The aortic valve with four leaflets: how should we best describe this blue moon?

Hemodynamics, anatomy, and outcomes of quadricuspid aortic valves: Multimodality imaging assessment

BACKGROUND

Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital heart disease with a limited body of literature. This retrospective cohort study investigates QAV morphology, function, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Echocardiography was used to assess valvular function. Morphological characteristics such as phenotypes, raphe, regurgitant orifice area (ROA), and aortic dilation (diameter >40 ​mm) were assessed by cardiac CT. Patients were followed up for the combined event of all-cause death and aortic valve replacement (AVR).

RESULTS

Ninety QAV patients (screened from 322385 CT scans) were included (mean age 55.2 ​± ​13.6 years, 61.1 ​% male). Isolated significant aortic regurgitation (AR) was present in 75.6 ​% of patients. The cohort was dominated by type I (four equal leaflets, 37.8 ​%) and type II (3 larger and 1 smaller leaflets, 42.2 ​%) QAV. Fused raphe was present in 26.7 ​% of patients. ROACT was correlated with AR severity and aortic dilation (41.1 ​%, n ​= ​37). Among patients without AVR at baseline (n ​= ​60), one died and 17 underwent AVR during a median follow-up of 35.0 months (IQR:17.3-62.8). ROACT was associated with an increasing risk of combined event (as a categorical variable with a cut-off of 21.4 ​mm2, HR ​= ​4.25, 95%CI 1.49-12.17, p ​= ​0.007; as a continuous variable (per mm2 increment), HR ​= ​1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.07, p ​= ​0.003). Additionally, ROACT had incremental prognostic value when added to the AR severity model (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve increased from 86.8 to 88.4, p ​= ​0.004).

CONCLUSION

QAV is characterized by variable anatomy, progressive AR, concomitant cusp fusion and aortic enlargement. ROACT may be a potential ancillary prognostic marker in patients with QAV.

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations

Over the past 2 decades, several categorizations have been proposed for the abnormalities of the aortic root. These schemes have mostly been devoid of input from specialists of congenital cardiac disease. The aim of this review is to provide a classification, from the perspective of these specialists, based on an understanding of normal and abnormal morphogenesis and anatomy, with emphasis placed on the features of clinical and surgical relevance. We contend that the description of the congenitally malformed aortic root is simplified when approached in a fashion that recognizes the normal root to be made up of 3 leaflets, supported by their own sinuses, with the sinuses themselves separated by the interleaflet triangles. The malformed root, usually found in the setting of 3 sinuses, can also be found with 2 sinuses, and very rarely with 4 sinuses. This permits description of trisinuate, bisinuate, and quadrisinuate variants, respectively. This feature then provides the basis for classification of the anatomical and functional number of leaflets present. By offering standardized terms and definitions, we submit that our classification will be suitable for those working in all cardiac specialties, whether pediatric or adult. It is of equal value in the settings of acquired or congenital cardiac disease. Our recommendations will serve to amend and/or add to the existing International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, along with the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases provided by the World Health Organization.

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations

Over the past 2 decades, several categorizations have been proposed for the abnormalities of the aortic root. These schemes have mostly been devoid of input from specialists of congenital cardiac disease. The aim of this review is to provide a classification, from the perspective of these specialists, based on an understanding of normal and abnormal morphogenesis and anatomy, with emphasis placed on the features of clinical and surgical relevance. We contend that the description of the congenitally malformed aortic root is simplified when approached in a fashion that recognizes the normal root to be made up of 3 leaflets, supported by their own sinuses, with the sinuses themselves separated by the interleaflet triangles. The malformed root, usually found in the setting of 3 sinuses, can also be found with 2 sinuses, and very rarely with 4 sinuses. This permits description of trisinuate, bisinuate, and quadrisinuate variants, respectively. This feature then provides the basis for classification of the anatomical and functional number of leaflets present. By offering standardized terms and definitions, we submit that our classification will be suitable for those working in all cardiac specialties, whether pediatric or adult. It is of equal value in the settings of acquired or congenital cardiac disease. Our recommendations will serve to amend and/or add to the existing International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, along with the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases provided by the World Health Organization.

Understanding the Aortic Root Using Computed Tomographic Assessment: A Potential Pathway to Improved Customized Surgical Repair

There is continued interest in surgical repair of both the congenitally malformed aortic valve, and the valve with acquired dysfunction. Aortic valvar repair based on a geometric approach has demonstrated improved durability and outcomes. Such an approach requires a thorough comprehension of the complex 3-dimensional anatomy of both the normal and congenitally malformed aortic root. In this review, we provide an understanding of this anatomy based on the features that can accurately be revealed by contrast-enhanced computed tomographic imaging. We highlight the complimentary role that such imaging, with multiplanar reformatting and 3-dimensional reconstructions, can play in selection of patients, and subsequent presurgical planning for valvar repair. The technique compliments other established techniques for perioperative imaging, with echocardiography maintaining its central role in assessment, and enhances direct surgical evaluation. This additive morphological and functional information holds the potential for improving selection of patients, surgical planning, subsequent surgical repair, and hopefully the subsequent outcomes.