, forage composition, and habitat types. We surveyed for the presence and distribution of dung beetles in an open field and forest as well as in three types of pasture forage designs. In the first experiment, four transects with pitfall traps from forest to open field were established with either horse, pig, or cow feces bait. In the second experiment, three cattle grazing systems with different forage species were tested with only cow feces. In the first experiment, 16 species were identified between the field and forest sites including native and exotic species. Although the dung type had little effect on beetle distribution, a significantly different distribution of dung beetles between the field and forest was observed. Only one species, Onthophagus hecate Panzer (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) showed no preference between open field and forest habitat. During this second experiment, no difference in dung beetle distribution was found between the three types of pasture assemblages. This study supports habitat type as a driver of interspecies distribution and diversity of dung beetles in North Florida.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick Conover
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL
| | - Jose Dubeux
- Agronomy Department, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
| | - Xavier Martini
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodriguez-Saona C, Vincent C, Isaacs R. Blueberry IPM: Past Successes and Future Challenges. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY 2019; 64:95-114. [PMID: 30629894 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-112147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Blueberry is a crop native to North America with expanding production and consumption worldwide. In the historical regions of production, integrated pest management (IPM) programs have been developed and provided effective control of key insect pests. These have integrated monitoring programs with physical, cultural, biological, behavioral, and chemical controls to meet the intense demands of consumers and modern food systems. Globalization of the blueberry industry has resulted in new pest-crop associations and the introduction of invasive pests into existing and new blueberry-growing areas. Invasive pests-in particular spotted wing drosophila-have been highly disruptive to traditional IPM programs, resulting in increased use of insecticides and the potential to disrupt beneficial insects. Moreover, regulatory agencies have reduced the number of broad-spectrum insecticides available to growers while facilitating registration and adoption of reduced-risk insecticides that have a narrower spectrum of activity. Despite these new tools, increasing international trade has constrained insecticide use because of maximum residue limits, which are often not standardized across countries. Great potential remains for biological, behavioral, cultural, and physical methods to contribute to blueberry IPM, and with more regions investing in blueberry research, we expect regionally relevant IPM programs to develop in the new production regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles Vincent
- Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec J3B 3E6, Canada;
| | - Rufus Isaacs
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nichols E, Alarcón V, Forgie S, Gomez-Puerta LA, Jones MS. Coprophagous Insects and the Ecology of Infectious Diseases of Wildlife. ILAR J 2018; 58:336-342. [PMID: 29036417 DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilx022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A diversity of macro- and microparasitic species exert strong influences on wildlife population density, community structure, and ecosystem functioning, all through their impacts on individual host fitness. Through consuming, manipulating, and relocating wildlife feces, over 7,000 species of coprophagous dung beetles interact with a staggering diversity of wildlife parasites with fecal-oral transmission in ways that both increase and decrease transmission. Here, we review the mechanisms by which dung beetles influence micro- and macroparasite transmission and outline a future research framework that integrates theory and empirical insights to advance our understanding of how these relationships may interact with ongoing environmental change drivers to further influence wildlife populations and community structure. Any organism that significantly influences parasite transmission will impact multiple levels of biological organization. Therefore, improving our understanding of the role of dung beetle interactions within disease ecology will be key to future efforts to understand the overall dynamics of infection in wildlife and how parasites contribute to the maintenance of ecosystem structure and function and evolutionary processes in wild animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Nichols
- Elizabeth Nichols, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. Viviana Alarcón, BSc, is a project manager at the Ecology Department, University of São Paulo, in São Paulo, Brazil. Shaun Forgie is a research associate at Landcare Research, Tamaki, in Auckland, New Zealand. Luis A. Gomez-Puerta is a DVM at the School of Veterinary Medicine, National University of San Marcos, in Lima, Peru. Matthew S. Jones is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Entomology, Washington State University, in Pullman, Washington
| | - Viviana Alarcón
- Elizabeth Nichols, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. Viviana Alarcón, BSc, is a project manager at the Ecology Department, University of São Paulo, in São Paulo, Brazil. Shaun Forgie is a research associate at Landcare Research, Tamaki, in Auckland, New Zealand. Luis A. Gomez-Puerta is a DVM at the School of Veterinary Medicine, National University of San Marcos, in Lima, Peru. Matthew S. Jones is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Entomology, Washington State University, in Pullman, Washington
| | - Shaun Forgie
- Elizabeth Nichols, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. Viviana Alarcón, BSc, is a project manager at the Ecology Department, University of São Paulo, in São Paulo, Brazil. Shaun Forgie is a research associate at Landcare Research, Tamaki, in Auckland, New Zealand. Luis A. Gomez-Puerta is a DVM at the School of Veterinary Medicine, National University of San Marcos, in Lima, Peru. Matthew S. Jones is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Entomology, Washington State University, in Pullman, Washington
| | - Luis A Gomez-Puerta
- Elizabeth Nichols, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. Viviana Alarcón, BSc, is a project manager at the Ecology Department, University of São Paulo, in São Paulo, Brazil. Shaun Forgie is a research associate at Landcare Research, Tamaki, in Auckland, New Zealand. Luis A. Gomez-Puerta is a DVM at the School of Veterinary Medicine, National University of San Marcos, in Lima, Peru. Matthew S. Jones is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Entomology, Washington State University, in Pullman, Washington
| | - Matthew S Jones
- Elizabeth Nichols, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. Viviana Alarcón, BSc, is a project manager at the Ecology Department, University of São Paulo, in São Paulo, Brazil. Shaun Forgie is a research associate at Landcare Research, Tamaki, in Auckland, New Zealand. Luis A. Gomez-Puerta is a DVM at the School of Veterinary Medicine, National University of San Marcos, in Lima, Peru. Matthew S. Jones is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Entomology, Washington State University, in Pullman, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Whitehouse TS, Sial AA, Schmidt JM. Natural Enemy Abundance in Southeastern Blueberry Agroecosystems: Distance to Edge and Impact of Management Practices. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY 2018; 47:32-38. [PMID: 29293975 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvx188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Natural enemies are valuable components of agroecosystems as they provide biological control services to help regulate pest populations. Promoting biocontrol services can improve sustainability by decreasing pesticide usage, which is a major challenge for the blueberry industry. Our research is the first to compare natural enemy populations in managed (conventional and organic) and unmanaged blueberry systems, in addition to the effects of non-crop habitat. We conducted our study in 10 blueberry orchards during the growing season across the major blueberry producing counties in Georgia, United States. To estimate the spatial distribution of natural enemies, we conducted suction sampling at three locations in each orchard: within the forested border, along the edge of blueberry orchard adjacent to forested border, and within the interior of the blueberry orchard. Natural enemies maintained higher abundance over the season in unmanaged areas when compared with organic or conventional production systems. In the conventional orchards, natural enemies were more abundant in the surrounding non-crop area compared with the interior of the orchard. Populations were more evenly distributed in less intensive systems (organic and unmanaged). Our results indicate spatial structure in natural enemy populations is related to management practice, and less intensive management can retain higher abundance of natural enemies in blueberry systems. Considerations must be made towards promoting ecologically based management practices to sustain natural enemy populations and potentially increase the delivery of biological control services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashfaq A Sial
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Jason M Schmidt
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ballman ES, Collins JA, Drummond FA. Pupation Behavior and Predation on Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Pupae in Maine Wild Blueberry Fields. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2017; 110:2308-2317. [PMID: 29029219 DOI: 10.1093/jee/tox233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura; Diptera: Drosophilidae) is an invasive vinegar fly and pest of soft fruits in North America, including wild blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) in Maine. Despite its presence in the continental United States for 9 yr, little is known about its natural enemy complex. Here we report the results of a 3-yr study designed to identify naturally-occurring predators in Maine's wild blueberry fields. Experiments were conducted to determine pupation site and pupation depth to understand D. suzukii's predation vulnerability. Predation rates in the field of fully-exposed, caged, and buried pupae were measured. Pitfall traps were deployed to identify the potential predator assemblage, and laboratory experiments were conducted to determine how many pupae were consumed by commonly occurring ground beetle species (Carabidae) and field crickets (Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burmeister). The most commonly collected predators were ants, ground beetles, harvestmen, and field crickets. Significantly more pupae were found to occur in the soil compared to blueberry fruit, with most pupae in the top 0.5 cm layer of soil. Pupal predation rates in the field were high, with higher rates of predation on exposed pupae compared to buried pupae. Laboratory studies revealed that ground beetles and field crickets are likely predators of D. suzukii pupae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francis A Drummond
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine
- Cooperative Extension, University of Maine
| |
Collapse
|