Echocardiographic arterial measurements in complex congenital diseases before bidirectional Glenn: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) last published its comprehensive expert panel report of clinical indications for CMR in 2004. This new Consensus Panel report brings those indications up to date for 2020 and includes the very substantial increase in scanning techniques, clinical applicability and adoption of CMR worldwide. We have used a nearly identical grading system for indications as in 2004 to ensure comparability with the previous report but have added the presence of randomized controlled trials as evidence for level 1 indications. In addition to the text, tables of the consensus indication levels are included for rapid assimilation and illustrative figures of some key techniques are provided.

Sedated Echocardiograms Better Characterize Branch Pulmonary Arteries Following Bidirectional Glenn Palliation with Minimal Risk of Adverse Events

Patients post-bidirectional Glenn (BDG) operation are at risk of left and right pulmonary artery (LPA and RPA) hypoplasia. Transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) in active children can miss essential elements of anatomy. Procedural sedation improves image quality but increases risk of adverse events. We hypothesized that echocardiograms performed with sedation in patients post-BDG would improve visualization of branch pulmonary arteries with minimal adverse events. Patients post-BDG between 2007-2016 were identified. Exclusion criteria were > 12 months of age, absence of complete TTE before discharge, death before discharge, conversion to shunt physiology, and prolonged post-operative course > 7 weeks. Of 254 post-BDG patients, 153 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. TTE reports were reviewed for visualization of LPA/RPA and hypoplasia of LPA/RPA. Blinded assessment of image quality was performed (scale of 1[poor] to 5[excellent]). Pertinent clinical data were recorded. Pearson's chi-squared and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests used for statistical analysis. The median age at surgery and hospital stay were 4.8 months and 10 days. Twenty-three patients underwent sedated TTE (15%). Sedated TTE significantly improved visualization of the RPA (100% vs 82%, p = 0.029) and LPA, though this did not reach statistical significance (100% vs 91%, p = 0.129). Sedated TTEs has significantly better image quality (median of 4 vs 3, p < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events due to sedation. Sedated TTE early post-BDG is safe, improves visualization of the RPA and LPA, and improves overall image quality. Routine sedated TTE in these patients should be considered. Implications for long-term outcome need to be further analyzed.

Post-operative Assessment of the Arterial Switch Operation: A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography

After an arterial switch operation (ASO), serial imaging is necessary to monitor for maladaptive changes. We compared cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to 2-D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in assessing post-operative ASO patients. We performed a retrospective review of patients at a single tertiary care center who underwent an ASO and subsequently had a CMR performed from 7/2010 to 7/2016. Those with single ventricle anatomy, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, or previous atrial switch operation were excluded. TTE obtained within 6 months of the CMR was used for comparison. Parameters compared included ventricular size and systolic function, semilunar valve regurgitation, neo-aortic root dimension, and the presence of branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis (on CMR by the Nakata index or right/left flow differential; on TTE by peak velocity > 2 m/s or PA diameter Z score < - 2). Forty-seven patients with 90 CMR and 86 TTE studies met inclusion criteria. CMR and TTE assessment of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular function did not statistically differ. RV dilation was overdetected by TTE (p = 0.046). Right pulmonary artery and left pulmonary artery (LPA) visualization by TTE was worse than CMR (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between CMR and TTE assessment of branch PA stenosis; however, there was poor agreement between the use of Z score and velocity when determining branch PA stenosis by TTE (κ < 0). Assessment of neo-pulmonary regurgitation (PR) and neo-aortic regurgitation (AR) was significantly different between CMR and TTE (p < 0.05). Assessment for delayed enhancement was performed in 18% of CMR studies (n = 16), with perfusion defects appreciated in three patients. Substantial differences between CMR and TTE exist when examining the post-operative ASO patient. CMR was superior for evaluation of the branch PAs, which commonly require re-intervention. TTE failed to recognize altered ventricular function in several cases. Differences between TTE and CMR could alter management is some cases. Incorporation of CMR into the routine surveillance of patients who received an ASO is warranted.