Adding historical high-sensitivity troponin T results to rule out acute myocardial infarction

Direct Comparison of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-Hour Vs. 0/2-Hour Algorithms in Patients with Acute Chest Pain

BACKGROUND

The recent guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology recommends using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) in either 0/1-h or 0/2-h algorithms to identify or rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Several studies have reported good diagnostic accuracy with both algorithms, but few have compared the algorithms directly.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the algorithms head-to-head, in the same patients.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective observational study; 1167 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department at Skåne University Hospital (Lund, Sweden) were enrolled. Only patients with a hs-cTnT sample at presentation AND after 1 AND 2 h were included in the analysis. We compared sensitivity, specificity, and negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). The primary outcome was index visit AMI.

RESULTS

A total of 710 patients were included, of whom 56 (7.9%) had AMI. Both algorithms had a sensitivity of 98.2% and an NPV of 99.8% for ruling out AMI, but the 0/2-h algorithm ruled out significantly more patients (69.3% vs. 66.2%, p < 0.001). For rule-in, the 0/2-h algorithm had higher PPV (73.4% vs. 65.2%) and slightly better specificity (97.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.016) than the 0/1-h algorithm.

CONCLUSION

Both algorithms had good diagnostic accuracy, with a slight advantage for the 0/2-h algorithm. Which algorithm to implement may thus depend on practical issues such as the ability to exploit the theoretical time saved with the 0/1-h algorithm. Further studies comparing the algorithms in combination with electrocardiography, history, or risk scores are needed.

Using historical cardiac troponins to identify patients at a high risk of myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

Many patients who present with chest pain have previous measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). The clinical usefulness of incorporating these measurements in identifying patients who are at a high risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. We investigated if the relative change between a historical hs-cTnT and the admission hs-cTnT could improve early identification of patients with a high risk of MI.

METHODS

We included all patients presenting with chest pain to seven different emergency departments (EDs) in Sweden from December 2009 to December 2016, who had at least one hs-cTnT measurement at the presentation and at least one available prior measurement. We used logistic regression to investigate the diagnostic performance of using various combinations of current and historical hs-cTnT measurements in diagnosing MI within 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 27 809 visits were included, among whom 2686 (9.7%) had an MI within 30 days. A cut-off value for historical hs-cTnT-adjusted admission hs-cTnT with similar specificity (91.2%) as an admission hs-cTnT of ≥52 ng/L identified 4% more MIs (43% vs 39%) and had a higher positive predictive value, 42.6% (95% CI, 41.0% to 44.3%) vs 38.9% (95% CI 37.4% to 40.4%), as well as a higher positive likelihood ratio, 6.95 (95% CI 6.69 to 7.22) vs 5.95 (95% CI 5.73 to 6.18). Among patients with an admission hs-cTnT of <52 ng/L who were classified as high-risk patients when incorporating past hs-cTnT measurements, 28% suffered an MI.

CONCLUSIONS

Historical hs-cTnT levels can be used with admission hs-cTnT to improve early risk stratification of MI in the ED.