Heterogeneity of myocardial 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake is a typical feature in cardiac sarcoidosis: a study of 231 patients

Comparing the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI for detecting cardiac sarcoidosis: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative diagnostic efficacy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis.

METHODS

An extensive search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify available publications up to November 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with subsequent transformation via the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

16 articles involving 1361 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis was 0.77(95%CI: 0.62-0.89), while the overall sensitivity of [18F]FDG PET/MRI was 0.94(95%CI: 0.84-1.00). The result indicated that [18F]FDG PET/MRI appears to a higher sensitivity in comparison to [18F]FDG PET/CT(P = 0.02). In contrast, the overall specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis was 0.90(95%CI: 0.85-0.94), while the overall specificity of [18F]FDG PET/MRI was 0.79(95%CI: 0.53-0.96), with no significant difference in specificity (P = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that [18F]FDG PET/MRI demonstrates superior sensitivity and comparable specificity to [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting cardiac sarcoidosis. However, the small number of PET/MRI studies limited the evidence of current results. To validate these results, larger, prospective studies employing a head-to-head design are needed.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac MRI versus FDG PET for Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background There is limited consensus regarding the relative diagnostic performance of cardiac MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET for cardiac sarcoidosis. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac MRI and FDG PET for cardiac sarcoidosis. Materials and Methods Medline, Ovid Epub, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Emcare, and Scopus were searched from inception until January 2022. Inclusion criteria included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac MRI or FDG PET for cardiac sarcoidosis in adults. Data were independently extracted by two investigators. Summary accuracy metrics were obtained by using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to assess the effect of different covariates. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The study protocol was registered a priori in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Prospero protocol CRD42021214776). Results Thirty-three studies were included (1997 patients, 687 with cardiac sarcoidosis); 17 studies evaluated cardiac MRI (1031 patients) and 26 evaluated FDG PET (1363 patients). Six studies directly compared cardiac MRI and PET in the same patients (303 patients). Cardiac MRI had higher sensitivity than FDG PET (95% vs 84%; P = .002), with no difference in specificity (85% vs 82%; P = .85). In a sensitivity analysis restricted to studies with direct comparison, point estimates were similar to those from the overall analysis: cardiac MRI and FDG PET had sensitivities of 92% and 81% and specificities of 72% and 82%, respectively. Covariate analysis demonstrated that sensitivity for FDG PET was highest with quantitative versus qualitative evaluation (93% vs 76%; P = .01), whereas sensitivity for MRI was highest with inclusion of T2 imaging (99% vs 88%; P = .001). Thirty studies were at risk of bias. Conclusion Cardiac MRI had higher sensitivity than fluorodeoxyglucose PET for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis but similar specificity. Limitations, including risk of bias and few studies with direct comparison, necessitate additional study. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Advances in Diagnostic Imaging for Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology, and its clinical presentation depends on the affected organ. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is one of the leading causes of death among patients with sarcoidosis. The clinical manifestations of CS are heterogeneous, and range from asymptomatic to life-threatening arrhythmias and progressive heart failure due to the extent and location of granulomatous inflammation in the myocardium. Advances in imaging techniques have played a pivotal role in the evaluation of CS because histological diagnoses obtained by myocardial biopsy tend to have lower sensitivity. The diagnosis of CS is challenging, and several approaches, notably those using positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been reported. Delayed-enhanced computed tomography (CT) may also be used for diagnosing CS in patients with MRI-incompatible devices and allows acceptable evaluation of myocardial hyperenhancement in such patients. This article reviews the advances in imaging techniques for the evaluation of CS.

The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

The etiology and the progression of sarcoidosis remain unknown. However, cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is significantly associated with a poor prognosis due to the associated congestive heart failure, arrhythmias (such as an advanced atrioventricular block), and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Novel imaging modalities are now available to detect CS lesions secondary to active inflammation, granuloma formation, and fibrotic changes. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) play essential roles in diagnosing and monitoring patients with confirmed or suspected CS. The following focused review will highlight the emerging role of non-invasive cardiac imaging techniques, including FDG PET/CT and CMR.

Texture analysis of delayed contrast-enhanced computed tomography to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic value of texture analysis to differentiate cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (non-CS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty CS patients and 15 non-CS patients who had undergone myocardial CT delayed enhancement (CTDE) were included. A total of 36 texture features were calculated according to the CT attenuation of CTDE. We investigated the diagnostic value to differentiate CS from non-CS. We also assessed the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for each feature and inter-observer agreement for visual assessment.

RESULTS

Seven extracted features had significantly higher run length non-uniformity (RLNU) values (5.4 × 10² ± 6.2 × 10² vs. 11.2 × 10² ± 4.9 × 10², p = 0.037) and significantly lower low gray-level zone emphasis (LGZE) values (7.1 × 10^-3 ± 8.6 × 10^-3 vs. 18.1 × 10^-3 ± 16.9 × 10^-3, p = 0.017) in CS than in non-CS. Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of RLNU and LGZE were excellent (ICCs > 0.8), while inter-observer agreement of visual assessment was poor (kappa = 0.19). The accuracies of texture analysis were 69% with RLNU and 71% with LGZE, which were better than that of visual assessment.

CONCLUSION

Texture analysis of CTDE could differentiate CS from non-CS with high reproducibility.

Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE database, from the earliest available date of indexing through 31 March 31, 2018, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for CS. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.

RESULTS

Across 17 studies (891 patients), the pooled sensitivity was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.71-0.91] with heterogeneity (I2 = 77.5) and a pooled specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.89) with heterogeneity (I2 = 80.0). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall LR+ of 4.9 (95% CI 3.3-7.3) and LR- of 0.2 (95% CI 0.11-0.35). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 27 (95% CI 14-55). Hierarchical SROC curve indicates that the area under the curve was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.92). Meta-regression showed that combined myocardial perfusion imaging was the source of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis showed the moderate sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for diagnosis of CS. The presence of combined myocardial perfusion imaging could improve diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for diagnosis of CS. At present, the literature regarding the use of F-18 FDG PET for detection of CS remains limited; thus, further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET for diagnosis of CS.

Nuclear Medicine Image Interpretation Progress in the Assessment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: July 2019 ASNC/JSNC Joint Session

Sarcoidosis is a significant disease affecting the heart. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a well-validated method for identifying significant focal inflammatory sarcoid lesions. The recent progress in image interpretation in nuclear medicine improves the diagnosis and the risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Especially, metabolic activity, texture analysis, phase analysis, right ventricle assessment, and digital PET/CT are promising methods to assess cardiac sarcoidosis. This review focuses on the latest data analyses and image interpretation used in nuclear medicine to assess cardiac sarcoidosis.

Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT texture analysis to diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis

PURPOSE

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglocose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) plays a significant role in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Texture analysis is a group of computational methods for evaluating the inhomogeneity among adjacent pixels or voxels. We investigated whether texture analysis applied to myocardial FDG uptake has diagnostic value in patients with CS.

METHODS

Thirty-seven CS patients (CS group), and 52 patients who underwent FDG PET/CT to detect malignant tumors with any FDG cardiac uptake (non-CS group) were studied. A total of 36 texture features from the histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM), gray-level zone size matrix (GLZSM) and neighborhood gray-level difference matrix (NGLDM), were computed using polar map images. First, the inter-operator and inter-scan reproducibility of the texture features of the CS group were evaluated. Then, texture features of the patients with CS were compared to those without CS lesions.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of the 36 texture features showed high inter-operator reproducibility with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) over 0.80. In addition, 17 of the 36 showed high inter-scan reproducibility with ICCs over 0.80. The SUVmax showed no difference between the CS and non-CS group [7.36 ± 2.77 vs. 8.78 ± 4.65, p = 0.45, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.60]. By contrast, 16 of the 36 texture features could distinguish CS from non-CS grsoup with AUC > 0.80. Multivariate logistic regression analysis after hierarchical clustering concluded that long-run emphasis (LRE; P = 0.0004) and short-run low gray-level emphasis (SRLGE; P = 0.016) were significant independent factors that could distinguish between the CS and non-CS groups. Specifically, LRE was significantly higher in CS than in non-CS (30.1 ± 25.4 vs. 11.4 ± 4.6, P < 0.0001), with high diagnostic ability (AUC = 0.91), and had high inter-operator reproducibility (ICC = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The texture analysis had high inter-operator and high inter-scan reproducibility. Some of texture features showed higher diagnostic value than SUVmax for CS diagnosis. Therefore, texture analysis may have a role in semi-automated systems for diagnosing CS.